ilk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2017
yeah.
i mean i get it, it's fun to watch someone sperg out. that's 95% of what i do here on this site.
but if you're gonna claim intellectual superiority, then why not go after the sjws that will put up a better fight/debate? have a better following? and NO i don't mean "block everyone on twitter, mainstream feminist/activist, has a bit on MTV" types.
That's the problem though. SJWs are the low hanging fruit. They've built a business on pwning special snowflakes or opportunists like Laci Green so when that completely loses steam what will they go after next? Without an easy enemy they have nothing to add other than what many before them have expressed.
Blaire is the only one who does that. The Laci Green debate was fun and you got something out of it from both sides. The only thing you'll get from the majority of skeptics is MTV is racist.
Blaire is a prime example of someone who profits off of the pursuit of low hanging fruit. It's not surprising that they happen to be a former SJW turned anti-SJW in 2015, the year it started to get popular and profitable. I've seen the "debate" with Laci Green. It was unproductive and boring. They had the opportunity to grill one of the most notorious feminists yet managed to talk about nothing that hasn't been discussed before. Laci Green is not red pilled. She or MTV realized social justice is becoming unprofitable so they're testing out the waters before changing their business tactics. It's amazing how easily anti-SJWs are convinced that she's on their side despite the fact that she never said she'd give up social justice or feminism.