US Twice as many Americans would avoid brands with Pride merch than would support them

Link (Archive)

Twice as many Americans would avoid brands with Pride merch than would support them​

A new poll released just before Pride Month shows that more Americans would avoid a company that offers Pride merchandise than would be motivated to support the same company.

The poll, commissioned by the LGBTQ+ organization GLAAD and conducted by the polling firm IPSOS, asked American adults what impact it would have on their likelihood of buying from a brand or store if they knew that that brand or store offered “LGBTQ Pride collections/merchandise.”

Fifteen percent of respondents said they would be more likely to buy from that brand or store, while nearly twice as many (27%) said they would be less likely to buy from that brand or store. A majority (55%) said that it wouldn’t impact their decision to purchase from the store.

Black non-Hispanic respondents responded less positively to the question about Pride merchandise, with only 8% saying they’d be more likely to buy from a store or brand with Pride merch and 11% saying they would be less likely to buy from them. An overwhelming majority (77%) of Black non-Hispanic respondents said it didn’t matter.

Hispanic people were more likely (19%) to say that Pride merchandise would positively impact their likelihood of buying from a brand.

The publicly released poll results don’t show breakout results for other races or ethnicities, so it’s unclear how white non-Hispanic, Asian-American/Pacific Islander (AAPI), Native American, or people of other races responded.

The poll also asked if it “would be a shame” if a store or brand stopped supporting Pride Month. More people disagreed (48%) with that statement than agreed (46%).

People were about evenly split on whether they were comfortable or uncomfortable with companies changing their logos for Pride Month (48% vs. 47%) and brands having marketing campaigns for Pride Month at all (48% vs. 47%). They were more comfortable with the idea of companies supporting LGBTQ+ organizations (52% vs. 43%) and sponsoring Pride events (52% vs. 44%).

The question of the public’s support for corporate Pride has been relevant in recent years as conservatives have mounted boycott campaigns of businesses that sell Pride gear. In 2023, it was a trend on social media for rightwing influencers to film themselves at Target looking angry or disgusted with the chain’s Pride offerings, eventually leading Target to withdraw its Pride displays in many stores. Target later rolled back its commitment to diversity. Several Republican state attorneys general threatened legal action against Target for selling Pride merchandise.

Years of backlash against companies that support Pride have led to fewer sponsors for Pride events this year. New York City’s Pride organizers have already said that they are $750,000 short in funds because corporate sponsors are pulling out, which could also be explained by corporations trying to stay in the good graces of the new presidential administration.

In a press release, GLAAD was more upbeat about the survey results. For example, for the question about Pride merchandise, they noted that 70% of Americans in their survey said that a brand offering Pride merchandise would have either a positive impact or no impact at all on their purchasing decisions, a statement that’s true even if most of those people are in the “no impact” category.

The release also highlighted that 81% of respondents agreed that “freedom means we all should be able to believe and behave as we choose, as long as it isn’t hurting anyone else.” Of course, the disagreement between pro- and anti-LGBTQ+ advocates is about what counts as freedom and what counts as hurting others.

GLAAD also noted that 85% of respondents agreed that “CEOs have a responsibility to speak up about things that matter to their consumers and shareholders,” even though the question, as worded, would include both support and opposition to equal rights as “things that matter to consumers.”

GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said that, despite the poll’s results, support for LGBTQ+ people “remains a business imperative” for companies. “Companies and leaders must listen to consumers who are demanding that brands prioritize values of freedom, inclusion, and growth over rank politics.”

The poll was conducted from April 11 to 14, 2025, and was based on 1025 interviews.
 
Hell, my gay as shit uncle avoids it like the plague and he's the most stereotypical gay ass motherfucker you'd ever seen in your LIFE. He's a god damn stylist for fucks sake.

But In his own words "I don't need a fucking rainbow to announce to the world I'm gay."
A lot of elder gays are fed up with this shit. Scott Thompson has also ditched the rainbow.
 
Last night, I watched the Paul Reubens documentary on HBO Max. I grew up watching Pee-Wee, and Pee-Wee's Big Adventure is still one of my all-time favorite comedies. There's just something about Pee-Wee that gets me in fits of giggling, and he's every bit as funny as an adult as he was when I was a kid. Sorry not sorry.

This documentary was basically the first time that Paul Reubens had openly and directly admitted he was gay. I mean, everyone with eyes and ears could piece that together themselves of course, but it was the first (and only) time Reubens ever talked about it in detail and in the public eye.

Even in the documentary, it was apparent that there was a level of discomfort for him talking about his personal life like that. He even made a couple of funny jokes about it that made me laugh. Overall, though, he came across as disinterested about any "movement" with LGBT rights, honestly. He was just a dude who had his preferences with men, and wanted people to not pry about it-- even to his dying day. Dude could have easily grifted so damn hard in his final years and been granted a pity party, but he didn't do any of that.

The documentary ends with a voicemail that Paul Reubens left for the director, after dodging further interviews about his sexual preferences and about the FBI raid with the kiddie porn accusations (no kiddie porn was found in the raid, btw-- it was all just gay shit, lol). Reubens recorded and sent this voicemail literally the day before he died from a very private battle with cancer. The voicemail kinda broke my heart, not gonna lie.

I'm sharing this because I think that if there were more people like Paul Reubens active in the alphabet community, then this "faggot fatigue" wouldn't be a thing.

Most people don't care about who grown adults sleep with behind closed doors these days ... Just don't flaunt it like it's your personality, don't teach kids about how you do it in the bedroom, and don't groom kids into being convinced that they were born in the wrong bodies, for fuck's sake. lol.
 
