Just Some Other Guy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2018
I mean.....the Super Pershing does objectively have better protection than the m26E1 at the very least.The long 90 isn't terrible since it has decent pen and good post-pen, but that reload sucks to use since a single missed shot hurts.
The M26E1 also gets a version that's a bit over a second faster to reload compared to the Super Pershing while having much better mobility, especially in Arcade where it gets increased top speed and horsepower boosts from being a medium tank compared to the Super Pershing being a heavy tank.
View attachment 7599600View attachment 7599602
Yeah, the Super Pershing sucks total ass because it has the power-to-weight ratio of the King Tiger despite not having the armor or cannon of the King Tiger.
So, congrats on your wallet-warrioring, at least!

It does alright. By no means terrible. I agree it's no equal to the KT(H) and honestly wish there was more BR separation in late ww2.
*Edit* Here's a much better example of bad:

*Edit* And yeah, I know it's TS but my personal experience in various tanks aligns pretty well with TS results. From playing both I think the E8 and T-34-85 are fairly even and after checking just now it agrees.
Last edited:
