Why is there so much mainstream acceptance of troonery when there's endless examples of how this is negatively affecting society?? - Why do we constantly excuse the bad behavior of troons?

[Shart Attack]

Too many people accept the premise that accepting trans bullshit has anything to do with being a liberal. Even you're doing it. Liberalism is a political philosophy that posits that the ideal society is one that maximizes liberty, that the best society is the one in which people are the most free. It has nothing to do with personally accepting what people choose to do with that freedom. The liberal position is that gay people should be free to marry each other. That doesn't mean you have to like gay marriage. The liberal position is that people should have absolute or nearly absolute free speech. That doesn't mean you have to like everything everyone says. The liberal position is that consenting adults should be free to cut their own dicks off if they want. That doesn't mean you have to play along with their mental illness, allow them to do it to minors, allow taxpayer money to fund it, or tolerate their creepy behavior toward women. You might argue that's political liberalism, and social liberalism means tolerance and keeping an open mind. Being open minded doesn't mean you're obligated to accept all of the ridiculous, immoral shit put before you, either.

People blindly accept the false premise that liberalism means accepting any and all deviant behavior, and they blindly accept the false premise that liberalism is a sign of intelligence. Young people especially want to be thought of as liberal because they think it means being forward-thinking, rational, intelligent, and morally superior to backwards-thinking conservative rednecks. They're constantly shown by ideologically motivated news media and youth-oriented fiction that to be a good "liberal," one must accept social justice dogma, including trans shit, so they go along with it. Older people and corporations want to remain relevant with the profitable 18 to 34 demographic, so they go along with it, too.

There's also that fact that the 24-hour news cycle and social media have made it possible to bombard people with propaganda every waking moment of their lives. Even rational people eventually buckle under that kind of sustained mental pressure. I highly recommend a book called Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes by Jacques Ellul. The references are badly dated, but it's a sobering examination of how propaganda works.

Edited for grammar because I be an retarded.

 

[Executive Petrel]

Snip snap is cheaper than therapy. Instead of helping the lunatics they get empowered to ensure big money from guilt driven virtue signaling normies who will buy rainbow products.
And even if Tranny ropes afterwards, its a win win situation.

It's a whole industry and a sick one.

 

[MrMeep]

The answer is always $$$$$$$$$$

LGB advocacy groups had nothing but harassing obscure Coloradan bakers to do for attention after sodomy was decriminalized, gay marriage was federally legalized. and sexuality was made part of anti-discrimination law. They'd achieved their goals. Adding the T gave them something to keep the wheel of begging for donations going.
Big Pharma and the cosmetic surgery community loooove the idea of lifetime customers for HRT and feminizing/masculizing plastic surgery.

The media's bought in because they're all owned by massive conglomerates that have fingers in one or both of those pies, and fear of media backlash is why all the social media platforms cape for trannies so hard.

I 1000% get the $$$ aspect when it comes to any money-making enterprise, especially the medical industry who is profiting handsomely off this new demographic that they've cajoled into buying puberty blockers, hormones and costly surgeries. All that is certainly obvious. But it doesn't explain why so much of the public kowtows to the trans movement, in particular "cis" women who really are only negatively impacted by this greenlighting of men entering female spaces. And the most fucked up part is we are sacrificing the safety of children to accommodate these fucking freaks. They are the ones who will pay the biggest price, and the tide will probably only change after enough of them have been violated and permanently traumatized as a consequence of all this.

 

[MrMeep]

I agree w

Too many people accept the premise that accepting trans bullshit has anything to do with being a liberal. Even you're doing it. Liberalism is a political philosophy that posits that the ideal society is one that maximizes liberty, that the best society is the one in which people are the most free. It has nothing to do with personally accepting what people choose to do with that freedom. The liberal position is that gay people should be free to marry each other. That doesn't mean you have to like gay marriage. The liberal position is that people should have absolute or nearly absolute free speech. That doesn't mean you have to like everything everyone says. The liberal position is that consenting adults should be free to cut their own dicks off if they want. That doesn't mean you have to play along with their mental illness, allow them to do it to minors, allow taxpayer money to fund it, or tolerate their creepy behavior toward women. You might argue that's political liberalism, and social liberalism means tolerance and keeping an open mind. Being open minded doesn't mean you're obligated to accept all of the ridiculous, immoral shit put before you, either.

