What should be done to stop mass shootings?

[Makhno]

1. Send the niggers back to Africa
2. Kill all cartel members
3. Ban SSRIs and execute Pharma jews responsible for pushing them
4. Unperson every mass shooter, immediate execution followed by total scrubbing of their life and complete media ban on their name/image/bio
4a. When you kill the mass shooter make it a public execution involving the most inhumane methods of torture imaginable

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

In that case you'll have no problem with restrictions reflecting that supposed fact, glad we're in agreement now on at least some restrictions.


They won't be flowing from our country into Mexico if we stop manufacturing them and confiscate the rest, retard. Demand won't go away and the cartels will gladly meet that demand.


65k is the lowest figure, it's been well over a million dipshit. And 65k defensive gun uses is just how many people were able to use their gun, it obviously doesn't reflect victims who were unable to use their gun or victims who don't own guns.

Even blindly taking 65k, that's a lot more than all gun deaths combined, ever, including your drop in the bucket mass shootings and even suicides, so if 65k is nothing then so are mass shootings (and just shootings period).


Then you should be more clear. I know articulating your simple, imbecilic ideas is challenging because you're autistic, but I gave you the benefit of the doubt and didn't assume you'd make such a nonsensical argument.

If having a big scary AR-15 (which you want banned) doesn't turn an old man into Rambo, you're saying it's not effective enough to guarantee he will successfully defend himself, and yet you want to give him an even less effective self-defense tool? That doesn't make any sense faggot.

Also, if merely having an AR-15 isn't going to help you attack people to defend yourself then there's no reason to single such a gun out for banning, since obviously it's not that effective in attacking people according to you.


How many of the people arrested posted QAnon content? And trying to conflate Q and MAGA is retarded, I can't even say nice try.

So since you are concerned with citing evidence now, cite evidence that video was staged.


Cool, but you're not making a compelling argument for banning any type of guns, in fact it only becomes more clear we shouldn't ban them.

I see you're now concerned with personal responsibility, that is good, and I agree. However, you're being inconsistent. Why should people (including women) need increased responsibility with guns but not pregnancy? You want to take away women's rights to self-defense but ensure their right to kill their offspring, try to be consistent when advocating for personal responsibility.


You suffer from main character syndrome, I had posted in that thread about conspiracies well before we even got in that argument. I'm pretty sure you started it by quoting me too, I wasn't even talking to you.

Stay mad and enjoy your threadban faggot

I am still against banning abortion then because I believe a woman has bodily autonomy. You can't force someone to donate blood or an organ, so why should you be able to force a woman to give birth?

Correct, they won't be flowing into Mexico, but cartels aren't going to just get guns out of no where. Eventually the supply would dry up. Again, I know your crippling autism makes it so that you can't comprehend things that aren't 0 or 100%, but even 90% prevention in gun deaths is good. Although it's irrelevant because even if we could stop 100% of mass shootings, you'd still be against gun control because Fox News has convinced your boomer ass that guns are always good and it's no big deal if people get shot.

Again, I know you're a proud anti-education simpleton, but not everyone is going to turn into rambo with a gun. Old men, especially, might have trouble defending with one. And again, your terminally online ass thinks these home invasions are super duper common and happening all over because you watch too much Fox News. If you think a pistol wouldn't work for self defense, why not ban it then? What would even be the purpose of having one?

Since you like to ask me questions, let me ask you one. Do you think people should be able to have nuclear weapons and bombs? Why or why not?

I want women to be able to guns, retard, just not automatic weapons. A pistol would work fine for self defense.

Yes, the tards arrested on Jan 6th were often QAnon. Remember QAnon Shaman? Lol, no, you quoted me because you were upset that I pointed out a conspiracy that shows you right-wing boomers are gullible retards. And you were just whining about being banned from the thread, I didn't even bring it up.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

I am still against banning abortion then because I believe a woman has bodily autonomy.

So let me get this straight; even though you say it's rare, you still want to defend their right to kill their offspring if they so desire--which is totally viable and anatomically identical to a fully developed infant--just on principle, simply because it still happens to be in its mother (who will need to remove it anyway, dead or alive, at which point it's just extra unnecessary steps to kill it)?

You can't force someone to donate blood or an organ, so why should you be able to force a woman to give birth?

False equivalence. Rare rape cases aside, they became pregnant through consensual sex, taking my blood would be raping me of my blood since I didn't consent to it unlike the mother.

Your comparison only sort of works in cases of rape, and even then not really.

