TheyCallMeTevin is a garbage troll

[Martys_not_smarty]

Game guides easily! for sure Sekiro game guide sitting around the pigpen still. Sure its got more visual then literature but that counts ?

For him sure close enough I guess, I always thought it was the instructions on the back of the body wash.

 

[RamzaTheon]

For him sure close enough I guess, I always thought it was the instructions on the back of the body wash.

No way in hell he reads a body wash bottle. Thats reading IN the shower.. With WATER! bugged mechanics his eyes would get itchy and sore

 

[KingjadVCMP]

What in the fuck was that fucking nonsense all about? Bloody hell. I skim read a lot of that, but for the point of the person wanting to know the software used for matching language patterns and stuff, that does seem like a reasonable request to make.

Anyways I was thinking about why DSP does the easiest, laziest things instead of putting in effort, and I realised something - most times in his life, his biggest wins are through being lazy and taking the easy option. The times he has made efforts, like making the KO Gaming channel, that weird fallout caps collection thing, the greenscreen etc, these stupid little ideas using effort fell through. But if he does what he always does and adds a lazy and easy idea now and then eventually one will be a hit and will run it into the ground.

Who can blame him for taking the lazy easy options when it's produced so much for him? Sure, long-term success and stability could be attained with more effort and planning but Phil's not that kind of person.

 

[RamzaTheon]

What in the fuck was that fucking nonsense all about? Bloody hell. I skim read a lot of that, but for the point of the person wanting to know the software used for matching language patterns and stuff, that does seem like a reasonable request to make.

Anyways I was thinking about why DSP does the easiest, laziest things instead of putting in effort, and I realised something - most times in his life, his biggest wins are through being lazy and taking the easy option. The times he has made efforts, like making the KO Gaming channel, that weird fallout caps collection thing, the greenscreen etc, these stupid little ideas using effort fell through. But if he does what he always does and adds a lazy and easy idea now and then eventually one will be a hit and will run it into the ground.

Who can blame him for taking the lazy easy options when it's produced so much for him? Sure, long-term success and stability could be attained with more effort and planning but Phil's not that kind of person.

That and most shit is just handed to him. The dude has the lifestyle of a 10/10 lady who can go to a baseball game and have the ball handed to them. I swear this man could probably dude an ONLYFANS arc and make money just him in different vests (Granted a paypig made the onlyfans and ran it for him all for free of course !)

 

[Nixxit]

1) people who use mentally retarded as an insult and have 0 shame about it

Insults are by definition meant to offend the insulted party, why should retardation be an exception ? Do you think it's not insulting somehow ?

And hey, I'll agree with you, you can't hold being truly mentally challenged against someone, it's not their fault, but no-one on Earth wishes they were, because it's obviously bad, so if you start acting like someone who is, well, square up, because that's not a compliment.

As to being a no-no word, this is truly a funny case. "Retarded" is part of this group of words that used to mean "mentally challenged" in the most clinical sense - such as moronic, idiotic, stupid, imbecile, cretin - but lost their meaning because they came to be used as insults, and were consequently deemed offensive. It's just human nature to use these words as insults, and you can bet that "challenged" will be replaced the same way.

As to why the WWE guy did not disprove it, again why is the burden of proof on him? If anything, he probably wants to be kept anonymous. I would not want to show my picture online in a mobile game. But I do agree that a discord conversation with voice would be easy to do should the WWE guy choose to do it.

I can think of over half a dozen way I could prove I'm not a balding professional gamer living in Washington who can only get his phone out during the streamer Darksphedyl's day off and breaks from the cesspool he calls his streams. If you can't, you are either, in fact, retarded, or DSP.

> guy uses a "statistical analysis" software to compare tweets to discord messages

Scotsman: UwU wow daddy

> guy comes on and asks what is the proof against dsp and if they have links with more information

Scotsman: fucking sperg

It's called forensic linguistics, if you want to be pedantic about it - and of course you do you absolute moron, it's all you have - and it's not some far-fetched idea to notice that if two people speak and type in a very similar fashion, the odds of them being the same person increase tremendously.

