YABookgate

Odo was EXPLICITLY stated as being a straight male as far as the fact that he considered himself male and heterosexual with no doubts that he was male and had a dick in his human form.

Also, one of the central storylines for DS9 was the "will they or won't they" romantic plotline with Odo spending the ENTIRE series wanting to fuck Kira and by the time Kira realized Odo wanted to stick his penis in her, it's too late as Odo has to rejoin his people to cure them of the bio weapon Starfleet infected him with that was used to poison the entire Founder race.

As for Garak/Bashir; I always took Garak's affection for Bashir to be more "my first real friend" deal than him having a crush on Bashir. The glimpses we got of Garak and his private life indicated that he grew up an uloved bastard in a culture where friendship was absurdly looked down upon due to the quasi-fascist and backstabbing nature of Cardasian culture and while he eventually rose to a decent position in the Obsidian Order, he fucked up at some point (his story about killing a high ranking Cardasian politician's kid by way of blowing up a transport vessel to kill a single criminal onboard it and got punished by basically being fired/exiled to DS9 makes sense in a "Rick Sanchez tells his backstory about how his wife died then backtracks about it being a lie because he is too arrogant/proud to ever tell someone his greatest fuck up/failure" sort of reveal). And that his own father was the guy who ratfucked him, as far as giving the order to fire/exile Garak.

Bashir was his first real "friend" and I have to think that he was so close and protective of Bashir in part because the concept of friendship is rare in his people along with Garak, tacitly knowing that Bashir would have issues if he knew all of the bad shit Garak had done in his past, hence him putting up a flirtatious front of half-truths, denials, and other bits and peaces to keep Bashir from ever truly getting to the point that he might find out something about Garak that might make him cut off contact with him.
Andrew Robinson considered Garak to be omnisexual and tried to play him that way in his first appearances, including being attracted to Bashir, and Alexander Siddig reportedly thought that Bashir and Garak were being set up as a couple in their early episodes together. Then Rick Berman got cold feet and ordered the writers to tone it down, so they brought Ziyal in as a new romantic interest for Garak and started developing the Bashir and O'Brien friendship instead. They still slipped in some innuendo from time to time, though, like that episode where Garak told Bashir to eat his (data) rod and Bashir gave him space chocolate as a going away present.

/trektriviasperging
 
Odo was EXPLICITLY stated as being a straight male as far as the fact that he considered himself male and heterosexual with no doubts that he was male and had a dick in his human form.

Also, one of the central storylines for DS9 was the "will they or won't they" romantic plotline with Odo spending the ENTIRE series wanting to fuck Kira and by the time Kira realized Odo wanted to stick his penis in her, it's too late as Odo has to rejoin his people to cure them of the bio weapon Starfleet infected him with that was used to poison the entire Founder race.

As for Garak/Bashir; I always took Garak's affection for Bashir to be more "my first real friend" deal than him having a crush on Bashir. The glimpses we got of Garak and his private life indicated that he grew up an uloved bastard in a culture where friendship was absurdly looked down upon due to the quasi-fascist and backstabbing nature of Cardasian culture and while he eventually rose to a decent position in the Obsidian Order, he fucked up at some point (his story about killing a high ranking Cardasian politician's kid by way of blowing up a transport vessel to kill a single criminal onboard it and got punished by basically being fired/exiled to DS9 makes sense in a "Rick Sanchez tells his backstory about how his wife died then backtracks about it being a lie because he is too arrogant/proud to ever tell someone his greatest fuck up/failure" sort of reveal). And that his own father was the guy who ratfucked him, as far as giving the order to fire/exile Garak.

Bashir was his first real "friend" and I have to think that he was so close and protective of Bashir in part because the concept of friendship is rare in his people along with Garak, tacitly knowing that Bashir would have issues if he knew all of the bad shit Garak had done in his past, hence him putting up a flirtatious front of half-truths, denials, and other bits and peaces to keep Bashir from ever truly getting to the point that he might find out something about Garak that might make him cut off contact with him.
Dude, I have boxes full of Trek books, references, and so much more. I know how they did the show. That's why I was complaining. The point was that I disagreed with it and wish they had applied more imagination to the opportunities their characters and setups provided.
 