Even in the documentary, it was apparent that there was a level of discomfort for him talking about his personal life like that. He even made a couple of funny jokes about it that made me laugh. Overall, though, he came across as disinterested about any "movement" with LGBT rights, honestly. He was just a dude who had his preferences with men, and wanted people to not pry about it-- even to his dying day.
Among the small and petty hills I would die on, the world owing Paul Reubens an apology is among them.

Hearing shit like this puts in perspective that I always knew Reubens was gay and it didn't matter because he understood discretion, and the world never returned the favor. They dragged him through the dirt because they felt like they somehow owned him, like he wasn't allowed a life outside of Pee-Wee Herman.

That man deserved so much fucking better.
 
Among the small and petty hills I would die on, the world owing Paul Reubens an apology is among them.

Hearing shit like this puts in perspective that I always knew Reubens was gay and it didn't matter because he understood discretion, and the world never returned the favor. They dragged him through the dirt because they felt like they somehow owned him, like he wasn't allowed a life outside of Pee-Wee Herman.

That man deserved so much fucking better.
Fuckin' A.

It was so messed up what happened to him.

Even my conservative Republican mother expressed disgust over his arrest in the early 90's.
 
They’ve also corrupted the rainbow - little girls love the Lisa frank style stuff, but I just will not be able to buy innocent rainbow anything for mine, because it’s never just a rainbow now, it’s a gay thing. That is really sad.
Absolutely true. I won't buy rainbow anything for kids, including gifts or school donations. It would make it look like I was trying to push LGBT shit.

I also don't want perverts and bpd headcase gender queers to have an opening to introduce it to children. "Hey, lil kid, do you know what that rainbow stands for?" Some teachers would even do it.
 
Sony gets cobalt for their Playstation PCBs from African mines using child labor. Then they pushed the BLM shit after George Floyd overdosed.
Do you remember when the person who ran Sony's Twitter account started saying that if your PlayStation 4 or 5 got destroyed in the riots, you should buy another one [from Sony]?
 
Because unironically fag stuff is factional shit. Much like wearing a Hell's Angel's Jacket and not be a member would get your ass jumped by their members, wearing fag shit signals to others you're a sheep or at the very least perfectly fine with getting your butthole rammed by degenerates.

Even if the stuff goes for 75% off, normals aren't gonna go out in droves to buy it because its nothing but trouble.
 
Some suburban Karens went out and tried to purchase some of those pride items to own the chuds, but found they wouldn't ring up - meaning the SKUs were never put in the system because even the stores knew it was virtue signaling bullshit intended to be seen but not sold and had been force shipped to stores whether they'd asked for it or not.
I heard about this too, but it was because of a prank people were pulling on Targets where they would try and buy a whole cart full of pride stuff, go to check out and as soon as you're about to pay, they go "Oops, I forgot my wallet in my car!", and just drive off.
 
I won't buy rainbow anything for kids, including gifts or school donations. It would make it look like I was trying to push LGBT shit.
We really need to take it back. Rainbows are beautiful and natural. Biblically they are the sign of God's promise. I could swear I heard that even rainbow flags used to be a christian thing, but now I can't find ANY info trying to google that (on Bing); all it brings up is shit like those fags that dress like nuns.
I also don't want perverts and bpd headcase gender queers to have an opening to introduce it to children. "Hey, lil kid, do you know what that rainbow stands for?" Some teachers would even do it.
I get this, it's just so sad. Maybe just educate them early. Imagine your kid responding: "Yeah, it's the symbol of God's promise not to drown the whole earth just to get rid of fags like you."
 
I have a few companies on permanent boycott due to them shitting on women in favour of trannies. I can vote with my wallet, and being scolded for it makes me dig my heels in more. It’ll be interesting to see who has pride merch in store this June.
I haven't bought a Gillette razor since that ad they ran and I likely will never buy anything of theirs ever again.

Oh, GOD. That name alone makes me cringe. One can only hope that the Bud Light controversy serves as a case study on why you should keep your marketers on a tight fucking leash.
kiwifarms_mumsnet_united.webp
 
I haven't bought a Gillette razor since that ad they ran
Several tampon companies made ads glorifying trannies. I mean ok men and women shave (yes the Gillette ones were dire) but the only use autogynephilic men have for tampons is fetishistic. It was disgusting.
Marks and Spencer’s encouraging trannies to get bras fitted in store and telling women they couldn’t be sure of an all female bra fitting experience, and that they were nasty bigots if this bothered them? Disgusting. M and S will not see another penny from me. When I was a young student I did plenty of retail work to make ends meet and we used to get men sneaking into the changing rooms to wank on dresses - we’ve gone from calling the police on them and filing a report to telling any woman who objects that’s she’s a bigot. It’s foul, and I will not play along. They can all get fucked, there’s enough competition and I’ll vote with my wallet
 
Several tampon companies made ads glorifying trannies. I mean ok men and women shave (yes the Gillette ones were dire) but the only use autogynephilic men have for tampons is fetishistic. It was disgusting.
Marks and Spencer’s encouraging trannies to get bras fitted in store and telling women they couldn’t be sure of an all female bra fitting experience, and that they were nasty bigots if this bothered them? Disgusting. M and S will not see another penny from me. When I was a young student I did plenty of retail work to make ends meet and we used to get men sneaking into the changing rooms to wank on dresses - we’ve gone from calling the police on them and filing a report to telling any woman who objects that’s she’s a bigot. It’s foul, and I will not play along. They can all get fucked, there’s enough competition and I’ll vote with my wallet
There are Booths and Waitrose to fill the slightly-posh food market. And lots of other places to buy socks or whathaveyou.
 
I'm sharing this because I think that if there were more people like Paul Reubens active in the alphabet community, then this "faggot fatigue" wouldn't be a thing.
But that's the catch, it's the fact he didn't want to be active in the community that made him so respected. Really what we need is for there not to be a gay community, outside of the actual cruising for sex scene.
 
Back