 

[TheyCallMeTevin]

What in the fuck was that fucking nonsense all about? Bloody hell. I skim read a lot of that, but for the point of the person wanting to know the software used for matching language patterns and stuff, that does seem like a reasonable request to make.

Anyways I was thinking about why DSP does the easiest, laziest things instead of putting in effort, and I realised something - most times in his life, his biggest wins are through being lazy and taking the easy option. The times he has made efforts, like making the KO Gaming channel, that weird fallout caps collection thing, the greenscreen etc, these stupid little ideas using effort fell through. But if he does what he always does and adds a lazy and easy idea now and then eventually one will be a hit and will run it into the ground.

Who can blame him for taking the lazy easy options when it's produced so much for him? Sure, long-term success and stability could be attained with more effort and planning but Phil's not that kind of person.

What is as about is i asked a basic question about proof and everyone dogpiled on me because they don't have it.

Insults are by definition meant to offend the insulted party, why should retardation be an exception ? Do you think it's not insulting somehow ?

And hey, I'll agree with you, you can't hold being truly mentally challenged against someone, it's not their fault, but no-one on Earth wishes they were, because it's obviously bad, so if you start acting like someone who is, well, square up, because that's not a compliment.

As to being a no-no word, this is truly a funny case. "Retarded" is part of this group of words that used to mean "mentally challenged" in the most clinical sense - such as moronic, idiotic, stupid, imbecile, cretin - but lost their meaning because they came to be used as insults, and were consequently deemed offensive. It's just human nature to use these words as insults, and you can bet that "challenged" will be replaced the same way.



I can think of over half a dozen way I could prove I'm not a balding professional gamer living in Washington who can only get his phone out during the streamer Darksphedyl's day off and breaks from the cesspool he calls his streams. If you can't, you are either, in fact, retarded, or DSP.



It's called forensic linguistics, if you want to be pedantic about it - and of course you do you absolute moron, it's all you have - and it's not some far-fetched idea to notice that if two people speak and type in a very similar fashion, the odds of them being the same person increase tremendously.

Wow two people who speak the same are the same person? So all of you are using the same vocabulary with nearly the same language nuances and the same idioms and the same sentiment and the same grammatical structure and the same punctuation and the same sentence structure and nearly the same spelling mistakes are the same person right?

Amazing you call me an absolute moron without taking 2 seconds to think why 2 people who speak the same language may sound the same. DSP isn't some highly regarded academic or a foreign national. He and probably the WWE guy are random people who both enjoy wrestling and are from fairly middle class backgrounds and probaly have similar educational experiences.

So believing that a linguistic tool that doesn't have a single internet footprint is legitimate evidence, but believing that 2 people out of 7 billion people on the earth may speak similarly is farfetched? Keep calling me a moron, I'm laughing my ass off at the projection.

By the way, not ONE of you has addressed the fact that the someone in the thread claimed he spoke to the guy who wrote the "forensic linguistics" tool and apparently that guy ADMITTED it is his own tool and not a peer reviewed source. And by the way, it's not pedantic to ask "hey can I have a link to the code?".

 

[Agent Proper]

Mate don't waste your time.

Phil's fans are called wheelchairs for a reason. We can show them video proof of Phil doing something, and they will claim it's fake or that we edited it. Even when they see Phil lie or scam they use their mental gymnastics to somehow excuse it.

It is just my style I keep communications open to anyone. Still I made my point and the Sperg would rather shit up page after page. I now see what we are dealing with and I now realize that a decent conversation where I could answer questions asked would have just been meet with "This isn't evidence or, proof. Retard".

 

[Zappin’ And Spazzin’]

Wow two people who speak the same are the same person? So all of you are using the same vocabulary with nearly the same language nuances and the same idioms and the same sentiment and the same grammatical structure and the same punctuation and the same sentence structure and nearly the same spelling mistakes are the same person right?

Amazing you call me an absolute moron without taking 2 seconds to think why 2 people who speak the same language may sound the same. DSP isn't some highly regarded academic or a foreign national. He and probably the WWE guy are random people who both enjoy wrestling and are from fairly middle class backgrounds and probaly have similar educational experiences.

