- Joined
- Dec 25, 2019
The Twitter Pedo Hunter / Loli Crusader Community
- Thread starter FishMonster
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2017
What I, a diagnosed cray, see: baby who is insurmountably cool, chillaxing near her car with a banana like a boss.
What supposedly normal people see:
- Joined
- May 28, 2020
The argument of a hypothetical driver not seeing and then hitting the child is such a bizarre reach it feels like a joke. I can't believe someone would seriously make that kind of argument without irony.
But more on topic, these people should really do some introspection if they see a child eating a very common thing for young kids to eat and immediately think of the child sexually. Lots of projection.
- Joined
- May 31, 2018
Frankly, you’d have to be a closeted mega-pervert to look at this innocuous image in a sexual light. Highly suspicious.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
What I wanna know is who the target audience for a car ad with a child in it is. Are they selling the car to parents? Usually these have some kind of focus-group testing implying the ad picture makes some demographic want to buy the car.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2018
How in the fuck is a little girl that is fully clothed and eating a banana in front of a car suggestive to anybody? I think I may have taken similar pictures like that when I was a kid. The fact that people complained about this particular ad and saw it as "inappropriate" is worrying to me considering the fact that child pageants and drag queen boys exist.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2017
There's been a huge obsession with people on the left over the past few years over "empowered" little girls (think of real life lisa simpsons)
This was probably some attempt towards that
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2018
Here's the "ad" in question - really just a tweet with the photo: http://archive.is/5ajQQ
I was thinking maybe it was a video which provided more context to tip it towards pedophilia, but no, that photo is pretty much it. It's not what I would have gone with since I don't know how it sells the car, and I can kinda see how a little girl wearing a dress and doing the one-bent-knee thing could be interpreted as suggestive, but once again Twitter hyperbolism has to take the day.
I had a banana for breakfast this morning. Good source of potassium. Doesn't mean I like dicks now.
More pedophilia from car manufacturers, I guess:
I was thinking maybe it was a video which provided more context to tip it towards pedophilia, but no, that photo is pretty much it. It's not what I would have gone with since I don't know how it sells the car, and I can kinda see how a little girl wearing a dress and doing the one-bent-knee thing could be interpreted as suggestive, but once again Twitter hyperbolism has to take the day.
I had a banana for breakfast this morning. Good source of potassium. Doesn't mean I like dicks now.
More pedophilia from car manufacturers, I guess:
Atatata
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2019
I thought it was supposed to be a silly parallel to those action scenes in movies where the dude stands in front of his car and smokes a ciggerate/eats an apple.
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2020
Been lurking on this thread for a while and only now do I have a solid contribution.
Context is bottom person (OP) made a post likening the video games cause violence argument to the whole thing about underage characters. Our focal point, Auntie Rachel, pulls up on the post with righteous indignation, insisting that every person who likes loli is a pedophile, that loli "normalizes" pedophilia, the works. OP compares lolicons to furries, and our dear Auntie Rachel gives us a nugget of wisdom.
So now the "former" animal diddler is going to preach to us on degeneracy? Please. Makes you wonder if she's using the textbook definition of zoophilia about being attracted to animals, or if she just admitted to straight-up fucking animals. Either way, she isn't "ex" anything. That shit doesn't just go away.
Also, to add on to the irony, she shot herself in the foot with that argument. She was speaking as someone attracted to animals and made it clear that drawn animals, anthro or otherwise, didn't impact her in the same way as real ones. So, isn't that logic applicable to the highly-stylized nature of lolicon? Fucking moron.
Auntie Rachel also admits to being schizophrenic later on, so I don't necessarily think her opinion is valid on distinguishing fiction from reality. Unfortunately, many of her responses revealing that information are gone, but I salvaged this absolute gem.
It would be sad if it wasn't absolutely hilarious.
Context is bottom person (OP) made a post likening the video games cause violence argument to the whole thing about underage characters. Our focal point, Auntie Rachel, pulls up on the post with righteous indignation, insisting that every person who likes loli is a pedophile, that loli "normalizes" pedophilia, the works. OP compares lolicons to furries, and our dear Auntie Rachel gives us a nugget of wisdom.
