Why do we put so much stock into loli/underaged characters as a direct link to being a pedo?

Pretty sure that pedophiles have a much higher incidence of raping kids or viewing CSAM than Catholics.
Are you dense?

Almost 1,700 priests and clergy accused of sex abuse are unsupervised.

Over 600 children abused by Catholic clergy in Baltimore.

2000 kids touched by Catholic clergy in Illinois.

But keep drooling about how lolicons are the real problem with child molestation. No one ever talks about this shit on the Farms for some reason, but hentai is a hot topic every other week. You fucks couldn't give less of a shit about protecting kids. The Catholic church has abused more children than any basement dwelling lolicon could have wet dreams about.

The absolute gall to say this shit. All pedophiles are artillery shells that have hit the ground, Fuze armed; it's just a matter if they've gone off yet.
This is some of the most retarded shit I've read on the farms, bravo for that. If all pedophiles were prophesied to molest kids then we would be executing them as soon as they are outed. I don't blame you for not knowing that's not how the real world works, you're clearly a very sheltered individual.
 
This is some of the most retarded shit I've read on the farms, bravo for that. If all pedophiles were prophesied to molest kids then we would be executing them as soon as they are outed. I don't blame you for not knowing that's not how the real world works, you're clearly a very sheltered individual.
Who says we shouldn't be? In some aspects we are with the sex offender registry being public knowledge to literally anyone, destroying their day to day lives. They want to rape kids. That is the end goal. Looking at loli is just another step in the road to that goal.

My question is why are you defending them so hard? They're the scum of society. Most people don't cry when a pedo gets outed, they cheer. Why not you?
 
Who says we shouldn't be? In some aspects we are with the sex offender registry being public knowledge to literally anyone, destroying their day to day lives. They want to rape kids. That is the end goal. Looking at loli is just another step in the road to that goal.

My question is why are you defending them so hard? They're the scum of society. Most people don't cry when a pedo gets outed, they cheer. Why not you?
I'm defending freedom of expression, not pedophiles. It's your job to get that idea into your thick skull. I'm not defending pedophiles by telling you that you have an objectively and entirely wrong definition of what a pedophile is, the education system clearly failed you on that point, and it's not my job to teach retards how to function.

I don't give a shit what happens to pedophiles, their mental illness is their responsibility to manage. If they can't stop themselves from touching kids then they get what's coming to them.
I care about banning lolicon/shota art since it's a slippery slope, and will not do anything positive for society. It's a "solution" that won't solve anything but kneecapping freedom of expression and setting a terrible precedent.
 
If it's meant to arouse the viewer or is obscene then it's not artistic
No one who knows anything about art would agree with this, this is just boring black and white thinking from someone with a firmly held opinion. Works can be arousing or obscene and still be art which is something we see all throughout history.
Banning guns won't protect children, but banning alcohol will do a great deal to prevent drunk driving
Banning alcohol = fewer drunk drivers.
Banning guns != less shootings???

For fucks sake be consistent and evaluate your cognitive dissonance. If fewer guns exist there is logically less opportunity for people to be harmed by them and countries with stricter gun laws see fewer school shootings. Sure you can't ever eliminate a risk entirely, but you can reduce it significantly.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: cigint
I'm defending freedom of expression, not pedophiles. It's your job to get that idea into your thick skull. I'm not defending pedophiles by telling you that you have an objectively and entirely wrong definition of what a pedophile is, the education system clearly failed you on that point, and it's not my job to teach retards how to function.

I don't give a shit what happens to pedophiles, their mental illness is their responsibility to manage. If they can't stop themselves from touching kids then they get what's coming to them.
I care about banning lolicon/shota art since it's a slippery slope, and will not do anything positive for society. It's a "solution" that won't solve anything but kneecapping freedom of expression and setting a terrible precedent.
You are dying on loli hill. Even if it's not illegal, it is wrong, and should be called out and shunned at every opportunity. Loli IS the slippery slope. Today it's just jerking off to a drawing, tomorrow you're raping a kid. Plenty of cases of that exact thing. I reject your notion it should be accepted. Fuck that shit. I hope you have to live in the getto if you're found with that shit. Fuck you and your arguments.
 
You are dying on loli hill. Even if it's not illegal, it is wrong, and should be called out and shunned at every opportunity. Loli IS the slippery slope. Today it's just jerking off to a drawing, tomorrow you're raping a kid. Plenty of cases of that exact thing. I reject your notion it should be accepted. Fuck that shit. I hope you have to live in the getto if you're found with that shit. Fuck you and your arguments.
You're genuinely just not smart enough to have this argument. I never stated it's not wrong. I never stated it shouldn't be shunned or called out. In fact, I never said it should be accepted. Only that lolicon is freedom of expression, and as abhorrent as it is, it should be protected since it does not lead to child molestation, it has never been proven, despite your delusions.