So believing that a linguistic tool that doesn't have a single internet footprint is legitimate evidence, but believing that 2 people out of 7 billion people on the earth may speak similarly is farfetched? Keep calling me a moron, I'm laughing my ass off at the projection.

By the way, not ONE of you has addressed the fact that the someone in the thread claimed he spoke to the guy who wrote the "forensic linguistics" tool and apparently that guy ADMITTED it is his own tool and not a peer reviewed source.

I love how you're so hung up on this one computer program yet can't answer simple questions like "Why did NotPhil ban Midfirstbank" or "how has NotPhil taken absolutely zero steps to prove that he's not Phil?"
Also, you sound a bit upset. Take a step back and realize that it's not at all unreasonable to think a person with mannerisms identical to another person's mannerisms is, in fact, the same person.
And none of the people in this thread act the same, by the way

 

[TheyCallMeTevin]

It is just my style I keep communications open to anyone. Still I made my point and the Sperg would rather shit up page after page. I now see what we are dealing with and I now realize that a decent conversation where I could answer questions asked would have just been meet with "This isn't evidence or, proof. Retard".

Tell me where I called someone "retard" once.

I love how you're so hung up on this one computer program yet can't answer simple questions like "Why did NotPhil ban Midfirstbank" or "how has NotPhil taken absolutely zero steps to prove that he's not Phil?"
Also, you sound a bit upset. Take a step back and realize that it's not at all unreasonable to think a person with mannerisms identical to another person's mannerisms is, in fact, the same person.
And none of the people in this thread act the same, by the way

I'm not "hung up" on anything. Mudslinging me doesn't prove your argument. My very first post said I play devil's advocate in my head and try to understand the opposing viewpoints, meaning your viewpoints. I wanted clarification on the program because a) it allows me to understand the viewpoint and b) i was interested in how they do text analysis. Not one of you were able to provide an answer to this, page after page. I simply then pointed out that the crux of your argument rests primarily on this single point. The rest of the argument of "well he didn't disprove it" is not a reasonable argument to any rational person. Prove to me it is. By that logic, I am Tevin. Because I didn't DISPROVE I was Tevin.

And the reason I'm angry is because for a group of people that claim to be rational adults, you all have been throwing playground insults and acting like children.

 

[Shirō Ishii]

I'm not "hung up" on anything. Mudslinging me doesn't prove your argument. My very first post said I play devil's advocate in my head and try to understand the opposing viewpoints, meaning your viewpoints. I wanted clarification on the program because a) it allows me to understand the viewpoint and b) i was interested in how they do text analysis. Not one of you were able to provide an answer to this, page after page. I simply then pointed out that the crux of your argument rests primarily on this single point. The rest of the argument of "well he didn't disprove it" is not a reasonable argument to any rational person. Prove to me it is. By that logic, I am Tevin. Because I didn't DISPROVE I was Tevin.

And the reason I'm angry is because for a group of people that claim to be rational adults, you all have been throwing playground insults and acting like children.

Spoiler

 

[Draza]

I'm not "hung up" on anything. Mudslinging me doesn't prove your argument. My very first post said I play devil's advocate in my head and try to understand the opposing viewpoints, meaning your viewpoints. I wanted clarification on the program because a) it allows me to understand the viewpoint and b) i was interested in how they do text analysis. Not one of you were able to provide an answer to this, page after page. I simply then pointed out that the crux of your argument rests primarily on this single point. The rest of the argument of "well he didn't disprove it" is not a reasonable argument to any rational person. Prove to me it is. By that logic, I am Tevin. Because I didn't DISPROVE I was Tevin.

And the reason I'm angry is because for a group of people that claim to be rational adults, you all have been throwing playground insults and acting like children.

Don't you have wife and son to take care of Phil?

 

[Pargon]

I'm not "hung up" on anything. Mudslinging me doesn't prove your argument. My very first post said I play devil's advocate in my head and try to understand the opposing viewpoints, meaning your viewpoints. I wanted clarification on the program because a) it allows me to understand the viewpoint and b) i was interested in how they do text analysis. Not one of you were able to provide an answer to this, page after page. I simply then pointed out that the crux of your argument rests primarily on this single point. The rest of the argument of "well he didn't disprove it" is not a reasonable argument to any rational person. Prove to me it is. By that logic, I am Tevin. Because I didn't DISPROVE I was Tevin.

