- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
I witnessed this IRL, but it doesn't involve me personally and it's interesting (at least to me), and I don't know what or if I should have done something about it.
>sitting in the quiet area of a loud park, where people gather to play chess
>it's late afternoon, sometimes drunks and homeless people also go there (sometimes they sleep on the benches)
>hobo joins a table, he has a plastic bag
>later, a soy golem approaches, he is red in the face, starts screaming at the hobo with the bag
>says he has incriminating evidence, threatens to call the police
>everybody is staring at him, wondering what his problem is
>shows us a photo he took of the contents of the hobo's bag, it's an injured pigeon
>the hobo had caught a wild pigeon and broke one of it's wings, I think maybe he wants to sell it or eat it
>sentient-pile-of-soy says pigeons are protected by law (don't know if this is true), and it's animal cruelty, wants to give the bird to the vets immediately (there is a veterinary cabinet close)
>hobo stands up, approaches the soy consumer, but the soylent-with-eyes is not intimidated
>after they face off awkwardly, the living soy mass winces and says he can't stand the hobo's stench, leaves angrily, saying he will call the police
>I leave soon afterwards, don't know how the story ends
It's clear that the bird was suffering. However I can't think of a good reason why humans can kill and eat chickens, but not pigeons. It's clear that the hobo was acting in a self-serving way that was causing suffering, but if it's against an animal is it not evil? I eat chickens almost everyday and I don't think about it, and I have no problems with the farming process of chickens. Should it be different in this case? Also the hobo could have been starving. The soy golem's actions seem also brave and altruistic, he confronted a hobo who could easily beat him up with no fear, showed care for the bird's suffering. It's good that I don't know how the story ended, I can't use hindsight to see if I was correct in not doing anything. Maybe the cops came and arrested the hobo, maybe he killed the pigeon and ate it.
>sitting in the quiet area of a loud park, where people gather to play chess
>it's late afternoon, sometimes drunks and homeless people also go there (sometimes they sleep on the benches)
>hobo joins a table, he has a plastic bag
>later, a soy golem approaches, he is red in the face, starts screaming at the hobo with the bag
>says he has incriminating evidence, threatens to call the police
>everybody is staring at him, wondering what his problem is
>shows us a photo he took of the contents of the hobo's bag, it's an injured pigeon
>the hobo had caught a wild pigeon and broke one of it's wings, I think maybe he wants to sell it or eat it
>sentient-pile-of-soy says pigeons are protected by law (don't know if this is true), and it's animal cruelty, wants to give the bird to the vets immediately (there is a veterinary cabinet close)
>hobo stands up, approaches the soy consumer, but the soylent-with-eyes is not intimidated
>after they face off awkwardly, the living soy mass winces and says he can't stand the hobo's stench, leaves angrily, saying he will call the police
>I leave soon afterwards, don't know how the story ends
It's clear that the bird was suffering. However I can't think of a good reason why humans can kill and eat chickens, but not pigeons. It's clear that the hobo was acting in a self-serving way that was causing suffering, but if it's against an animal is it not evil? I eat chickens almost everyday and I don't think about it, and I have no problems with the farming process of chickens. Should it be different in this case? Also the hobo could have been starving. The soy golem's actions seem also brave and altruistic, he confronted a hobo who could easily beat him up with no fear, showed care for the bird's suffering. It's good that I don't know how the story ended, I can't use hindsight to see if I was correct in not doing anything. Maybe the cops came and arrested the hobo, maybe he killed the pigeon and ate it.