Law Upcoming vote on Net Neutrality laws - How many times do we need to strike this shit down?

FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil plans next week for a final vote to reverse a landmark 2015 net neutrality order barring the blocking or slowing of web content, two people briefed on the plans said.

In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to withdraw the former Obama administration’s order reclassifying internet service providers as if they were utilities. Pai now plans to hold a final vote on the proposal at the FCC’s Dec. 14 meeting, the people said, and roll out details of the plans next week.

Pai asked in May for public comment on whether the FCC has authority or should keep any regulations limiting internet providers’ ability to block, throttle or offer “fast lanes” to some websites, known as “paid prioritization.” Several industry officials told Reuters they expect Pai to drop those specific legal requirements but retain some transparency requirements under the order.

An FCC spokesman declined to comment.

Internet providers including AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc say ending the rules could spark billions in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility a future administration could regulate internet pricing.

Critics say the move could harm consumers, small businesses and access to the internet.

In July, a group representing major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged Pai to drop plans to rescind the rules.

Advocacy group Free Press said Wednesday “we’ll learn the gory details in the next few days, but we know that Pai intends to dismantle the basic protections that have fueled the internet’s growth.”

Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors an “open internet.” The proposal to reverse the Obama rules reclassifying internet service has drawn more than 22 million comments.

Pai is mounting an aggressive deregulatory agenda since being named by President Donald Trump to head the FCC.

On Thursday the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. The proposal would make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market.

Pai is also expected to call for an initial vote in December to rescind rules that say one company may not own stations serving more than 39 percent of U.S. television households, two people briefed on the matter said.
Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
 
Quick question here. Prospective politicians with ties to foreign governments are heavily scrutinized with the idea being that they may be more beholden to those governments and their interests than the needs and wants of the American people.

How come former CEOs and other business types with conflicting loyalties aren't held to the same standard? Aren't they just as dangerous?
 
I honestly don’t think this is gonna fly. Maybe I’m being idealistic, but I like to think that even if this does go through, people are gonna make sure it doesn’t actually go into effect, or at the very least water it down to the point where you barely even notice a change.

People put up with a lot of bullshit from the gubment, but even the most compliant of sheep have their limits. Literally EVERYONE is against this. It’s, like, 97% opposed vs. 3% in favor. Do I think people are gonna go out and dismantle society? No, not at all. But it’s pretty unanimously accepted that no one’s gonna let this carpet-flying asshole ruin their internetz.
 
Why would he address any legitimate issues? To him, there doesn't need to be a reason to end NN besides monetary gain.
Because monetary gains often strongly correlates with political power, especially if you are a politician. Seeing as the Republican party deals with a hostile media that will point out every wrongdoing they commit (and more), this will bite him in the ass, especially as the world becomes more reliant on the Internet for daily functions. If the FCC outlaws net neutrality, this will reflect poorly on Trump's administration as a whole. It will give Democrats (and companies that strongly affiliate with the left like Google) a unified stance that isn't a SJW pet cause and they will never let this issue go, at least not until they get into office again. If Trump loses the 2020 election, one of the first thing a Democratic administration will do is toss out Ajit Pai and replace him with a Democratic crony. Pai won't get to enjoy the power that comes with more money for long.

Of course the Democrats probably have no intention to restore net neutrality. All they have to do is to say that the Republicans fucked up at keeping the Internet free and promise to put things back "like how Obama did" (even though net neutrality had always been a thing up until now). Pai's short-sighted behavior will be his downfall.
 
Quick question here. Prospective politicians with ties to foreign governments are heavily scrutinized with the idea being that they may be more beholden to those governments and their interests than the needs and wants of the American people.

How come former CEOs and other business types with conflicting loyalties aren't held to the same standard? Aren't they just as dangerous?

Ever heard of Dick Cheney? Ever heard of Halliburton?
 
I dunno, man, I feel like taking away free porn really could cause at least a few riots.
Trying to fuck with the porn industry as a whole is actually a really bad idea. It's like video games and the whole gamergate thing, but with porn, and people with actual reasonable, if not a shit ton, level of money and power from within the industry.
 
I'm with @Secret Asshole - we cannot be calm about this. We need to make this sandrat wish he were deported back to Designated Shitting Street Land.

I'm just fucking tired of "ITS THE FREE MARKET, WE ARE TOTALLY GIVING YOU MORE CHOICES" when the reality is anything but that. The amount of corporate welfare we have in this country is insane. We aren't even a capitalist country, we've got corporate welfare out the ass.

His excuse is "Oh well, if an ISP fucks you over, switch!" No you dumb street shitter, do you know ISPs have carved out monopolies where in some case there is only a single choice of ISP? And most states, BY LAW cannot establish their own ISP. So its the illusion of choice. And the net neutrality law he is passing is barring states from legally establishing their own net neutrality regulations. So he is completely locking it down because he is a corporate shill who believes he's some free market hero when he is just so fucking stupid he thinks he's some sort of hero for consumers.

If states could develop their own net neutrality provisions and create their own ISPs, then fine. But they can't. This is intentionally giving a monopoly more power. That's why I loathe this faggot. He has no intention of doing this fairly or compensating for what he is doing. This isn't capitalism, its socialism for ISPs. If there were actual competition, NN wouldn't matter. You could just switch to an ISP that undercut the faggots nickle and diming you. But that isn't the case. Which is why this is important. Because this is intentionally giving a monopoly more power, which is why I loathe this faggot. He's a corporate cocksucker of the worst kind.

Ever heard of Dick Cheney? Ever heard of Halliburton?

Tons of corporations are in with government. So many it makes your head spin.
 
I don't know what everyone else is thinking, but I'm not keen on getting slower internet because I didn't pay the extra 20 dollars a month for it. There doesn't seem to be any pluses from killing off net neutrality.

Maybe it's just that I feel nervous around corporations.

That's the right reaction, m8.
 
https://gizmodo.com/what-actually-happens-the-day-net-neutrality-is-repeale-1820813374

I know I've posted this elsewhere, too - but I think it needs to be read, or at least the comments do, anyway.

Ajit Pai - Ajit.Pai@fcc.gov
Mignon Clyburn - Mignon.Clyburn@fcc.gov (confirmed 'no' vote)
Michael O'Rielly - Mike.ORielly@fcc.gov
Brendan Carr - Brendan.Carr@fcc.gov
Jessica Rosenworcel - Jessica.Rosenworcel@fcc.gov (confirmed 'no' vote)

[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
https://gizmodo.com/what-actually-happens-the-day-net-neutrality-is-repeale-1820813374

I know I've posted this elsewhere, too - but I think it needs to be read, or at least the comments do, anyway.

Ajit Pai - Ajit.Pai@fcc.gov
Mignon Clyburn - Mignon.Clyburn@fcc.gov (confirmed 'no' vote)
Michael O'Rielly - Mike.ORielly@fcc.gov
Brendan Carr - Brendan.Carr@fcc.gov
Jessica Rosenworcel - Jessica.Rosenworcel@fcc.gov (confirmed 'no' vote)
[/QUOTE]
I’ve heard a lot of people mention this going to court. But I’m not entirely sure if thats true or not. In the meantime all the news about this is super depressing.
 
Back