You thought the seething was bad before?

Wait until more people read this from Sanderson.

Man puts out a Novella length indictment of modern trad publishing and Amazon, while being fact-driven and completely polite.

I'm also thrilled he confirms a lot of my suspicions about wider trad publishing. Hell, he gives his own sales data out.

I know half my office was in a bloodrage over this. I can only imagine how Tor must be, given he confirms he will be doing more of his own books via Kickstarter. Though he says he will keep publishing Elantris through them, the most important thing he says is what he OMITS: Sanderson admits he retains the rights to his work, and COULD walk away from Tor. If he wanted to.

They gotta be shitting bricks.

Meanwhile called a friend of mine at Baen for an unrelated thing... they're laughing about how half of Sanderson's suggestions about trad publishing's future are things Baen has been doing for years, even decades in some cases.
 
You thought the seething was bad before?

Wait until more people read this from Sanderson.

Man puts out a Novella length indictment of modern trad publishing and Amazon, while being fact-driven and completely polite.

I'm also thrilled he confirms a lot of my suspicions about wider trad publishing. Hell, he gives his own sales data out.

I know half my office was in a bloodrage over this. I can only imagine how Tor must be, given he confirms he will be doing more of his own books via Kickstarter. Though he says he will keep publishing Elantris through them, the most important thing he says is what he OMITS: Sanderson admits he retains the rights to his work, and COULD walk away from Tor. If he wanted to.

They gotta be shitting bricks.

Meanwhile called a friend of mine at Baen for an unrelated thing... they're laughing about how half of Sanderson's suggestions about trad publishing's future are things Baen has been doing for years, even decades in some cases.
I'll give the blog post a read tomorrow, but considering how big he is, what is the chance he decided to open his own publishing company and published other writers works as well?
 
I'm also thrilled he confirms a lot of my suspicions about wider trad publishing. Hell, he gives his own sales data out.

I know half my office was in a bloodrage over this. I can only imagine how Tor must be, given he confirms he will be doing more of his own books via Kickstarter. Though he says he will keep publishing Elantris through them, the most important thing he says is what he OMITS: Sanderson admits he retains the rights to his work, and COULD walk away from Tor. If he wanted to.

They gotta be shitting bricks.

Meanwhile called a friend of mine at Baen for an unrelated thing... they're laughing about how half of Sanderson's suggestions about trad publishing's future are things Baen has been doing for years, even decades in some cases.
I've been an aspiring author for about 3 years, just working on the craft to get myself to a state where my writing is acceptable to someone who might purchase it. In that time, everything I read about publishing, getting published, the politics, the typical modern infestation of bullshit really made me question what I'd hoped to do since I was 12 years old. That was until I came across the thread about finding a non pozzed publisher, and becoming aware of Baen.

When Sanderson announced his kickstarter and I saw that it was in the millions, I felt despair. "How could I ever do that myself when he's so big and popular? I haven't even put out my first proper book." But then I recognised in that uncommon for me two minutes of feminine and effeminate hysteria, that I've already had the same plans and ideas in my mind as what Sanderson is doing right now. I can do that too! I can have a series of books with a tonne of extras that will make people want to purchase it. It's what I'd want! Art, videos, games, even NFTs for those who would want that kind of thing. But 'publishers' wouldn't allow it. I'd have to do it myself.

Thank you Brandon for throwing a wrench into the system. It's given me more hope and determination. I now know that an industry now chock-a-block full of women, niggers and trannies and all the assorted bullshit that comes with them has a place for white men who just want to tell stories and get the work done. Like everything else in history that great men have done, we have to do it ourselves.

