The Twitter Pedo Hunter / Loli Crusader Community

[GreenJacket]

Imagine getting your knickers into such a wad about heavily stylized assorted pencil lines.

Well hey, if it's so inconsequential, you shouldn't mind if it's taken away.

 

[Colonel Gaddafi]

Well hey, if it's so inconsequential, you shouldn't mind if it's taken away.

As long as people have hands and something to draw with you can’t police what they choose to put on paper. Artistic censorship is ineffective and dictatorial.

Going to edit this to save a double post for some additional thought.

Personally I believe pornography in the modern understanding is bad for society. All you have to do is graze thorough this thread to see this. Most of these loli crusaders are so brain rotten by porn that they can’t even see a child in pajamas without subconsciously sexualizing it. The widespread availability of free hardcore pornography in the modern world is incredibly damaging to young people. Remember the old saying, if something is free then you’re the product. It’s also exploitative of the performers, sadly. Now do I think porn should be illegal? Well, I do think that would benefit society, but no, adults should be able to watch what they choose, so long as said material doesn’t violate the law (CP, animal abuse, snuff…).

Now those considerations evaporate with erotic art like hentai, or erotic literature. There are no victims, and to say you can or can’t write or draw something is encroaching on one’s right to freedom of speech. Is it safe to assume those who read loli works are lolicons themselves? Probably most, though not all. Though as another user said, this is never enough for actual pedophiles, they need the real thing to satisfy their perversions, just like someone who’s a necrophiliac isn’t ever going to be satisfied with drawings of corpses, no, they’re hitting up Documenting Reality. So policing fictitious depictions wastes resources that are already incredibly limited that could be used to hunt people involved in actual child abuse. I’d much rather have officers putting all their effort into catching abusers rather than thumbing though every hentai manga that’s imported. And finally, anyone who lived through the Video Nasty scare in the UK will tell you censorship is a slippery fucking slope. Where do we stop? I just finished reading One Hundred Years of Solitude, which is regarded as one of the greatest works of Latin American literature. It has multiple depictions of adult/minor relationships (incestuous no less), should that be concerned obscene as well? What about Nabakov’s work or even well regarded erotic novels like Tropic of Cancer? It’s a Pandora’s box we shouldn’t what to open to save the assorted pencil stroke minors.

Off my high horse.

 

[GreenJacket]

As long as people have hands and something to draw with you can’t police what they choose to put on paper. Artistic censorship is ineffective and dictatorial.

Going to edit this to save a double post for some additional thought.

Personally I believe pornography in the modern understanding is bad for society. All you have to do is graze thorough this thread to see this. Most of these loli crusaders are so brain rotten by porn that they can’t even see a child in pajamas without subconsciously sexualizing it. The widespread availability of free hardcore pornography in the modern world is incredibly damaging to young people. Remember the old saying, if something is free then you’re the product. It’s also exploitative of the performers, sadly. Now do I think porn should be illegal? Well, I do think that would benefit society, but no, adults should be able to watch what they choose, so long as said material doesn’t violate the law (CP, animal abuse, snuff…).

Now those considerations evaporate with erotic art like hentai, or erotic literature. There are no victims, and to say you can or can’t write or draw something is encroaching on one’s right to freedom of speech. Is it safe to assume those who read loli works are lolicons themselves? Probably most, though not all. Though as another user said, this is never enough for actual pedophiles, they need the real thing to satisfy their perversions, just like someone who’s a necrophiliac isn’t ever going to be satisfied with drawings of corpses, no, they’re hitting up Documenting Reality. So policing fictitious depictions wastes resources that are already incredibly limited that could be used to hunt people involved in actual child abuse. I’d much rather have officers putting all their effort into catching abusers rather than thumbing though every hentai manga that’s imported. And finally, anyone who lived through the Video Nasty scare in the UK will tell you censorship is a slippery fucking slope. Where do we stop? I just finished reading One Hundred Years of Solitude, which is regarded as one of the greatest works of Latin American literature. It has multiple depictions of adult/minor relationships (incestuous no less), should that be concerned obscene as well? What about Nabakov’s work or even well regarded erotic novels like Tropic of Cancer? It’s a Pandora’s box we shouldn’t what to open to save the assorted pencil stroke minors.

