US Twice as many Americans would avoid brands with Pride merch than would support them

Link (Archive)

Twice as many Americans would avoid brands with Pride merch than would support them​

A new poll released just before Pride Month shows that more Americans would avoid a company that offers Pride merchandise than would be motivated to support the same company.

The poll, commissioned by the LGBTQ+ organization GLAAD and conducted by the polling firm IPSOS, asked American adults what impact it would have on their likelihood of buying from a brand or store if they knew that that brand or store offered “LGBTQ Pride collections/merchandise.”

Fifteen percent of respondents said they would be more likely to buy from that brand or store, while nearly twice as many (27%) said they would be less likely to buy from that brand or store. A majority (55%) said that it wouldn’t impact their decision to purchase from the store.

Black non-Hispanic respondents responded less positively to the question about Pride merchandise, with only 8% saying they’d be more likely to buy from a store or brand with Pride merch and 11% saying they would be less likely to buy from them. An overwhelming majority (77%) of Black non-Hispanic respondents said it didn’t matter.

Hispanic people were more likely (19%) to say that Pride merchandise would positively impact their likelihood of buying from a brand.

The publicly released poll results don’t show breakout results for other races or ethnicities, so it’s unclear how white non-Hispanic, Asian-American/Pacific Islander (AAPI), Native American, or people of other races responded.

The poll also asked if it “would be a shame” if a store or brand stopped supporting Pride Month. More people disagreed (48%) with that statement than agreed (46%).

People were about evenly split on whether they were comfortable or uncomfortable with companies changing their logos for Pride Month (48% vs. 47%) and brands having marketing campaigns for Pride Month at all (48% vs. 47%). They were more comfortable with the idea of companies supporting LGBTQ+ organizations (52% vs. 43%) and sponsoring Pride events (52% vs. 44%).

The question of the public’s support for corporate Pride has been relevant in recent years as conservatives have mounted boycott campaigns of businesses that sell Pride gear. In 2023, it was a trend on social media for rightwing influencers to film themselves at Target looking angry or disgusted with the chain’s Pride offerings, eventually leading Target to withdraw its Pride displays in many stores. Target later rolled back its commitment to diversity. Several Republican state attorneys general threatened legal action against Target for selling Pride merchandise.

Years of backlash against companies that support Pride have led to fewer sponsors for Pride events this year. New York City’s Pride organizers have already said that they are $750,000 short in funds because corporate sponsors are pulling out, which could also be explained by corporations trying to stay in the good graces of the new presidential administration.

In a press release, GLAAD was more upbeat about the survey results. For example, for the question about Pride merchandise, they noted that 70% of Americans in their survey said that a brand offering Pride merchandise would have either a positive impact or no impact at all on their purchasing decisions, a statement that’s true even if most of those people are in the “no impact” category.

The release also highlighted that 81% of respondents agreed that “freedom means we all should be able to believe and behave as we choose, as long as it isn’t hurting anyone else.” Of course, the disagreement between pro- and anti-LGBTQ+ advocates is about what counts as freedom and what counts as hurting others.

GLAAD also noted that 85% of respondents agreed that “CEOs have a responsibility to speak up about things that matter to their consumers and shareholders,” even though the question, as worded, would include both support and opposition to equal rights as “things that matter to consumers.”

GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said that, despite the poll’s results, support for LGBTQ+ people “remains a business imperative” for companies. “Companies and leaders must listen to consumers who are demanding that brands prioritize values of freedom, inclusion, and growth over rank politics.”

The poll was conducted from April 11 to 14, 2025, and was based on 1025 interviews.
 
I don't care if Nike wants to sell gay sneakers, but I am going to pick another brand if all I see are gay sneakers. I am not gay and do not want to buy gay sneakers. What makes the situation worse for companies is when they have attack dog marketers trying to shame consumers who are not gay and do not want gay sneakers.

There is this very, very strange habit among post-Obama American companies whereby they present a product, consumers do not buy it, and the company then yells at consumers. It would be one thing if the product was superior. I would consider buying a motherboard made by savant trannies if it was some crazy space-age component that was (for the sake of argument) significantly better, more reliable, and cheaper than all competitors. The problem is these companies make basic shit and their only angle is "look, it's gay!" These are novelty products.
World of Warcraft did this, berating their customers with animated mobile ads for their 2022-2024 expansion cycle of Dragonflight. Users rightly called the new race faggy, Blizzard marketers acted the part in their ads chiding the viewer, and it was a commercial disaster.

I went back for rock robots, a spider city and goblins though. 🥺
 
Is there a name for it when there's a social cause that at first seems "valid" because the loudest voices are mistaken for popular sentiment, but after some time and fatigue of said cause, people openly admit they didn't care for the cause in the first place? Because there should be when the whiny twunts that made a big deal about Pride merch get their noses rubbed in it like this that we can remind them that they, too, are just a passing fad and they can shove their moral superiority up their spoiled asses.
 
