The Twitter Pedo Hunter / Loli Crusader Community

[Buttigieg2020]

Yeah this seems like Resetera in a nutshell. Any indication of sexualized female will get them to start lobbing pedo accusations around, meanwhile they trade CP in their discords.

 

[Saffronette]

Over the years I have become very wary of people who HATE loli/shota with a passion, because more often than not they're either trying to hide the fact that they're pedophiles or trying atone for liking it in the past. On tumblr it was extremely common that antis would claim that they're against "nasty things" and claimed to protect children from "nasty people". However, when people would go through their blogs and find their accounts linked to their so called "secret nsfw blog" filled with the various fetishes they preach against (like DDLG for example) they would proceed to abandon their accounts.

I knew of one girl who had a blog dedicated to musicians/entertainers like Gackt and she seemed fine at first. But then some antis got into her head and probably told her that the media she liked was used by pedos to commit crimes. So one day she went on this huge rant about how she admitted to liking yaoi and enjoyed "Boku no Pico" but then decided that she was contributing to problematic behaviors. So in order to atone for this, she would scream about how rape scenes in literature are causing problems in the real world. Also she would make lengthy fan fiction about Gackt fucking Till Lindemann (Rhett and Link too) because that's a totally fine thing to do right? Eventually her account was deactivated and I can assume that people who followed her were tired of her antics.

There's also a weird subsection of furries who hate anime because of underage characters being sexualized, but are fine with cubs and babyfurs. They have this very strange thought process about certain characters "looking like real children" and because of that, they claim that it turns people into pedos. Hell, some even try to argue that an anime character can't consent to sex but their furry OCs could.

Also I have this interesting set of tweets from when the #ArbysWaifu thing was trending.

For context, this guy was exposed for liking cub porn of Cream the Rabbit. A Sonic character who is officially 6 years old.

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

Over the years I have become very wary of people who HATE loli/shota with a passion, because more often than not they're either trying to hide the fact that they're pedophiles or trying atone for liking it in the past. On tumblr it was extremely common that antis would claim that they're against "nasty things" and claimed to protect children from "nasty people". However, when people would go through their blogs and find their accounts linked to their so called "secret nsfw blog" filled with the various fetishes they preach against (like DDLG for example) they would proceed to abandon their accounts.

I knew of one girl who had a blog dedicated to musicians/entertainers like Gackt and she seemed fine at first. But then some antis got into her head and probably told her that the media she liked was used by pedos to commit crimes. So one day she went on this huge rant about how she admitted to liking yaoi and enjoyed "Boku no Pico" but then decided that she was contributing to problematic behaviors. So in order to atone for this, she would scream about how rape scenes in literature are causing problems in the real world. Also she would make lengthy fan fiction about Gackt fucking Till Lindemann (Rhett and Link too) because that's a totally fine thing to do right? Eventually her account was deactivated and I can assume that people who followed her were tired of her antics.

There's also a weird subsection of furries who hate anime because of underage characters being sexualized, but are fine with cubs and babyfurs. They have this very strange thought process about certain characters "looking like real children" and because of that, they claim that it turns people into pedos. Hell, some even try to argue that an anime character can't consent to sex but their furry OCs could.

Also I have this interesting set of tweets from when the #ArbysWaifu thing was trending.
View attachment 1068609 View attachment 1068610
For context, this guy was exposed for liking cub porn of Cream the Rabbit. A Sonic character who is officially 6 years old.

The fact that all Sonic characters have super specific ages always creeped me out for some reason

 

[Saffronette]

The fact that all Sonic characters have super specific ages always creeped me out for some reason

I guess it was to clear up misconceptions from 90's. They didn't get official ages until around 2003. Most of the Sonic characters are teenagers with some exceptions like Rouge, Vector, Big, and Eggman.

 

[Aria]

according to official sources melony is 30+ so how is this in anyway paedophilia?

