Martin Luther also thought that Revelation should be in the apocrypha. Martin Luther can be right on some things and wrong in others.
Okay, but if people that disagree on multiple things concur on one thing for millenia, it gives it more credence than something that was only invented in the 1800s to sperg about how Catholics worship Mary. I give more credence to history than a random sperg when it comes to my religion becuase it there is really no logical reason Catholics would want to ""worship"" Mary for no reason and keep it as tradition for multiple ecumenical councils when multiple heresies, some even more trivial and confounding, were stamped out like Arianism or Monophysim.
James the Just is Jesus's brother period as per Josephus and Paul and the gospels. Adelphoi clearly means brother in this context.
Nigger learn Koine Greek. Philia is "blood brother". Adelphoi is "closely related kinsman (which ranges from cousin to half-brother to step-brother depending on the context). No competent writer of Greek would confuse the two. They are entirely different concepts. What you are saying is like saying "They meant erotic love, even though the word they used was not that". And then there's the issue of the fucking Aramaic, the OG language of the Bible disagreeing with you. If James the Younger was Jesus's blood brother, the Aramaic for it would be something like James, son of Mary. Instead we see Jesus's brother, James, which again indicates a non-blood brother relationship. Stop your retarded ass from embarrassing yourself. I read books upon books about this. You literally read the translatipn of a translation of a translation and cane to your uninformed opinion, forgetting naturally, translastions are imperfect ccopies of the original.
On a theological level, it's extra retarded to say Mary wasn't a perpetual virgin since she's the New Ark of The Covenant (since she did carry God in the form of Christ in her womb). The last time people touched the Ark with unclean hands and/or thoughts, they fucking died. Joseph dies in the 30 years between the Advent narrative and Jesus's calling, but based on the fact that he's still alive during the Incident in the Temple when Jesus was 13 and frankly the fact that it isn't in the Bible, you can tell that he died a death that wasn't literal Divine Punishment from God.
UNINFORMED SPERGING ABOUT SHIT YOU CLEARLY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT
The existence of tradition is not an argument. There are plenty of examples of Catholic tradition beyond that one that are just silly or wrong.
Please point to me where the Trinity is explicitly mentioned in the Bible. Because that is not there. It's hinted at, but groups like the Arians denied it and it was onlt through Ecumenical Councils that became the basis of Christendom that we have such dogmas. Basically, Protestants rely on Tradition yet disparage it at the same time because they literally have no historical understanding of how Christian doctrine was formed over the milenia.
Also I like how "tradcaths" start screeching about stuff like trannies when that's what their Catholic political representatives support
I'm not really talking about trannies so much as the mindset both Protestants and far leftists have where reality is subject to my interpretation and objective facts and traditions don't matter: they are to be destroyed and replaced with what I feel. This tendency in both camps is eerily similar and really I feel like Protesant groups are some of the most prone to far left thought specifically because is an outgrowth of Protestantism itself. Fundamentally, Protestantism was, is and always wil be a meme. The only debate should be whether to join an Ortodox church or The Catholic Chuch or do neither and become a nonbeliver. Protestantism is basically just nihilism dressed up as Christianty.
