Off-Topic Whiteknight Containment Thread

" I am not retarded i am just pretending to be" No my friend, you are just being retarded.
Nicks supporters do not need you to speak for them. In fact it is fools game to do it. They are stupid kids who think the world is out to get them. They are the fucking emo cutters of the 2020s. I get the sentiment, but they are no different than the retards on the other side who want communism to take over the west. Hatched from the same egg in both mind and body really. Being a political extremist is just the same thing as being a Marvel CONNSOMER. It is just a cope for having 0 personality.
This is unironically the absolute dumbest thing I have ever read, and I was just reading a male feminist magazine hours ago(where stupidity is as cheap as water).

Do you realize how utterly bankrupt and ridiculous that "argument" is?
 
Completely stunning how my compassion and empathy filled posts lead to a confluence of disingenuity and retardation.

Do people even read?
If you have to state the things you say are full of compassion and empathy, you might be giving yourself too many pats on the back. Perhaps you should exercise patience though. That's as important as the other two.
 
Do you realize how utterly bankrupt and ridiculous that "argument" is?
>Mesopotamian Avatar

>Argues that the other person's argument is ridiculous instead of addressing the point

>Instead addressing the point calls the other person stupid and states they clearly cant comprehend the subject

Sargon is that you?

>Incoming argument from @Shamash "I'm really tired and dont have time for this right now"
 
This is unironically the absolute dumbest thing I have ever read, and I was just reading a male feminist magazine hours ago(where stupidity is as cheap as water).

Do you realize how utterly bankrupt and ridiculous that "argument" is?
Faggots to the right of me, faggots to the left. It would be better if i put a bullet in both their heads.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: nym
The "what is white" thing is a little disingenuous if we're talking about America where it's one of the races listed on nearly every government form or college application. In Europe maybe not, but in America it's obviously a thing because otherwise white privilege/supremacy as a concept makes no sense.

The problem WNs have is that they're unable to grasp how this isn't about a war on white people so much as it is a war on any regional power structure not totally subjugated to the international order. In America that means whites, and in Europe that means native European populations. In East Asia that also means East Asian populations. Are there leftists in America who treat it as though it's a war on white people? Absolutely, but they're middle management. They're the true believers that go up on the wall after the revolution. The people in charge of them only care about subjugating power blocs.
.... "what is white?" is not at all disingenuous even in the American context. People darker than many lighter skinned black people (immigrants from Central America, for example) are identified as white by the federal govt and the entities it empowers. The definition of who is properly white us tenuous because its biological basis is so flimsy - the perfection of whiteness is so easily ruined by like.... having a black grandparent.

In the US Jews are seen as white except for WN... Brown people immigrating from Latin America are counted as white... not by neo nazis tho? Arabs and Iranians.... counted as white - but some are African American because they're from north africa?

I imagine that of course when neo nazis are talking about "white" they mean germanic and nordic people primarily. Which is interesting to me because Fuentes fails racial purity standards pretty easily. But I guess that makes it accessible for less acceptable dweebs whose racial purity might be questioned (italian americans, irish americans, euro mutt americans, white dudes with 1 black or native grandparent etc etc).
This is unironically the absolute dumbest thing I have ever read, and I was just reading a male feminist magazine hours ago(where stupidity is as cheap as water).

Do you realize how utterly bankrupt and ridiculous that "argument" is?
honestly idk if you're a teen or what but you come off as super autistic. did you get an aspergers diagnosis or are you too young to have caught that label? because honestly that's the only excuse i can think of for your diatribes.
 
.... "what is white?" is not at all disingenuous even in the American context. People darker than many lighter skinned black people (immigrants from Central America, for example) are identified as white by the federal govt and the entities it empowers. The definition of who is properly white us tenuous because its biological basis is so flimsy - the perfection of whiteness is so easily ruined by like.... having a black grandparent.

In the US Jews are seen as white except for WN... Brown people immigrating from Latin America are counted as white... not by neo nazis tho? Arabs and Iranians.... counted as white - but some are African American because they're from north africa?

I imagine that of course when neo nazis are talking about "white" they mean germanic and nordic people primarily. Which is interesting to me because Fuentes fails racial purity standards pretty easily. But I guess that makes it accessible for less acceptable dweebs whose racial purity might be questioned (italian americans, irish americans, euro mutt americans, white dudes with 1 black or native grandparent etc etc).

honestly idk if you're a teen or what but you come off as super autistic. did you get an aspergers diagnosis or are you too young to have caught that label? because honestly that's the only excuse i can think of for your diatribes.
The boundaries of ethnic groups can change over time. Any of the smarter WNs (and there might not be very many at this point) will tell you that what they mean by "white" is the people who would not be able to get away with putting something other than "white" on a college application or other government document. The state has already decided that this is enough of a real ethnic category that they're willing to enforce laws based upon it. If you want to know what white is, ask the people whose job it is to enforce those laws.