 

[Antique Rice]

Over the years I have become very wary of people who HATE loli/shota with a passion, because more often than not they're either trying to hide the fact that they're pedophiles or trying atone for liking it in the past. On tumblr it was extremely common that antis would claim that they're against "nasty things" and claimed to protect children from "nasty people". However, when people would go through their blogs and find their accounts linked to their so called "secret nsfw blog" filled with the various fetishes they preach against (like DDLG for example) they would proceed to abandon their accounts.

I knew of one girl who had a blog dedicated to musicians/entertainers like Gackt and she seemed fine at first. But then some antis got into her head and probably told her that the media she liked was used by pedos to commit crimes. So one day she went on this huge rant about how she admitted to liking yaoi and enjoyed "Boku no Pico" but then decided that she was contributing to problematic behaviors. So in order to atone for this, she would scream about how rape scenes in literature are causing problems in the real world. Also she would make lengthy fan fiction about Gackt fucking Till Lindemann (Rhett and Link too) because that's a totally fine thing to do right? Eventually her account was deactivated and I can assume that people who followed her were tired of her antics.

There's also a weird subsection of furries who hate anime because of underage characters being sexualized, but are fine with cubs and babyfurs. They have this very strange thought process about certain characters "looking like real children" and because of that, they claim that it turns people into pedos. Hell, some even try to argue that an anime character can't consent to sex but their furry OCs could.

Also I have this interesting set of tweets from when the #ArbysWaifu thing was trending.
View attachment 1068609 View attachment 1068610
For context, this guy was exposed for liking cub porn of Cream the Rabbit. A Sonic character who is officially 6 years old.

Fucking bizarre how people on Twitter keep falling back on "oh it's anime avatars" like that means their opinion is less valid than somebody with a... doped-up rabbit I guess as their pic. That's always the response when they can't manage to just shut their mouth but don't have an actual point to make. Very strange phenomenon.

 

[TokiBun]

This community is one of the most infuriating on twitter. Congrats, they’ve devalued the word pedophile so it can’t be taken seriously anymore. At least when pedophilia is called out on KF there’s actual evidence and not baseless claims.

 

[peanus weenus]

Hell, some even try to argue that an anime character can't consent to sex but their furry OCs could.

Look, the dog never said "no" when it had a huge wooden log shoved into it's vagina so the dog obviously consented.

 

[TokiBun]

I think it’s a waste of time for people to complain about fans jerking it to aged up art of characters they like. First of all these characters aren’t real but secondly it’s better that they’re sexualizing characters as adults. I want to know it what universe does that qualify as pedophilia?

 

[c-no]

Fucking bizarre how people on Twitter keep falling back on "oh it's anime avatars" like that means their opinion is less valid than somebody with a... doped-up rabbit I guess as their pic. That's always the response when they can't manage to just shut their mouth but don't have an actual point to make. Very strange phenomenon.

In all honesty, if one were to dismiss the opinions of another because there's an anime avatar, the same should be extended to furries. Furries and weebs are no different beyond whatever they're jacking off to, whether it's some 3000 year old demon child or a rainbow colored wolf with an overly large penis that also walks on two legs, both groups will just end up having their own spergs jerking off to an ancient loli being violated or rainbow colored wolf getting sexually assaulted by another rainbow wolf with a larger dick.

Look, the dog never said "no" when it had a huge wooden log shoved into it's vagina so the dog obviously consented.

It's perfectly fine sexualizing a fictional animal such as talking ponies, smart ass dogs, and other fictional animal characters from various cartoons compared to sexualizing a fictional anime character because furries totally aren't disgusting like weebs.

 

[Saffronette]

In all honesty, if one were to dismiss the opinions of another because there's an anime avatar, the same should be extended to furries. Furries and weebs are no different beyond whatever they're jacking off to, whether it's some 3000 year old demon child or a rainbow colored wolf with an overly large penis that also walks on two legs, both groups will just end up having their own spergs jerking off to an ancient loli being violated or rainbow colored wolf getting sexually assaulted by another rainbow wolf with a larger dick.