Off my high horse.

I hate having to respond to effortposts, because I have to keep multiple points in check, but here we go:
1. Porn is not free speech and that meme was only pushed in the 70s by pornographers to deconstruct a political freedom and associate are rights with taboo and obscenity.
2. The only people sexualizing depictions of little girls are the people jacking off to it. I have been around enough on the internet to know that they're not just 'in pajamas' and to insinuate that people that are against it are the real pedophiles is an incredibly weak and fallacious defense. "Arachnaphobic? You just want to fuck spiders." Need I remind you that the loli in lolicon is a reference to Lolita. So one wonders why there would be people going out to find their own Lolitas.
3. Resources towards controlling certain images and information is stretched thin, yes, but here in the States we don't have any laws against lolicon that wouldn't cover pornography in general and yet if resources are still stretched thin, why even bother enforcing laws regarding CSAM at all? Websites like KF take active roles in suppressing the dissemination of CSAM by removing offending content and banning posters. Struggles against problems like this may be monumental but they happen through collaborative efforts. Part of the push against lolicon is not just about its legality, but also shaming those who use/enable it and encouraging action be taken.
4. "It's just drawn images" is a cope that ignores the process that is happening here. You need to understand that the slippery slope is real and that with pornography, which you admit is 'bad for society,' there is a phenomenon in which viewers become more depraved as time goes on. I am entirely of the belief that lolicon, whose illustrated appearance both cleans up and fantasizes depictions of sexualized children, is a gateway for viewing of actual CSAM.

 

[Atatata]

I hate having to respond to effortposts, because I have to keep multiple points in check, but here we go:
1. Porn is not free speech and that meme was only pushed in the 70s by pornographers to deconstruct a political freedom and associate are rights with taboo and obscenity.
2. The only people sexualizing depictions of little girls are the people jacking off to it. I have been around enough on the internet to know that they're not just 'in pajamas' and to insinuate that people that are against it are the real pedophiles is an incredibly weak and fallacious defense. "Arachnaphobic? You just want to fuck spiders." Need I remind you that the loli in lolicon is a reference to Lolita. So one wonders why there would be people going out to find their own Lolitas.
3. Resources towards controlling certain images and information is stretched thin, yes, but here in the States we don't have any laws against lolicon that wouldn't cover pornography in general and yet if resources are still stretched thin, why even bother enforcing laws regarding CSAM at all? Websites like KF take active roles in suppressing the dissemination of CSAM by removing offending content and banning posters. Struggles against problems like this may be monumental but they happen through collaborative efforts. Part of the push against lolicon is not just about its legality, but also shaming those who use/enable it and encouraging action be taken.
4. "It's just drawn images" is a cope that ignores the process that is happening here. You need to understand that the slippery slope is real and that with pornography, which you admit is 'bad for society,' there is a phenomenon in which viewers become more depraved as time goes on. I am entirely of the belief that lolicon, whose illustrated appearance both cleans up and fantasizes depictions of sexualized children, is a gateway for viewing of actual CSAM.

In the case of porn not being free speech, how exactly would anyone go about cutting down on drawing and writing forms of erotica without cutting into free speech?

Unlike pornography, it only needs a person to buy it, a person to sell it, and a stylus/platform. And that is to sell. To have, anyone can easily look up a drawing tutorial and create their own. And unlike pornography, there is no reason to share any sort of identity.

Many artists that do such work also clearly just do it for cash, and making it more difficult to purchase will just make it a more lucrative venture.

 

[Corn Flakes]

1. Porn is not free speech and that meme was only pushed in the 70s by pornographers to deconstruct a political freedom and associate are rights with taboo and obscenity.

