WingsofRedemption / Jordie Jordan - Morbidly Obese E-Begging Suicide-Baiting Vidya Streamer. Trolled by people somehow more pathetic.

[Rectdectpect]

It's at least a yearly tradition at this point. I don't know why it's so hard to make fun of a fat sperg on the internet without inevitably getting involved in teenage girl-caliber drama and catfights.

This is why Sean Ranklin is and always will be the GOAT.

Shout out Sean Ranklin and big ups to the homie Gustavo.

 

[shiftyz]

It's at least a yearly tradition at this point. I don't know why it's so hard to make fun of a fat sperg on the internet without inevitably getting involved in teenage girl-caliber drama and catfights.

This is why Sean Ranklin is and always will be the GOAT.

Personally, watching the autists have a internet slapfight is half the fun. Much more entertaining than watching a lexapro zombie play with his r6 premades.

 

[iNEEDthatMoney]

Last stream he said he has contacts for news channels like fox news CNN and said he'll do a interview if they dont stop

But what about his contacts with FBI!
He has personally been vetted by them!

 

[Matt Damon]

But what about his contacts with FBI!
He has personally been vetted by them!

Don't forget that he's seriously considering, uh... suing them.

With all these resources at his disposal, Richard is definitely going to make a real effort this time instead of talking tough and giving up immediately again, I swear.

 

[Catboys the Musical]

>realtawk podcast spergs say they are going to sue wings due to the strikes they are getting, despite just restreaming him and not having a leg to stand on in court

I'm kinda iffy on this one point. There's some legal precedent that could point in RealTawk's favor. I think it can be pretty easily proven that Wings filed the takedowns in bad faith, given his incredibly loose grasp on the concept of Fair Use. Plus Wings abusing DMCA to take down and extort troll channels, then proceeding to brag about it is a thing he's done for like 2-3 years at this point. I think the reaction from the trolls is incredibly spergy, mass flagging his channels down over and over. But Wings did kick the hornet's nest by flagging down the Discord servers and DMCAing the YouTube channels, and then publicly bragging about it. "I've taken down about 90% of the troll empire." Now Wings is trying to change the story (he has a habit of constantly changing his stories) to say he's only ever flagged 2 things since 2016, when you can look back like less than a year ago and he's publicly bragging about flagging channels down.

 

[shiftyz]

I'm kinda iffy on this one point. There's some legal precedent that could point in RealTawk's favor. I think it can be pretty easily proven that Wings filed the takedowns in bad faith, given his incredibly loose grasp on the concept of Fair Use. Plus Wings abusing DMCA to take down and extort troll channels, then proceeding to brag about it is a thing he's done for like 2-3 years at this point. I think the reaction from the trolls is incredibly spergy, mass flagging his channels down over and over. But Wings did kick the hornet's nest by flagging down the Discord servers and DMCAing the YouTube channels, and then publicly bragging about it. "I've taken down about 90% of the troll empire." Now Wings is trying to change the story (he has a habit of constantly changing his stories) to say he's only ever flagged 2 things since 2016, when you can look back like less than a year ago and he's publicly bragging about flagging channels down.

The thing is, it is his content. Slapping a few images over it and having two retards talk over him, whilst monetising the whole thing is very hard to argue for in court. I doubt if I streamed netflix shows on twitch, with a few images and occasionally interjecting with some retarded commentary I would last more than a few days before getting banned. If I monetised it I imagine I would get flagged down in a single day, granted I got enough attention and viewers. As for the takedown being issued in bad faith, again it's his content. He is well within his rights to flag it down.

 

[Catboys the Musical]

The thing is, it is his content. Slapping a few images over it and having two retards talk over him, whilst monetising the whole thing is very hard to argue for in court. I doubt if I streamed netflix shows on twitch, with a few images and occasionally interjecting with some retarded commentary I would last more than a few days before getting banned. If I monetised it I imagine I would get flagged down in a single day, granted I got enough attention and viewers. As for the takedown being issued in bad faith, again it's his content.

The H3H3 vs. Matt Hoss case states that commentary is a "cornerstone" of Fair Use. The Sargon vs. Akilah Obviously case established precedent that clipping content and titling it in a way that provides commentary is enough to establish Fair Use. I'm not saying that it'd clearly go in RealTawk's favor, just that it's not as "cut and dry" as you're making it out to be. I also mentioned the highlight channels that Wings flagged down and extorted, because I think those are a much more clear example of Fair Use. Plus again, Wings clearly filed these takedown requests in bad faith. He has an incredibly loose grasp on the concept of Fair Use, and his gloating on stream and in chat can be used to argue that he struck them out of spite rather than protecting his copyright.

 

[iNEEDthatMoney]

I'm kinda iffy on this one point. There's some legal precedent that could point in RealTawk's favor. I think it can be pretty easily proven that Wings filed the takedowns in bad faith, given his incredibly loose grasp on the concept of Fair Use.