I'll give the blog post a read tomorrow, but considering how big he is, what is the chance he decided to open his own publishing company and published other writers works as well?
I caught his interview with Daniel Greene yesterday (Typical lefty bullshit aside, he's pretty good for getting up to date info) and I got the thought that he'd start his own platform. Reading his explanation, that's basically what he says. He'd be silly not to.
 
Thank you Brandon for throwing a wrench into the system. It's given me more hope and determination. I now know that an industry now chock-a-block full of women, niggers and trannies and all the assorted bullshit that comes with them has a place for white men who just want to tell stories and get the work done. Like everything else in history that great men have done, we have to do it ourselves.

If Kickstarter becomes a platform where there's a return to books being about story instead of Identity politics and Muh Racism, then I, as a reader, will be thrilled to bits. Hell, I might even support Sanderson's kickstarter since his essay on choosing the platform and the problem with Amazon I found convincing and inspiring. Either way, I sure as hell won't support any author bitching about the 'money' and shit in jealousy after this concludes.

Write good content or perish penniless.
 
I'll give the blog post a read tomorrow, but considering how big he is, what is the chance he decided to open his own publishing company and published other writers works as well?
It doesn't look like it, he is using the money to move his works more into film and creating "special edition" variants.

From what I got from the Q/A - he sinks the boot firmly into Amazon, is not likely to ever go near indie publishing as the Amazon dominance has ruined it, but criticizes Trad Publishing for being very conservative with sales and marketing opportunities: No "Special Edition" books, no print/eBook combinations. He really believes in having premium products - ie: the DELUXE HARDCOVER at $100 a superfan might buy.

Sanderson: "Kickstarter is a bad venue for people who don’t have an existing fan base or some other way to get attention. If you are a brand-new author, you are unlikely to have success convincing people to Kickstart a book without some kind of really good hook. It’s therefore a bad place to launch new talent. (Something that, for all their flaws, both Amazon indie and traditional publishing can do far better.)"
 
From what I got from the Q/A - he sinks the boot firmly into Amazon, is not likely to ever go near indie publishing as the Amazon dominance has ruined it, but criticizes Trad Publishing for being very conservative with sales and marketing opportunities: No "Special Edition" books, no print/eBook combinations. He really believes in having premium products - ie: the DELUXE HARDCOVER at $100 a superfan might buy.
I remember when Baen was getting their Free E-Book Library started up they were putting CDs in certain new hardbacks which had something like several hundred of their free ebooks on it (this was around 2003-2005). No DRM or anything. It’s what made me interested in them and why I’m willing to pay for ebooks directly off their site. For my favorite authors I’ll even pay the extra cost for their eARCs.
 
We had a black Marine with a KILLER mil scifi book we had to turn away because he refused to bend on not making more characters gay.
I cant believe this is a fucking thing. I would tell anyone who told me how to write my characters to go pound sand. What happened to the editorial process? I can understand 'can you flesh out this character more' but how did we go from that to 'could you make this one suck dick?'
Speak for yourself. I've always written villains that I could agree with too easily. You just imagine "what would I do if I didn't care who would be hurt?"

aka the MovieBob method of villainy.

I've actually found it generally annoying how shallow people make villains nowadays. They're so cartoonish you start wondering how any evil is done in the first place.
I'm reminded of that shitty tvtropes quote stolen from avengers.

"That's the problem with heroes, really. Their only purpose in life is to thwart others. They make no plans, develop no strategies. They react instead of act. Without villains, heroes would stagnate. Without heroes, villains would be running the world. Heroes have morals. Villains have work ethic."

The problem is that a lot of people completely leave out why the villain does anything, thus making them terrible characters. I remember reading a series a long while back (I only have vague recollections of it), can't remember the name, where the big bad guy was toppled over the course of one or two books out of a... three book series, I think. It turned out that he'd been holding back robo-satan or something even worse than he was, and the dystopia he'd created had been geared towards keeping this eldritch abomination firmly locked up with backup plan after backup plan to help people survive if it ever got out. It turned out that ages ago he and his own adventurer party (their descendants made up modern nobility) were heroes back in the day that sat out to vanquish this thing and had promptly discovered it couldn't be killed, and so they had to seal it away.