You're making it sound like porn didn't exist before the 70s, yet since the invention of the printing press there has always been a thriving market for pornography. Usually of the written kind, but pornographic lithographic material has been around for just as long.

Anti-pornography and anti-obscenity laws have been used to politically prosecute people through the ages. China loves wielding its anti-pornography laws as a cudgel to remove any kind of gay or lesbian content from their network. Public decency laws are perfectly fine, there is such a thing as societal standards, but what people do away from public spheres is their own business.

2. The only people sexualizing depictions of little girls are the people jacking off to it. I have been around enough on the internet to know that they're not just 'in pajamas' and to insinuate that people that are against it are the real pedophiles is an incredibly weak and fallacious defense. "Arachnaphobic? You just want to fuck spiders." Need I remind you that the loli in lolicon is a reference to Lolita. So one wonders why there would be people going out to find their own Lolitas.

Listen, if you want to go rag on lolicons, go ahead. There should be a thread for it. This one isn't it, though. I'm pretty sure 90% of the people posting in this thread agree that lolicons are deplorable degenerates, but this thread is about making fun of the people who get so incensed about lolicons that they get unreasonable, unhelpful or just plain perform self-owns in order to "own the lolicons".

Case in point, that baby's face photoshopped on the cosplayer we had a couple pages back. That shit wasn't done by a lolicon, it was done by a "crusader" trying to own said lolicons and at the same time likely breaking a law or two.

3. Resources towards controlling certain images and information is stretched thin, yes, but here in the States we don't have any laws against lolicon that wouldn't cover pornography in general and yet if resources are still stretched thin, why even bother enforcing laws regarding CSAM at all? Websites like KF take active roles in suppressing the dissemination of CSAM by removing offending content and banning posters. Struggles against problems like this may be monumental but they happen through collaborative efforts. Part of the push against lolicon is not just about its legality, but also shaming those who use/enable it and encouraging action be taken.

Good. Go shame lolicons in the lolicon-shaming thread and leave this thread alone.

This shit happens all the time, too. Just because we're making fun of anti-lolicon spergs doesn't mean we approve of lolicons. Just because I think antifa are a bunch of thugs and useful idiots, doesn't mean I don't also think actual fascists should be shot on sight. There is such a thing as holding more than one thought in your head at any given time.

4. "It's just drawn images" is a cope that ignores the process that is happening here. You need to understand that the slippery slope is real and that with pornography, which you admit is 'bad for society,' there is a phenomenon in which viewers become more depraved as time goes on. I am entirely of the belief that lolicon, whose illustrated appearance both cleans up and fantasizes depictions of sexualized children, is a gateway for viewing of actual CSAM.

You're putting the cart before the horse.

Pedophilia is a paraphilia. As I said in another thread, there's good evidence that paraphilias are inherent and inheritable. Meaning: a pedophile will always be attracted to children (and their own children, if they have any, are likely to become pedophiles as well). Furthermore, while pedophiles might consume fictional depictions of pedophilia, their focus is by definition the real thing. Fictional depictions do not quench the thirst of someone with a paraphilia like that: Ted Bundy could have looked at all the corpses he wanted, but it wouldn't satisfy his necrophilic desires.

The way your argument goes we should ban cars because people driving them inevitably start speeding and crashing into crowds of schoolchildren. That is just not what happens. The vast majority of people consuming porn of all kinds can engage with it without addiction or turning it into a paraphilia.

Long story short, while some pedophiles will have fictional content in their "libraries", every pedophile looks for pornographic images/videos with actual children above anything else. Most don't actually seem to bother with fictional depictions since, let's face it, porn featuring real-life children is not hard to find if you know where to look (and that's a fucking tragedy that should be corrected posthaste). Lolicons, degenerates as they might be, aren't pedophiles unless they actually own or consume that content.

In the case of porn not being free speech, how exactly would anyone go about cutting down on drawing and writing forms of erotica without cutting into free speech?

