Tucker Carlson - Can't Cuck the Tuck, But Got Canned Following Lawsuit

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Do you think Tucker is doing God's Work?

  • Yes, based and redpilled by mainstream standards

    Votes: 185 80.8%
  • No, I am a shameless leftist cuckold for Corporate America

    Votes: 44 19.2%

  • Total voters
    229
In reference to protecting the environment from pollution, does your idea of a far leftist believe in nuclear power for energy?

As far as capitalism, like capitalism in general or crony capitalism or shareholder obsessed capitalism?
I never met anyone involved in politics who opposed nuclear energy. Two people I know who call themselves far-leftists are vociferously in support of it.

I would say I'm pretty normal for an oldskool far leftist in the Western world. I like Noam Chomsky, David Graeber, John Pilger, Chris Hedges, and Occupy Wall Street. I understand 'capitalist' institutions and activities as ones in which every other consideration must ultimately give way to making profit (..either for banks, shareholders, or the individual owner.)

I'm a free-speech absolutist. I'm pro small businesses and pro small-scale private property. I'm pro bearing arms (cf. Marx: "Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary".) I'm for the nationalisation of a country's natural resources: taxpayer ownership of the country's water, electricity, soil, and air.

I'm against lending money at interest (i.e. usury) and the trading of things of tangible value (like labour and food) for intangible things (like stocks and NFTs), and any individual or group owning more property than they can defend without armies, private cops, or lawyers. So I'm against for instance the stock market, the existence of billionaires, full-time and/or large-scale property investors, private equity firms, and hedge funds.
 
So I'm against for instance the stock market, the existence of billionaires, full-time and/or large-scale property investors, private equity firms, and hedge funds.
Stock market has been one of modern humanity's biggest mistakes, worsened by the adding of derivatives to turn it into a rich-man's betting pool.
 
When the guys of PBS who wants Tucker Carlson off the air, you know then he did a good job.
May 4, 2022

PBS agitates to have Tucker Carlson taken off the air​

By Russell Cook

The taxpayer-funded national network PBS is pushing for less viewpoint diversity. No doubt intended to accelerate the growing push for Tucker and Fox News to be taken off the air. From the PBS Newshour, May 2, 2022
"Tucker Carlson’s influence and his increasingly extreme views" (Amna Nawaz interviews New York Times' Nick Confessore, who wrote the 4/30 "How Tucker Carlson Stoked White Fear to Conquer Cable"

Excerpts [emphases added]:
Nick Confessore: ... He's the highest rated cable show host in history.And it's also the most racist show in history. ... Every night, that show teaches fear and loathing. He may claim to be a person who opposes racism and prejudice, but what the show tells you every night is to be afraid, to be afraid of people who are in the street asking for police officers to not shoot Black people, be afraid of Afghan refugees who helped us in the war who are coming over here now, to be afraid of Dr. Fauci, and to be afraid of immigration in general, which he posits is part of a cabal, a plot to destroy Western civilization ...... it's not just the anti-white racism kind of rhetoric on the show. He's literally taking ideas that began on the very far right, on arcane corners of the Internet, on neo-Nazi sites ...

... Amna Nawaz: Nick, he's also aggressively defended January 6 insurrectionists and played down how violent that day actually was. … he's very much in line with the Republican Party and their message. What did your reporting find about that relationship between the GOP and Tucker Carlson?

Nick Confessore: Look, I would say he is the high priest of Trumpism.
"Amy Walter and Annie Linskey on primary election season, Tucker Carlson’s role in the GOP"

Excerpts:
Judy Woodruff: .. Amy, let's start with what we just heard Amna talking to Nick Confessore about .. Clarify for us, what is Tucker Carlson's role in the Republican Party, in American politics?
Amy Walter: .. Nick Confessore put it really well when he said that he's filling the void that had been left by Donald Trump's voice being off of social media ... He's also being talked about as a potential 2024 candidate for president. And that's not idle discussion. I think his name will be very seriously floated, and we may see more to come of a Tucker Carlson trial balloon in 2024. ....

... Judy Woodruff: And, Annie, what — the darker side of this, which we heard in that conversation, about race… and about the role of the threat that many white Americans feel, what does that say about our politics right now?
Annie Linskey: ... I think that was one of the most stunning takeaways, for me at least, from the New York Times reporting, which was just so incredible, is just the extent to which they really documented the ways in which Carlson is normalizing discussions of race that I think would not be considered — are not considered appropriate in many parts of the country. .. But Carlson's show is moving through the window to where they're becoming more appropriate. And I think that's what many groups on the left worry about. And I think that is what The Times is reporting is kind of showing us, really the danger that Tucker Carlson and his show presents, is making it more OK to have those kinds of grievances voiced out loud....
According to the PBS NewsHour and the NYT, neither of which seem to have people who've watched Tucker's show at any depth, Tucker espouses Bull Connor-style racism and enables people like you and me to freely advocate talk that escalates toward genocide. His show should therefore be silenced, he should be jailed for insurrectionist incitement before he announces his presidential run, and you and I need to be leery of saying anything against ..... well anything. Obey.
 