That I can remember more about the main villain than I can a lot of the 'good' side characters shows how incredibly well written and memorable he was. If you write a cartoonish one dimensional villain, you aren't writing a good one.
 
I know half my office was in a bloodrage over this. I can only imagine how Tor must be, given he confirms he will be doing more of his own books via Kickstarter. Though he says he will keep publishing Elantris through them, the most important thing he says is what he OMITS: Sanderson admits he retains the rights to his work, and COULD walk away from Tor. If he wanted to.
He has said that back in the day when he was unknown Tor was his first choice because they were Robert Jordan's publisher. He would have gone wherever he got an offer, but was really hoping to get picked up by Tor over any other publisher. They sure don't seem to be publishing much like Robert Jordan these days. And he sure doesn't seem as enamored with them or with the Manhattan publishing hive mind generally these days.

IIRC Tom Doherty actually waived a noncompete he had had Jim Baen sign that would have kept Baen from setting up shop until several years after it did. Interesting but obviously ultimately pointless to speculate what would have happened had the noncompete been enforced.
 
He has said that back in the day when he was unknown Tor was his first choice because they were Robert Jordan's publisher. He would have gone wherever he got an offer, but was really hoping to get picked up by Tor over any other publisher. They sure don't seem to be publishing much like Robert Jordan these days. And he sure doesn't seem as enamored with them or with the Manhattan publishing hive mind generally these days.

IIRC Tom Doherty actually waived a noncompete he had had Jim Baen sign that would have kept Baen from setting up shop until several years after it did. Interesting but obviously ultimately pointless to speculate what would have happened had the noncompete been enforced.
I don't think Tor is entirely clueless as to knowing where their reader money is coming from - they maybe self aware in that "late-night way when one realises they've fucked up their entire life" awareness, as they did do some big fantasy acquisitions back in the height of Game Of Thrones mania, Ie: THE RUIN OF K(A)NGS a series which was so entirely a knock-off of the Name of the Wind it was kind of embarrassing, and they pushed it SO HARD, but it never caught on. Also due to the GoT craze over dragons that time, the author changed the series name from something something-kings to something something-dragons, which was rather obviously a grab for the zeitgeist involving dragons.

But I suspect that it was cynical enough that it might have lost them money so they might be going back into chasing that "eat your spinach" dollar for a while
 
Meanwhile over in "release the fucking books" land, Patrick Rothfuss is making vague excuses as to why he can't release a SINGLE CHAPTER from his THIRD BOOK that he's been working on for OVER A DECADE after literally ASKING FOR MONEY so FANS COULD GET THAT SINGLE CHAPTER.


Thread was full of people calling him a piece of shit but that's impolite so they got deleted. Have to keep Pat happy so he can keep running his charity to give goats to African kids, that definitely isn't a grifting operation, and don't ask questions about how a writer with no other job can go 10+ years without writing. Sanderson's books may not be my cup of tea but at least he sits down and does the work.

Although it is pretty funny to watch Rothfuss fail as someone who is opposed to his politics. He's showing a bit of the Whedonesque soyboy entitlement these days. Here's hoping it metastasizes and he becomes a cow. His son has always had long blonde hair, maybe he'll troon him out.
 
Meanwhile over in "release the fucking books" land, Patrick Rothfuss is making vague excuses as to why he can't release a SINGLE CHAPTER from his THIRD BOOK that he's been working on for OVER A DECADE after literally ASKING FOR MONEY so FANS COULD GET THAT SINGLE CHAPTER.


Thread was full of people calling him a piece of shit but that's impolite so they got deleted. Have to keep Pat happy so he can keep running his charity to give goats to African kids, that definitely isn't a grifting operation, and don't ask questions about how a writer with no other job can go 10+ years without writing. Sanderson's books may not be my cup of tea but at least he sits down and does the work.