Correct, they won't be flowing into Mexico, but cartels aren't going to just get guns out of no where.

Cite your source proving that guns are only manufactured in USA and that it's impossible for them to be manufactured illegally.

Again, I know you're a proud anti-education simpleton, but not everyone is going to turn into rambo with a gun.

So what would be a more effective weapon for women, elderly, etc, and why?

If you think a pistol wouldn't work for self defense, why not ban it then? What would even be the purpose of having one?

You don't just ban things without a good reason, and there's plenty of instances where it might be better, such as in your car rather than your home. Think, retard, think.

Since you like to ask me questions, let me ask you one. Do you think people should be able to have nuclear weapons and bombs? Why or why not?

Nobody should have nukes, not even governments, doomsday weapons capable of literally destroying the world should be illegal. Is that a good enough, logical reason for you?

I want women to be able to guns, retard, just not automatic weapons. A pistol would work fine for self defense.

So you want to restrict women's rights and decide what they can and cannot defend their bodies with. You're a woman hating incel who wants them to be raped so they will be coerced by pro-abortionists into killing their babies. Now it all makes sense...you're sick, HHH.

Yes, the tards arrested on Jan 6th were often QAnon.

Cite your source, I want to know how many.

Lol, no, you quoted me because you were upset that I pointed out a conspiracy that shows you right-wing boomers are gullible retards.

I'm pretty sure that's not how it went down, actually, you were just mad another user and I were mocking your stupid, poorly thought out post.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

So let me get this straight; even though you say it's rare, you still want to defend their right to kill their offspring if they so desire--which is totally viable and anatomically identical to a fully developed infant--just on principle, simply because it still happens to be in its mother (who will need to remove it anyway, dead or alive, at which point it's just extra unnecessary steps to kill it)?


False equivalence. Rare rape cases aside, they became pregnant through consensual sex, taking my blood would be raping me of my blood since I didn't consent to it unlike the mother.

Your comparison only sort of works in cases of rape, and even then not really.


Cite your source proving that guns are only manufactured in USA and that it's impossible for them to be manufactured illegally.


So what would be a more effective weapon for women, elderly, etc, and why?


You don't just ban things without a good reason, and there's plenty of instances where it might be better, such as in your car rather than your home. Think, retard, think.


Nobody should have nukes, not even governments, doomsday weapons capable of literally destroying the world should be illegal. Is that a good enough, logical reason for you?


So you want to restrict women's rights and decide what they can and cannot defend their bodies with. You're a woman hating incel who wants them to be raped so they will be coerced by pro-abortionists into killing their babies. Now it all makes sense...you're sick, HHH.


Cite your source, I want to know how many.


I'm pretty sure that's not how it went down, actually, you were just mad another user and I were mocking your stupid, poorly thought out post.

Yes, it's rare. I believe in bodily autonomy. It's no more murder than not donating an organ. I know you are against forced organ donation, but you're fine forcing women to give birth because you wanna punish women who have sex with men who aren't you. You incels are all alike, Eris.

I know it makes your incel ass seething mad, but people are gonna fuck. Punishing them by making them have babies, especially more so when your boomer political party is trying to ban birth control (I know you say you're against that, but you seem quite quiet when it comes up because your diseased brain cannot fathom criticizing your fellow theocrats).

So you're fine banning one dangerous weapon, but not an AR-15?

How is an AR-15 needed but a pistol isn't? Again, I know you get all your talking points from Fox News like any good 85 year old man, but you can have guns that aren't automatic weapons.

I know you're slow in the mind, Eris, but an AR-15 isn't going to do much good to stop a rape. It's not a short-range weapon. I thought you Fox News watching boomers knew about guns?

I doubt any source has the exact number, but there was a lot of QAnon flags going around then. Not sure what that matters, but I know you're upset your fellow senile 85 year old men were arrested for something.

Yes, that's exactly how it panned out, Eris. You love to follow me around and start arguments with me because you're upset that I don't want to live in a theocracy like you bible thumpers do

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

It's no more murder than not donating an organ.

Killing offspring which you conceded is anatomically identical to a fully developed infant is not wrong, how exactly...?

I know you are against forced organ donation, but you're fine forcing women to give birth because you wanna punish women who have sex with men who aren't you. You incels are all alike, Eris.

She consented to the reproductive act called sex, which obviously carries the possibility of pregnancy, because that's where babies come from, HHH.

See, difference is I'm not consenting to that surgical act of organ donation, that's where donated organs come from, HHH. Consent matters, you homosexual pedophile.