And the reason I'm angry is because for a group of people that claim to be rational adults, you all have been throwing playground insults and acting like children.

Motherfucker, if you don't stop doubleposting all this autism I'm going to go back in time and give your grandmother such a cervical prolapse that history will be changed so drastically that the earth will fling itself off its own axis

 

[Forbidden Math]

I simply then pointed out that the crux of your argument rests primarily on this single point.

It doesn't though. I told you pages ago all of us knew it was Phil well before the text match program. You seem to keep ignoring these points so how about I bullet point them for you so you can continue to play stupid and ignore them and act like the program was all we had. DEBUNKED!

• Phil wouldn't say the name of the game on stream, he would avoid saying it and call it another game. This is a classic tell of lying.
• Phil has admitted in the past he played the game. So why can't he show his screen name and clear poor innocent "TheyCallMeDSP"?
• Why is there a user with the name "TheyCallMeDSP" who is apparently neither a DSP fan or troll? Is his name David Smith Prince or something?
• Why would someone who spent 40k on a mobile game not do everything they could to clear their name when the guilds they were in started to get harassed and kick him out of guild after guild after guild?

I could go on, but I tell you what answer these first oh mighty King of Semantics.

 

[Zappin’ And Spazzin’]

And the reason I'm angry is because for a group of people that claim to be rational adults, you all have been throwing playground insults and acting like children.

Because you came into this thread demanding answers to questions that have already been discussed and looked into, instead of just doing the research yourself.
Have you read the entire WWE Champions thread? No?
Because it's not the responsibility of anyone in this thread to tell you absolutely every detail of every circumstance. The average poster here isn't that involved with Phil and probably only pops in every now and then for a quick laugh.
I know it's a typical mentality on the modern internet where, if you spend 10 minutes of your day insulting something, that means you're "obsessed" and it "lives in your head rent free." But just because someone thinks lowly of Phil, doesn't mean they're a walking encyclopedia of why he's a shithead. The way I see it, you only need "he snorts a lot" as a valid reason to dislike him. And by the way, if people are instantly believing that Phil is a liar, that's Phil's own fault for establishing a reputation of a liar.
It's also annoying people that you show your newfaggotry with every post. For the love of God, stop doubleposting.

 

[Agent Proper]

Tell me where I called someone "retard" once.

That just seems like it would be your response after I explain step by step why I am convinced that account is Phil.

I and others here have laid it out for you here. so just DM me and quit seagulling (squawking and shitting everywhere). No one likes that dumb shit.

 

[Scotsman]

What is as about is i asked a basic question about proof and everyone dogpiled on me because they don't have it.

You didn't ask a basic question. You came in here like it was some sort of parliament meeting, all jumped up and ready to argue, posting autistic walls of text about how court cases work. Then you come out with shit like "reclaiming power" and "extending the olive branch".

Go to Reddit, they love debating with retards.

 

[gh0stzero]

I'm not "hung up" on anything. Mudslinging me doesn't prove your argument. My very first post said I play devil's advocate in my head and try to understand the opposing viewpoints, meaning your viewpoints. I wanted clarification on the program because a) it allows me to understand the viewpoint and b) i was interested in how they do text analysis. Not one of you were able to provide an answer to this, page after page. I simply then pointed out that the crux of your argument rests primarily on this single point. The rest of the argument of "well he didn't disprove it" is not a reasonable argument to any rational person. Prove to me it is. By that logic, I am Tevin. Because I didn't DISPROVE I was Tevin.

And the reason I'm angry is because for a group of people that claim to be rational adults, you all have been throwing playground insults and acting like children.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/despit...mpions-mobile-game.65126/page-26#post-5856294

There.

Also:

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/despit...mpions-mobile-game.65126/page-26#post-5856217

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/despit...mpions-mobile-game.65126/page-19#post-5852855

 

[TheyCallMeTevin]

It doesn't though. I told you pages ago all of us knew it was Phil well before the text match program. You seem to keep ignoring these points so how about I bullet point them for you so you can continue to play stupid and ignore them and act like the program was all we had. DEBUNKED!