It's perfectly fine sexualizing a fictional animal such as talking ponies, smart ass dogs, and other fictional animal characters from various cartoons compared to sexualizing a fictional anime character because furries totally aren't disgusting like weebs.

It is baffling how furries think that what they jack off to is somehow purer than hentai. I don't care about whatever fictional thing you wanna pleasure yourself to, but you're no less of a degenerate than anyone else. Especially when they feel the need to claim moral superiority over it.

 

[TokiBun]

It is baffling how furries think that what they jack off to is somehow purer than hentai. I don't care about whatever fictional thing you wanna pleasure yourself to, but you're no less of a degenerate than anyone else. Especially when they feel the need to claim moral superiority over it.

People would hate furries and weebs less if they kept their interests in appropriate forums.

 

[Saffronette]

Not too long ago, a guy who runs a twitter account called "Babey of the Day" was revealed to be liking lewd art of underaged anime characters. He was mostly known for his other accounts (Golvellious and Cavenoire) while he made images of anime girls holding signs with text like this.


Because of this post getting popular, some people called him out for his past on tumblr (which is how I originally found out about him).


On his account, astroboyomegafactor, he would make death threats to people who angered him while tagging it as "suicide mention". Here is one of the infamous threads he was in and where people found out he was reblogging ecchi art of Senran Kagura characters. He claims that he used to like the series before and stopped due to finding out some of the characters were underage.

His twitter accounts would often get banned due to targeted harassment, because he would make call-out posts about artists like Rizzydraws over ridiculous reasons. He is also ban evading as well.

There's also posts from people letting him know he had a NSFW twitter account so he shouldn't be going around calling everyone pedos for no reason. Also on that NSFW account of his, he liked porn of various Pokemon girls as well as Raven and Starfire from Teen Titans.


One day, he ended up making this so called "final post" on BotD because Smugruko made an article about him and used this as a reason to deflect attention away from his antics. (archive)

I did make a comment about how his followers shouldn't be defending him because he doesn't follow his own advice about "protecting minors". And yes there were people defending him because he hates lolicon and stands up to so called "freaks". This is one of the few who changed their mind on him after I showed them his tumblr history. I'm aware that Smug is a habitual liar and all, but most of the stuff that that's been revealed about him has been on twitter for a while.

 

[TokiBun]

View attachment 1072052

Not too long ago, a guy who runs a twitter account called "Babey of the Day" was revealed to be liking lewd art of underaged anime characters. He was mostly known for his other accounts (Golvellious and Cavenoire) while he made images of anime girls holding signs with text like this.
View attachment 1072020

Because of this post getting popular, some people called him out for his past on tumblr (which is how I originally found out about him).
View attachment 1072046

On his account, astroboyomegafactor, he would make death threats to people who angered him while tagging it as "suicide mention". Here is one of the infamous threads he was in and where people found out he was reblogging ecchi art of Senran Kagura characters. He claims that he used to like the series before and stopped due to finding out some of the characters were underage.

His twitter accounts would often get banned due to targeted harassment, because he would make call-out posts about artists like Rizzydraws over ridiculous reasons. He is also ban evading as well.
View attachment 1072048
View attachment 1072051

There's also posts from people letting him know he had a NSFW twitter account so he shouldn't be going around calling everyone pedos for no reason. Also on that NSFW account of his, he liked porn of various Pokemon girls as well as Raven and Starfire from Teen Titans.
View attachment 1072073

One day, he ended up making this so called "final post" on BotD because Smugruko made an article about him and used this as a reason to deflect attention away from his antics. (archive)

I did make a comment about how his followers shouldn't be defending him because he doesn't follow his own advice about "protecting minors". And yes there were people defending him because he hates lolicon and stands up to so called "freaks". This is one of the few who changed their mind on him after I showed them his tumblr history. I'm aware that Smug is a habitual liar and all, but most of the stuff that that's been revealed about him has been on twitter for a while.
View attachment 1072120
View attachment 1072121

Just further proof that the ones calling out “pedo content” are usually pedos themselves.