World of Warcraft did this, berating their customers with animated mobile ads for their 2022-2024 expansion cycle of Dragonflight. Users rightly called the new race faggy, Blizzard marketers acted the part in their ads chiding the viewer, and it was a commercial disaster.

I went back for rock robots, a spider city and goblins though. 🥺
See, that's the issue. People can smell fear, they have internal bullshit detectors, and they instinctively recognize insecurity. Companies only berate their customers like this when they know their product is shit and the outlook is bad. If these companies acted with any amount of confidence about this shit, they would probably sell just fine and the sales results would speak for themselves.
 
Pride merch would sit in discount bins for months before being hauled to the dumpster. It was all a big show. Especially at Target. I never saw anyone buying that stuff. They had way too much of it. The only Pride merch I've seen so far are some Pride flag headbands at CVS. And they don't look like they are moving.
I went to Spirit Halloween the day after the holiday when everything goes on sale and 75% of the jewelry still sitting on the shelf was tranny colored witch necklaces.
 
This is the first time I've heard of this murder. That poor little boy.
Same. Looking more into it, the killers were card carrying NAMBLA members but the ACLU white knighted NAMBLA to protect them in an incitement lawsuit. The ACLU may have been shit longer than I realized.
 
World of Warcraft did this, berating their customers with animated mobile ads for their 2022-2024 expansion cycle of Dragonflight. Users rightly called the new race faggy, Blizzard marketers acted the part in their ads chiding the viewer, and it was a commercial disaster.

I went back for rock robots, a spider city and goblins though. 🥺
Remember the Devil May Cry reboot from 2013 trying this. It ended up flopping.
 
Has anyone ever been sued by their shareholders for this shit? If the United Healthcare BoD can be sued for easing up on their policies after Luigi, surely Anheuser-Busch could be sued for trying to peddle crossdressing abominations to their customers, most which are blue collar men.
I really, really want to see some Reddit shareholders question what financial justification there could possibly be for the strict to the point of absurdity rules mods of major subs have on what you are allowed to believe about trans issues.
 
Has anyone ever been sued by their shareholders for this shit? If the United Healthcare BoD can be sued for easing up on their policies after Luigi, surely Anheuser-Busch could be sued for trying to peddle crossdressing abominations to their customers, most which are blue collar men.
A few have tried, none have been successful yet, AFAIK, but the fact they're willing to try now means just more pressure to stop this insanity.
 
World of Warcraft did this, berating their customers with animated mobile ads for their 2022-2024 expansion cycle of Dragonflight. Users rightly called the new race faggy, Blizzard marketers acted the part in their ads chiding the viewer, and it was a commercial disaster.

I went back for rock robots, a spider city and goblins though. 🥺

Holy shit, did they get Patrick Tomlinson to be their social media nerd for this?

Nooo, little one. It is you who are wrong about the dragons.
 
Makes sense, I don't think the average gay guy is wearing a rainbow shirt anywhere but the antiwoke person is absolutely avoiding places that sell them. And I assume most people overall don't give a fuck either way as long as it doesn't get too obnoxious
 
  • Like
Reactions: queue-anon
Yeah, repeating that over and over ain't gonna work anymore because it's not true and the echo chamber that supported it is on life support now. Normie consumers aren't demanding that brands prioritize some retarded aspirational ideal or another. Normie consumers want choice and a decent bang for their buck. Ya know: Monetary value. Quality. Not feelz based moral "values".

Normie consumers are sick and tired of politicized capitalism and their virtue signalling brands. Most don't care about (or support) the idea that corporations are people too and should have a visible stance on political issues. They just want to buy the crap they want and need in peace without having to think about what or who they're supporting with their purchases.
Corporations have been using virtue signaling as as an attempt to keep a customer base as they continue to cut corners more and more through continually decreasing the quality and/or amounts of what they sell, all while continually raising their prices.

In other words they're nothing but greedy fucks with an insatiable appetite for wealth and they don't give a shit about anyone no matter who they are or what they identify as. They only care about the money in their wallets and bank accounts.
 
Corporations have been using virtue signaling as as an attempt to keep a customer base as they continue to cut corners more and more through continually decreasing the quality and/or amounts of what they sell, all while continually raising their prices.
It's also why they call their employees "team members" these days and talk about how you are "part of the family" - horseshit that only exists to make employees psychologically less inclined to ask for more pay or refuse to put up with indignities on the job - we're "family" here and you need to think about the greater good instead of just yourself, there is no "I" in "team" here.
 
Back