US Twice as many Americans would avoid brands with Pride merch than would support them

Link (Archive)

Twice as many Americans would avoid brands with Pride merch than would support them​

A new poll released just before Pride Month shows that more Americans would avoid a company that offers Pride merchandise than would be motivated to support the same company.

The poll, commissioned by the LGBTQ+ organization GLAAD and conducted by the polling firm IPSOS, asked American adults what impact it would have on their likelihood of buying from a brand or store if they knew that that brand or store offered “LGBTQ Pride collections/merchandise.”

Fifteen percent of respondents said they would be more likely to buy from that brand or store, while nearly twice as many (27%) said they would be less likely to buy from that brand or store. A majority (55%) said that it wouldn’t impact their decision to purchase from the store.

Black non-Hispanic respondents responded less positively to the question about Pride merchandise, with only 8% saying they’d be more likely to buy from a store or brand with Pride merch and 11% saying they would be less likely to buy from them. An overwhelming majority (77%) of Black non-Hispanic respondents said it didn’t matter.

Hispanic people were more likely (19%) to say that Pride merchandise would positively impact their likelihood of buying from a brand.

The publicly released poll results don’t show breakout results for other races or ethnicities, so it’s unclear how white non-Hispanic, Asian-American/Pacific Islander (AAPI), Native American, or people of other races responded.

The poll also asked if it “would be a shame” if a store or brand stopped supporting Pride Month. More people disagreed (48%) with that statement than agreed (46%).

People were about evenly split on whether they were comfortable or uncomfortable with companies changing their logos for Pride Month (48% vs. 47%) and brands having marketing campaigns for Pride Month at all (48% vs. 47%). They were more comfortable with the idea of companies supporting LGBTQ+ organizations (52% vs. 43%) and sponsoring Pride events (52% vs. 44%).

The question of the public’s support for corporate Pride has been relevant in recent years as conservatives have mounted boycott campaigns of businesses that sell Pride gear. In 2023, it was a trend on social media for rightwing influencers to film themselves at Target looking angry or disgusted with the chain’s Pride offerings, eventually leading Target to withdraw its Pride displays in many stores. Target later rolled back its commitment to diversity. Several Republican state attorneys general threatened legal action against Target for selling Pride merchandise.

Years of backlash against companies that support Pride have led to fewer sponsors for Pride events this year. New York City’s Pride organizers have already said that they are $750,000 short in funds because corporate sponsors are pulling out, which could also be explained by corporations trying to stay in the good graces of the new presidential administration.

In a press release, GLAAD was more upbeat about the survey results. For example, for the question about Pride merchandise, they noted that 70% of Americans in their survey said that a brand offering Pride merchandise would have either a positive impact or no impact at all on their purchasing decisions, a statement that’s true even if most of those people are in the “no impact” category.

The release also highlighted that 81% of respondents agreed that “freedom means we all should be able to believe and behave as we choose, as long as it isn’t hurting anyone else.” Of course, the disagreement between pro- and anti-LGBTQ+ advocates is about what counts as freedom and what counts as hurting others.

GLAAD also noted that 85% of respondents agreed that “CEOs have a responsibility to speak up about things that matter to their consumers and shareholders,” even though the question, as worded, would include both support and opposition to equal rights as “things that matter to consumers.”

GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said that, despite the poll’s results, support for LGBTQ+ people “remains a business imperative” for companies. “Companies and leaders must listen to consumers who are demanding that brands prioritize values of freedom, inclusion, and growth over rank politics.”

The poll was conducted from April 11 to 14, 2025, and was based on 1025 interviews.
 
No, its because the current admin isn't shoveling government funbux towards corporations to support this garbage. Which is of course a fucking good thing.

The reality is that corporations know "pride" products and marketing is a huge loser with consumers and more importantly have known this for years. What kept it going was the gain from government gibs was greater than the loss from doing something unpopular with consumers.

Now that the tap is finally being cut off, there is no longer anything to be gained and thus corporations no longer support something that loses them consumers.

Pride merch would sit in discount bins for months before being hauled to the dumpster. It was all a big show. Especially at Target. I never saw anyone buying that stuff. They had way too much of it. The only Pride merch I've seen so far are some Pride flag headbands at CVS. And they don't look like they are moving.
 