People blindly accept the false premise that liberalism means accepting any and all deviant behavior, and they blindly accept the false premise that liberalism is a sign of intelligence. Young people especially want to be thought of as liberal because they think it means being forward-thinking, rational, intelligent, and morally superior to backwards-thinking conservative rednecks. They're constantly shown by ideologically motivated news media and youth-oriented fiction that to be a good "liberal," one must accept social justice dogma, including trans shit, so they go along with it. Older people and corporations want to remain relevant with the profitable 18 to 34 demographic, so they go along with it, too.

There's also that fact that the 24-hour news cycle and social media have made it possible to bombard people with propaganda every waking moment of their lives. Even rational people eventually buckle under that kind of sustained mental pressure. I highly recommend a book called Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes by Jacques Ellul. The references are badly dated, but it's a sobering examination of how propaganda works.

Edited for grammar because I be an retarded.

I fully agree with you- I don't think being liberal should dictate blindly accepting what would otherwise in rational circumstances be considered deviant behavior and permanent mutilation of children. Unfortunately wokeism has done a very good job of convincing people that that is the case, and that if you don't step in line and support the trans movement you're a transphobe and a bigot- and you're now relegated to either conservative or fringe feminist circles. I think in all likelihood there's probably a significant minority of people who are otherwise "liberal" who feel the same way, but since every single mainstream social media platforms censors these views there's nowhere to
convene to discuss them except KF and the like.

 

[rel=alternate]

"And you can't question ANY of this stuff on mainstream social media platforms without the online trans community sending their army to manipulate the reaction/feedback on your post. Women aren't allowed to question anything or raise issue with stuff that directly affects them without being called a "TERF." I seriously don't understand how there aren't more people recognizing the contradictions of this mainstream doctrine. "

Because normal people just don't want to have anything to do with it. They have a life beyond a stupid debate about trannies, and the risk of speaking out is much greater than the reward, if any. Most people avoid trannies like the plague, IRL and online. They don't engage, they cross the road.

As demonstrated by the recent leaks, the issue is that these people have nothing better to do than to spend their life on twitter, so they end up owning the place. And nobody cares enough to call them out on it, because it ultimately does not matter.

Politicians are just using this as leverage to gain some marginal audience and silence their opponents.

I see how some of the younger people might get their mind corrupted, but I am pretty convinced the huge majority of people just know they are freaks and don't bother themselves even thinking about them. I can't think of a single person in my life who actually thinks trannies are not mentally ill. It's just not worth fighting about whether they are or not.

 

[Absolutego]

I 1000% get the $$$ aspect when it comes to any money-making enterprise, especially the medical industry who is profiting handsomely off this new demographic that they've cajoled into buying puberty blockers, hormones and costly surgeries. All that is certainly obvious. But it doesn't explain why so much of the public kowtows to the trans movement, in particular "cis" women who really are only negatively impacted by this greenlighting of men entering female spaces. And the most fucked up part is we are sacrificing the safety of children to accommodate these fucking freaks. They are the ones who will pay the biggest price, and the tide will probably only change after enough of them have been violated and permanently traumatized as a consequence of all this.

The cis women either a) aren't directly impacted, and consequently have no issue simping for trannies for internet/media attention points, or b) are sufficiently cowed by all relevant authority figures telling them to suck the girldick.
The few who aren't are labeled TERFs and blasted by the rest of polite society for not being sympathetic enough. People in general, but especially women, are easily malleable by outside forces, and a lot of female athletes choose to suffer in silence rather than rick the reputational backlash of calling out trannies in NCAA sports, as just one example.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

I assumed the default position of acceptance

Why?

 

[Helvítis Túristi]

Why do we excuse the bad behavior of troons? This question can lead to "why do we excuse the bad behavior of *insert minority group here*?" If we don't have to tolerate one group that's harmful to society, why do we have to tolerate the other groups that harmful to society?