The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

[theshitposter]

And why can't we discuss the trial on 'FB and other places'?
Oh, that's right, because elitist leftist authoritarianism does not permit any departure from its teachings.

Let me put it another way. Faggots like you and @DSM-IV are welcome to post here, even if your views are counter to our prevailing beliefs.
But we don't censor you, ban you or delete your posts. Facebook? Reddit? Twitter? Post anything even slightly outside the tightly defined 'acceptable thought' and get banned, deleted, maybe even doxed and physically attacked or swatted.

That's the difference between leftist fucksticks like you and heroic noble aryan free-speech ubermensch like us.
You're censorious drones, useful idiots, clamoring for virtue headpats by endorsing the beliefs and policies of people with hundreds of millions in the bank and a complete immunity to blowback from their leftocratic idiocy.

You're endorsing Jim Carrey's political views, for fucks' sake.

View attachment 2102616

Conservatives just tolerate the opposing view for now to prove a point. The day they attain any significant majority powers, they would drop the veil to reveal the true colors

 

[Ita Mori]

Conservatives just tolerate the opposing view for now to prove a point. The day they attain any significant majority powers, they would drop the veil to reveal the true colors

Deleting trannies out of the server is a true color we can all appreciate though.

 

[Never knows best]

I can't wait for another summer of "mostly peaceful protests" again. Aren't cities still rebuilding from the lockdowns and the chimpouts the first time?

Any sane, rational, unpressured jury would vote to find Chauvin not guilty, but I wonder just how threatened they are, knowing that, should Chauvin walk, a gigantic BLM/Antifa riot is going to swarm Minneapolis, and the current administration likely won't do anything to stop the looting, raping, and killing.

The judge must ask the jury "who will you trust, the evidence or your eyes". I honestly think evidence means fuck all in the current climate but hey, who knows

 

[draggs]

Conservatives just tolerate the opposing view for now to prove a point. The day they attain any significant majority powers, they would drop the veil to reveal the true colors

they didnt when this same bullshit was pulled about bushitler and the republikkkans about to bring back slavery and an extremely based christian tyranny

they didnt in the last 4 years despite muh authoritarian strongman drompfh

 

[TitusOvid]

Conservatives just tolerate the opposing view for now to prove a point. The day they attain any significant majority powers, they would drop the veil to reveal the true colors

Without censorship, the conservative viewpoints would naturally dominate. Just look at any unmoderated forum. The leftists need censorship more than the conservatives.

 

[Gehenna]

they didnt when this same bullshit was pulled about bushitler and the republikkkans about to bring back slavery and an extremely based christian tyranny

they didnt in the last 4 years despite muh authoritarian strongman drompfh

It wasn't as bad then, the Bush years had a sort of equilibrium. The fringes of the right and the fringes of the left were about equal in power, embraced by neither side as anything but a sometimes necessary evil. There were signs of what was to come, but not clear ones, and everyone held to the belief that discord would even out... not grow worse.

Without censorship, the conservative viewpoints would naturally dominate. Just look at any unmoderated forum. The leftists need censorship more than the conservatives.

Not... quite. The viewpoint that naturally arises is that of moderation, neither terribly conservative nor terribly liberal. The further from the center one goes, the more calls for censorship rise. Whichever part is in power for the swing back and forth of cultural power will attempt to censor the other side.

 

[Ita Mori]

Without censorship, the conservative viewpoints would naturally dominate. Just look at any unmoderated forum.

Debatable.
This forum was not founded on conservative principles. It's main focus/target was a retarded conservative manchild.
Web 1.0 had as much conservatism as California does sane people.

Offline, I'd wager you get moderates as the majority.I can't see too many people clinging to conservative values like no sex except when baby-making with spouse, or refusing to listen to any music that talks about fictional settings depicting excess, aggression, and lavish living.
However, the fact that being anti-men-in-dresses or against censorship is now conservative just goes to show how fringe the left has become, and why they must label their political enemies as successors of the most extremists in their ideology as a cope.

 

[Pokemonquistador2]

Conservatives just tolerate the opposing view for now to prove a point. The day they attain any significant majority powers, they would drop the veil to reveal the true colors

Conservatives ain't going to do shit. The only thing that would jolt society into a Conservative direction is massive scarcity, unrest or destruction. That's because Conservatism is, at its core, a strategy for dealing with adversity: to organize society to generate the most amount of resources in the shortest amount of time, in response to disasters like war or famine. Another purpose of Conservatism is to sweep away all of the parasitism and timewasting faggotry that plagues wealthier societies, where status-seeking and conflict avoidance are the paramount activities. If you're a troon who's terrified that the RWDS are coming for your dick-severing scalpels, then keep your eye on the Resource Level. The second that people no longer have a day's worth of food on hand is the second that Conservatives will finally awaken and do shit, because that's when the Normies and Bowtie Twirlers will finally have something they care about more than being a racist and looking bad to people who hate them.

 

[Gehenna]

Debatable.
This forum was not founded on conservative principles. It's main focus/target was a retarded conservative manchild.
Web 1.0 had as much conservatism as California does sane people.