Black non-Hispanic respondents responded less positively to the question about Pride merchandise, with only 8% saying they’d be more likely to buy from a store or brand with Pride merch and 11% saying they would be less likely to buy from them
But they gave black people a spot on the gay flag! What do you mean they don’t want to be associated with troons, freaks and pedophiles?
 
I don't care if Nike wants to sell gay sneakers, but I am going to pick another brand if all I see are gay sneakers. I am not gay and do not want to buy gay sneakers. What makes the situation worse for companies is when they have attack dog marketers trying to shame consumers who are not gay and do not want gay sneakers.

There is this very, very strange habit among post-Obama American companies whereby they present a product, consumers do not buy it, and the company then yells at consumers. It would be one thing if the product was superior. I would consider buying a motherboard made by savant trannies if it was some crazy space-age component that was (for the sake of argument) significantly better, more reliable, and cheaper than all competitors. The problem is these companies make basic shit and their only angle is "look, it's gay!" These are novelty products.
 
An issue I’ve noticed in America is corporations have forgotten that consumers aren’t their corporate employee drones and don’t have to behave like it. A lot of the drones are caught up in it as well and want everyone to have to act like pod people too.

This is a friction point between woke culture in general and black culture.
 
I would consider buying a motherboard made by savant trannies if it was some crazy space-age component that was (for the sake of argument) significantly better, more reliable, and cheaper than all competitors. The problem is these companies make basic shit and their only angle is "look, it's gay!" These are novelty products.
For the sake of argument that motherboard would have spyware installed on it to make sure you didn't use no no words and also to spy on kids.
 
I don't care if Nike wants to sell gay sneakers, but I am going to pick another brand if all I see are gay sneakers. I am not gay and do not want to buy gay sneakers. What makes the situation worse for companies is when they have attack dog marketers trying to shame consumers who are not gay and do not want gay sneakers.
Nike has a lot bigger issues than gay sneakers. They can just afford to pay fancy lawyers millions of dollars to squash all those silly stories about human rights violations. That is the main reason why any gigantic corporation virtue signaling about "gay rights" is patently retarded. Ask Target where half their clothes, a majority of their tech, and their produce is sourced from.
 
For the sake of argument that motherboard would have spyware installed on it to make sure you didn't use no no words and also to spy on kids.
The point is these LGBTWhatever products aren't even amazing or innovative. They are novelties at best and people eventually stop caring. How many gay sneakers can a person own? It's like that episode of Hey Arnold! where Gerald can't offload his inventory of watches because everyone got one and the fad passes.
 
Last edited:
*snip*
I am starting to see history a bit differently, also. Gay rights largely took off in the 90s and 2000s because the most degenerate and creepy gays all died horribly of AIDS, leaving only the relative normies behind. Now, the demographics have finally turned over and we are seeing why people were so hateful and homophobic during the 1960s and 70s
You're close, the acceptance that came in the 90s and 2000s did follow from the gay community behaving more 'normal' but it wasn't because all the 'bad' ones died or faded from relevance. The gay community prior to the 90's in America realized how problematic their image was/had gotten (being seen as sodomites who spread diseases both inside and outside your community) and worked to distribute documents inside their community that instructed them to 'act more normal' and disavow all the disturbing shit publicly and when pressed lie to their faces about what it means to be 'gay'. They didn't stop having their orgies or secret sex clubs and such they just hid it and lied when asked.

The 'normal' gays you have today are a product of that time period of acting 'normal' but the community was never truly reformed and made 'normal'. The only difference between then and now is that they don't have to lie to you anymore and yes they will target your children.
 
They are novelties at best
They’ve also corrupted the rainbow - little girls love the Lisa frank style stuff, but I just will not be able to buy innocent rainbow anything for mine, because it’s never just a rainbow now, it’s a gay thing. That is really sad. Children like bright colours (which is partly why they use them.)
I have a few companies on permanent boycott due to them shitting on women in favour of trannies. I can vote with my wallet, and being scolded for it makes me dig my heels in more. It’ll be interesting to see who has pride merch in store this June.
 