Your reading comprehension is just THAT fucking terrible, you had to have been thrown down a flight of stairs as an infant.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: Hweeks and BirdUp
You're genuinely just not smart enough to have this argument. I never stated it's not wrong. I never stated it shouldn't be shunned or called out. In fact, I never said it should be accepted. Only that lolicon is freedom of expression, and as abhorrent as it is, it should be protected since it does not lead to child molestation, it has never been proven, despite your delusions.

Your reading comprehension is just THAT fucking terrible, you had to have been thrown down a flight of stairs as an infant.
Doesn't lead to child molestation? Idk man, think too many predators have been caught with lolicon to say that's true. You sound very mad.
 
Doesn't lead to child molestation? Idk man, think too many predators have been caught with lolicon to say that's true. You sound very mad.
By that logic, we should have abolished and outlawed the Catholic church and its religion a long time ago. The environment makes it too easy to touch little boys. Hope you agree.
 
By that logic, we should have abolished and outlawed the Catholic church and its religion a long time ago. The environment makes it too easy to touch little boys. Hope you agree.
I'm not even catholic moron l, but even I know that's a false positive. The catholic church doesn't have a policy of child rape and never has. Lolicon openly depicts it. And catholic priests STILL rape 3x less than school teachers. I think they're pretty safe.
 
No one who knows anything about art would agree with this, this is just boring black and white thinking from someone with a firmly held opinion. Works can be arousing or obscene and still be art which is something we see all throughout history.

Banning alcohol = fewer drunk drivers.
Banning guns != less shootings???

For fucks sake be consistent and evaluate your cognitive dissonance. If fewer guns exist there is logically less opportunity for people to be harmed by them and countries with stricter gun laws see fewer school shootings. Sure you can't ever eliminate a risk entirely, but you can reduce it significantly.
I'm completely consistent. Banning alcohol would absolutely result in fewer drunk drivers, we have direct evidence of this from abolition. Banning guns would have very little protective effect for children because not that many children get shot to begin with, and in countries that ban guns, violence just takes other forms, e.g. knife violence. This is completely consistent, you're just a little too dumb to understand what's being discussed.

edit: You already malformed the argument here:
Banning guns might protect children
=> you =>
Banning guns != less shootings???

False equivalence
 
I'm all for not giving power given to government under the guise of "protect the kids" but this is not the dunk you think it is nigga, read the room.
Wtf you mean "dunk", it's a factoid. I fail to see the error. Pedophilia is the mental illness of being aroused by prepubescent kids, not a brain switch that tells the person "child rape is okay". Pedophiles can be self-aware and know that touching kids as wrong, and never harm a child. That said, they should be made to seek treatment to ensure this is the case.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Hweeks
Wtf you mean "dunk", it's a factoid. I fail to see the error. Pedophilia is the mental illness of being aroused by prepubescent kids, not a brain switch that tells the person "child rape is okay". Pedophiles can be self-aware and know that touching kids as wrong, and never harm a child. That said, they should be made to seek treatment to ensure this is the case.

Allowing pedos to coom isn't treatment. People who over indulge in pornography don't function very well and sometimes end up with fucked up fetishes or a completly different sexual orientation. People who seldom look st porn have much more self control. Allowing the normalization of the porn isn't the answer.

The thing actually keeping people from assaulting kids is the severe punishment and societal shame that comes with it. Defending lolicon and shotacon runs antithetical to that.
 
Wtf you mean "dunk", it's a factoid. I fail to see the error. Pedophilia is the mental illness of being aroused by prepubescent kids, not a brain switch that tells the person "child rape is okay". Pedophiles can be self-aware and know that touching kids as wrong, and never harm a child. That said, they should be made to seek treatment to ensure this is the case.
Why should they seek treatment if they're self aware and fully in control of their actions. Again, this is a pedophile:
M107_M795_M483A1.jpg
Doesn't matter if its hit the ground or not, that fuse is screwed on and will eventually go off. All it takes is a push. Lolicon certainly isn't helping. It's like kicking a 155mm shell; you are asking for it to blow.
 
Allowing pedos to coom isn't treatment. People who over indulge in pornography don't function very well and sometimes end up with fucked up fetishes or a completly different sexual orientation. People who seldom look st porn have much more self control. Allowing the normalization of the porn isn't the answer.

