- Joined
- Aug 23, 2018
While obviously not tournament legal, how forward compatible are they?3e did away with them, so you'd need to find someone happy to play the previous edition if you want to use one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While obviously not tournament legal, how forward compatible are they?3e did away with them, so you'd need to find someone happy to play the previous edition if you want to use one.
No, I meant Bligh was the admech guy that was supposed to be the savior of admech players for 40k and somehow if he hadn't died, admech would have 40k rules for their 30k shit that he designed instead of being stuck with inspector gadget extendo legs sniper guy. But like I said, it's a stupid excuse because that doesn't explain why space marines don't get their tanks and this one guy was the only person on Earth who could come up with rules for admech.I assume you meant to say that Bligh was the FW guy rather than the AdMech one, since that fits the context - Imperial Armour was his project and FW was definitely left somewhat rudderless after his death. That said, he died in 2017, so they've had 8 years to get their act together at this point and it's only grown worse.
On the 40k side, the modern AdMech are Jes Goodwin's designs and I've heard that he's very protective of them, probably only reinforced by how divisive they are, so that might be contributing; perhaps it's reminiscent of how he hurriedly returned Eldar to his original designs in 4e after the more divergent 3e Aspects.
Interesting. Don't think I've ever seen Bligh referred to much for AdMech in particular rather than FW in general (which would, admittedly, explain Marines also not getting their rules if it were the relevant factor).No, I meant Bligh was the admech guy that was supposed to be the savior of admech players for 40k and somehow if he hadn't died, admech would have 40k rules for their 30k shit that he designed instead of being stuck with inspector gadget extendo legs sniper guy. But like I said, it's a stupid excuse because that doesn't explain why space marines don't get their tanks and this one guy was the only person on Earth who could come up with rules for admech.
Haven't actually played any 3e myself to compare, but I think it's a substantial enough change that you'd need to do a decent bit of homebrewing to get things working.While obviously not tournament legal, how forward compatible are they?
Yeah like I said, it's a weird cope. It also doesn't make sense because marines got their rules for a bit before it was all dumped to legends, meanwhile for admech it was just the termite drill and I think one unit of infantry that had 40k rules before being sent to legends. It also doesn't account for half of custodes and knights being both, even after some of the HH knights were re-done in plastic and packaged specifically as a HH product.Interesting. Don't think I've ever seen Bligh referred to much for AdMech in particular rather than FW in general (which would, admittedly, explain Marines also not getting their rules if it were the relevant factor).
Still hardly the only factor since he died during the 8e Indexhammer days and much of FW would continue to get 40k rules for two entire editions (plus 10e Indexhammer) before we reached the current state.
Pretty much - the drill and Secutarii, for a total of technically three datasheets since the latter came in melee and range variants. I'm sure it was just two more weeks until they were due to get all the robots.meanwhile for admech it was just the termite drill and I think one unit of infantry
Im sure most people wont give a fuck as long as you give them the heads up. I mean, that guy, he has an issue with everything but most people wouldnt care too much.While obviously not tournament legal, how forward compatible are they?
I think my favorite part about the authors interpretation is how tactically flexible and innovative they can be when faced with obstacles. The team leader is open to squad suggestions, which makes them remarkably liberal by 40k standards. Tradition is a secondary concern when it comes to killing the enemies of the emperor. They also spend their free time training the hell out of each other in mock battles. There is a mixture of faith and practicality that is appealing.View attachment 8211398
View attachment 8211407
Basically, yeah. Known for their aggression even by SoB standards, which is saying something.
So what does that makes every single damn Space Marine Sergeant? Its a rare one that doesn't ask their squad for input. Hell, the IG codex specifically allows lower-ranked units to issue orders to higher-ranked ones by claiming its tactical advice. Even in the IG the only regiments that wouldn't do something like that are the Mordians, Krieg, and maybe the Valhallans. Even the notoriously well-drilled and well-disciplined Cadians get a little rough when they're actually in the field.The team leader is open to squad suggestions, which makes them remarkably liberal by 40k standards.
Yeah I could have worded that a bit better but at least by SoB standards they seem a lot more tactical and less "no retreat! Die to the last woman in this shit hole! "So what does that makes every single damn Space Marine Sergeant? Its a rare one that doesn't ask their squad for input. Hell, the IG codex specifically allows lower-ranked units to issue orders to higher-ranked ones by claiming its tactical advice. Even in the IG the only regiments that wouldn't do something like that are the Mordians, Krieg, and maybe the Valhallans. Even the notoriously well-drilled and well-disciplined Cadians get a little rough when they're actually in the field.
