US Twice as many Americans would avoid brands with Pride merch than would support them

Link (Archive)

Twice as many Americans would avoid brands with Pride merch than would support them​

A new poll released just before Pride Month shows that more Americans would avoid a company that offers Pride merchandise than would be motivated to support the same company.

The poll, commissioned by the LGBTQ+ organization GLAAD and conducted by the polling firm IPSOS, asked American adults what impact it would have on their likelihood of buying from a brand or store if they knew that that brand or store offered “LGBTQ Pride collections/merchandise.”

Fifteen percent of respondents said they would be more likely to buy from that brand or store, while nearly twice as many (27%) said they would be less likely to buy from that brand or store. A majority (55%) said that it wouldn’t impact their decision to purchase from the store.

Black non-Hispanic respondents responded less positively to the question about Pride merchandise, with only 8% saying they’d be more likely to buy from a store or brand with Pride merch and 11% saying they would be less likely to buy from them. An overwhelming majority (77%) of Black non-Hispanic respondents said it didn’t matter.

Hispanic people were more likely (19%) to say that Pride merchandise would positively impact their likelihood of buying from a brand.

The publicly released poll results don’t show breakout results for other races or ethnicities, so it’s unclear how white non-Hispanic, Asian-American/Pacific Islander (AAPI), Native American, or people of other races responded.

The poll also asked if it “would be a shame” if a store or brand stopped supporting Pride Month. More people disagreed (48%) with that statement than agreed (46%).

People were about evenly split on whether they were comfortable or uncomfortable with companies changing their logos for Pride Month (48% vs. 47%) and brands having marketing campaigns for Pride Month at all (48% vs. 47%). They were more comfortable with the idea of companies supporting LGBTQ+ organizations (52% vs. 43%) and sponsoring Pride events (52% vs. 44%).

The question of the public’s support for corporate Pride has been relevant in recent years as conservatives have mounted boycott campaigns of businesses that sell Pride gear. In 2023, it was a trend on social media for rightwing influencers to film themselves at Target looking angry or disgusted with the chain’s Pride offerings, eventually leading Target to withdraw its Pride displays in many stores. Target later rolled back its commitment to diversity. Several Republican state attorneys general threatened legal action against Target for selling Pride merchandise.

Years of backlash against companies that support Pride have led to fewer sponsors for Pride events this year. New York City’s Pride organizers have already said that they are $750,000 short in funds because corporate sponsors are pulling out, which could also be explained by corporations trying to stay in the good graces of the new presidential administration.

In a press release, GLAAD was more upbeat about the survey results. For example, for the question about Pride merchandise, they noted that 70% of Americans in their survey said that a brand offering Pride merchandise would have either a positive impact or no impact at all on their purchasing decisions, a statement that’s true even if most of those people are in the “no impact” category.

The release also highlighted that 81% of respondents agreed that “freedom means we all should be able to believe and behave as we choose, as long as it isn’t hurting anyone else.” Of course, the disagreement between pro- and anti-LGBTQ+ advocates is about what counts as freedom and what counts as hurting others.

GLAAD also noted that 85% of respondents agreed that “CEOs have a responsibility to speak up about things that matter to their consumers and shareholders,” even though the question, as worded, would include both support and opposition to equal rights as “things that matter to consumers.”

GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said that, despite the poll’s results, support for LGBTQ+ people “remains a business imperative” for companies. “Companies and leaders must listen to consumers who are demanding that brands prioritize values of freedom, inclusion, and growth over rank politics.”

The poll was conducted from April 11 to 14, 2025, and was based on 1025 interviews.
 
GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said that, despite the poll’s results, support for LGBTQ+ people “remains a business imperative” for companies. “Companies and leaders must listen to consumers who are demanding that brands prioritize values of freedom, inclusion, and growth over rank politics.”
You already have freedom and you're excluded from nothing. You should fuck off back to the closet before you make it worse for yourself. Or don't - either way.
 
The poll also asked if it “would be a shame” if a store or brand stopped supporting Pride Month. More people disagreed (48%) with that statement than agreed (46%).
Interesting that even with their push-polling they couldn't get majority support. Wonder how lopsided the numbers would be if they'd gone with a more neutral/natural phrasing like, "Do you think a store/brand should stop supporting Pride Month?"

Of course, the disagreement between pro- and anti-LGBTQ+ advocates is about what counts as freedom and what counts as hurting others.
Spending years demanding that elementary schoolers be exposed to gender-porn, that middle aged men in lingerie be given access to them, that public fetish festivals and strip shows have children present, and that parents who don't want their kids chemically sterilized & surgically castrated lose custody, kind of made it clear...
 
New York City’s Pride organizers have already said that they are $750,000 short in funds because corporate sponsors are pulling out, which could also be explained by corporations trying to stay in the good graces of the new presidential administration.
No, its because the current admin isn't shoveling government funbux towards corporations to support this garbage. Which is of course a fucking good thing.

