Law Upcoming vote on Net Neutrality laws - How many times do we need to strike this shit down?

FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil plans next week for a final vote to reverse a landmark 2015 net neutrality order barring the blocking or slowing of web content, two people briefed on the plans said.

In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to withdraw the former Obama administration’s order reclassifying internet service providers as if they were utilities. Pai now plans to hold a final vote on the proposal at the FCC’s Dec. 14 meeting, the people said, and roll out details of the plans next week.

Pai asked in May for public comment on whether the FCC has authority or should keep any regulations limiting internet providers’ ability to block, throttle or offer “fast lanes” to some websites, known as “paid prioritization.” Several industry officials told Reuters they expect Pai to drop those specific legal requirements but retain some transparency requirements under the order.

An FCC spokesman declined to comment.

Internet providers including AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc say ending the rules could spark billions in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility a future administration could regulate internet pricing.

Critics say the move could harm consumers, small businesses and access to the internet.

In July, a group representing major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged Pai to drop plans to rescind the rules.

Advocacy group Free Press said Wednesday “we’ll learn the gory details in the next few days, but we know that Pai intends to dismantle the basic protections that have fueled the internet’s growth.”

Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors an “open internet.” The proposal to reverse the Obama rules reclassifying internet service has drawn more than 22 million comments.

Pai is mounting an aggressive deregulatory agenda since being named by President Donald Trump to head the FCC.

On Thursday the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. The proposal would make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market.

Pai is also expected to call for an initial vote in December to rescind rules that say one company may not own stations serving more than 39 percent of U.S. television households, two people briefed on the matter said.
Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
 
Every recent article about Ajit Pai and net neutrality serves as a reminder that Republicans are still assholes too. This happens just as I'm getting used to troons and danger hairs as the new queens of pissing in the pool.

"All the protest letters we've received are fake." "They're harassing my family." "Look at these stupid Tweets with threats and embarrassing misspellings." Pai is hellbent on pushing this through and he will use every rhetorical tactic he can to get conservatives falling behind him, just like Saint Anita and the other liberal hydra heads.
If he thinks messages aimed at his children like "your father killed democracy" are fake, then he's a raging idiot and I'm honestly surprised Trump even elected this piece of easilly offended Indian loopoo chairman of anything, much less the FCC.

Hell, why even elect an Indian anything in America?
 
The game was rigged from the start. He was never with us.

Capture.PNG
 
Trumps thing is "winners." Anyone who resembles a coke-addled "investment banker" in 1987, in either appearance or temperament, is a "winner" in his eyes. Pai and Omorossa qualify. The Mooch. Anyone who celebrates Huey Lewis's entire catalog.

The question is not skin tone. It's whether or not you are pretty sure they have strippers on speed dial for business purposes.
 
he was appointed by trump. not elected

He was promoted by Trump, who appointed him Chairman. He was appointed by Obama, who put him on the Commission in the first place.

If you're wondering why Obama would appoint a screamingly partisan knob like this, the Commission is supposedly non-partisan and consists of five members. Only three of them can be from the same political party. So he had to replace a Republican.
 
we must keep harassing his family. harass his friends and neighbors as well. we will never stop harassing him until net neutrality is kept safe

Good. I hope the pests keep the pressure on in the weeks to come. It might not have any effect on how the vote will go, but at least it'll make this piece of shit miserable.
 
I dunno why people thought Trump would have some stance on Net Neutrality, I never heard him mention it, he's a businessman, he buys and sells buildings, he's got a degree in economics. Net Neutrality probably doesn't even enter his mind. He's grown up with Traditional media most of his life. So I doubt he's worried about Kiwifarms being throttled to 3 kbs.
 
I do hope that there are at least ways to get around the throttling. I've heard that despite NN some companies do still throttle bandwidth. But fuck Pai.

It's not like there's going to be instant armageddon. This is the kind of hysterical shit that happens every time this kind of legislation comes up. Sure, that kind of hysteria is somewhat useful in defeating this crap by flooding legislators with complaints, but it's not like everything instantly turns to AOL the moment that fat orange cocksucker in the White House signs something into law he doesn't understand because he's too stupid.

There are still fallbacks like VPNs and so on. Eventually they go after those, too.

It's mildly amusing to think of the /pol/acks who worshipped the walking meme Trump getting ass fucked by him as their politically incorrect platforms get obliterated by ISPs who don't want to be associated with that, so throttle them down to 0. But it's a lot less amusing since I use a lot of those sites myself. Also, that shit will come along after Trump is out of office anyway. These things take years to happen.
 
I dunno why people thought Trump would have some stance on Net Neutrality, I never heard him mention it, he's a businessman, he buys and sells buildings, he's got a degree in economics. Net Neutrality probably doesn't even enter his mind. He's grown up with Traditional media most of his life. So I doubt he's worried about Kiwifarms being throttled to 3 kbs.
trump.png

Before he was president.

To put this into context, the Fairness Doctrine required broadcasters on TV and radio to present news content on controversial issues in an honest, equitable, and balanced manner. It was repealed in 1987.

Which is to say, he did have an opinion, it was just made of farts and old man rage at the confusing tellybox, and happened to be about an entirely separate subject, unbeknownst to him.
 
laughed at or laughed with?
A bit of both actually. I hate everything Pai stands for and think he’s a corrupt piece of shit...but at the same time I found some of his jabs here kinda funny and it’s a little amusing how many people you find who think he’s a sociopath just cause he wants to slow the net down for some people.

Tl;dr, I’m against Pai, but a lot of people make me embarrassed to be on the same side as them.
 
Back