Using US Courts to Burn Money, for Free, Forever

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
For real though, processor issues aside, where would half the info the site's gotten direct about Greer come from if that was put in place? Like, great, now he's got the money to fight the lawsuits, but there wouldn't be any lawsuits anymore because all the informants, shitposters, and bored NEETs who fuel the threads to begin with would be gone.
Posting should be free, but everyone who pays the membership gets a cool smiley face on their profile page like a sticker on top of a homework assignment.
 
Yeah, it sucks when a useful thing is being misused to cause harm. I think it's good that you bring these things up and into the light, Null. Sadly, there is no easy answer or fix. And it will continue being a problem as long as there are people around that can't handle being criticized.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
I think this problem could be mitigated a little if there was a regulation stating that pro se litigants had to show up to a courthouse to file. Say Melinda gets the vexatious litigant status in a few states immediately around her, is she really going to be able to afford to, or even be bothered to, drive 3 states across/fly somewhere to file again?
 
Tell that to the judge, Niggers run United States right now.

I'm having Rhodesia flashbacks. Schools went to shit, Healthcare went to shit, Court system devolved into anarchy, starvation then some.

US court system is a joke and contribute further decline of US. Fuck the courts.

I feel bad for US taxpayers and shithole states that let our gangbangers, sex offenders and drug dealers out the streets with little to no control over them.
 
Fuck, the legal system over there is nuts.
Mate Drachenlord got 2 years in Prison in Germany, for spraying water at trolls that turned up at his house, and insulting the police for not doing anything to protect him from actual harrasment.

His German Lawyer, like the majority of criminal lawyers in Europe, would have been less interested in putting forward a strong defence than in avoiding inconveniencing, the Court, Police and other government agencies.

At least in the US Null was able to hire decent lawyers that vigourously represented his interests.
 
Not only is justice not free, justice is also (especially in Current Year) slanted heavily towards sympathetic defendants. If Null was a two-spirit woman of color running a G-rated My Little Pony forum for kids, he'd be able to utilize the sympathy of the masses to gain public favor and maybe even get some senators and congressmen on his side, at least on social media. He'd have ammo for his defense and possible political support for legislative change.

Sadly, a defendant running a site full of people who gleefully say all the "bad words" doesn't get any sympathy and most definitely wouldn't get any support from politicians and big name civil rights activists. Hell, not even the ACLU is interested in protecting freedom of expression anymore. Nobody wants to be seen as supporting "hate speech." and it's being seen that is the real problem. Plenty of people still agree with the principle but are no longer willing to be open about it for fear of censure and public outrage from the dangerhairs with megaphones.
 
Null links to his first article on Zero Hedge in this article, and I think it's the best article of the three he's written. I recommend my fellow autists to give it a read, if you haven't already.

Wikipedia's description of Zero Hedge is pretty amusing btw, precisely because it's so predictable. Key words used: "far-right", "conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric", "the US radical right", "the alt-right", "pro-Russian bias", etc. etc. We live in a society.
 

> .uk link
Capture666.PNG


Give me all your disagrees and puzzle pieces guys, I'm just out here trying to secure the existence of American grammar rules and a future for non-British writing
 
This is probably a dumb question but

If they sue someone in the same way, each time (using the same legal arguments and all)

Why still hire a lawyer? After the first time, you could just use the same legal arguments and logic you've used every time.

Like, if I sue someone in a certain way and it fails based on reason A, B and C - then why hire a lawyer the next time? Just repressent yourself and give the same reasons again.

idk if this question makes sense
 
It's an American article about the American situation by an American linguist professor which happened to be hosted on an UK site.
The author, Geoffrey K. Pullum, is a British-American author. This article specifically is an opinion piece which happens to be published in a peer-reviewed journal, a long-running feature of the publication Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. The site on which it is hosted is the University of Edinburgh website, which is where Geoffrey K. Pullum is Professor Emeritus.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
You should take solace in the fact that you have something that Russell Greer and Melinda Scott will never have - the cultlike devotion of literally dozens of homosexual, degenerate, exceptional fans.

In all seriousness, you are a treasure and the internet is richer for you and your work. Never change.
 
This was another great read. Sorry you have to deal with these psychotic retards. I would 100 percent support the cause and buy a copy of yo yovana. As far as the mountain jew is concerned I don't think there is any other recourse but hiring someone to find her in Minecraft and kill her. I would however pay good money for the go pro footage if you won attorney's fees and sent a debt collector.
 
Back