Law Upcoming vote on Net Neutrality laws - How many times do we need to strike this shit down?

FCC plans to vote to overturn U.S. net neutrality rules in December
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of the Federal Communications Commission is set to unveil plans next week for a final vote to reverse a landmark 2015 net neutrality order barring the blocking or slowing of web content, two people briefed on the plans said.

In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to withdraw the former Obama administration’s order reclassifying internet service providers as if they were utilities. Pai now plans to hold a final vote on the proposal at the FCC’s Dec. 14 meeting, the people said, and roll out details of the plans next week.

Pai asked in May for public comment on whether the FCC has authority or should keep any regulations limiting internet providers’ ability to block, throttle or offer “fast lanes” to some websites, known as “paid prioritization.” Several industry officials told Reuters they expect Pai to drop those specific legal requirements but retain some transparency requirements under the order.

An FCC spokesman declined to comment.

Internet providers including AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc say ending the rules could spark billions in additional broadband investment and eliminate the possibility a future administration could regulate internet pricing.

Critics say the move could harm consumers, small businesses and access to the internet.

In July, a group representing major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged Pai to drop plans to rescind the rules.

Advocacy group Free Press said Wednesday “we’ll learn the gory details in the next few days, but we know that Pai intends to dismantle the basic protections that have fueled the internet’s growth.”

Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors an “open internet.” The proposal to reverse the Obama rules reclassifying internet service has drawn more than 22 million comments.

Pai is mounting an aggressive deregulatory agenda since being named by President Donald Trump to head the FCC.

On Thursday the FCC will vote on Pai’s proposal to eliminate the 42-year-old ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and TV station in a major market. The proposal would make it easier for media companies to buy additional TV stations in the same market.

Pai is also expected to call for an initial vote in December to rescind rules that say one company may not own stations serving more than 39 percent of U.S. television households, two people briefed on the matter said.
Oh, and Comcast is already lobbying.

I'm so sick of this shit, seriously. The FCC is whoring out for Comcast and AT&T instead of ensuring that American citizens have equal access to the internet.
 
Isn't voter suppression illegal of some sort? Nobody wants it, and yet Aiji ignores them and decides to press the bill on their faces. 'Kay.

And I'm sure D.C. Courts (or something like that name) repelled Net Neutrality a few years back. Nothing life-changing happened, I wasn't aware, and there was no riots. And then... Net Neutrality came back. I got no idea how and why. It was pretty short-lived too, only lasted a few months.
 
well i mean, theyre arent in the wrong
My opinion on the matter is protection of public officials should be waived when there is a constant hatred of that person. Say if numerous polls showed approval of a person was at 15% or less, then law enforcement cannot go after those who send death threats. People hate what Pai is doing and the fact that he gets protection by being a government official shows how susceptible these positions of power are to sociopaths
 
My opinion on the matter is protection of public officials should be waived when there is a constant hatred of that person. Say if numerous polls showed approval of a person was at 15% or less, then law enforcement cannot go after those who send death threats. People hate what Pai is doing and the fact that he gets protection by being a government official shows how susceptible these positions of power are to sociopaths
You'd think that, the problem is that the government (sadly) doesn't work that way. So unless Trump gets kicked out or someone is crazy enough to murder Pai, he's not going anywhere.
 
Hence why people are threatening to kill him if he gets it through.

well i mean, theyre arent in the wrong

My opinion on the matter is protection of public officials should be waived when there is a constant hatred of that person. Say if numerous polls showed approval of a person was at 15% or less, then law enforcement cannot go after those who send death threats. People hate what Pai is doing and the fact that he gets protection by being a government official shows how susceptible these positions of power are to sociopaths

if someone was crazy enough to actually attempt to assassinate pai, i'd pay their legal fees
:alog:
 
DD2AEA5C-0333-4B10-9A8F-346DAE006D6B.jpeg
 
Considering the fact he is a shill for the telecom industry, there's conflict of interest. The fact he ignored the the outrage of the US is a sign of severe corruption. The FCC has refused to comment on the fake anti-net neutrality comments and stealing of people's identities, they are hiding something no doubt. I have no idea what crime that would be though

This is what's blowing my fucking mind. We know there's been extensive corporate lobbying on the part of cable companies. We know that the FCC- a government institution- is pushing the agenda of cable corporations. We know that Pai has been burying his head in the sand and ignoring the millions of voices that are telling him what a horrible thing he's pushing for, to the point where he honestly seems delusional. We know that Pai and other anti-net neutrality lawmakers have been ignoring the calls and letters and messages from citizens who don't support their agenda.

They are being so openly, blatantly corrupt I can't believe they're getting away with it.
 
This is what's blowing my fucking mind. We know there's been extensive corporate lobbying on the part of cable companies. We know that the FCC- a government institution- is pushing the agenda of cable corporations. We know that Pai has been burying his head in the sand and ignoring the millions of voices that are telling him what a horrible thing he's pushing for, to the point where he honestly seems delusional. We know that Pai and other anti-net neutrality lawmakers have been ignoring the calls and letters and messages from citizens who don't support their agenda.

They are being so openly, blatantly corrupt I can't believe they're getting away with it.

WORSE STILL, no one is talking about this enough. This shitstorm should be widespread - on a worldwide level, where it will have such consequences, too!
 
WORSE STILL, no one is talking about this enough. This shitstorm should be widespread - on a worldwide level, where it will have such consequences, too!
Maybe the FCC's blinded the rest of the world's leaders/news outlets too. Which would be foolish to think about, but if they haven't been talking about it before, who knows?

This is what's blowing my fucking mind. We know there's been extensive corporate lobbying on the part of cable companies. We know that the FCC- a government institution- is pushing the agenda of cable corporations. We know that Pai has been burying his head in the sand and ignoring the millions of voices that are telling him what a horrible thing he's pushing for, to the point where he honestly seems delusional. We know that Pai and other anti-net neutrality lawmakers have been ignoring the calls and letters and messages from citizens who don't support their agenda.

They are being so openly, blatantly corrupt I can't believe they're getting away with it.
Something tells me Pai's going to have a lot more than "Your daddy ruined the internet" signs when/if it passes. Like I said before, it's entirely possible that one day, someone snaps and actually tries to take his and his family's lives if he's being this arrogant to what everyone's got to say.
 
Back