I know it makes your incel ass seething mad, but people are gonna fuck.

Couldn't care less, in fact it'd be great if whites would do more of it. Your male feminist tactic of opposimg responsibility won't get you laid anyway, give it up and buy a whore.

So you're fine banning one dangerous weapon, but not an AR-15?

Not every dangerous weapon requires banning; I won't ban pipes, hammers, knives, rocks, vehicles, archery, etc because it's stupid to and unnecessary. Maybe some regulations and rules, but do these all need to be banned or regulated equally (or at all)? I don't think so.

How is an AR-15 needed but a pistol isn't?

I don't remember saying a pistol isn't needed, different types of guns are just obviously better for certain scenarios and places. People did not rely on a cannon for self-defense riding on their horses to the saloon, did they?

I know you're slow in the mind, Eris, but an AR-15 isn't going to do much good to stop a rape.

I'd think shooting the men breaking into your home would prevent a rape pretty effectively, actually, why don't you?

I doubt any source has the exact number, but there was a lot of QAnon flags going around then.

How many times do I need to remind you this isn't the conspiracy theory thread?

Yes, that's exactly how it panned out, Eris. You love to follow me around and start arguments with me because you're upset that I don't want to live in a theocracy like you bible thumpers do

You need to get over yourself, otherwise you'll stay a 50 year old WWF larping virgin forever because women don't like narcissists. And as a Wokeist you LOVE theocracies.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Killing offspring which you conceded is anatomically identical to a fully developed infant is not wrong, how exactly...?


She consented to the reproductive act called sex, which obviously carries the possibility of pregnancy, because that's where babies come from, HHH.

See, difference is I'm not consenting to that surgical act of organ donation, that's where donated organs come from, HHH. Consent matters, you homosexual pedophile.


Couldn't care less, in fact it'd be great if whites would do more of it. Your male feminist tactic of opposimg responsibility won't get you laid anyway, give it up and buy a whore.


Not every dangerous weapon requires banning; I won't ban pipes, hammers, knives, rocks, vehicles, archery, etc because it's stupid to and unnecessary. Maybe some regulations and rules, but do these all need to be banned or regulated equally (or at all)? I don't think so.


I don't remember saying a pistol isn't needed, different types of guns are just obviously better for certain scenarios and places. People did not rely on a cannon for self-defense riding on their horses to the saloon, did they?


I'd think shooting the men breaking into your home would prevent a rape pretty effectively, actually, why don't you?


How many times do I need to remind you this isn't the conspiracy theory thread?


You need to get over yourself, otherwise you'll stay a 50 year old WWF larping virgin forever because women don't like narcissists. And as a Wokeist you LOVE theocracies.

Again, because the woman has bodily autonomy. You can refuse to donate a kidney to a man who would die without it. If abortion is murder, how is that not murder? Yet you're totally fine with that. Oh, right, because you want to punish harlots who have sex.

Except you can have sex, take every precaution and still end up pregnant. You want to force women who have sex to give birth if they get pregnant because you're an incel religious zealot who hates women. Again, if abortion is murder, how is refusing to donate an organ to a dying person who needs it not murder?

AR-15s would be pretty useless to prevent a rape that is occurring. Rapes are typically short-range crimes. If a guy is trying to take her down and take her clothes off, an AR-15 is too big to be useful. Those guns are heavy, you know.

And again, you act like home invasions happen all the time. I know your boomer ass watches Fox News and that's what they tell you, but it really doesn't happen often. And again, a pistol or another gun would work just fine. Rapes very, very, very rarely happen with someone breaking into your home, Eris. Again, you watch too much Fox News. And again, a non-semiautomatic gun would work fine for defense in that situation.

Lol you don't even know what "woke" means, Eris. You still can't define it. I've given you ample opportunity to define "woke" and tell me why you hate it so much. Women like guys who don't act like 85 year old religious zealots in the year 1955. Stop acting like that and maybe you can meet a nice woman. Having a girlfriend is pretty awesome. Sorry it makes your incel ass seethe that I have one and your elderly ass doesn't.

 

[Wesker]

AR-15s would be pretty useless to prevent a rape that is occurring. Rapes are typically short-range crimes. If a guy is trying to take her down and take her clothes off, an AR-15 is too big to be useful. Those guns are heavy, you know.

They're so useless the (((government))) has been trying to outlaw them for 40 years. And yes, I wouldn't expect your frail bones being able to support a 6lb gun on your rickety shoulder.