Unlike pornography, it only needs a person to buy it, a person to sell it, and a stylus/platform. And that is to sell. To have, anyone can easily look up a drawing tutorial and create their own. And unlike pornography, there is no reason to share any sort of identity.

Many artists that do such work also clearly just do it for cash, and making it more difficult to purchase will just make it a more lucrative venture.

The Soviet Union, one of the most long-lasting, centralized and authoritarian systems we've seen in history, banned pornography. And yet the little black books were still in circulation. Printers were seized, people were arrested, but there's always been demand for that stuff. Hell, most written pornography is consumed by women, you can find accounts of people in the 18th century bitching about how housewives' "scandalous" books were going to lead to the extinction of the human race.

For a current example, pornography is also banned in China. There's still a thriving market there. As I mentioned above, their anti-pornography laws are used to bash gay and lesbian content off their chunk of the internet.

The formats might change, the level of quality might also vary, but there's always been and there will always be demand for titillating content. There's an argument to be made that this sort of content is now too easy to access in bulk and people aren't built for that much stimulation, and the plague of coombrained and pornsick perverts on twitter is good evidence of that, but trying to ban it results only in backlash, heavy-handed actions from the government, and the creation of more black markets.

 

[Atatata]

For a current example, pornography is also banned in China. There's still a thriving market there.

Speaking of, Danmei (chinese bl genre) is thriving despite the government trying to push back on that sort of thing.

Mo Dao Zu Shi, one of the more popular ones, got an anime, live action netflix adaption, drama cds, an overseas release of the novel and even nenderoids. Though, in fairness, the adaptions tried to cut as much homo out as possible.

 

[Colonel Gaddafi]

I hate having to respond to effortposts, because I have to keep multiple points in check, but here we go:
1. Porn is not free speech and that meme was only pushed in the 70s by pornographers to deconstruct a political freedom and associate are rights with taboo and obscenity.
2. The only people sexualizing depictions of little girls are the people jacking off to it. I have been around enough on the internet to know that they're not just 'in pajamas' and to insinuate that people that are against it are the real pedophiles is an incredibly weak and fallacious defense. "Arachnaphobic? You just want to fuck spiders." Need I remind you that the loli in lolicon is a reference to Lolita. So one wonders why there would be people going out to find their own Lolitas.
3. Resources towards controlling certain images and information is stretched thin, yes, but here in the States we don't have any laws against lolicon that wouldn't cover pornography in general and yet if resources are still stretched thin, why even bother enforcing laws regarding CSAM at all? Websites like KF take active roles in suppressing the dissemination of CSAM by removing offending content and banning posters. Struggles against problems like this may be monumental but they happen through collaborative efforts. Part of the push against lolicon is not just about its legality, but also shaming those who use/enable it and encouraging action be taken.
4. "It's just drawn images" is a cope that ignores the process that is happening here. You need to understand that the slippery slope is real and that with pornography, which you admit is 'bad for society,' there is a phenomenon in which viewers become more depraved as time goes on. I am entirely of the belief that lolicon, whose illustrated appearance both cleans up and fantasizes depictions of sexualized children, is a gateway for viewing of actual CSAM.

1. We’re talking about drawings, not porn in the western sense of Debbie Does Dallas, even then it’s a stretch as to whether it shouldn’t be protected under free speech. Different people are going to draw the line on different definitions of ‘porn’, some people would call Fifty Shades of Grey porn, and while it’s shit, it’s still dictatorial to censor. Hardcore porn has existed well before porn’s so called Golden Era, it was just more underground. I’m all for more regulations towards porn, but even if I disagree with it I’m not going to tell other adults what they can and can’t watch. It’s not my business as long as they’re not exposing kids to it.
2. Read this thread, the pajamas thing is a legit criticism from a loli crusader. Normal people don’t see kids in any sexual sense, let alone ones that are fully clothed from head to toe.
3. In the UK these images are illegal, so yes, it is annoying when you have an entire cybercrimes division hunting down Pixiv artists while Pakistani grooming gangs rape actual little girls. The UK also has a sky high rate of CSA compared to Japan, where loli is obviously legal, it makes one think.
4. Like violent video games and films make a more violent society? Porn addiction is a thing, and it’s been thoroughly criticized itt. Let’s be real though, pedophiles don’t want ‘cleaned up’ images of kids. They want the real thing, and no bug eyed anime girl can compare.