So now the "former" animal diddler is going to preach to us on degeneracy? Please. Makes you wonder if she's using the textbook definition of zoophilia about being attracted to animals, or if she just admitted to straight-up fucking animals. Either way, she isn't "ex" anything. That shit doesn't just go away.
Also, to add on to the irony, she shot herself in the foot with that argument. She was speaking as someone attracted to animals and made it clear that drawn animals, anthro or otherwise, didn't impact her in the same way as real ones. So, isn't that logic applicable to the highly-stylized nature of lolicon? Fucking moron.
Auntie Rachel also admits to being schizophrenic later on, so I don't necessarily think her opinion is valid on distinguishing fiction from reality. Unfortunately, many of her responses revealing that information are gone, but I salvaged this absolute gem.
It would be sad if it wasn't absolutely hilarious.
![[Redacted]-san](http://uploads.kiwifarms.st/data/avatars/l/25/25303.jpg?1623991751){kind=avatar}
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
Anytime a zoophile freak wants to preach to people about why liking lolicon should put people in jail, I get more dead inside and more hateful towards those zoophiles or schizo pedo puritans that worry about cartoon characters being sexualized. These individuals still make me hopeless and bitter.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2020
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
Yeah, but they're still fucking bitchy annoying assholes about it though and bothering people.At least they're honest about why they're projecting so hard.
School of Fish
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
Well I'm going to be honest here, I do find it pretty cringy that people cover their cars with anime characters for the same reasons I find it pretty cringy that people put truck nuts on their cars anyway.
So with that said, wishing death and misfortune on other people just because they've decorated their cars in a certain way is just really A-Logging at best and makes you a really shitty human being then.
The only people that will get offended by this are morons with nothing better to do. There is nothing sexually suggestive about this car advertisement and this just adds another reason why Twitter needs to go up in flames at this point.
This has to be satire, there's no way that anyone can be this stupid and lacks this much self awareness as well. The day Twitter implodes is the day that the rest of the Internet will be far better off later on.
At this point, the only thing we can do now is to point and laugh at these people then.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2020
Bold of you to say, personally I believe Twitter is the containment website and we should be grateful for its existence and function to keep all the ilk away from us. There's a reason it wasn't as bad as it is nowadays before Tumblr died.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2013
Imagine being so angry at something so innocuous that you would threaten to vandalize someone's property. Let me guess, these people are the same types who call themselves antibullying?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
Personally, I'll never trust antis of any kind, because they're filthy moralistic hypocrites that faps to lolicon in secret for all I know.
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2020
Oh no, they definitely are. The amount of antis that have been outed as lolicons/shotacons and/or actual predators are unreal.
Just recently, a notorious and outspoken anti in the JoJo fandom was busted for her 18+ server allowing minors in. There is a screenshot from a moderator stating that as long as you're 15+, you can stay, and they knowingly allowed minors to be a part of the server. Now, look, I think that this can be chalked up to being irresponsible due to the weird blurred lines fandom has sometimes, but the anti's reaction made it all the more suspicious. The owner of the server threw a temper tantrum after someone expressed concerns about the facilitation of the exchange of porn between minors and adults. She said shit like, "I guess we can't be horny anymore!" Funniest part is that you'd maybe expect this from someone who's 18/19, but this woman is 21. There's also allegations that she was flirting with and sent porn to a 12 year-old.
Either way, if you feel the constant need to virtue signal about being against pedophilia, then there's definitely something you need to consult a shrink about.
Also, did you know that the term for them isn't "antis" anymore? It's come into wider usage to call them "fantis" now due to people on Twitter assuming that "anti" means "anti-MAP/zoophile." Antis deliberately blurred that line between being "anti-ship" and "anti-pedo" to make themselves be more justified in their moral circlejerk. People were calling them "fanpol" (fandom police) for a while, but, uh, I don't think I need to explain why that fell out of usage.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
I too don't like pedos either, the only ones I worry about are Pedosexuals, and I'm guessing fanpol isn't used as much because /pol/ used it to troll fandoms or something but I might be reaching tbh. And that's why I'll never trust antis of any kind, because they are just as bad as the people they hate.