You're so developed mentally disabled in regards to guns, their purposes and the 2nd amendment it's astounding.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Again, because the woman has bodily autonomy.

Justify how killing viable offspring on principle is okay.

You can refuse to donate a kidney to a man who would die without it. If abortion is murder, how is that not murder?

Consent, as I said, because the woman consented to engaging in a reproductive act, and I'm not consenting to surgery.

Except you can have sex, take every precaution and still end up pregnant.

Wrong, a woman can't get pregnant if you take any of the proper precautions. Just off the top of my head:

1) Practice abstinence
2) Receive surgery (eg., tubal ligation)
3) Seek men with vasectomies

Now, if by "every precaution" you mean slap a cheap old condom on, there's a possibility of pregnancy, but the less surefire precautions one takes the more likely they are to become pregnant. It's up to them to weigh the risks and know the responsibilities involved, killing babies because you want it raw isn't responsible.

AR-15s would be pretty useless to prevent a rape that is occurring.

They wouldn't be optimal for stopping a rape that's already occurring, sure, but plenty effective in preventing invaders FROM raping you. Like I said, different guns have different uses.

And again, you act like home invasions happen all the time.

They happen often enough, it's not up to you to tell women what to be afraid of and how to defend themselves, you sexist incel.

Lol you don't even know what "woke" means, Eris. You still can't define it.

If you really think I don't know then tell me, surely you must know because you've used the term yourself before.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Justify how killing viable offspring on principle is okay.


Consent, as I said, because the woman consented to engaging in a reproductive act, and I'm not consenting to surgery.


Wrong, a woman can't get pregnant if you take any of the proper precautions. Just off the top of my head:

1) Practice abstinence
2) Receive surgery (eg., tubal ligation)
3) Seek men with vasectomies

Now, if by "every precaution" you mean slap a cheap old condom on, there's a possibility of pregnancy, but the less surefire precautions one takes the more likely they are to become pregnant. It's up to them to weigh the risks and know the responsibilities involved, killing babies because you want it raw isn't responsible.


They wouldn't be optimal for stopping a rape that's already occurring, sure, but plenty effective in preventing invaders FROM raping you. Like I said, different guns have different uses.


They happen often enough, it's not up to you to tell women what to be afraid of and how to defend themselves, you sexist incel.


If you really think I don't know then tell me, surely you must know because you've used the term yourself before.

Again, a woman not wanting her uterus to raise a fetus is no more murder than refusing to donate a kidney to a man dying of ESRD.

So it's fine for you to be responsible for a death due to your bodily autonomy but not a woman? Got it.

Those precautions can, and do, fail (well, except abstinence). And again, fetuses aren't babies. We've been over this, Eris.

So why do you need AR-15s when a regular gun won't do the job?

Lol, like I said, they're rare. You'd know this if you didn't get your talking points from watching Fox News, but I know you senile 85 year olds love being scared by Fox News.

You keep using the term "woke" and saying how much you hate it, but you can't even define it. It's funny how you're trying to weasel out of defining it still. I know Fox News told your boomer ass that "woke" is bad, but instead of just parroting it blindly like you boomers do, maybe you should look up what "woke" means instead. I know you hate learning and education, but give it a shot.

They're so useless the (((government))) has been trying to outlaw them for 40 years. And yes, I wouldn't expect your frail bones being able to support a 6lb gun on your rickety shoulder.

You're so developed mentally disabled in regards to guns, their purposes and the 2nd amendment it's astounding.

I know you're a proud low IQ simpleton, but how the fuck is a woman, on the ground, fighting off a guy trying to get her clothes off going to grab and use an AR-15? Again, I know Fox News told your senile, elderly ass that AR-15s are always good and you're an impressionable autistic simpleton so you believe whatever your boomer news source tells you, but answer my question.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Again, a woman not wanting her uterus to raise a fetus is no more murder than refusing to donate a kidney to a man dying of ESRD.

Blatant false equivalence aside, in the case of late term abortion--which you keep pivoting away from--the "raising" is already essentially complete.

So it's fine for you to be responsible for a death due to your bodily autonomy but not a woman? Got it.

The responsibility isn't on me, I have nothing to do with the human in question. You can say I have a moral obligation, and perhaps so, but I have no responsibility and the moral obligation is certainly lesser.

Those precautions can, and do, fail (well, except abstinence). And again, fetuses aren't babies. We've been over this, Eris.