Although it is pretty funny to watch Rothfuss fail as someone who is opposed to his politics. He's showing a bit of the Whedonesque soyboy entitlement these days. Here's hoping it metastasizes and he becomes a cow. His son has always had long blonde hair, maybe he'll troon him out.
Why does Rothfuss have a painting of a sad, isolated girl behind him and a stuffed teddy bear on top of his bookshelf? Given the number of sff writers who turn out to have degenerate preferences, it seems worth addressing.
 
*PARTICULARLY* FUCKING CUTE.

Yeah I don't see this ending well. On the bright side he'll have plenty of time to work on his books in prison.

particularly fucking cute.jpg
 
*PARTICULARLY* FUCKING CUTE.

Yeah I don't see this ending well. On the bright side he'll have plenty of time to work on his books in prison.

View attachment 3087609
Who the fuck names their kid Oot? even if it's a nickname, it's still retarded and should be reserved for an alien's name, not your own damn kid. I can smell the pretention coming from this possible nonce.
 
I can smell the pretention coming from this possible nonce.
nah it's fine
First I have to figure out what fucking day it is. And yeah. It’s Thursday. But if it’s Thursday, why are there still pills in the little Thursday pill home? But I’m pretty sure that I remember taking my meds this morning. That’s why the pill thing is here, right? Because I carried it downstairs when I was getting ready to take the pills….
But the pills are still in there.

So I look at this thing, and I say, “I don’t know if I took my meds already.”

I have to make something clear here, I’m not talking to myself. But at the same time, I’m not really asking my kids for advice on this, either. Because while I value their thoughts and feelings, they shouldn’t be making certain decisions. They’re 7 and 11 years old, respectively. They’re wise beyond their years and off-the-charts articulate, but *I’m* the one who needs to fucking figure out whether I’ve taken my meds.

But why am I saying this out loud then? I honestly don’t know. I do tend to process things out loud more often when the boys are around. Maybe that’s how we’re wired as primates, to talk around our children so we can model our decision making process.

Anyway, whatever the reason, I’m talking it through, saying, “Do I risk missing my meds entirely, or do I risk doubling up on my meds? If I double up, will that make me really scattered, or will I be Super Productive today…?”

Without missing a beat or breaking stride, Oot walks behind me and asks casually, “What’s the LD-50?”

I turn to look at him, not quite sure what I just heard. He’s doing something at the sink now. “Did you just ask me about the LD-50?” I ask.

He turns to look at me, nodding. He’s not above showboating. He likes being clever. And if there’s a pedantry gene, he has it (and he got it from me) but right now he’s not doing that. Or if he is doing it, he’s gone next level and has realized the value of the slow-play. Maybe he’s learning that less is more…

Either way, he’s just looking at me with vague curiosity in his big, serious eyes, as if he can’t understand why my tone would be incredulous. As if he doesn’t know why I would be impressed that he remembered the concept of LD-50. Something I didn’t learn about until my junior year of college. Something I’m pretty sure I only mentioned once to my boys a couple months ago, probably when I was dosing Cutie with antibiotics during a recent deeply shitty medial adventure.

“Yeah,” he says.

And I just start to laugh. I go over and hug him, laughing. And I keep laughing uncontrollably for at least a solid minute.

I know I’ve laughed in surprise before. (That’s one of the big theories about laughter, actually. Some folks believe true laughter, [Duchenne laughter] only erupts as a symptom. It’s the result of a sort cognitive fuse being blown when we experience something that goes contrary to our expectations. The cognitive and neurophysiological roots of laughter is one of the many odd rabbit holes of research I’ve gone down over the years, as I used to consider myself a bit of a humorist. But that, as they say, is a blog for a different day…)

Anyway. I’m laughing. And while part of this *is* surprise. It’s also just joy. I don’t remember laughing out of real joy before I became a dad. It’s been happening a fair amount this last year as these boys continue to startle me with their kindness and honesty. They startle me by actually remembering things I’ve told them. And not just remembering. They actually understand and internalize and make use of this stuff, too….

