TGWTG Tony Goldmark / "Some Jerk with A Camera" - Some Jerk with a Trust Fund

I know why Tony has a hate boner on for Pewds. It's because Pewds is everything Tony wishes he could be; slim, good looking, funny, successful, popular, charismatic, independently wealthy...he's basically the anti-Tony. Pewds built an internet empire with nothing but some spare time, a webcam, a computer, and his own wit and humor. Tony has had to squander his inheritance AND ride the Walker Bros. cocks just to make it to the pitiful level he's at. Then again, Pewds has a work ethic and loves his fans, whereas Tony is a lazy putz and hates his fans.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: ChampFantana, Kosher Salt, Rondo Richter Belmont and 12 others
After a few days of radio silence, Tony's idiocy comes back in full force:

mUx8zZm.png

That user isn't throwing a temper tantrum like you do so I'd say he/she IS smarter than you, Tony.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Rondo Richter Belmont, Stupid Fan, Saney and 8 others
The infantile screeching, the tantrums over who won the election, the pouting over the President, the obsession with kiddie cartoons and family fun parks, the lack of any attributes one expects from adults, the way he treated his ex-wife (expecting her to act like his mommy)...Tony sure does put the "child" in manchild.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Francis E. Dec Esc., ChevroletBlackboard and 4 others
LordKaT said:
I would love to see Tubby put together an actual intellectual argument instead of the usual Twitter mocking.

It won't happen, but I'd still love see it. It might read worse than Quinns book.
Click to expand...

Oh hey, you're back! Did you see what Tony's ex had to say about him earlier in this thread? It's an eye opener for sure.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: El Porko Fako, ChevroletBlackboard, Y2K Baby and 1 other person
LordKaT said:
I would love to see Tubby put together an actual intellectual argument instead of the usual Twitter mocking.

It won't happen, but I'd still love see it. It might read worse than Quinns book.
Click to expand...

Why use facts and sound reasoning to conduct a civil debate when you can shriek hysterically like a Downs Syndrome chimp, throw out baseless accusations, call people names, and disregard completely any and all opinions that are different from yours because of your smug and unwarranted sense of superiority? It's the new intellectualism, don'cha know?!
 
The Dude said:
It's the "us vs. them" mentality. They are so blinded by politics and partisanism that they would vote for anyone with a "D" next to their name, even a literal Nazi sympathizer, just to beat those mean old Republicans. Just look at how many people like Tony idolize Margaret Sanger, a woman who believed that women who were "unfit or unable to effectively raise children" (any woman who isn't white) should be barred from having children. She was literally a proponent of negative eugenics, within kissing distance of being a Nazi, and someone many Leftists admire, including Tony's bae Hillary Clinton.
Click to expand...

To be fair a lot of people on both sides don't know jack about her. She was extremely anti-abortion and her views on eugenics were those of the progressive and liberal movements in places like California and many other blue states.

The NAACP endorsed eugenics by having programs such as the Better Babies contests. Several of the black leaders were supporters of only having the best and brightest of the coloreds having children especially with whites that way the traits of niggerdness would be removed by the white genes. This btw is the words of the black leaders such as W.E.B Dubois.

MLK praised Margaret Sanger since she brought health care clinics to black areas and encouraged the training of black doctors and nurses.

whoops posted in wrong thread. had multiple tabs opened and didn't check.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Lensherr, Mellorine, Lackadaisy and 5 others
  • Agree
Reactions: Dr. Dik and El Porko Fako
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back