 

[Book Thief]

Encountered some of this shit a few weeks ago. Figured it might fit here:

Spoiler: LEWDS ARE ILLEGAL YOU KNOW

❄️Chilly Sufi❄️🏳️‍🌈 on Twitter

“@heartdaysnight May I continue?”

twitter.com

Personally, I couldn't give a rat's ass what anyone faps to, with the singular condition that it remains entirely fictional. The moment you start dealing with real life kids or animals is the moment you deserve to have your genitals seared off with a red-hot iron poker. Keep your degeneracy 2D, boys and girls!

 

[Unyielding Stupidity]

You know, the Danish have a saying, that roughly translated, means "A thief thinks every man steals", which applies to these guys quite nicely.
It's pretty much guaranteed that a lot of these incredibly vocal moral crusaders have enough skeletons in their closet to build a skull pyramid that'd put even Timur to shame. Seriously, the amount of times you'll see one of these people flipping their shit over someone drawing a anime girl with small tits and acting like the artist is literally on the level of Rolf Harris, who then proceed to like and retweet absolute bucketloads of actual shota (or other arguably degenerate/vile pornography) is frankly insane.

 

[peanus weenus]

And here we go, we reached the logical conclusion of whining about nonexistent kids getting hurt.

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/...h-child-porn-over-hansel-and-gretel-retelling

Last April, Quebec author Yvan Godbout and his publisher Nycolas Doucet were charged with producing and distributing child pornography. The charges against them stem from a single paragraph in one of Godbout’s novels, a dark retelling of Hansel and Gretel, in which a father sexually assaults his daughter. Godbout and Doucet were arrested in March 2019, after a reader came upon the passage and called the authorities. The work was not marketed to children, contains no explicit visual images, a content warning was printed on the back, and the scene is meant to be horrifying, not erotic.


Godbout’s book Hansel et Gretel was published in September 2017 by Éditions AdA as part of its series Contes interdits (Forbidden Tales). The works in the series reimagine classic fairy tales as horror stories. Currently, Hansel et Gretel is ranked at 3.6 out of 5 stars on Goodreads.

Though the case has attracted almost no attention in the English media, advocates for civil liberties have spoken out against Godbout and Doucet’s arrests. In a letter to Quebec’s Minister of Justice, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) called the charges against the two men “a terrible exercise of your quasi-judicial powers,” and said: “it is straining the limits of reasonableness to suggest that the novel is ‘child pornography’ as contemplated under [Canada’s Criminal Code].” A petition protesting the prosecution of Godbout and Doucet currently has almost 20,000 signatures.

 

[UnsufficentBoobage]

And here we go, we reached the logical conclusion of whining about nonexistent kids getting hurt.

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/...h-child-porn-over-hansel-and-gretel-retelling

What is with people and putting incest into Hansel and Gretel?
That's some tumblr logic...so much for "those people are harmless idiots" T_T

 

[Pizza Time]

Unfortunately didn't get a chance to archive before she went protected, but more evidence that these "activists" are almost all braindead self aggrandizing teenagers.

 

[mr.moon1488]

The main reason pedophilia is amoral is that at least one person involved is not able to give consent. One has to be on some serious shit to think that drawn porn is even in the same league as actual pedophilia. Not saying that it's not amoral, but it doesn't seem to be any more amoral than any other kind of porn. Hell, in someways it might be less amoral since with regular porn you're just taking the provider's word for it that everyone involved is actually of age.

That aside though, if you're getting off to loli, futanari, furry, or any other shit like that, you might ought to ask yourself if you don't have a serious underlying problem.