The thing actually keeping people from assaulting kids is the severe punishment and societal shame that comes with it. Defending lolicon and shotacon runs antithetical to that.
Again, and again, I have to keep you retards from putting words in my mouth every single time, because you can't wrap your heads around my point when I've stated it in the most simple terms possible:

No, cooming is not treatment. Therapy is.

The existence of lolicon and shotacon does not lead to kids being molested. You can't prove this, stop reiterating it, it's not a claim based on reality and there is no evidence supporting it.

Why should they seek treatment if they're self aware and fully in control of their actions. Again, this is a pedophile:
View attachment 5737670
Doesn't matter if its hit the ground or not, that fuse is screwed on and will eventually go off. All it takes is a push. Lolicon certainly isn't helping. It's like kicking a 155mm shell; you are asking for it to blow.

If we're lucky a 155mm shell will hit your house one day and we'll have one less retard to worry about.

Were you touched as a child? Is that why you just post about pedophiles regardless of if it makes sense or not? Hating pedophiles is perfectly rational and understandable but you are seriously a moron for believing this is true.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: WelperHelper99
Again, and again, I have to keep you retards from putting words in my mouth every single time, because you can't wrap your heads around my point when I've stated it in the most simple terms possible:

No, cooming is not treatment. Therapy is.

The existence of lolicon and shotacon does not lead to kids being molested. You can't prove this, stop reiterating it, it's not a claim based on reality and there is no evidence supporting it.
Child molesters hard drives beg to differ
If we're lucky a 155mm shell will hit your house one day and we'll have one less retard to worry about.

Were you touched as a child? Is that why you just post about pedophiles regardless of if it makes sense or not? Hating pedophiles is perfectly rational and understandable but you are seriously a moron for believing this is true.
It's called I'm a uncle. It changes your perspective on sketchy drawings of children. Makes you quite violent about the subject actually.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Lightsaber Dildo
Child molesters hard drives beg to differ

It's called I'm a uncle. It changes your perspective on sketchy drawings of children. Makes you quite violent about the subject actually.
So you're violent about drawings but not the Catholic church, which has done way more direct harm to children in the past 10 years than lolicon ever has?

Maybe you should be facing the wall too if you look at a drawing and see a child.
 
So you're violent about drawings but not the Catholic church, which has done way more direct harm to children in the past 10 years than lolicon ever has?

Maybe you should be facing the wall too if you look at a drawing and see a child.
So far I've given you stats how low the actual rape rate of catholic priests are. Josh as presented those on multiple streams. You have unequivocally said no pedophiles that have raped kids have looked at lolicon or the lolicon has been a part of why they have raped a child? Stats? Proof? Or...
 
Again, and again, I have to keep you retards from putting words in my mouth every single time, because you can't wrap your heads around my point when I've stated it in the most simple terms possible:

No, cooming is not treatment. Therapy is.

The existence of lolicon and shotacon does not lead to kids being molested. You can't prove this, stop reiterating it, it's not a claim based on reality and there is no evidence supporting it.
Cooming makes it worse not better. For some reason lolicon and shota is the magical exception and consuming it makes you less horny. Therapy also isn't the answer, its punitive justice. Suggesting therapy is making it everyone else's problem and that there is a way to fix it. Its a crime and should always remain that way.

The reason teachers/priests/hollywood gets away with it because they got people covering for them. They also "get rehab" when caught and just reoffend. People are evil and should have consequences when doing fucked shit.
 
So far I've given you stats how low the actual rape rate of catholic priests are. Josh as presented those on multiple streams. You have unequivocally said no pedophiles that have raped kids have looked at lolicon or the lolicon has been a part of why they have raped a child? Stats? Proof? Or...
You didn't give any stats, you made some shit up and dismissed all those victims in favor of your point. All the kids who were touched by Catholics don't fucking matter to you? You don't give a shit about the safety of children, you just hate icky drawings. Stop pretending you care about kids.

For as much dumb shit there is on Wikipedia there is almost 500(!) sources presenting evidence of sexual abuse in the Catholic church on the page about the subject.

On the end of lolicon end of things, there is literally no studies that can tie lolicon consumption directly to child abuse. In every case (that I know of) that lolicon was involved, real CP was also involved. The offendors were child molestors not because they looked at CP, but because they already wanted to molest kids.
In fact, there was a Czech study that found that reported cases of child abuse declined when simulated CP was legalized.

So keep crying over fictional children while Pope Diddler has fun with real ones in the confessional.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Kiwisee and Hweeks
Back