You might wonder why this surprises me. I mean, why on earth would I be dadding so hard if not to this exact purpose? Why would I be spending so much time and energy trying to teach them stuff, if not so they would learn it?

And… yeah. I mean. Of course. That’s the dream.

But if I’ve learned anything over the last decade, is that you can care a lot, and work really hard, and do your level best… and in the end all you get for your trouble is double therapy and trouble sleeping at night. So these days I fight to keep my expectations modest. It’s the whole Buddhist thing: Taṇhā leads to dukkha. Desire causes suffering. Hope is the highwire without which you need not fear a fall.

So I try not to hope too much for the boys. The world is hard enough, and life is heavy enough. They don’t need my expectations weighing them down. I just try to take them as they come and enjoy them for who they are.

But oh it’s hard. These boys, they’re pretty great.

It occurs to me that I sat down to tell a cute (if slightly braggy) story about my kids, and it’s turned into something else. I can’t be surprised at that, though. Most people think that writing is just expressing what you already think or feel. It’s transcription. It’s explanation. I used to think that, too, way back in the day. But not for decades. Now I know better. For me, writing is almost always a process of exploration and discovery. Not always, but often.

You want to know the *real* truth? I originally started to write this little story as a *tweet* and instead it turned into a thousand word maunder where the upshot is that I’m surprised my boys actually listen to me. In some ways that doesn’t seem like much. Hardly worth the work or words.

But on the other hand, what’s better than your kids listening to you and then turning around and reminding you of what you’ve shared? What more could I hope for?

And there we are gain. Back at hope. And hope, you see, is a hell of a drug, and while that doesn’t make hope bad, it does make it dangerous. Maybe it’s just that way for me though. Maybe I have hope sensitivity. Or whatever the hope-appropriate version of drug-intolerance is. Maybe it’s that when it comes to hope, the Effective Dose is way too close to the Lethal Dose for me.

But these boys. I tell you. They are such a wonder and a delight. And so, despite myself sometimes, I hope.

pat
8270338365_9702a680c9_o.jpg
 
Brandon Sanderson’s Message to Publishing Is Mostly a Message About Himself
https://archive.md/0nXMG (6000+ in queue, LOL)

Gizmodo's gonna Gizmodo...exactly what you expect it to say in exactly the tone you expect them to use.

Wonder if this will be the shot across the bow that starts Brando Sando's cancellation?
Even gizmodo leftist drones are mad in the comments section and the author made their twitter private, I guess people weren't being nice to her.
 
I cant believe this is a fucking thing. I would tell anyone who told me how to write my characters to go pound sand. What happened to the editorial process? I can understand 'can you flesh out this character more' but how did we go from that to 'could you make this one suck dick?'

I'm reminded of that shitty tvtropes quote stolen from avengers.

"That's the problem with heroes, really. Their only purpose in life is to thwart others. They make no plans, develop no strategies. They react instead of act. Without villains, heroes would stagnate. Without heroes, villains would be running the world. Heroes have morals. Villains have work ethic."

The problem is that a lot of people completely leave out why the villain does anything, thus making them terrible characters. I remember reading a series a long while back (I only have vague recollections of it), can't remember the name, where the big bad guy was toppled over the course of one or two books out of a... three book series, I think. It turned out that he'd been holding back robo-satan or something even worse than he was, and the dystopia he'd created had been geared towards keeping this eldritch abomination firmly locked up with backup plan after backup plan to help people survive if it ever got out. It turned out that ages ago he and his own adventurer party (their descendants made up modern nobility) were heroes back in the day that sat out to vanquish this thing and had promptly discovered it couldn't be killed, and so they had to seal it away.

That I can remember more about the main villain than I can a lot of the 'good' side characters shows how incredibly well written and memorable he was. If you write a cartoonish one dimensional villain, you aren't writing a good one.
That sounds like the Mistborn series. I really enjoyed it since it basically does in one book what other series does in 3 or more. And the protagonists have to rule from where the villain left off.
 
Back