I think you’re in the wrong thread though, this isn’t a pro-loli hugbox.

 

[Just wandering]

found this thing. We don't have picture of said drawing so we can't judge and goind apshit against a crop top ans skinny jean isn't a bit a stretch?

 

[creamy cookies]

found this thing. We don't have picture of said drawing so we can't judge and goind apshit against a crop top ans skinny jean isn't a bit a stretch?

this guy sounds like a faggot but he has a point in which drawing your own family like this is perverted as all hell. drawing real kids in a porny artstyle with explicitly porny proportions and posting it on your 18+ account takes some balls, because it's actually cp to base shit like this off a real child, let alone her being this guy's sister

 

[VasonJoorhees]

found this thing. We don't have picture of said drawing so we can't judge and goind apshit against a crop top ans skinny jean isn't a bit a stretch?

Drawing a literal prepubescent child that is your sibling with clearly depicted breasts, a croptop exposing skin, and womanly proportions regarding her bottom and thighs is clear-as-crystal sexualization and pretty gross. This should not be up for debate.

Also, the art is traced. The reasonably high quality anatomy coupled with the poorly done "Supreme" text makes it pretty obvious, and that's before even read that the artist was called out for tracing this. So not only is it pedo shit, but it's STOLEN pedo shit.

My nephew is the same age as this guy's sister, so I found this particularly disturbing. Really feel bad for this guys younger sibling and family.

 

[Corn Flakes]

found this thing. We don't have picture of said drawing so we can't judge and goind apshit against a crop top ans skinny jean isn't a bit a stretch?

Fucking coomers, man. This is the kind of idiot that keeps the moral crusaders around.

Repeat after me, everybody: do not draw sexualized images of actual kids. Even if it weren't illegal (it is), Shadman did that and now he's a methhead. Don't be like Shadman.

 

[Linking]

Unfortunately i forget achieved

 

[peanus weenus]

Ok here's a good one I think

 

[Alessonincrippliningdepre]

https://mobile.twitter.com/PGamingReal/status/1521185638271406086

This is a big day for schizos

 

[Corn Flakes]

https://mobile.twitter.com/PGamingReal/status/1521185638271406086

This is a big day for schizos

Is that an update? Because I thought that already was Twitter's policy, it was just completely unenforced. And currently unenforceable with how the site's code and database seems to be locked down after the purchase.

 

[Corn Flakes]

Doublepost, but it's a funny thing I saw somewhere else and I was sure the farms would already have a writeup on:
Crosspost from the Vtuber thread.
(Courtesy of @Azchan, reposted without permission.)

---

So Kusuriko (random indie) "Graduated" over dumb Twitter drama. Don't really know anything about her.

Spoiler: Agency claims they fired her

Spoiler: She claims she quit

1. For context she put up her Dakimakura for sale on a website that sells dakimakuras of lolis and shit.
2. She asks for her merch to be removed as shee is not comfortable having her products in a site where lewd loli merch is sold.
3. Website quickly takes her items off as she wanted.
4. She proceeds to bitch and moan on Twitter about them selling "child porn".
   Vtuber Cringe account posts about it.
5. She starts ranting and blocking everyone who doesn't agree with her.
   Company says they are going to look into it.
6. Next day company comes out with statement above while at around the same time she announces her graduation.

Spoiler: Context

Spoiler: Her original apology Tweet Longer after Management got in contact with her.

I guess the company didn't want to deal with it, especially after being at OffKai. She deleted most of her tweets but it was just the standard "I don't want to be associated with pedos" and at some point, she pulled the "I am a victim of CSA". I think these smaller groups (if they have management) should probably give a small workshop on how to address Twitter drama and how to de-escalate. I get she might not like what the store is selling and she might want to remove her product from their shop (which she was the one that initially had them add it) but the whole moral grandstanding is what fucked her over.