Stock market has been one of modern humanity's biggest mistakes, worsened by the adding of derivatives to turn it into a rich-man's betting pool.
To be fair, without the stock market and other innovations of early capitalism we wouldn't have modern society...oh okay I see your point.
When the guys of PBS who wants Tucker Carlson off the air, you know then he did a good job.
Even the most gentle pushing against the narrative terrifies these people. It's quite incredible really, and also for PBS just asking for them to be defunded.
 
I never met anyone involved in politics who opposed nuclear energy. Two people I know who call themselves far-leftists are vociferously in support of it.

I would say I'm pretty normal for an oldskool far leftist in the Western world. I like Noam Chomsky, David Graeber, John Pilger, Chris Hedges, and Occupy Wall Street. I understand 'capitalist' institutions and activities as ones in which every other consideration must ultimately give way to making profit (..either for banks, shareholders, or the individual owner.)

I'm a free-speech absolutist. I'm pro small businesses and pro small-scale private property. I'm pro bearing arms (cf. Marx: "Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary".) I'm for the nationalisation of a country's natural resources: taxpayer ownership of the country's water, electricity, soil, and air.

I'm against lending money at interest (i.e. usury) and the trading of things of tangible value (like labour and food) for intangible things (like stocks and NFTs), and any individual or group owning more property than they can defend without armies, private cops, or lawyers. So I'm against for instance the stock market, the existence of billionaires, full-time and/or large-scale property investors, private equity firms, and hedge funds.
What are your thoughts on Noam Chomsky's stuff with the Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
What are your thoughts on Noam Chomsky's stuff with the Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot.
They took a stance that was understandable, given the the evidence available to them at the time, as well as the general historical trend of how the US treats and talks about left-wing people and countries (see Operation Condor and Gladio, Operation Mockingbird, the killing of US unionists and the use of prison labour to outcompete free workers) and they later correctly recanted (in 'Manufacturing Consent'.)
 
  • Informative
Reactions: MrJokerRager
When the guys of PBS who wants Tucker Carlson off the air, you know then he did a good job.
Keep in mind that the audience for PBS is probably whiter than a KKK rally from the 1950s.
 
without the stock market and other innovations of early capitalism we wouldn't have modern society
Citation needed and Early Life detected
We wouldn't have stonktards without an army of contract lawyers, and we wouldn't have white collar workers without the blood sweat and tears of blue and pink collar labourers.
The burden of proof is on you to show me what turning real, good things like air, water, and food into intangible metrics of value (currencies, stocks, derivatives) does for society.
How the fuck does using vast amounts of hydroelectrical energy to buy and sell fractions of air and water at 500mb/s speed benefit humankind?
Explain that to the average farmer, nurse, or electrician.
You can't, you bloodsucker, and you know it.

pharisee.jpg
 
Last edited:
When the guys of PBS who wants Tucker Carlson off the air, you know then he did a good job.
“grievances voiced out loud”

This is the problem right here, in western politics. Whites can not openly voice their grievances, and even Tucker Carlson has to modulate things.

They know if whites are allowed to express sentiments forbidden to them since 1945 then the whole world order as (((they))) constructed will collapse in spectacular fashion. And there isn’t enough housing in Israel for all the Askhenazis that will run.

Forestalling the White rising until they become an impotent minority is the overriding summa cum raison for the System.
 
Citation needed and Early Life detected
We wouldn't have stonktards without an army of contract lawyers, and we wouldn't have white collar workers without the blood sweat and tears of blue and pink collar labourers.
The burden of proof is on you to show me what turning real, good things like air, water, and food into intangible metrics of value (currencies, stocks, derivatives) does for society.
How the fuck does using vast amounts of hydroelectrical energy to buy and sell fractions of air and water at 500mb/s speed benefit humankind?
Explain that to the average farmer, nurse, or electrician.
You can't, you bloodsucker, and you know it.

View attachment 3247583
Stock markets let investors pool their resources together to finance ventures which would otherwise be risky. Case in point is 17th century Netherlands, where the first stock market was invented, and be extension the rest of Europe, where stock markets helped finance all sorts of things that led to the Industrial Revolution and European domination of the world. There's really no reason why a stock market can't be a benefit for society, even if today's stock markets are obviously not.
 
People are deliberately misrepresenting what he said about Hurricanes recently. They're saying he called them a "scam", and that's not what he meant, and they fucking know it. What he's saying is that the hype surrounding Hurricanes and all the fear mongering, and the panic buying of supplies right before the storm hits. THAT'S the scam, but like always Leftists deliberately misrepresent what he's saying in order to 'pwn the cons'.
 
It was a great interview and first time the /pol/ thread for the show hit three threads lol.




 
Back