The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votes: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votes: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votes: 299 30.1%

  • Total voters
    992
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Conspiracy theory - I think one of the reasons why Democrats are pushing open borders harder than usual is because they realize that the black vote isn't as secure as they thought. Biden only won the election (officially) because he got the white male votes that Hillary lost. By all accounts, Trump increased his 2016 in every minority demo. And that's with four straight years of CNN screaming that he was the most racist president of all time.
I would think Hillary would've had a higher chance for 2020. Or at least a safer bet. She had way too much baggage with Benghazi lingering over to secure any demographic. Biden is perfect for the DNC: old, neo-liberal, White, deteriorating. They practically set him up to win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashford Lawrence
Not sure if this was posted.

View attachment 2103582
Can someone explain to me how Chauvin is meant to get a fair trial if the President and an elected Congresswoman are both implying his guilt and if one is pressuring the jury to vote a certain way by making statements that could be seen as threats?
 
"Agitators"
I've seen niggers use this to debunk any accountability for the rioters. For a year now I've been able to see "peaceful protestors" from the city turn into 'peaceful' rioters. There is no such thing as "agitators" when it comes down to a mass amount of people who self identify as "BLM" or "Antifa." I guess the Ferguson riots wasn't because a bunch of chimps didn't get their way.

Does that mean an eternity of break times?
to hear st. louis county pd tell it, most of the 2014 ferguson rioters were from nearby IL.
 
its not totally random, there are few constants involved usually. Crime, drugs, illegal guns, resisting arrest, running from police, shooting at police, hitting police, hitting bystanders, screaming bystanders, thievery, edited video clips, deceptive media, lying politicians, lying prosecutors, funny memes. anyone could write the script to the next black killed by cop miniseries using any of those.
The only real constant is that the policeman is always white and racist.
 
Can someone explain to me how Chauvin is meant to get a fair trial if the President and an elected Congresswoman are both implying his guilt and if one is pressuring the jury to vote a certain way by making statements that could be seen as threats?
Usually the jury is sequestered and prevented from accessing any outside information, and in such cases it doesn't matter what the fuck politicians say about a case, but here the jury was just told "lol don't read the news" as if they didn't have the news blasted from their phones.
 
I know one thing, after this trial, this may be the first election where I vote straight R on the ballot.

If anything, that's a HOPE that the current DNC would be held accountable for the bullshit since 2020.

:optimistic:

Still a bunch of old guard racists tho.
Same. My ballot will be more red than my PFP. Shit like this whole Floyd ordeal makes me want to stay as far away from the Democrats as possible, those troglodytes.
I'm hoping someone like DeSantis runs for president so I can vote for him. We need a good Republican candidate very, very badly in 2024.
 

Screenshot_20210420-194719_Chrome.jpg

Sneed
 
It was hilarious when Florida was one of the first states to be decided (the MSM refused to call it out of spite), and there was so much anger and betrayal at the KKKubans for believing Trump's lies that the Democrats were pushing communism.
Florida in 2020 apparently showed the rest of the cucks in the South how to have a redemption arc and challenge the federal government. Nobody would have guessed Florida Man and Florida Woman being the most based folks in the nation.
 
Can someone explain to me how Chauvin is meant to get a fair trial if the President and an elected Congresswoman are both implying his guilt and if one is pressuring the jury to vote a certain way by making statements that could be seen as threats?
No, That would be double plus ungood.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back