TGWTG Tony Goldmark / "Some Jerk with A Camera" - Some Jerk with a Trust Fund

ScatmansWorld said:
Looks like Tony got noticed by his greatest role model the Robert of Filmography
View attachment 1101211
Click to expand...
Calm down bro, you just triple posted.

Skidmark is sweeping the whole "Exploited affirmative action with her true and honest Native American heritage 1/32nd bloodline to get where she is today" thing under the rug, I see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A Big Bumbling Black Man and Kosher Salt
ScatmansWorld said:
twitter.com

One false move, baby, suddenly everything's ruined on Twitter

“One Movie Later was a bad idea and I've wasted altogether too much of my own time on it. Time that could've been spent on Some Jerk season four.”
twitter.com twitter.com
Tony has decided to give up on his One Movie Later movie reviews and will just do reviews on his podcast from now on.
Click to expand...

Hol'up! Lemme get this straight...Tony is putting an end to the movie review videos? The movie review videos that he was doing INSTEAD of the park review videos? The movie review videos that he used to justify continuing to receive Patreon money, stating that they were still "content"? And now he's saying they were a waste of time and distracted him from doing the park review videos? And after he pitched bitch fits any time anyone told him they thought the videos were a waste of time and to get back to the park review videos? Do I have this right?

And also, LOL at Skidmark stating anything is a waste of time. The lazy lardass doesn't have a job or adult responsibilities. He has nothing BUT time. He chose to squander it on Twitter with "Orange Man BAD!" rants instead of making videos.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Doctor Placebo, The Pink Panther, grandpasatan and 4 others
Tony is calling people "chuds" now, how long before he declares himself a communist?
twitter.com

#FreeWelder on Twitter

“Could someone please introduce this chud to a thing we have now called Google? https://t.co/fSFW9jSkmb”
twitter.com twitter.com
screencapture-twitter-tonygoldmark-status-1221182471250661377-2020-01-26-22_17_25.jpg
 
Keep Yourself Safe said:
Tony is calling people "chuds" now, how long before he declares himself a communist?
twitter.com

#FreeWelder on Twitter

“Could someone please introduce this chud to a thing we have now called Google? https://t.co/fSFW9jSkmb”
twitter.com twitter.com
View attachment 1116780
Click to expand...

Nobody should be expected to know that "cis" as used by a tiny smattering of profoundly mentally ill men is a word that means "normal, not insane, not a freakish pervert."
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: UnKillFill, The Dude, Duncan Hills Coffee and 10 others
AnOminous said:
Nobody should be expected to know that "cis" as used by a tiny smattering of profoundly mentally ill men is a word that means "normal, not insane, not a freakish pervert."
Click to expand...

"Cis" only caught on because the faggerati realized that calling straights "filthy fucking breeders" was too obvious.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: ChampFantana, Francis E. Dec Esc., Keep Yourself Safe and 4 others
Cis caught on because far left activists didn't want people thinking too much about how "trans rights" that turn society upside down by forcibly ignoring biological sexual differences are only a positive thing for .005% of the population and a probable negative for 99.995% of the population. Calling people who aren't trans "cis" creates the false impression that you're talking about two equally comparable groups. Hence the ridiculous over-abundance of tranny representation these days.

Also, "most people" (which includes not just most of the hated white men, but most black people, Hispanics, Native Americans, women etc) being a historic oppressor class leftists should despise and work against the interests of isn't a big seller. Cis works much better as an abstract hated oppressor.

In short, it's one of Saul Alinsky's rules. Identify the target, freeze it, isolate it and personalize it.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Francis E. Dec Esc., Keep Yourself Safe, ChevroletBlackboard and 4 others
Lensherr said:
View attachment 1121307
Click to expand...
I'll just share the same comment I put on Cinema Roberto's thread here, since Bob the Blob retweeted this.

Doctor Placebo said:
TLJ: Free the animals, leave the child slaves. Don't think too much about how the New Republic and Resistance allowed and supported this for way longer than the First Order has, even though we just spent like a quarter of this movie calling attention to it. Root for the Mary Sue roasties against the emo Nazi clowns, but feel good that some of their followers smashed up the stuff of the people who sell weapons to them. Don't worry about whether that will negatively effect their war efforts, or if you should even be rooting for them at all. We literally gave Purple Hair a fucking halo even though she deals with known child slavers. It's a gray conflict AND a completely black and white conflict, okay? *Footage of Rian Johnson furiously masturbating*

Pretentious smoothbrains like Goldmark and Chipman: IT'S SO DEEEEEEP DUUUUUDE! *Furiously masturbate along with Rian Johnson*
Click to expand...
TLJ's themes and messages are muddled, contradictory, and never fully committed to, even if you ignore that the story used to deliver them is nonsensical drivel that's no better than Jar Jar Abram's TROS. And at least Jar Jar didn't deliberately create the most obnoxious characters possible for his dumpster fire. You could tell even he thought Rose Tico and Holdo were fucking terrible.

And anyone who reduces Arthur's issues to "he's poor I guess" is either an imbecile who's incapable of comprehending the film (which makes them pretty exceptional since it's pretty straightforward film), or didn't actually watch it and is getting all their info from skimming over social media hot takes.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Flexo, A Big Bumbling Black Man, Army Burger and 2 others
Doctor Placebo said:
I'll just share the same comment I put on Cinema Roberto's thread here, since Bob the Blob retweeted this.


TLJ's themes and messages are muddled, contradictory, and never fully committed to, even if you ignore that the story used to deliver them is nonsensical drivel that's no better than Jar Jar Abram's TROS. And at least Jar Jar didn't deliberately create the most obnoxious characters possible for his dumpster fire. You could tell even he thought Rose Tico and Holdo were fucking terrible.

And anyone who reduces Arthur's issues to "he's poor I guess" is either an imbecile who's incapable of comprehending the film (which makes them pretty exceptional since it's pretty straightforward film), or didn't actually watch it and is getting all their info from skimming over social media hot takes.
Click to expand...
Either that, or he’s being deliberately uncharitable IMO. Not sure which would be worse though.
 
Why am I not surprised that Skidmark not only likes The Last Jedi, but also believes it's some deep, philosophical analysis of class and culture, and not just some fantasy about space wars and astro wizards with laser swords?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Sir Wesley Tailpipe

Tony and Friends talk about Rise of Skywalker and Star Wars in general for an hour and a half. (Featuring MarzGurl for some reason)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back