It'd be the same as responding to a black nationalist with "well what is Black". What black is, at least in America, is an ethnic group composed of a broad variety of ancestries united by a number of shared social, political, and historical factors.

I'd be happy enough to call everyone white and end racism. The problem is that many people, including a lot of Jews who definitely don't consistently consider themselves white, aren't going to agree to that plan because they identify otherwise. We tried doing it the other way by making everyone black, but the best whites could do was Eminem and the experiment failed.

Now, I'm not a white nationalist or any kind of racial nationalist. It's also harder to be racist in general when you don't believe in evolution, as it turns out. White nationalism can't work, and that's because while they might form an ethnic category, it's not cohesive enough to actually support a nation. Languages are prior to races and not the other way around, according to a saint whose name I can't remember.
 
Last edited:
So...okay I'm very sympathetic to Fuentes supporters.

Problem is, well there just isn't a leader worthy of the command that his would be army would give him.

You shouldn't be ashamed to want to follow-you should however know when your leader has failed to achieve what he has brought you to achieve, in this case he is unworthy of your fidelity.

So my message to Fuentes supporters is take the loss with dignity-beyond that it would be presumptuous of me to tell you what to do. If however...a true leader emerges, one who keeps Nick's message, but proves equal to the task of the ideal-then yes follow him!

Be the army, be the servant of the king who has earned his crown. Not the pretender and He will lead you to victory.
Bruh his message is fuckin stupid.
 
So my message to Fuentes supporters is take the loss with dignity-beyond that it would be presumptuous of me to tell you what to do. If however...a true leader emerges, one who keeps Nick's message, but proves equal to the task of the ideal-then yes follow him!

Franssen is this you?

Open up that fridge Franssen. Open the basement door, Franssen.
 
I'm defending the fundamental impulses of his supporters, neither Ralph or Fuentes himself you disingenuous cretin.
Nobody was shitting on their supporter's motives until you brought the subject up. And frankly regardless of their "fundamental impulses" they'd still be stupid to support Nick/AF at this point. He has done nothing of note besides trolling Charlie Kirk a few times, and none of his talking points are particularly unique. Add in the whole closet fag thing, the grifting, and the probable involvement with feds and it makes no sense for anyone to carry water for him.

And it's not like Nick is some kind of unique or necessary centerpiece of right-wing thought. You can still hate niggers, troons, and immigrants and support "traditional values", states rights, etc. None of that requires you to defend or support a hypocritical gay mexican streamer that larps as a wigger.
 
If however...a true leader emerges, one who keeps Nick's message, but proves equal to the task of the ideal-then yes follow him!
I'm not sure it's healthy to encourage followers of a faggot e-celeb grifter to try to find a surrogate 'leader' to follow. Clearly their approach to 'leaders' is flawed, and they shouldn't just fling themselves at the next grift to come along. Your message might make sense if it was to people following a serious leader, but telling them that shilling for e-celebs is great seems unlikely to help.

It's like saying that DSP is a good wrestler because he buys sweaty pro wrestler images in p2w games. Not all 'following' is good, or equivalent.

Realistically, though, Nick's message by now seems to basically reduce to, 'Be a gay incel, fucking catboys is based and not being sussy gay is cringe.' I'm not sure how this will save the white race.
 
.... "what is white?" is not at all disingenuous even in the American context.
Yes, it is.

No one has any problem figuring out who or what a white person is when it comes to blaming someone for their problems. When blacks talk about "white people", everyone knows exactly who they are talking about. It's ONLY when whites try to self-advocate that these "What is white?" arguments get wheeled out. Not having a super-precise definition of "white" is not a problem for anyone in any other context.
When BLM says that we live in a white supremacist society, no one says "Whoa, whoa whoa! Hold up there, bucko! What do you mean when you say 'white'? I have a friend who is half Lebanese and half Italian. Are they white? Are they part of this 'white supremacy' you speak of?'" I've never had anyone ask to see my 23 and Me before deciding whether or not I have "white privilege". White privilege theory assumes that everyone can tell who a white person is.
Again, this line of argument is ONLY used against whites trying to self-advocate.
 
Last edited:
Okay when the last White child is slain, when the Jews feast on the bones of the last White family, when the niggers celebrate the rape of the last White woman.
I see you have accused of us being black Jews and told everyone of our secrets. I must warn you that exposing us and our niggas will leave us no choice but to take action against you. Our niggas are on every corner of the planet and we will strike you at your very heart. Stop with these posts immediately on the grace of Yahweh or you will feel his divine wrath.
 
Back