View attachment 8211780View attachment 8211781
And as I posted up that's like half the Convents. But yes, generally speaking actual tactics and common sense like "let the heavy bolter do all of the hard work and we clean up the leftovers" are extremely rare in 40k, depending on author and how grimdark/grimderp Games Workshop is feeling that day.Yeah I could have worded that a bit better but at least by SoB standards they seem a lot more tactical and less "no retreat! Die to the last woman in this shit hole! "
It's real bizarre considering how cash hungry GW is. Why not maximize the playable of models to ensure you sell the most models? I remember back in 3rd they even had Chaos Daemon models that could be used for both WHFB and 40k and had their own unique box design to designate their dual role.All that being said, whatever internal nonsense they have going on at GW about insisting on as many models as possible only being usable for one game system and no others is kind of ididiotic.
Rumor has it that it's due to internal affairs, that they want to measure the success of each game system so they know what to keep supporting, and which teams they can give the credit to. I personally think that it's due to their desire to make 40k an E-sport ala Magic the Gathering for marketing purposes. Makes balancing easier when there is less variables, that and many of the cut units weren't introduced by the main 40k team to begin with, models like the Contemptor or Decimator and their rules were Forgeworld. There needs to be a decent level of availability and accessibility so that Timmy can get his hands on whatever is being played.It's real bizarre considering how cash hungry GW is. Why not maximize the playable of models to ensure you sell the most models?
It's pretty much all AoS packaging now. There are a few daemons that do not have analogues in 40k, which isnt a completely new concept but you're right, the unique boxes are gone. People have been worried that the entire undivided index is getting yeeted but I am very doubtful of that. I am slightly concerned about the fact that when you take one of the God aligned legion detachments designed for daemon soup, certain units are just missing outright, hoping they dont prune Skulltaker, The Changeling, etc.I remember back in 3rd they even had Chaos Daemon models that could be used for both WHFB and 40k and had their own unique box design to designate their dual role.
Nah, it gets dumber than that. Just look at the rhino chassis as an example. The current 30k plastic rhino is actually a decent kit(because it's not fucking 20 years old) and actually fits the footprint close enough that no one cares(unlike say, the landraider proteus). Yet still for whatever fucking reason GW made sure the HH legion vindicator doesn't have the dozer blade that the 40k vindicator has so it can fit in locations that that 40k version cannot... and thus it's not a suitable proxy without printing a dozer blade for it.Rumor has it that it's due to internal affairs, that they want to measure the success of each game system so they know what to keep supporting, and which teams they can give the credit to. I personally think that it's due to their desire to make 40k an E-sport ala Magic the Gathering for marketing purposes. Makes balancing easier when there is less variables, that and many of the cut units weren't introduced by the main 40k team to begin with, models like the Contemptor or Decimator and their rules were Forgeworld. There needs to be a decent level of availability and accessibility so that Timmy can get his hands on whatever is being played.
I think we all know the most obvious explanation is that its cutting a starfish in half, they expect you to buy more to "complete" your armies for both systems
The HH rhino kit actually has a major design flaw in the underbelly, where it does not properly fit and requires a decent amount of effort to get things to align appropriately. It's too thickNah, it gets dumber than that. Just look at the rhino chassis as an example. The current 30k plastic rhino is actually a decent kit(because it's not fucking 20 years old) and actually fits the footprint
I believe you mean the Spartan. The Proteus is only slightly smaller than the 3rd Land Raider, and GW gave the okay for using it, which means the only issues playing one comes down to what the tournament organizer decides. The Spartan is significantly largerfits the footprint close enough that no one cares(unlike say, the landraider proteus).
The new Plastic HH vindicator is copying the Forgeworld Resin design which came before it. This is also true in some regards for the Proteus.Yet still for whatever fucking reason GW made sure the HH legion vindicator doesn't have the dozer blade that the 40k vindicator has so it can fit in locations that that 40k version cannot... and thus it's not a suitable proxy without printing a dozer blade for it.
Once again, it's copying a forgeworld resin sculpt but in plastic. The extra ass on the solar auxila russ barely affects the silhouette. The HH Demolisher variant does come with the wheel chair rockers, and that does affect the silhouette more dramatically, but not meaningfully. Sponsons were optional for a very long time, and technically still are, the free wargear has just made it stupid to not take them, but there is no way every option is going to remain free forever, they even have financial incentives to not leave it that way, more reasons to buy another box.the HH Leman Russ intentionally made slightly longer and without sponsons.
If these didnt already exist in 40k from imperial armor books you'd have a point with this specifically, but these sculpts were designed before the call to segregate the systems, with very minor detailings changed on the journey to plastic.And the only reason to do that shit, for models that should have been the same or close enough was to prevent direct compatibility for another one of their own product ranges.
