"Oh look, here's my dad being buck broken by a stoner hippie. Here's my dad threatening to sue Muse for releasing a music video on his birthday. Here's my dad buying a fifteen thousand dollar Chinisium sword in place of my college fun..."
If
female-pattern baldness is not already in her genes, that poor child is going to be the spitting image of her father, in no time, after going through his feed...
On 26 February, Tim had Mike Crispi, chairman of America First Republicans of New Jersey, as the guest.
Phil, & Charles, the host of the paywalled
Green Room pre-show, were the co-hosts.
Clip Collection:
-After all his anger at
people, particularly, from Communist China using loopholes in birthright citizenship, Tim sees no issue with President Donald Trump's proposed "
gold card" to people willing to invest $5 million, which would offer a green card equivalent, much as the
EB-5 visa does now, but with a higher investment requirement. Tim repeats Trump's claim that with "1 million people" buying that, it could send "$5 trillion" towards the debt. Despite his prior concerns over Communist Chinese anchor babies, it is now alright to keep an avenue for Communist Chinese investors, as well as their spouses & children, to achieve permanent residence:
-Tim says he asked Grok for companies selling exo-suits, to see what they are capable of:
Then, later in the show, Tim says he already ordered some & is looking forward to testing them on his half pipe, in order "to break it, instantly". & the beanie boy wonders why people think his finances are not so solvent. Throwing money at exo-suits, which using the examples he showed, earlier, "
can be tested in the working environment as part of the Experience package (from EUR 2,900 or USD 2,990)":
-Tim admits that some of his hires for
IRL occurred because the person super-chatted him. No wonder the beanie boy has no issue with Trump's gold card visa programme, he is running his own to purchase spots on the Branch Timidian compound. That explains why Raymond continues to give his boss money, there must be a monthly charge to retain access to the co-hosting pool:
Ian is entering his BRICS phase:

(
archive)
With the news of the day being a gaggle of Trump-friendly social media personalities getting access to Epstein documents, before the general public, posing on the White House steps, do you know what Tim's first thought is? Is it to call out the failure to share this information with the general public? Is it making a spectacle around the abuse of women & girls, as if it were graduation day & the influencers just got their diplomas?
Of course not, it is begging these people to come on his show, so he can benefit from it:

(
archive)
Tim had Amber Duke, senior editor of
The Daily Caller, as the guest.
Mary & Phil were the co-hosts.
Clip Collection:
-Mary takes the more pessimistic perspective, on the influencers given the binders by the White House, while Tim does his level best to hide his jealousy over not being invited or having them come by to talk about it. Though Tim claims that he knows for a fact the people photographed were "blindsided". Though forgive me for saying that Tim's judge of character is poor. Look at him partnering with Emily Molli & Rocco Castoro, only to have them
betray him in dramatic fashion:
-Tim does admit that the influencers are now "getting roasted" for being a prop & a photo-op. But the beanie boy continues to defend "some of the people there" as having no idea what was happening, & is "not mad at any of them":
-A super-chatter jokes that Tim should have kept with the show's tradition, to watch the stream &
comment from the delivery room as his child was born, as some super-chatters have in the past. Tim says that he did, for $100. But this had me thinking, with both employees & Tim, himself, sending money to the show, via super-chats, I wonder if that would run afoul of tax law, or business regulations. Can you have your employees give their employer money, derived from their pay? Can a boss send money to his business, via a third party (in this case, YouTube, which took a portion)? It seems like a legal grey area that could be used for accusations of money laundering, unless this falls under some sort of donation protection? I know little of tax policy, so I leave it up to other to puzzle out:
-In answering a super-chat, unsurprisingly, Tim is incorrect. The information released in the binders is not "new". The
flight logs, &
address book, have been publicly available for years. This reeks of running defense for the administration & the influencers that peddled it as some grand unveiling. & to top off how unserious about this Tim is, he interrupts discussion about the weakened impact of the phrase "Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself" to prove he super-chatter during his wife's delivery:
\
-Tim gets a super-chat about the Tate brothers arriving in Florida, & Governor Ron DeSantis doing a press conference about trying to find ways to prosecute them. Tim says he has not seen enough evidence to warrant not interacting with them. He argues you need to platform him, in order "to communicate with his audience". Tim claims that his greater follower count means "he is already winning", & not platforming him is no victory. The beanie boy brings up something to call out Andrew Tate on, his claims of having children with only one means "
you are not a conqueror". Phil notes how doing that "does not raise children", & fails to make them well-adjusted. Mary calls out Elon Musk for doing the same, which elicits an "oof" from Tim, & moving to the paywalled section: