Using US Courts to Burn Money, for Free, Forever

[Troon Destroyer]

>A Christian convert to Judaism
>Lives on welfare and taxpayer money
>Her car and her house cannot be used to pay the fees
>The state provides her an attorney for free
>Tries to sue a Jew for the 6th time
A Chris-Chan state goyim outjewing a Jew in the court? We're reaching levels of chutzpah that shouldn't even be imaginable.

 

[Swingletonthesimpleton]

Read the article. VA doesn't but even if I got her penalized she's already promised to refile in FL where she'd not be a Vex.

Time to call agent 47.

 

[nekrataal]

Something I’ve noticed about people who receive gibs from the government is that they’ll spend money on the dumbest shit. If these tards had to pay out of their own pockets they wouldn’t be so willing to file frivolous lawsuits.

 

[Overly Serious]

Read the article. VA doesn't but even if I got her penalized she's already promised to refile in FL where she'd not be a Vex.

If that happened, can the previous frivolous / vexatious lawsuits be counted as evidence towards getting her similarly declared a vex in FL? I.e. despite the headaches of dealing with another state's legal system the process would be shorter?

In Bongland a ruling by a court in one region isn't invalid because you go to another region. The US seems to have the worst of both worlds - it would be fine to have the different state legal systems if someone couldn't shop between them all but had to abide by the state they're actually resident in.

We currently pay low IQ people (like Melinda) to pump out retards every nine months and amazingly, we've ended up with a lot of retards as a result. What a society.

When I was in North Africa, a woman asked me why my girlfriend and I weren't married yet, and was it because I was still saving up money for a house. That was just the expectation that you wouldn't start a family until you were at least somewhat prepared. I also heard jokes from just regular local people there that if you have kids in the UK, the govt. will pay for them. Was the common view, and not wrong.

 

[Null]

If that happened, can the previous frivolous / vexatious lawsuits be counted as evidence towards getting her similarly declared a vex in FL? I.e. despite the headaches of dealing with another state's legal system the process would be shorter?

perhaps, so about $10,000 per state times 50 states.

most states don't even have VL and it doesn't exist federally either afaik.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

 

[cybertoaster]

View attachment 2700111View attachment 2700112

Seems the best choice is to preemptively accuse them of shit, like if they threaten you saying they are going to accuse you of rape then the best thing to do its go straight to the cops and say she raped you, specially if you're in college.

Now the burden of proof is on them because fuck logic, and if they accuse you of rape then nobody is going to believe them.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

Seems the best choice is to preemptively accuse them of shit, like if they threaten you saying they are going to accuse you of rape then the best thing to do its go straight to the cops and say she raped you, specially if you're in college.

Now the burden of proof is on them because fuck logic, and if they accuse you of rape then nobody is going to believe them.

Welcome to the legal world, where lawyers become wealthy as a result of people suing each other.

 

[Alexander Thaut]

Welcome to the legal world, where lawyers become wealthy as a result of people suing each other.

sounds like you just need to network with retards who have money and get them to pay you for frivolous lawsuits

 

[Feline Supremacist]

sounds like you just need to network with retards who have money and get them to pay you for frivolous lawsuits

To be honest almost every lawsuit is a frivolous one, except the ones against soulless/faceless governments/corporations. What situation where two people willing to work things out needs to end in a lawsuit? None, really.

 

[AnOminous]

To be honest almost every lawsuit is a frivolous one, except the ones against soulless/faceless governments/corporations. What situation where two people willing to work things out needs to end in a lawsuit? None, really.

Things end up in court usually because one or BOTH parties are being completely unreasonable. Sometimes the lawyers "help" them stay that way.

 

[MisoSupper]

I agree with everything stated in the article, but it could've been written and structured better. Currently it feels like a rant on a blog where you're just dumping endlessly with the introduction and thesis cut out or truncated. Of course, I and the rest of us know your thesis already but looking at it from an outsiders' perspective, I think they'd lose interest before arriving at the meat of the article. Anyways, just some constructive criticism.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

She isn't informing him though, she is saying she will use the legal system to attack a person/entity if he leaves her thread up, even when her case is dismissed. Possibly going as far to court shop.

This situation is not the norm. The civil court system is set up in such a way that it can deal with the most situations in the easiest way. Most people who sue have good faith, some cause, OR can be punished if they act frivolously (or they use a lawyer who would face reprecussions). Treating every every plaintiff as if they might be a nutcase mountain jew who lives off welfare and sovcit leanings would be a lot more expensive and difficult than the current flawed system.

I'm not saying that something shouldn't be done to change that, but something would have to change. The courts, by and large, are just not set up to deal with someone doing this to random internet people.

 

[Manul Otocolobus]

Declaring someone a "Vexatious Litigant" should have a lower burden of proof. At the moment there is an imbalance between allowing people to file multiple bullshit lawsuits and being declared a vexatious litigant in favor of allowing people to file bullshit lawsuits. I guarantee if a study has been done it would show that picking out a vexatious litigant from a valid litigant is very simple, their patterns of filing and nature of their filings would be very distinct. They should use this as a way to reform and strike a more even balance between allowing valid litigation and punitive punishment against vexatious litigants.

 

[AnOminous]

Declaring someone a "Vexatious Litigant" should have a lower burden of proof. At the moment there is an imbalance between allowing people to file multiple bullshit lawsuits and being declared a vexatious litigant in favor of allowing people to file bullshit lawsuits. I guarantee if a study has been done it would show that picking out a vexatious litigant from a valid litigant is very simple, their patterns of filing and nature of their filings would be very distinct. They should use this as a way to reform and strike a more even balance between allowing valid litigation and punitive punishment against vexatious litigants.

A major problem is the real definition of "vexatious litigant" would become "poor person who unsuccessfully sues a rich person." It wouldn't benefit anyone but people with the money for procedural shenanigans, and then you'd have a similar issue with vexatious requests to have people declared vexatious litigants.

 

[Cats]

Bella Mafia, Quackafella Records Incorporated By Rhyme Syndicate, Three Yellow Men Trillionaire Club

 

[El Pútrido Degenerado]

Read the article. VA doesn't but even if I got her penalized she's already promised to refile in FL where she'd not be a Vex.

Apparently, a person who is subject to vexatious litigation can sue the plaintiff for MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. If they have initiated maliciously and without a probable cause by a person who is not in good faith for the purpose of annoying or embarrassing the opponent.
I'm not any law expert. I just managed to look some things up and saw this article in regards to Vexatious Litigation. You may need to ask your attorney about it. If the Jewish woman in question is as poor as you say, that could be seen as a potential motive to sue.

 

[Slap47]

Something I’ve noticed about people who receive gibs from the government is that they’ll spend money on the dumbest shit. If these tards had to pay out of their own pockets they wouldn’t be so willing to file frivolous lawsuits.

Chris Chan started making their own money and still purchased dumb shit. The dumb shit spending is ingrained in their soul.

 

[Sasha]

*puff smoke*
I curse you in the name of Y'arwaah.

 

[Hot HOT HOTTT]

[Current year]