every time I see clips of that movie in action it just looks worse
Wasnt there a leak of this movie and people thought it was a troll cause of how bad the graphics was? Also one cool fact about pixar is that every movie of theirs is developed with a tech mindset (they base some of the story concepts based on what tech theyre going to innovate on, very nintendoesque mindset) and every movie they try to innovate in one area of the tech, be it rendering fur, rendering hair, water reflections, interactions between materials etc. I think with The Good Dinosaur they dropped that and started making nonsense for the sake of it.
no, I'm pretty sure with TGD they tried for those hyper-realistic backgrounds to really push their graphics to the limit
Probably because the other parts are even more colossally shitty.
And yet the movie with the retarded downie YEE dinosaur was probably more watchable.
Sure, Pixar has made a very pretty visual for a tech demo like Good Dino, and yes I am calling it a tech demo because it lacks actual depth and actual writing. It's just a shitty excuse for Pixar to show off its hyper-realistic backgrounds blending in with very over-the-top cartoon characters (and the final result is just a shit mish-mash). A lot of people can point fingers as to why the final product ended up being this way, such as the difficult production and not, but it's still a very shit movie. In comparison, three other Pixar movies Toy Story, its sequel and Ratatouille have had respective production troubles as well, but they turned out great.
I watched it on a flight, once. Cant remember a single thing except for the Sam Elliott Dinosaur and the fact that it ripped off the lion king, very shittily.
The customs of the dwarf society are a poke at Tolkien and a running joke in the series. Way to miss the point.
This one was about girls enlisting in disguise in an armed conflict. You'd call Jeanne d'Arc a pooner too? You haven't even read this book judging by your ignorance.
Yea, Good Dino was forgettable as sin. It's sad that it's a complete case of wasted potential. Also, it's funny that Disney would keep releasing the same exact story over and over. Bambi, Old Yeller, Jungle Book, Lion King, Dinosaur, Brother Bear, Eight Below, Brave, Good Dinosaur, Black Panther, both live-action remakes of Jungle Book and Lion King; they use the same exact storyline over and over.
The trolls may be an example but my memory is fuzzy. I'm thinking of the kud that lookslike a stack of bricks and is adopted by the Night Watch guard that wears the Hat Of +10 Intelligence
The main people who try that stunt of claiming female soldiers dressing as men to go to war as troons are troons themselves.
Literally made an alt just to give you all a cool fact. Guero Balazos is a real thing made by mexican minor cow Kalcifer Vallarta, who is an orbiter of Doomentio, one of the many cows in the hispanic cartoon reviewing community. Doomentio's real name is Arturo Coronado in case you wanted additional context for this piece of Ñ posting. Hell, if iirc this meme was made by one of Kalcifer's suckups.
This shit is such a cope. Usually in Asian households it takes till the third gen to become americanized but Latinos turn into burgers the moment they kickstart the next gen. This shit is fucking Cali, how the fuck can you at least not try to learn Spanish if half your family knows the language.
This one hurts the most because you know the same people celebrating Primos today were calling El Tigre racist back in the day. El Tigre was basically the anti-Primos, it was fucking massive the other side of Rio Grande and Gutierrez is actually mexican.
Does it matter that it pokes fun at Tolkien's dwarves if it comes across as "drag soldiers good"? And by the end of monstrous regiment jackrum becomes a pooner with the pronoun changes and the protag encourages jackrum to do so, with the ending showing the protag allowing pooners to join the military. Yes I've not read the books but I've read enough about them and pratchett online to know that the stuff he wrote had ulterior motives. Don't do the stupid mauler thing of "my interpretation is objectively right independent of context so current thing isn't biased towards communism", no communist author in history has outright indicated their intentions unless they're from Russia, you always need to dig more and look for context cause they love to hide that shit. Even in interviews pratchett is on record stating the book is about gender confusion and identity problems. If it's a straight Mulan like story there wouldn't be any identity crisis.
I just saw so many pooners and breadtubers online worshipping that book with detailed explanation of why it is. It seemed legit, that's all. I'm not even doing so positively I hate troons.
Maybe you should read and watch things for yourself and form your own opinions on them.
Just saying. Jeanne d'Arc was not a fucking troon and only troons say that troon shit.
Fair but to find a particular piece of media's philosophy or political bias, you require both the content of the media and the authors intention. The authors intention is something most people miss cause they don't care to look around or are so enamored by that media that they don't want to consider the possibility that it might have radical biases. There's enough context for pratchetts intentions being communist from interviews he gave to his friendship with Neil Gaiman and the "British invasion" clique to his daughters statements on social media. Ignoring that and saying his books don't have that bias is like saying the Boondocks or Arcane dont have radical biases.
But without actually reading the books you have no way to see that bias in action and actually understand the context of the work, and even with bias the work itself can unintentionally (and in some cases easily) be read to mean the opposite of what the creator intends. You still need to read it and actually think for yourself.
