Why do we put so much stock into loli/underaged characters as a direct link to being a pedo?

Do you think a hyperrealistic rape, torture, & murder VR simulator game would be insane to regulate because we don't like people feeling enjoyment of it?
It would be sane to regulate it on the basis of demonstrable harm caused; e.g. the desensitization to violence of young consumers. Meanwhile, it would be insane to regulate it on the basis of hypothetical projected feelings of enjoyment, which you have categorized as unacceptable and illegal for someone to feel.
 
He claims to have played the censored version. If a game is bereft of nudity or sex scenes and otherwise good, you can just bypass/ignore any remaining suggestive elements and enjoy the rest of the game.

It's the Fate game that's the issue, as you've rather graphically explained several times
Yes. Literally the same one they sell on Switch, just on Steam. As for Fate, I explained it repeatedly. I skipped the sex the same way you'd fast forward past a part in a movie you didn't like, to get to the good shit. My copy was torrented; it was take it or leave it.
 
25 FUCKING PAGES

THATS IT THIS THREAD WILL BE CONQUERD

I AM KING KIRYU, I DECLARE LOLI....................................................HARAM

YOU ALL ARE FLITHY KUFFARS WORTHY OF THE BRAZIER BULL.

Anyways fun fact red bull depending on where you live has flavor change dramatically the red bull in europe tastes like medicine while the red bull in america tastes like green apple oh and the red bull in india tastes like mango.

Uhh also does anyone read manga slowly i have a hard time finishing mangas that are 10+ vols long.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Something obscene shouldn't be considered art, and thus doesn't deserve the protected status thereof.
Something being obscene doesn't stop it from being art. Of course it doesn't make it art either, it comes down to the individual piece of work.

Remember that something can also be obscene without being sexual: a painting of Muhammad would be considered obscene by over one billion people on earth and many famous art pieces we love today where considered extremely controversial/offensive at one point in time.

The idea that art can't be offensive, obscene, or sexual is ridiculous.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Mukhrani and Hweeks
One last thing I'd like to add. People are playing semantics hard with the word lolicon and loli. The difference between the two is like zoophile and furry. There is a clear distinction but it also may as well be there. Adding -con at the end is explicitly porn. Its fine for animes to have young children on them since they are the target demographic but it is fucking weird when adults are obsessed with the characters.
 
Yes. Literally the same one they sell on Switch, just on Steam. As for Fate, I explained it repeatedly. I skipped the sex the same way you'd fast forward past a part in a movie you didn't like, to get to the good shit. My copy was torrented; it was take it or leave it.
This reads like you never grew out of your mom covering your eyes whenever a sex scene showed up in a movie.
Mana transfer was changed in realta nua as to not be sexual. As for Prisma Illia, only freaks watch that. How do you know so much about Fate by the way?
I read the VN when I was a teenager. And I didn't skip the h-scenes because I'm not a pussy. The scenes don't take away from the narrative at all. Tohsaka's was funny af though, there's a reason why it's memed so heavily.
Isn't it probable that they could graduate to cp, then become molesters after that?
In my opinion it's not. A majority of the anime characters I know of that fit the commonly accepted criteria of "loli" do not even look or act like real children. At best, they're proportioned more like petite girls with giant heads, and at worst, they don't even look human.

Most people think "loli" is just characters drawn to be as accurate to a 5-10 years old kid as possible, but I don't think that's very common for the degenerate. The average twitter lolicon degenerates are usually hebephiles (just to be 100% accurate, I know what I'm saying here), not pedophiles, they're looking at characters like Megumin, who is like...15? These characters usually are more mature or independent than the kind of kids you'd think a child molestor would be going after, and they're drawn with traits usually associated with teenage girls or young women instead of children. It's still pretty gross and uncomfortable, but not as reprehensible as looking at characters like Kanna from Dragon Maid or Anya from Spy x Family, who no matter their appearance, are written as children in their setting.

However, with how common online grooming is these days and the age groups targeted by predators on Discord, I'm willing to bring that up to add to your point that even people who think teenage anime girls are arousing should be given just as much scrutiny as any other pedophile.
 
