Why Modern women expectations are too high and unrealistic?

My anime women have never expected anything of me realistic or not.
rika crossed arms.png
 
Nigger where did you find a bulgarwoman that was actually pleasant? Please tell me, I'm tired of dating turks and westoids
Have you tried not to be broke?

Be not broke or be chad pick one and guaranteed a pleasant lady will walk in and threat you like a king like this guy. He got proper waify until she realised he is a broke bitch and won't marry her.
 
There's old and there's too old, but from experience people who marry in their early to mid 30's seem to be more stable than those who marry right out of their teens or their early 20s, specially the men who will marry anything that says yes to them, only to find out how divorce works. One I know never got back on his feet, lost his own company and is now living in a tinyhouse, but not by choice.
And yet my observation and experience is the exact opposite.

Class factors in play?
 
Ah but lets unpack that definition you provided. What do you know about being divine, pious, or devout? And why do you insist that I am falling short of these things by advocating for loving, devoted marriages and raising children? Do you think its pious or devout to prioritize a career over children?
It is ungodly to arrogate to oneself the knowledge of the design and intentions of God.

Your very "Protestant" scriptural riposte is inapposite. ...and your choice of it underscores my point above.

I enjoy shitposting and engaging in discussions.
And it is unseemly to do so while wielding a cross and interlacing supposed Christian admonitions with your shitposts.

You advertise yourself as something, but you act counter to that and presume to prescribe God's will while taking snaky positions and relying on the spaces between.

What I'm saying is that its better to sacrifice unncessary luxuries and, as a result, live simply, than it is to abandon your beliefs and virtues.
Disingenuousness is not godly. You have positioned all of your comments about women and women's choices in their lives. You have also presupposed roles within a family. Where are your lectures - and I mean beyond glib asides - about men?
 
Did your college not cover reading comprehension?
Yours clearly didn't. You said all of this in the same paragraph:
He was not successful despite being targeted by organized crime.

he was targeted because it was successful.

However it wasn't successful long enough to amount to much.


You're arguing with a Catholic
So he claims, but he comes across as a Puritan with a dash of Presbyterianism.
 
Alcoholics Anonymous or prison?
A death in the family.
It is ungodly to arrogate to oneself the knowledge of the design and intentions of God.
I'm doubtful that you have any real idea what you're talking about. You're taking stabs in the dark here.
Your very "Protestant" scriptural riposte is inapposite. ...and your choice of it underscores my point above.
This proves my suspicion. You don't have any idea what you're talking about. Why not engage in the conversation instead of lashing out at me?
And it is unseemly to do so while wielding a cross and interlacing supposed Christian admonitions with your shitposts.
Cope about it.
You advertise yourself as something, but you act counter to that and presume to prescribe God's will while taking snaky positions and relying on the spaces between.
Did you miss the part where I explained that its a Pale Rider reference? I'm not claiming to be a literal preacher, its a character from a movie I like. The word "preacher" isn't even a legitimate office in Catholicism, we have Priests.
Where are your lectures - and I mean beyond glib asides - about men?
This is a thread about women. It's in the title.
Yours clearly didn't. You said all of this in the same paragraph:
It would be easier to discuss it with more specific information but that would be power leveling. I'm hampered by the necessity to remain vague. Still I think the overall message is clear if you're not being pedantic. However you don't really care do you? You're just looking for reasons to lash out because you don't like what I have to say but don't want to engage in an actual discussion.
So he claims, but he comes across as a Puritan with a dash of Presbyterianism.
Case in point. You have no real idea about the differences between Christian faiths and you're trying to be insulting instead of engaging.
 
Gotta say. Lotta dumb ass mad bitches in this thread. After reading some of the smoothest brained takes I've ever seen. I am more convinced than ever that every restriction that society ever placed on women was there for a good reason. yeah, shit sucks in the world. But to convince yourself that every man in existence is a pot bellied alcoholic woman beater is fucking schizo shit. And reeks of daddy issues. Get off the Internet and touch grass/pound sand/kick rocks/stop being retarded. Neg rate me all you want. I know I'm right.
 
and now is one of the leftovers is an unpleasant thought.
I don't think anyone should adopt that mindset. It's not healthy and it's not true.

We are all beloved children of God. Not unwanted leftovers.

Such a notion comes from trying to hold all people to a nebulous universal standard but that's not how life works.

Speaking for myself I'm much more financially, emotionally, and spiritually stable than I was 10 years ago. The guy I used to be would not have made a good parent. That isn't to say I couldn't have risen to the occasion if it was thrust upon me, but there's also no guarantee I would have either.

For women I think we often get caught up in the issue of promiscuity and that in turn belays a struggle between healthy shame and misguided empowerment.

Yet it's important to remember that promiscuity is just as wrong when men do it. That isn't to say the old lock and key analogy is entirely wrong. We know that women's promiscuity can result in more visible and long lasting consequences than men's, but from a moral standpoint both are equally sinful. The lock and key analogy is often used erroneously as some sort of justification for men when it shouldn't be.
 
Back