Opinion You. This is your fault.

1653669526639.png

On Tuesday, a gunman targeted a fourth-grade classroom at an elementary school in Uvalde, Tex., killing 21 people, 19 of them children. On May 14, a gunman shot and killed 10 people at a supermarket in Buffalo. On April 12, a gunman shot 10 people in a Brooklyn, N.Y. subway station. We’re 145 days into the year and there have already been 213 mass shootings in the United States.

The problem is mental illness.

The problem is lone-wolf gunmen.

The problem is soft targets.

The problem is evil.

The problem is them, over there; it’s their fault that the kids keep getting killed.

Wrong. The problem is you.

Way back in 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was castigated for saying that some Americans “cling to guns,” and for suggesting that this was unreasonable or unhealthy. The evidence — which is to say the pileup of bodies year after year — suggests he was correct.

But other politicians, seeing the backlash, learned what not to say. They learned not to point fingers, because they knew that they, too, would be accused of hating freedom, loving tyranny, overreaching in pursuit of control. They understood that they would be shouted down and then perhaps voted out.

They learned not to say the obvious: These mass shootings aren’t acts of God. The status quo is bad. Our lack of action on guns is killing people, and someone is to blame.

But who?

You. It’s your fault.

You, the gun-obsessed minority who lord over our politics and prevent change from being made. You, who mumble “thoughts and prayers” but balk at action.

You, the constitutional absolutist who believes that “the right to bear arms” — written in the late 1700s, when a state-of-the-art weapon was the flintlock musket — should be expanded to include modern-day, high-capacity automatic rifles, at the cost of children’s lives.

You, the “shooting hobbyist” or “gun enthusiast” who advocates against gun control because you think anything that makes your weekend amusement even the slightest bit more difficult to participate in is not to be borne.

You, the performative patriot who believes that background checks, age limitations, training requirements — any reasonable regulations that could help keep people safe — are insufferable limitations on your freedom.

You, the sophist who says “guns don’t kill people, people kill people,” as if those people aren’t killing others using guns, as if it isn’t obvious that the havoc they wreak would be much reduced had they not been given easy access to weapons of mass murder.

You, the pundit who sneers that your opponents “don’t want a solution” and then refuses to provide your own, preferring to use a tragedy to build your brand.

You, who would rather forget about the children murdered and the families broken, because if we thought about them too much you’d feel bad and might have to give something up.

Lest I be accused of being one-sided, let’s not stop the finger-pointing there. If it’s a “you” problem, it’s an “us” problem, too — the United States and its culture writ large, right and left included.

A country that defines itself by its freedom — and has, over decades, fetishized a misguided ideal of “liberty” that values the individual over everyone and everything else.

A country that touts its dynamism yet dithers, its leaders wringing their hands and offering empty platitudes — “we have to find solutions,” “we must take action” — as if the solutions aren’t obvious, as if the actions one could take haven’t been modeled for us by other countries for decades.

A country that exports democracy but whose politicians pretend that their jobs are meaningless, who believe that when it comes to gun control, “legislation doesn’t work” — despite the fact that they were elected to write it.

It’s easy to find excuses for why this keeps happening. We’ve done it for decades. But the comforting fictions have worn thin, to the point of transparency.

It’s time to stop feigning helplessness. To stop pretending we are the ones under attack. To stop gaslighting the real victims, who have already suffered tragedy enough.

It’s time to admit that we — we Americans, and the rationalizations we tolerate — are to blame. Only then can we shoulder the responsibility to act.

1653669772239.png
Opinion by Christine Emba

Christine Emba is an opinion columnist and editor for The Post and the author of "Rethinking Sex: A Provocation." Before coming to The Post in 2015, Christine was the Hilton Kramer Fellow in Criticism at the New Criterion and a deputy editor at the Economist Intelligence Unit.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/26/uvalde-mass-shooting-inaction-on-guns-to-blame/ (A)
 
These muppets all love to talk about "privilege this," and "privilege that," but you know what one of the biggest privileges in the world is? The privilege of not needing to own a gun. I grew up in a rural town, so all the farmers had guns to keep their livestock safe from poachers or predators. A lot of kids I grew up with had dads who'd go out hunting. They'd sell the pelts of whatever they killed, and feed their families with the meat. One year, the coyote population got so bad, it was set to cause serious harm to the local ecosystem, so the conservation authority asked hunters to go out, kill as many coyotes as they could, and then call in to report how many they had got until the population decreased to a safe level. Not only are guns necessary for people in rural areas, but think about people trapped in the Hellholes of inner cities, crawling with gangs, who need guns to protect themselves and their property. You take the guns away from the good, responsible citizens, then you've just made them sitting ducks for the scumbags of the neighbourhood, or the scumbags up in the ivory towers. Solzhenitsyn wrote about how if Stalin's secret police feared for their lives when they went into the night to make their random arrests, then, maybe, conditions in the Soviet union never would have gotten as horrible as they did, because an unarmed populace can be subjected to all manner of atrocities, even from their own government, who knows they can't fight back. Sure, maybe in a perfect world, nobody would need to own a gun, but that world will never exist. The reality is, citizens need to be allowed to bear arms. Sometimes tragedies happen, and that's horrible, but that doesn't mean everyone should have to sacrifice their rights
 
I know of a school (not going to PL about location or why I know) where a kid took a used needle and stabbed 20 kids with it and then said he was HIV positive - that’s a long, slow death and no guns involved. If people want to hurt or kill lots of people, they will.