They’ve also corrupted the rainbow - little girls love the Lisa frank style stuff, but I just will not be able to buy innocent rainbow anything for mine, because it’s never just a rainbow now, it’s a gay thing. That is really sad. Children like bright colours (which is partly why they use them.)
I have a few companies on permanent boycott due to them shitting on women in favour of trannies. I can vote with my wallet, and being scolded for it makes me dig my heels in more. It’ll be interesting to see who has pride merch in store this June.
I work for a company that itself is quite conservative and whose clientele are also right of center at the very least. We have various odds and ends in stock of things like little hair bows and beach hats for kids that have rainbows on them. Not faggot rainbows or pride flag patterns or anything, just general kid stuff like smiling sunshines with the macaroni noodle curved rainbow look, the classic sort of stuff. All of that merchandise has been in total freefall for years now because the literal concept of refracted light has become total poison to decent people. No one's buying little rainbow sun hats for their daughters or whatever because they don't want to chance even mistakenly being seen as promoting this kind of stuff.
 
Nike has a lot bigger issues than gay sneakers. They can just afford to pay fancy lawyers millions of dollars to squash all those silly stories about human rights violations. That is the main reason why any gigantic corporation virtue signaling about "gay rights" is patently retarded. Ask Target where half their clothes, a majority of their tech, and their produce is sourced from.

Sony gets cobalt for their Playstation PCBs from African mines using child labor. Then they pushed the BLM shit after George Floyd overdosed.
 
Grift that's how. I bet every single one of the organizers gets a healthy payday out of this, or at least they used to.
Which probably then got turned around like USAID funds and spread back down the line as gifts and donations to dozens of other lesser orgs and "activists" who in turn passed them on to politicians and PACs.....

Wanna see if an organization stumping for donations is legit? Offer to donate them pallet loads of water for their volunteers and see if they bite or demand cash instead....

Pride merch would sit in discount bins for months before being hauled to the dumpster. It was all a big show. Especially at Target. I never saw anyone buying that stuff. They had way too much of it. The only Pride merch I've seen so far are some Pride flag headbands at CVS. And they don't look like they are moving.
It became a bit of a scandal back during the tuck-friendly swimsuit debacle that sparked a boycott.

Some suburban Karens went out and tried to purchase some of those pride items to own the chuds, but found they wouldn't ring up - meaning the SKUs were never put in the system because even the stores knew it was virtue signaling bullshit intended to be seen but not sold and had been force shipped to stores whether they'd asked for it or not.

But they gave black people a spot on the gay flag! What do you mean they don’t want to be associated with troons, freaks and pedophiles?
The ever-growing number of stripes on the flag only proves how fake the movement is. Real revolutions don't require sponsors or recruitment.
 
Last edited:
I work for a company that itself is quite conservative and whose clientele are also right of center at the very least. We have various odds and ends in stock of things like little hair bows and beach hats for kids that have rainbows on them. Not faggot rainbows or pride flag patterns or anything, just general kid stuff like smiling sunshines with the macaroni noodle curved rainbow look, the classic sort of stuff. All of that merchandise has been in total freefall for years now because the literal concept of refracted light has become total poison to decent people. No one's buying little rainbow sun hats for their daughters or whatever because they don't want to chance even mistakenly being seen as promoting this kind of stuff.
I sometimes forget when the rainbow is part of a brand's image for non-gay reasons and have to do a double take. This has happened with Falcom(which has been using a rainbow for a long time), old Apple products from the 80's-90's, and Atari. The Atari 50 compilation looks like it's celebrating pride month when you forget that Atari used a rainbow at one point.
 
I have a few companies on permanent boycott due to them shitting on women in favour of trannies. I can vote with my wallet, and being scolded for it makes me dig my heels in more. It’ll be interesting to see who has pride merch in store this June.
This is the worst of it and why there is backlash. If consumers told these companies "we don't want your gay shit" and the companies shrugged and said "okay, whatever," it probably wouldn't be so much of an issue - but that's not what happens. These companies push these novelty products, no one buys, they panic, try to guilt consumers into buying it, and then it's a free fall from that point until a private equity firm buys out the company and restructures it.
 
Back