I remember a while ago some shit happened with Sargon, when a youtuber sued him for having her be shown in a clip.
Sargon won, setting a precedent that you can re-clip videos with no commentary.

Restreams with actual commentary would 100% win in court.

 

[shiftyz]

The Sargon vs. Akilah Obviously case established precedent that clipping content

The troll channels fair enough, you have a point. But I was talking about realtawk, which is a straight up restream.

 

[Catboys the Musical]

The troll channels fair enough, you have a point. But I was talking about realtawk, which is a straight up restream.

I'm not saying that it'd clearly go in RealTawk's favor, just that it's not as "cut and dry" as you're making it out to be.

 

[shiftyz]

I personally think it would be pretty cut and dry considering that you could easily argue that the purpose of the restream is monetised harassment given the history of everything that's gone on, which would certainly muddy the waters. Unfortunately we will never know, which is a massive shame. Would be amazing content.
Edit: Also considering the majority of the "commentary" is them just calling him a fat pedo is another thing that I imagine would go down like a lead balloon in a courtroom.

 

[Jurisdiction]

>shit comes out that realtawk made a deal to pay wings to avoid his strikes

Hmmm so thats the most likely possibly for a deal. I never thought it was them making a deal about the shaving beard like gulag and his goons are trying to make it out to be. But it was really suspicious to why real tawk was banning so many people. But it makes sense that whole threat of legal trouble was BS and just a grift.
We actually have some screenshots provided by professional pred proving people got banned.

So both sides of the civil war fucking shit. But its pretty much over now since everyone is focusing on richard again due to his fuck ups and him celebrating too early. Which is pretty funny.

 

[Matt Damon]

I doubt if I streamed netflix shows on twitch, with a few images and occasionally interjecting with some retarded commentary

If you were presenting a transformative work using that Netflix show as a basis for that work, then it's fair use. You can't analogize a situation with an entirely different fact pattern and then claim the two situations are legally identical because they're presented in vaguely similar formats - the context is absolutely essential to the fair use claim.

If I monetised it I imagine I would get flagged down in a single day, granted I got enough attention and viewers.

A corporation's gay policies for washing their hands of copyright disputes have nothing to do with whether it'd be considered fair use of a copyrighted work in civil court.

As for the takedown being issued in bad faith, again it's his content. He is well within his rights to flag it down.

No, he's not at all. Being ignorant of basic copyright law because of your 62 IQ does not give you special legal privileges.

 

[shiftyz]

If you were presenting a transformative work using that Netflix show as a basis for that work, then it's fair use. You can't analogize a situation with an entirely different fact pattern and then claim the two situations are legally identical because they're presented in vaguely similar formats - the context is absolutely essential to the fair use claim.

A corporation's gay policies for washing their hands of copyright disputes have nothing to do with whether it'd be considered fair use of a copyrighted work in civil court.

No, he's not at all. Being ignorant of basic copyright law because of your 62 IQ does not give you special legal privileges.

Fair enough then. Remind me to throw out paedophile accusations during my next restream of breaking bad.

 

[shiftyz]

Hmmm so thats the most likely possibly for a deal. I never thought it was them making a deal about the shaving beard like gulag and his goons are trying to make it out to be. But it was really suspicious to why real tawk was banning so many people. But it makes sense that whole threat of legal trouble was BS and just a grift.
We actually have some screenshots provided by professional pred proving people got banned.
View attachment 3608908
So both sides of the civil war fucking shit. But its pretty much over now since everyone is focusing on richard again due to his fuck ups and him celebrating too early. Which is pretty funny.

Wings just linked this on his twitter also.

 

[Matt Damon]

Remind me to throw out paedophile accusations during my next restream of breaking bad.

I don't understand why you're being intentionally obtuse about this.

 

[shiftyz]

I don't understand why you're being intentionally obtuse about this.

Because I am a sperg who doesn't want to admit I might of been wrong. It's a coping mechanism.

 

[Keffals Raped Me]

Wings just linked this on his twitter also.

I wanna see these faggot a-logs burn as much as the next guy but is Wings "we had a dog named nigger" "nigger fetch my shoes" "black people dont tip" of Redemption really going to try and take a moral highground over a troll being racist?

 

[shiftyz]

I wanna see these faggot a-logs burn as much as the next guy but is Wings "we had a dog named nigger" "nigger fetch my shoes" "black people dont tip" of Redemption really going to try and take a moral highground over a troll being racist?

He was a 22 year old kid when he said those things, skyrim wasn't even out yet. Give him a break.

 

[InwardsStink]

I wanna see these faggot a-logs burn as much as the next guy but is Wings "we had a dog named nigger" "nigger fetch my shoes" "black people dont tip" of Redemption really going to try and take a moral highground over a troll being racist?

Why shouldn’t he? That’s how you win schoolyard arguments which is all the internet really amounts to anyway.