Prove to me any one case, ever, where a woman who underwent tubal ligation got pregnant by a man with a vasectomy when he used a condom and she was on the pill. If a baby is born from such a union it should be regarded as miraculous and doubly illegal to abort.

So why do you need AR-15s when a regular gun won't do the job?

Different guns, different jobs. Are you retarded? I ask rhetorically, I already know the answer.

Lol, like I said, they're rare.

So you say, but they happen often enough.

You keep using the term "woke" and saying how much you hate it, but you can't even define it.

Is there a reason you can't define it yourself, despite having used it?

 

[Lurker]

@Hollywood Hulk Hogan, if I may interject.

Because it appears to me like @SSj_Ness's opinions on abortion stem from his religious background, it seems like a fruitless effort to debate such a thing with him. Ultimately, no matter what reasons a pro-choice person can give, it simply won't matter because his religious views dictate that it's wrong. One can argue that it's possible that certain religions actually don't care about abortion, but it seems that people will have their own interpretations of their religious doctrine.

I don't agree with it. I personally think that denying women their bodily autonomy is appalling. But because their religion (or their personal interpretation of their religion) dictates that a fetus is a fully living person, there will never be any compromise.

Also I don't know why we're even talking about abortion in the gun violence thread, unless we're referring to super late-term abortions, if you're picking up what I'm putting down.

---

Also I have no solution to gun violence other than taking away everyone's guns, which is retardedly unrealistic due to the sheer proliferation of them.

I just want a solution that works for everybody, but I doubt we'll ever find one, and that genuinely makes me sad.

 

[The Repeated Meme]

Since school shootings are apparently an epidemic I would allow all teachers to carry and have armed security. Not sure if I'd go so far as to install metal detectors and have security checkpoints but it might be worth considering.

Having armed security at grocery stores to not only stop potential deadly threats but also stop shoplifting would probably be a good idea: kill to birds with one stone. While grocery store shootings are rare, they are a potentially vulnerable location. Allowing customers and employees to openly carry would go a long way as a potential deterrent, so it's also worth considering loosening relevant firearm regulation.

Not sure what else could possibly be done. Would it be paranoid overkill in most cases? Sure, but better safe than sorry.

It's also worth noting that most school shootings happen because of relentless bullying so having the school administrators take a more active role in policing negative interactions between students would be worth considering.

 

[Overwritten Tapes]

Attack choppers patrolling 24/7

 

[xXEddie.DurellXx]

Public rape?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Blatant false equivalence aside, in the case of late term abortion--which you keep pivoting away from--the "raising" is already essentially complete.


The responsibility isn't on me, I have nothing to do with the human in question. You can say I have a moral obligation, and perhaps so, but I have no responsibility and the moral obligation is certainly lesser.


Prove to me any one case, ever, where a woman who underwent tubal ligation got pregnant by a man with a vasectomy when he used a condom and she was on the pill. If a baby is born from such a union it should be regarded as miraculous and doubly illegal to abort.


Different guns, different jobs. Are you retarded? I ask rhetorically, I already know the answer.


So you say, but they happen often enough.


Is there a reason you can't define it yourself, despite having used it?

As @Lurker said, we are just wasting our time here.

You want to control women's bodies and remove their bodily autonomy because you're a religious zealot, while I think everyone should have control over their own bodies.

You think children getting shot in school is no big deal and think that overworked and underpaid teachers, who you don't even trust to teach children because education is "woke" (which you can't even define), should be forced to go Rambo mode over a shooter because Fox News told your boomer ass that guns are good and never should be banned.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

@Hollywood Hulk Hogan, if I may interject.

Because it appears to me like @SSj_Ness's opinions on abortion stem from his religious background, it seems like a fruitless effort to debate such a thing with him.

My crux of my argument is purely scientific.

But because their religion (or their personal interpretation of their religion) dictates that a fetus is a fully living person, there will never be any compromise.

One problem is everyone's definition of "fully living person" will differ. Another problem is the premise that only a "fully living person" has value and deserves protection, regardless of what that actually constitutes.

Also I have no solution to gun violence other than taking away everyone's guns, which is retardedly unrealistic due to the sheer proliferation of them.

Even if we could I'm not sure it'd ever be a good idea for any country in the long term, but especially for America in its current state. Giving up your right to self-defense against tyranny and criminals is shortsighted imo.

As @Lurker said, we are just wasting our time here.

That's your fault, you hate answering directly and resorting to repeating talking points, telling yourself you're just trolling, but truth is you really can't answer.