No, I meant the new landraider proteus. The spartan isn't even close. That aside, the landraider proteus and the regular landraider are also way off. Not sure why there's a rhino in the image, but here's a comparison.I believe you mean the Spartan. The Proteus is only slightly smaller than the 3rd Land Raider, and GW gave the okay for using it, which means the only issues playing one comes down to what the tournament organizer decides. The Spartan is significantly larger
And GW could have taken the plastic HH vindicator as a replacement for the 40k version, but didn't, or include a front plow that at least matched the width of the 40k version but didn't.The new Plastic HH vindicator is copying the Forgeworld Resin design which came before it. This is also true in some regards for the Proteus.
In a random casual pickup game, no it doesn't matter so long as you expect it to be played as if it had the extra width. Tournaments(you mentioned TOs) it should matter because its modeling for advantage. It's the same as leaving the extra bits off of the eldar wave serpent that would otherwise widen the profile to the point where the model couldn't fit the same way a falcon can. If 40k had silhouettes or specified model volumes based off of the base sizes(and actually had bases on everything) this would be easily avoidable. It's cheating, and there's no justification for it.Very few people are going to take umbrage with the use of the HH Vindicator, Predator, Proteus, or Russ unless they are actual low functioning OCD retards. You may bump into some issues with trying to run a HH basilisk in 40k, as it does not use the chimera chasis, but even that most people will let slide considering it's going to be out of line of sight 98% of the game anyway and does not require LoS to fire. It IS sad that leviathans and deredos are mostly lost, and that the best admech models are not usable. At least some of them can be used as count-as but they should really allow the use of the Thanatar or create something that draws inspiration from it for 40k.
I've seen this image, the Proteus isn't even fully built here, the treads are missing and they make a huge difference.No, I meant the new landraider proteus
This issue also arises for infantry, as conversions and kitbashes are rampant, and it's handled fairly loosely, the main issues simply being base sizes being appropriate and readability for WYSIWYG, and if those conditions are met that seems to satisfy.it should matter because its modeling for advantage
If the TO outlined that it was allowed it isn't cheating. No one is debating that there isn't an impact on distance measurements for ranged weapons or getting into engagement range. If you want things to be uniform then buy the old kits and only attend events where they enforce harsh requirements, the forgeworld designs and HH kits were not replacement goods, they were speciality "bonus" products to begin with for enthusiasts, and now they have their own home and contained enviornment. The Deimos Vindicator WAS allowed in 40k already before this, you could even take the laser destroyer variant, it's not some new devious plan that James schemed. Yes, they COULD have added on to the kit with a dozer blade, but that would not correct the fact that the deimos vindicator by definition is not the regular vindicator, if it was there would be no reason to buy it - it's a different kit.cheating, and there's no justification for it.
I wasn't even referring to distance regarding getting weapon ranges or getting into engagement. It's a major problem because it means that the smaller models can fit in places that the larger versions wouldn't. The difference between the landraiders isn't even minor either. The threads on the landraider proteus don't make up for the huge difference in length(just look at it in the image you provided, that's a massive difference) or the width of the sponsons.If the TO outlined that it was allowed it isn't cheating. No one is debating that there isn't an impact on distance measurements for ranged weapons or getting into engagement range.
Indeed, but because the base sizes are at least standardized then it's not much of an issue as long as someone didn't decide to model all of their guardsmen as being seated or something stupid(which would again be modeling for advantage).This issue also arises for infantry, as conversions and kitbashes are rampant, and it's handled fairly loosely, the main issues simply being base sizes being appropriate and readability for WYSIWYG, and if those conditions are met that seems to satisfy.
And it shouldn't have been without express permission from a TO if we're talking about tournaments. The gun doesn't particularly matter, it's the dozer blade that is the problem. Again, casual pick up game do whatever you want. Hell, even some casual RTT do whatever you want. If I see that shit at the table I'm on at a GT, I'm calling the TO over.The Deimos Vindicator WAS allowed in 40k already before this, you could even take the laser destroyer variant, it's not some new devious plan that James schemed
You can do this right now with the Heresy Rhino's Ram spikes, and just the same with the Chaos Rhinos, there is no requirement to model them with itSuddenly bein able to fit an entire base in front of a vehicle where one otherwise wouldn't fit, or squeeze a vehicle between gaps it wouldn't normally fit, is ridiculous.
The optional spikes are not the same as the dozer plate on the 40k vindicator being wider than the body, or that the hull of the landraider proteus is significantly smaller than the 40k landraider. Yes, the rhino spikes are an optional part of the kit people leave off.You can do this right now with the Heresy Rhino's Ram spikes, and just the same with the Chaos Rhinos, there is no requirement to model them with it
View attachment 8213313View attachment 8213314