This reads like you never grew out of your mom covering your eyes whenever a sex scene showed up in a movie.
I read the VN when I was a teenager. And I didn't skip the h-scenes because I'm not a pussy. The scenes don't take away from the narrative at all. Tohsaka's was funny af though, there's a reason why it's memed so heavily.
You are a autistic coomer. That shit was cringe as fuck and gross. Completely off beat with the story too. It took me out of the story because it was forced as fuck and creepy.
 
The most well know post on the site about this subject was a poster talking that pedos don't watch loli porn because it's not so much attraction to the body type as much as the extremely skewed power dynamics involved. For pedos it's all about the abuse, and they can't get that kick from drawings.

I think you'd probably find animal torture as a bigger factor for a person turning into pedo than lolicon, and in general it is an easy rallying point for internet goodboy points. It doesn't help that it's not unheard of for the crusaders against Japanese porn getting caught with far worse irl material.
 
You are a autistic coomer. That shit was cringe as fuck and gross. Completely off beat with the story too. It took me out of the story because it was forced as fuck and creepy.
Nobody said you had to get off to it, moron. If you don't think "tohsaka's anus is defenseless" isn't funny as fuck then you're missing out. You don't have to like the sex scenes, but if you only like Fate for the fights then you have extremely low standards for good fight scenes. The best fight in the entire series STILL hasn't even been done right in animation to this day (Saber vs. Fake Assassin). I bet you thought Fate/Zero was peak fiction. Which I hope not, because the writer for that series wrote a loli guro porn VN.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: WelperHelper99
Nobody said you had to get off to it, moron. If you don't think "tohsaka's anus is defenseless" isn't funny as fuck then you're missing out. You don't have to like the sex scenes, but if you only like Fate for the fights then you have extremely low standards for good fight scenes. The best fight in the entire series STILL hasn't even been done right in animation to this day (Saber vs. Fake Assassin). I bet you thought Fate/Zero was peak fiction. Which I hope not, because the writer for that series wrote a loli guro porn VN.
You're just proving my point that the sex scenes failed on multiple systematic levels. They weren't supposed to be funny. Any laughter that happened was out of cringe. Not to mention it was still gross, out of place, downright creepy, and didn't need to be there to make the story work. I do not mind AT ALL it got censored.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Lightsaber Dildo
Fr though i think i can manage mostly 2 or three volumes and if its autistically complex then it might as well be an entire month before i finish it
I know! Usually I'll have a big burst of speed for a day, then just forget about it. I have 3 manga right now just waiting for me to catch up lol
 
Again, under anti-loli laws, you would be sent to prison for having porn of Yoko Litter, a drawing of a fictional 14 year old girl, on your PC. She's an underage character, it doesn't matter what she looks like, she is UNDERAGE.
Bold emphasis mine.
This is not a convincing argument because it doesn't consider why people consider loli a bad thing to begin with. It's the sexual attraction to childlike bodies and personalities that makes lolis disgusting. It definitely matters what the character looks like.

Wouldn't you think it's absurd if I grab some photo of a 50 year old milf pornstar and say she's actually 5 years old and if you find her hot then you're a pedo?

If some coomer jacks off to Yoko Littner, does he jack off to the idea that she's 14, or does he jack off to her body (which obviously does not look like the body of a minor?)

The fact that people meme about "oh she's actually 9000 years old" shows how flimsy of an argument is to think that it's only the listed age and not the physical appearance that matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WelperHelper99
Almost every anime is set in high school and even third years are only 17 years old.
This will always makes me confused, and wonder why people are so eager to stand by their cartoons. There is literally no reason for this. Every character is always both specialised and drawn to appeal to coomers but also canonically a teenager. I really don't think it's projection when I say I believe the only reason this is done is to give the people drawing it and consuming it the ability to enact their sexual fantasies of being attracted to high school age girls.
Inb4 the cope about how this is just Japan being obsession with childhood/teenage innocence (cope for the entire nation of Japan having the culture equivalent of autism).
 
Bold emphasis mine.
This is not a convincing argument because it doesn't consider why people consider loli a bad thing to begin with. It's the sexual attraction to childlike bodies and personalities that makes lolis disgusting. It definitely matters what the character looks like.