---

Extra: the original Vtuber Cringe thread on it. It goes on a while, including a virtue-signaling gore fetishist.

Corn Flakes' own take on it:
Yet another self-own to own the lolicons. She would have been suspended for infringing the same rules @Alessonincrippliningdepre posted earlier.

What is it with dumbass crusaders and posting the very porn they claim to hate?! Yes, it's censored. No, that doesn't make it any less CP if you're claiming it's CP. She could have said the exact same things (and likely gotten the same reaction) with words alone, but if you're trying to make a claim of someone doing something illegal, you shouldn't be doing the exact same damn thing.

 

[Atatata]

Doublepost, but it's a funny thing I saw somewhere else and I was sure the farms would already have a writeup on:
Crosspost from the Vtuber thread.
(Courtesy of @Azchan, reposted without permission.)

---

So Kusuriko (random indie) "Graduated" over dumb Twitter drama. Don't really know anything about her.

Spoiler: Agency claims they fired her

Spoiler: She claims she quit

1. For context she put up her Dakimakura for sale on a website that sells dakimakuras of lolis and shit.
2. She asks for her merch to be removed as shee is not comfortable having her products in a site where lewd loli merch is sold.
3. Website quickly takes her items off as she wanted.
4. She proceeds to bitch and moan on Twitter about them selling "child porn".
   Vtuber Cringe account posts about it.
5. She starts ranting and blocking everyone who doesn't agree with her.
   Company says they are going to look into it.
6. Next day company comes out with statement above while at around the same time she announces her graduation.

Spoiler: Context

Spoiler: Her original apology Tweet Longer after Management got in contact with her.

I guess the company didn't want to deal with it, especially after being at OffKai. She deleted most of her tweets but it was just the standard "I don't want to be associated with pedos" and at some point, she pulled the "I am a victim of CSA". I think these smaller groups (if they have management) should probably give a small workshop on how to address Twitter drama and how to de-escalate. I get she might not like what the store is selling and she might want to remove her product from their shop (which she was the one that initially had them add it) but the whole moral grandstanding is what fucked her over.

---

Extra: the original Vtuber Cringe thread on it. It goes on a while, including a virtue-signaling gore fetishist.

Corn Flakes' own take on it:
Yet another self-own to own the lolicons. She would have been suspended for infringing the same rules @Alessonincrippliningdepre posted earlier.

What is it with dumbass crusaders and posting the very porn they claim to hate?! Yes, it's censored. No, that doesn't make it any less CP if you're claiming it's CP. She could have said the exact same things (and likely gotten the same reaction) with words alone, but if you're trying to make a claim of someone doing something illegal, you shouldn't be doing the exact same damn thing.

Guess vtubing and anime shit really was taken over by the mainstream, though while it seems pretty retarded to be a lolita wearing moeshit vtuber of all things while being against loli, that collage of vtubers someone posted is surprising.

Its weird that (antis? Crusaders?) can be a huge fan of vtubers or say, something like Berserk, Fate, or Takagi, but completely ignore this sort of thing.

 

[Corn Flakes]

Guess vtubing and anime shit really was taken over by the mainstream, though while it seems pretty retarded to be a lolita wearing moeshit vtuber of all things while being against loli, that collage of vtubers someone posted is surprising.
View attachment 3244162
Its weird that (antis? Crusaders?) can be a huge fan of vtubers or say, something like Berserk, Fate, or Takagi, but completely ignore this sort of thing.

I don't get it either. I mean, Japanese attitudes towards lolicon (95% of the examples there are girls, and even those are considered weird when they go too far) are just a whole series of rabbit holes in and of themselves.

Crusading when you're part of a community like that is just asking for trouble.

