- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Artemis II mission clock started! We are T -2 Days, 3 hours and 15 minutes.
Weather is an 80% Go for launch on the 1st.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think because this flight is meant to be a test regarding future missions to the moon, from what I understand theyre just going around the moon not landing.Is it just me or was there a lack of publicity for the event?
I wouldn't have known about it had I not tuned into some talk radio station the other day.
Even that is still historic as people haven't even left orbit since 1972.from what I understand theyre just going around the moon not landing
Artemis II will test and demonstrate optical communications to and from Earth using the Orion Artemis II Optical Communications System (O2O). The O2O hardware will be integrated into the Orion spacecraft and includes an optical module (a 4-inch [100 mm] telescope and two gimbals), a modem and control electronics. O2O will communicate with ground stations in. The test device will send data to Earth with a downlink rate of up to 260 megabits per second.
That's a space happenings megathread. This is one for just one mission that could be historic.Just so OP knows, there is already a thread for this in happenings.
Yes. A happening. In space. That thread has also been talking about this mission for months.That's a space happenings megathread. This is one for just one mission that could be historic.
Artemis II mission clock started! We are T -2 Days, 3 hours and 15 minutes.
Weather is an 80% Go for launch on the 1st.
I still think it is better to have a different thread for a big thing, instead of having to go to page 800 of a 1000 page thread.That thread has also been talking about this mission for months.
What's the point of having a space happening thread if every time something happens we make a separate thread anyway? May as well just delete the mega thread then. Are we going to do separate threads for Artemis III, IV and the Starship launch too?I still think it is better to have a different thread for a big thing, instead of having to go to page 800 of a 1000 page thread.
I think there can still be separate threads for really historic breakthroughs.[...]

... when NASA flew this exact mission in 2022, large pieces of material blew out of Orion’s heat shield during re-entry, leaving divots. Large bolts embedded in the heat shield also partially eroded and melted through.
NASA’s initial instinct was to cover up the problem. In early press releases, they stressed that both rocket and spacecraft had performed exceptionally, while declining to publish the post-flight assessment review. The first mention of heat shield damage came from Orion program manager Howard Hu on a call with reporters in March of 2023. Hu said: “we observed there were more variations across the heat shield than we expected; some of the expected char material that we would expect coming back home ablated away differently than what our computer models and what our ground testing predicted.”

This left NASA in a quandary. The Orion capsule for Artemis II was already mated to its service module. Taking it off to make changes to the heat shield, even if the agency knew what changes to make, would take years. Nor was there room in the schedule to conduct a flight test, or any spare hardware to conduct the flight test with. Each Orion costs north of a billion dollars, and the only rocket it can launch on (SLS) costs two to four billion dollars a shot, depending on how you do the accounting.
...
In a nutshell, Camarda argues that NASA is demonstrating the same dysfunction that led to the Columbia and Challenger disasters. Faced with an unexpected engineering failure, it has built toy models to convince itself that the conclusion it wants to reach (it’s safe to fly) are supported by evidence. These toy models are not grounded in physics, but because they appear to be quantitative, they create a false sense of security and understanding, an epistemic fig leaf for management to hide behind.
Put more simply, NASA is going to fly Artemis II based on vibes, hoping that whatever happened to the heat shield on Artemis I won’t get bad enough to harm the crew on Artemis II.