Wouldn't you think it's absurd if I grab some photo of a 50 year old milf pornstar and say she's actually 5 years old and if you find her hot then you're a pedo?

If some coomer jacks off to Yoko Littner, does he jack off to the idea that she's 14, or does he jack off to her body (which obviously does not look like the body of a minor?)

The fact that people meme about "oh she's actually 9000 years old" shows how flimsy of an argument is to think that it's only the listed age and not the physical appearance that matters.
You see, that makes actual sense. The opposing argument is stating that people only jack off to a number. Sexiest thing in the world- math. It's about how the character is drawn. I stated it before, Yoko could easily be 20 just by the appearance. It's a bad argument stating that's what people mean by loli.
 
Bold emphasis mine.
This is not a convincing argument because it doesn't consider why people consider loli a bad thing to begin with. It's the sexual attraction to childlike bodies and personalities that makes lolis disgusting. It definitely matters what the character looks like.

Wouldn't you think it's absurd if I grab some photo of a 50 year old milf pornstar and say she's actually 5 years old and if you find her hot then you're a pedo?

If some coomer jacks off to Yoko Littner, does he jack off to the idea that she's 14, or does he jack off to her body (which obviously does not look like the body of a minor?)

The fact that people meme about "oh she's actually 9000 years old" shows how flimsy of an argument is to think that it's only the listed age and not the physical appearance that matters.
I understand it's absurd, the thing with this viewpoint is it still presents a contradiction. Appearance and age both matter when we're talking about real people. However, if these rules only selectively apply to fictional characters, that means we are very likely to give passes to things that we shouldn't or prosecute people who don't deserve it.

If a coomer jacks it to Yoko Litter's 14 year old depiction, he is still jacking off to a drawing of a 14 year old. This is not okay. "She doesn't look like a minor" would not hold up in court, since it doesn't hold up for real people either.

This also opens up the can of worms of what "the body of a minor" means. Some minors are developed more maturely than others, what's the frame of reference then? You can't reliably establish one, apart from distinguishing a 5 year old from a 15 year old. Eventually the lines will get blurry in the range of characters 14 and up. Take for example Ilulu from Dragon Maid. Is it legal to coom to that thing?

If only the physical appearance matters, that also dismisses the personality and actions of the character. What if there's a character with the body of a 20 year old has their mind swapped with that of a 10 year old, shouldn't that character be considered pedophilia if sexualized? The character has no capability to consent, even if they have the body of an adult.

Different pedos get off to different things. For some it's the body type, others it's the power dynamic, etc. You have to prove beyond doubt that the images have no artistic merit and the person was getting off to it, and the only way that makes sense is to apply the same rules that real people follow to fictional characters...which still makes no sense! It's all contradictory.
 
This also opens up the can of worms of what "the body of a minor" means. Some minors are developed more maturely than others, what's the frame of reference then? You can't reliably establish one, apart from distinguishing a 5 year old from a 15 year old. Eventually the lines will get blurry in the range of characters 14 and up. Take for example Ilulu from Dragon Maid. Is it legal to coom to that thing?
It's the intent of the artist. If she's stacked, has adult characteristics, she's intended to be mature. If she looks 5, she's 5 and the artistis a fucking creep if he tries to do anything sexual. It's not hard.
Different pedos get off to different things. For some it's the body type, others it's the power dynamic, etc. You have to prove beyond doubt that the images have no artistic merit and the person was getting off to it, and the only way that makes sense is to apply the same rules that real people follow to fictional characters...which still makes no sense! It's all contradictory.
You are making 2+2 the formula to get to the moon. If it's disgusting, vile, it's bad. Literally trust your gut.
 
You address none of my points. I banish you to the Shadow Realm.
Where is your Seal of Orichalcos? Since you haven't played this card at all you cannot banish your opponent to the Shadow Realm, they will instead be sent to the showers before being let back onto the convention floor.
why people are so eager to stand by their cartoons.
They've made the cartoon part of their identity, so they see any attack on their cartoon as an attack on them. Fatherless behaviour ran rampant, there are many such cases and it is very sad.
 
Last edited:
Back