 

[KokoroKoroki]

Doublepost, but it's a funny thing I saw somewhere else and I was sure the farms would already have a writeup on:
Crosspost from the Vtuber thread.
(Courtesy of @Azchan, reposted without permission.)

---

So Kusuriko (random indie) "Graduated" over dumb Twitter drama. Don't really know anything about her.

Spoiler: Agency claims they fired her

Spoiler: She claims she quit

1. For context she put up her Dakimakura for sale on a website that sells dakimakuras of lolis and shit.
2. She asks for her merch to be removed as shee is not comfortable having her products in a site where lewd loli merch is sold.
3. Website quickly takes her items off as she wanted.
4. She proceeds to bitch and moan on Twitter about them selling "child porn".
   Vtuber Cringe account posts about it.
5. She starts ranting and blocking everyone who doesn't agree with her.
   Company says they are going to look into it.
6. Next day company comes out with statement above while at around the same time she announces her graduation.

Spoiler: Context

Spoiler: Her original apology Tweet Longer after Management got in contact with her.

I guess the company didn't want to deal with it, especially after being at OffKai. She deleted most of her tweets but it was just the standard "I don't want to be associated with pedos" and at some point, she pulled the "I am a victim of CSA". I think these smaller groups (if they have management) should probably give a small workshop on how to address Twitter drama and how to de-escalate. I get she might not like what the store is selling and she might want to remove her product from their shop (which she was the one that initially had them add it) but the whole moral grandstanding is what fucked her over.

---

Extra: the original Vtuber Cringe thread on it. It goes on a while, including a virtue-signaling gore fetishist.

Corn Flakes' own take on it:
Yet another self-own to own the lolicons. She would have been suspended for infringing the same rules @Alessonincrippliningdepre posted earlier.

What is it with dumbass crusaders and posting the very porn they claim to hate?! Yes, it's censored. No, that doesn't make it any less CP if you're claiming it's CP. She could have said the exact same things (and likely gotten the same reaction) with words alone, but if you're trying to make a claim of someone doing something illegal, you shouldn't be doing the exact same damn thing.

I was debating whether I should actually post this but everything here is more than enough I'd say.

I didn't screenshot it unfortunately but she protected her account to take the heat off of her before deleting almost all of the tweets involving the drama.

There should be a golden rule for these crusaders that needs to be strapped to their monitors with superglue:
"Do not call something CP if you are 100% comfortable with reposting it on your own account"

 

[Corn Flakes]

I was debating whether I should actually post this but everything here is more than enough I'd say.

I didn't screenshot it unfortunately but she protected her account to take the heat off of her before deleting almost all of the tweets involving the drama.

There should be a golden rule for these crusaders that needs to be strapped to their monitors with superglue:
"Do not call something CP if you are 100% comfortable with reposting it on your own account"

These are the two lessons Crusaders never learn:

1. Know your fucking audience. I might find the Japanese obsession with lolicon weird as fuck, but I'm not gonna saunter into Japanese twitter with a bunch of DeepL-translated messages hurling abuse and telling them all to come to Jesus. More to the point, these people know what they like.
   
   Calling a racist a racist isn't going to make them stop being a racist. Calling a lolicon a lolicon isn't going to magically convert them to wholesome people who are exclusively into porn featuring consenting adults in consensual relationships. There's not a single instance in history where insulting a whole group of people has caused that group to have a change of heart and abandon their sinful ways.
   
   
2. Call-outs never fucking work. Either you drive the creep in question underground and they surface somewhere else a week or two later, maybe with a new identity, or you Streisand the fuck out of them. I guarantee you Cuddly Octopus sold a lot more bodypillows than they lost in sales with this nontroversy.
   
   If you're certain you're dealing with illegal content, don't go yelling about it in the schoolyard: go talk to the fucking teacher. Look to the relevant authorities and report it to them, so the people with the power to do something about it can actually act on your discovery. Seriously, what did she expect? For the pornmongers to close shop? To abandon what I'm sure are rather profitable product lines, just because she told them to?

Seriously, people on Twitter have no idea how small they truly are.