• Phil wouldn't say the name of the game on stream, he would avoid saying it and call it another game. This is a classic tell of lying.
• Phil has admitted in the past he played the game. So why can't he show his screen name and clear poor innocent "TheyCallMeDSP"?
• Why is there are user with the name "TheyCallMeDSP" who is apparently neither a DSP fan or troll? Is his name David Smith Prince or something?
• Why would someone who spent 40k on a mobile game not do everything they could to clear their name when the guilds they were in started to get harassed and kick him out of guild after guild after guild?

I could go on, but I tell you what answer these first.

Answer what? I literally do not care about any of these points or if DSP has spent 40k. Literally my only question has been do you have a link to the fucking code. The only reason the conversation has continued is because you all felt offended that someone could possibly disagree with you and thus started insulting me. If your argument is solid my points should have been easily debunked. I don't know years of DSP lore and shit like you all. I literally saw a post on youtube saying it is 100% him and that there was a statistical linguistics tool to prove it and I was curious since I could not find that tool anywhere online.

But I'll take a crack at the above points just as a 3rd party person and present possibilities. I make no claim on their likeliness in this answer:

1) I looked up signs of lying and literally did not see anything about "avoiding saying [the name]" of the subject at hand. I would guess that him doing that is basically a way to make people forget about the issue or devalue it. He did the same thing with superhound by calling him super burnout. Phil basically seems like the kind of guy who talks himself up to make himself seem bigger than he is, as a defense mechanism. but it doesn't come across to me as a "lie", more of a defensive mechanism. He does 2 things by pretending he is not aware of something or by deliberately not saying names of something: 1) new people dont know what he is talking about and have a harder time finding the lore 2) he makes himself sound like he doesn't care which is beneficial for the reason above

2) I did see the clip where he admitted he played it. So some reasons I might not show my username to the public: I use the handle on multiple accounts and it's an identifiable handle which a google search in some other sites might reveal more information about me; if my username is known publicly, I will be harassed in-game, or my friends in game will not associate with me. Online handles provide a level of anonymity. That is what I can think of right now. Based on your point, the WWE guy was kciked out of guilds after it was known he could possibly be DSP. Seems like DSP might be aware of the hate he gets online and doesn't want to get kicked out of whatever group he is in.

I do agree however that it would be easy to disprove this. I'm just saying why it's possible he doesn't. It could be he is hiding something else.

3) Probably the same reason there are multiple people in the world called David Smith? just before creating my account, I looked up a handle I was going to use and found it was used on some pinterest-esque accounts. I don't see how this evidence that they are the same person.

Follow up question to the above point - once the possible link was made, was the WWE account deleted? or did the guy leave his account up? if it's still up, that is more evidence to me that they are not the same person. If I am trying to hide my profile, I would delete it so people don't have the chance to analyze it. I saw this exact situation happen on summit1g's stream: someone he played with was doing incredibly well, and someone looked up the gamer tag handle and found it in a forum for game hacks. When the player was accused, the profile was deleted.

4) Who got kicked out of guild after guild after guild? WWE guy? Sounds like he did try to prove he is not DSP but no one listened or believed. Again, as a random user, why do I want to post my face and identity just because people associate with a random online personality who happens to have the same online handle as me?

You didn't ask a basic question. You came in here like it was some sort of parliament meeting, all jumped up and ready to argue, posting autistic walls of text about how court cases work. Then you come out with shit like "reclaiming power" and "extending the olive branch".

Go to Reddit, they love debating with retards.

Mate learn to read before you insult someone else. Clearly you don't understand how parliament meetings work. Point out also who brought up preponderance of evidence first and if you can prove I was the first to use that phrase I will agree with you and delete this account (assuming you can delete accounts. If I can't, I'll just stop posting on KiwiFarms).

 

[Prince Lotor]

Tell me where I called someone "retard" once.

You're right, you've been nothing but polite and a paragon of social etiquette. I think we've gotten off on the wrong foot. I let Phil know how you have been intelligently debating the trolls and haters with facts and logic and he has a special message for you

 

[thedingledongle]

Jesus Christ