The reality is that corporations know "pride" products and marketing is a huge loser with consumers and more importantly have known this for years. What kept it going was the gain from government gibs was greater than the loss from doing something unpopular with consumers.

Now that the tap is finally being cut off, there is no longer anything to be gained and thus corporations no longer support something that loses them consumers.
 
New York City’s Pride organizers have already said that they are $750,000 short in funds
How the fuck does it cost more than 3/4s of a million dollars to block off some streets and let some fags march down holding signs? Or were corporate sponsors paying for the rolling fuck truck Sodom and Gonorrhea floats and underage child drag queen twerking competitions for adult men?

Maybe the reason people don't want to buy pride themed shit is because they're feeling LGBTfatigue to go along with their nigger fatigue and beaner fatigue?
 
I think that's a bit reductive.

It leaves out all the rampant pedophilia.
Yeah you’re right. The constant targeting of children has been next level. I used to think the “gays and trannies are pedos” people were homophobic bigots, but the last few years have really opened my eyes.

Especially the surrogacy stuff. Why tf do two men have the right to purchase a baby? Shudder.

I am starting to see history a bit differently, also. Gay rights largely took off in the 90s and 2000s because the most degenerate and creepy gays all died horribly of AIDS, leaving only the relative normies behind. Now, the demographics have finally turned over and we are seeing why people were so hateful and homophobic during the 1960s and 70s
 
How the fuck does it cost more than 3/4s of a million dollars to block off some streets and let some fags march down holding signs? Or were corporate sponsors paying for the rolling fuck truck Sodom and Gonorrhea floats and underage child drag queen twerking competitions for adult men?

Maybe the reason people don't want to buy pride themed shit is because they're feeling LGBTfatigue to go along with their nigger fatigue and beaner fatigue?
Grift that's how. I bet every single one of the organizers gets a healthy payday out of this, or at least they used to.
 
Gay rights largely took off in the 90s and 2000s because the most degenerate and creepy gays all died horribly of AIDS, leaving only the relative normies behind.
I don't know about that. It seemed to me there was just a more concerted effort in the media and especially at schools and universities to push for gay acceptance in the late 80s-90s. Such as when (((Meredith Sterling))) spontaneously decided to organize the first "Gay/Straight Alliance" in 1988, clubs which were then seeded in high schools across the entire country. Or when that faggot Matthew Shepard got killed by his meth-head boyfriend and the everyone in the news magically converged on the narrative that he was tortured to death by strangers in the woods just for being gay, and how his tears washed away the blood from his face.

There's also the question of why all the media mysteriously knew to start suppressing stories like Jeffrey Curley's, the little boy who got abducted, raped and murdered by two openly gay men in 1997.
 
The reality is that corporations know "pride" products and marketing is a huge loser with consumers and more importantly have known this for years. What kept it going was the gain from government gibs was greater than the loss from doing something unpopular with consumers.
And the "pride" products might collect some dust on the stores stands and doubtful then stores located in Dearborn and Hamtramck sell them.
 
Years of backlash against companies that support Pride have led to fewer sponsors for Pride events this year. New York City’s Pride organizers have already said that they are $750,000 short in funds because corporate sponsors are pulling out, which could also be explained by corporations trying to stay in the good graces of the new presidential administration.

Maybe, or maybe it's this:
Fifteen percent of respondents said they would be more likely to buy from that brand or store, while nearly twice as many (27%) said they would be less likely to buy from that brand or store. A majority (55%) said that it wouldn’t impact their decision to purchase from the store.

And this:
The poll also asked if it “would be a shame” if a store or brand stopped supporting Pride Month. More people disagreed (48%) with that statement than agreed (46%).

People were about evenly split on whether they were comfortable or uncomfortable with companies changing their logos for Pride Month (48% vs. 47%) and brands having marketing campaigns for Pride Month at all (48% vs. 47%). They were more comfortable with the idea of companies supporting LGBTQ+ organizations (52% vs. 43%) and sponsoring Pride events (52% vs. 44%).

Read your own article, journo, the answers lie within.
 
“Companies and leaders must listen to consumers who are demanding that brands prioritize values of freedom, inclusion, and growth over rank politics.”
Yeah, repeating that over and over ain't gonna work anymore because it's not true and the echo chamber that supported it is on life support now. Normie consumers aren't demanding that brands prioritize some retarded aspirational ideal or another. Normie consumers want choice and a decent bang for their buck. Ya know: Monetary value. Quality. Not feelz based moral "values".

Normie consumers are sick and tired of politicized capitalism and their virtue signalling brands. Most don't care about (or support) the idea that corporations are people too and should have a visible stance on political issues. They just want to buy the crap they want and need in peace without having to think about what or who they're supporting with their purchases.
 
Back