I am not strongly pro-gun, and I’ve said it before. I’m not bringing up this example to say “everyone should be armed”. I think there are a lot of idiots, morons and genuinely evil people who own and use them and I wish they couldn’t.

But I also accept that there are a lot of honest, intelligent gun owners just trying to do their best, and that there are reasons that people need guns, and I don’t think they should lose them just because there’s monsters out there.
 
These muppets all love to talk about "privilege this," and "privilege that," but you know what one of the biggest privileges in the world is? The privilege of not needing to own a gun. I grew up in a rural town, so all the farmers had guns to keep their livestock safe from poachers or predators. A lot of kids I grew up with had dads who'd go out hunting. They'd sell the pelts of whatever they killed, and feed their families with the meat. One year, the coyote population got so bad, it was set to cause serious harm to the local ecosystem, so the conservation authority asked hunters to go out, kill as many coyotes as they could, and then call in to report how many they had got until the population decreased to a safe level. Not only are guns necessary for people in rural areas, but think about people trapped in the Hellholes of inner cities, crawling with gangs, who need guns to protect themselves and their property. You take the guns away from the good, responsible citizens, then you've just made them sitting ducks for the scumbags of the neighbourhood, or the scumbags up in the ivory towers. Solzhenitsyn wrote about how if Stalin's secret police feared for their lives when they went into the night to make their random arrests, then, maybe, conditions in the Soviet union never would have gotten as horrible as they did, because an unarmed populace can be subjected to all manner of atrocities, even from their own government, who knows they can't fight back. Sure, maybe in a perfect world, nobody would need to own a gun, but that world will never exist. The reality is, citizens need to be allowed to bear arms. Sometimes tragedies happen, and that's horrible, but that doesn't mean everyone should have to sacrifice their rights
DDE8350B-1E0B-4EFF-8103-0462A9B1DE01.jpeg


+1 for realizing that class hierarchy in America is a more serious problem that still does not get fixed in current day
 
You, the gun-obsessed minority who lord over our politics and prevent change from being made. You, who mumble “thoughts and prayers” but balk at action.

There are more guns in the US than people and gunowners outgun the military by 80 to 1. It isn't a minority and none of those people are going to give up their guns. Deal with it.
 
You, the sophist who says “guns don’t kill people, people kill people,” as if those people aren’t killing others using guns, as if it isn’t obvious that the havoc they wreak would be much reduced had they not been given easy access to weapons of mass murder.
The worst attack on a school in American history was the Bath schoolhouse massacre. Some local asshole was so angry about being fired that he rigged the school's boiler room (as well as his vehicle that he parked outside the school) with dynamite killing 60 people. The vast majority of which were children under 13.
Also stricter gun laws don't stop mass murders because criminals by their very nature dont respect the law, you dipshit.
 
You take the guns away from the good, responsible citizens, then you've just made them sitting ducks for the scumbags of the neighbourhood, or the scumbags up in the ivory towers.
That's exactly what this is. A thinly veiled attempt to disarm their political enemies. They defanged the police and the courts (making most laws unenforceable and therefore your rights) and the only thing left that is a serious impediment to their goons ruling society with organized street violence is what remains of the armed populace.

In 2020 the mask came off. We know that anarcho-communist and race mobs terrorizing the public with impunity is how they seek to cement their control on society. These are their Weimar footsoldiers that they sic on their enemies to remove them and to intimidate the public. They really are intentionally going down this road and have no intention of stopping.

If you voluntarily disarm yourself in the hopes that the other side will deescalate as well, you are a fool. It's going to get worse before it gets better.
 
Throwing a tantrum will never get you what you want faggot.
Speaking of performative, how long again was it when you retards were going about ACAB?

SPEAKING OF ACAB.
Chaz.
SPEAKING OF CHAZ.
George Floyd.
SPEAKING OF GEORGE FLOYD.
The lives of innocent children.
SPEAKING OF CHILDREN.
Roe V Wade.

For retards whose tactic is to gang up on individuals via a schizophrenic mass of gotchas and no yous you dumbfucks really cannot make an individual thought coherent.
 
Back