Offline, I'd wager you get moderates as the majority.I can't see too many people clinging to conservative values like no sex except when baby-making with spouse, or refusing to listen to any music that talks about fictional settings depicting excess, aggression, and lavish living.
However, the fact that being anti-men-in-dresses or against censorship is now conservative just goes to show how fringe the left has become, and why they must label their political enemies as successors of the most extremists in their ideology as a cope.

Right now conservatives are being cracked down on by the censorious left, thus they gravitate towards areas that allow free speech. This is done to such extremes that moderate positions are LABELED as conservative. But... they really aren't 'conservative' positions. Rather the left has swung so far left that if you planted a 'center' point it'd be massively skewed. When in reality the spectrum is the same, it just looks like this;


Progressives ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Center ----------- Conservatives

 

[Rungle]

Debatable.
This forum was not founded on conservative principles. It's main focus/target was a retarded conservative manchild.
Web 1.0 had as much conservatism as California does sane people.

Offline, I'd wager you get moderates as the majority.I can't see too many people clinging to conservative values like no sex except when baby-making with spouse, or refusing to listen to any music that talks about fictional settings depicting excess, aggression, and lavish living.
However, the fact that being anti-men-in-dresses or against censorship is now conservative just goes to show how fringe the left has become, and why they must label their political enemies as successors of the most extremists in their ideology as a cope.

Wait... were not neonazi's on this forum?

 

[Gypsymagic]

With patron saint Floyd as my witness, as soon as Chauvin is acquitted on all charges, I'll have him place his divine knee on every off-topic political sperg's neck so you can all personally give Saint Floyd a banana up in heaven as an apology for this sinful derailment.

 

[TLEN]

Derailment is impossible, all roads lead to Floyd's neck.

 

[Takayuki Yagami]

Who's rooting for the not guilty verdict just for premium chimp television?

I’m rooting for it cause it’s the correct answer in a just world, but a mistrail or a compromise verdict of manslaughter are the only somewhat hopeful outcomes in this.

 

[Tuxedo_Zemus]

Fuck it, I can't change my name but I can change my title

 

[Brahma]

I'm changing my hopes and wishes to:

Chauvin found turbo guilty and sentenced to 80 years


Minneapolis to burn to the ground anyway in a Cat 5 giga chimpout event so bad that FEMA have to be called in.


The left turns itself inside out trying to rationalize their golem misbehaving when it got everything it wanted.


Chauvin gets a mistrial and found not guilty early 2022.

Trump gets elected dog catcher in union county, FL and gets back on Twitter in time to shitpost the midterms.

 

[DumbDude42]

Not... quite. The viewpoint that naturally arises is that of moderation, neither terribly conservative nor terribly liberal. The further from the center one goes, the more calls for censorship rise. Whichever part is in power for the swing back and forth of cultural power will attempt to censor the other side.

retard take
what you consider "moderation" and "center" would be considered ultra radical hyper liberal by basically every person on the planet before the 20th century.
what you consider moderate/normal/baseline is itself the result of the current ruling ideology that shapes your worldview through propaganda and indoctrination.

 

[SITHRAK!]

Wait... were not neonazi's on this forum?

Why be a neo-nazi when you can be an culturo-homogeneist radical socio-nationalist?

 

[Coccxys]

I'm betting if he is found guilty of manslaughter then media outlets will report it as him.being found not guilty of murder in the headline then mention the lesser guilty verdict further down. Got to insight the riots in those too dumb to read beyond thw headline.

 

[Rekkington]

Debatable.
This forum was not founded on conservative principles. It's main focus/target was a retarded conservative manchild.
Web 1.0 had as much conservatism as California does sane people.

Offline, I'd wager you get moderates as the majority.I can't see too many people clinging to conservative values like no sex except when baby-making with spouse, or refusing to listen to any music that talks about fictional settings depicting excess, aggression, and lavish living.
However, the fact that being anti-men-in-dresses or against censorship is now conservative just goes to show how fringe the left has become, and why they must label their political enemies as successors of the most extremists in their ideology as a cope.

The existence of the moderate as any sort of grounded entity is a boomer fantasy. By all definitions that currently exist a moderate would be a conservative. The more one is informed on any issue the less "centrist" they are, which is in reality just a dumb Hegelian synthesis of both extremes for people who don't watch the news.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

Not... quite. The viewpoint that naturally arises is that of moderation, neither terribly conservative nor terribly liberal. The further from the center one goes, the more calls for censorship rise. Whichever part is in power for the swing back and forth of cultural power will attempt to censor the other side.

I'd give you that, but it's erroneous to assume centrists don't gladly jump on the censorship bandwagon.

In fact, I'd argue more power-hungry types who want to ban people from wrong thinking don't care where they stand on a spectrum between Real Communism and full-on AnCap lolbertopia, they care more about power and making people stop saying things they don't like.
Shit I would hardly call the modern EU far-left or far-right yet look at how censorship happy they are being.

TL;DR: The kings don't give a shit about being pure cap or pure soc, they just wanna tell people what to do.