I think everyone should have control over their own bodies.

I agree, except you don't actually believe that, excluding people too young to deserve life. How very ageist, you bigot!

You think children getting shot in school is no big deal and think that overworked and underpaid teachers, who you don't even trust to teach children because education is "woke" (which you can't even define), should be forced to go Rambo mode over a shooter because Fox News told your boomer ass that guns are good and never should be banned.

You are very specific about where and how children shouldn't be killed, just at school with guns, but you think it's okay for them to be killed in the womb or at home by criminals (be it with guns or not).

If schools are so dangerous why wouldn't teachers be glad to have a weapon for self-defense? Them being woke is irrelevant because even woke people don't want to be shot, HHH.

 

[Stardust]

Everybody posting in this thread will keep them too MATI to shoot anyone, because we all know being right on the internet is more important than misusing a firearm. This is the solution.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

That's your fault, you hate answering directly and resorting to repeating talking points, telling yourself you're just trolling, but truth is you really can't answer.

I agree, except you don't actually believe that, excluding people too young to deserve life. How very ageist, you bigot!

You are very specific about where and how children shouldn't be killed, just at school with guns, but you think it's okay for them to be killed in the womb or at home by criminals (be it with guns or not).

If schools are so dangerous why wouldn't teachers be glad to have a weapon for self-defense? Them being woke is irrelevant because even woke people don't want to be shot, HHH.

Lol I answered your questions just fine. You're the tard who keeps dodging the question of "what does 'woke' even mean and why do you hate it so much?". You're dodging it like it's a formal education.

You don't believe everyone should have control over their bodies. You would be pro-choice if you did. Instead you want to punish women who have sex by making them carry babies.

Fetuses aren't children, Eris. Just like how you can't be forced to donate an organ to save someone, a woman shouldn't be forced to use her uterus to carry a fetus.

Again, you don't even trust teachers to teach children, yet you trust them to have a gun and defend against a mass shooter. Teachers are already overworked and underpaid and now they have religious zealots like you trying to ban books and teaching about racism and gay people because you're a bible thumping boomer stuck in the 1950s

 

[AgendaPoster]

Oh wow, another cool topic to post in.
It's an incredible coincidence this is yet another "muh American controversy" topic.
It has HHH in it and I see mentions of abortions too - yet no circumcision. Hmmm.
---------------------------
I think I am with the Liberals on the gun issue.
A civilized country must trust law enforcement with a monopoly on violence.
However, muttified, diverse countries cannot be civilized, so America is in quite the conundrum.
- ban niggers and migration, and guns, have cozy society. Ban rednecks too, why not.
- go with Amurica Fuck Yeah! have guns, mass shootings, spergouts, you know trad life - and keep the niggers and diversity
It's such a sad, sad situation for America.
What do you say, HHH?
Should we deport each and every violent criminal, and then ban weapons? Colorblind! - as I am an avowed anti-racist.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Lol I answered your questions just fine. You're the tard who keeps dodging the question of "what does 'woke' even mean and why do you hate it so much?". You're dodging it like it's a formal education.

It takes 20 back and forths to corner you into acknowledging a basic fact. And why do you want me to define a word you know, if you think I don't know it then you can try to educate me.

You don't believe everyone should have control over their bodies.

Neither do you, if they're too young.

You would be pro-choice if you did. Instead you want to punish women who have sex by making them carry babies.

I do support abortion though, just not unrestricted. If the mother will die then it's permissible. You want viable babies to be killed because you equate responsibility to punishment.

Fetuses aren't children, Eris.

A viable "fetus" is the same as an "infant", they're both babies, a word you hate since you prefer sterile euphemistic medical terms to hide behind.

Just like how you can't be forced to donate an organ to save someone, a woman shouldn't be forced to use her uterus to carry a fetus.

The woman consented to engaging in procreative acts, I don't consent to surgery, but go ahead and dodge this point and whine about me not defining "woke" for you

Again, you don't even trust teachers to teach children, yet you trust them to have a gun and defend against a mass shooter.

If they're going to be teaching them anyway then they should have defensive weapons if schools are as dangerous as you say. I'd prefer non-Wokeist teachers but oh well.

Teachers are already overworked and underpaid and now they have religious zealots like you trying to ban books and teaching about racism and gay people because you're a bible thumping boomer stuck in the 1950s

So you want them overworked, underpaid, AND shot by shooters? I know you love fags and niggers because you're a libtard, but even you can figure out how self-defense is a good thing, not a bad thing.