Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The defense had rested, it could provide nothing else. Springing it on them let the prosecution use it for maximum effect while the defense couldn't do jack shit. Or it would, if it had been allowed in.Is anyone else still desparately confused over what is going on? So like, there's this report which would be damning to the asphyxiation narrative, I get that much. But the prosecution wanted it to be brought up? Why? Wouldn't it destroy their main claim which is 'Floyd died cause knee neck?'" Was it just to counter the "Floyd died cause of the car fumes" thing? But also someone said that it wouldn't even counter that to begin with? If this is a crucial piece of evidence to either side why is it banned? Because they wouldn't have time to prepare for it? And if so why is that such a big deal?
Please help, I think I'm retarded or something cause I was easily following the case up until this shit.
Is anyone else still desparately confused over what is going on? So like, there's this report which would be damning to the asphyxiation narrative, I get that much. But the prosecution wanted it to be brought up? Why? Wouldn't it destroy their main claim which is 'Floyd died cause knee neck?'" Was it just to counter the "Floyd died cause of the car fumes" thing? But also someone said that it wouldn't even counter that to begin with? If this is a crucial piece of evidence to either side why is it banned? Because they wouldn't have time to prepare for it? And if so why is that such a big deal?
Please help, I think I'm retarded or something cause I was easily following the case up until this shit.
The defense had rested, it could provide nothing else. Springing it on them let the prosecution use it for maximum effect while the defense couldn't do jack shit. Or it would, if it had been allowed in.
it makes more sense if you assume the prosecution doesnt know what it's doing and was so desperate to debunk that little bit of based rhodesian's testimony they brought back potato nigger who inadvertently contradicted himself and the brunt of their main argument
If he walks the Feds will step in and prosecute him for civil rights violations. Oh and they'd also make sure he'd be denied bail. See the Capitol protestors spending months in solitary on trespassing charges that don't carry custodial sentences even if they're found guilty. The process is the punishment.Chauvin walks, then cops accidentally find CP on his desktop, a stash of meth under his bed and a fake 20$ bill.
I've had it clarified for me since I was posting before and I think I understand nowPlease help, I think I'm retarded or something cause I was easily following the case up until this shit.
Cell Phones are fine.This ordeal alone has made cell phones not worth it for society.
It has nothing to do with how they are chosen, it's the fact that other judges are the ones who decide if something needs a sanction and what sanction applies.Well it's not uncommon here for judges to get sanctions if they pull obviously dumb shit. But then we don't do stupid stuff like elect our judges or let politicians appoint them.
Cell Phones are fine.
The problem was when they decided to add camera/video features onto them
Well, this prosecution tactic would make sense if they're operating under the assumption that the jury is literally retarded.Is anyone else still desparately confused over what is going on? So like, there's this report which would be damning to the asphyxiation narrative, I get that much. But the prosecution wanted it to be brought up? Why? Wouldn't it destroy their main claim which is 'Floyd died cause knee neck?'" Was it just to counter the "Floyd died cause of the car fumes" thing? But also someone said that it wouldn't even counter that to begin with? If this is a crucial piece of evidence to either side why is it banned? Because they wouldn't have time to prepare for it? And if so why is that such a big deal?
Please help, I think I'm retarded or something cause I was easily following the case up until this shit.
Fun Factoid: Even in your false hologram you're a crybaby loser.What annoys me is that the amount of cope on all sides is akin to that of flat earthers. I'm not talking about Nelson being fanfictioned either into a 4D chess player or a racist helping a cop get away with murder, but about the the lack of interest in finding out what actually happened in favour of a fanatical focus on satisfying some emotional stimulus or whatever it is that people get out of it by believing in some grand conspiracy.
Since we are dealing with redditors, thought I would do the reddit thing and look at post history.And that's why you should never be within 500 square yards of a damned jury trial you unbelievable fuckstick jesus do you hear yourselves right now
It's some basic demoralization shit. Cell video is just another poor little fact to be clipped up, edited out, and generally tortured until it can mean anything, until the bugmen won't be able to believe the unadulterated version when they actually see it.they say "oh they're great they've allowed us to expose police brutality where-ever it is found" but 99% of the time what they've really done is allowed some non or exaggerated incident to be taken completely out of context which gives an excuse for chimpouts and widespread chaos and violence
Why'd the guy turn into Kuwabara?
It's some basic demoralization shit. Cell video is just another poor little fact to be clipped up, edited out, and generally tortured until it can mean anything, until the bugmen won't be able to believe the unadulterated version when they actually see it.
I know people have answered some of this, but in addition this data was taken a while after CPR and stuff started. So just like it’s wrong to say “Floyd had traumatic rib and lung bruising” it would be wrong to say “Floyd had ideal blood oxygenation levels” as that had nothing to do with Chauvin or his actionsIs anyone else still desparately confused over what is going on? So like, there's this report which would be damning to the asphyxiation narrative, I get that much. But the prosecution wanted it to be brought up? Why? Wouldn't it destroy their main claim which is 'Floyd died cause knee neck?'" Was it just to counter the "Floyd died cause of the car fumes" thing? But also someone said that it wouldn't even counter that to begin with? If this is a crucial piece of evidence to either side why is it banned? Because they wouldn't have time to prepare for it? And if so why is that such a big deal?
Please help, I think I'm retarded or something cause I was easily following the case up until this shit.
Uhh what?judicial systems for what its worth are still fairly robust as well. they're some of the few non-compromised institutions left in clown world. i dont share the pessimism of the people here even though i understand it.
the same judicial system that forced abortion and gay marriage on america?judicial systems for what its worth are still fairly robust as well. they're some of the few non-compromised institutions left in clown world. i dont share the pessimism of the people here even though i understand it.
This is the same judicial system that wouldn't provide one of the passengers immunity on drug charges so they could testify against floyd.judicial systems for what its worth are still fairly robust as well. they're some of the few non-compromised institutions left in clown world. i dont share the pessimism of the people here even though i understand it.
This is the same judicial system that wouldn't provide one of the passengers immunity on drug charges so they could testify against floyd.
Uhh what?
We are literally seeing it be turned into an extension of a mob's lynching impulse 2 years ago the woman who deeper her Taser and a pistol would have been maybe fired and that's it. Now see almost certainly going to be convinced of 2nd degree manslaughter. The derpy Capitol "visitors" are all going to get multi year prison terms for making a bunch of spineless politicians piss themselves.
Other side of the coin is the literal abdication of responsibility of leftist DAs all over the country. ANTIFA fucks getting no chargers, no bail, no consequences. It's now literally legal to shoplifting up to $1000-$1500 of goods in most of the west coast...... DAs there have explicitly state this again and again, under $X limits no prosection.
Shit, it's becoming a gigantic joke right I'm front of us.