Opinion You. This is your fault.

1653669526639.png

On Tuesday, a gunman targeted a fourth-grade classroom at an elementary school in Uvalde, Tex., killing 21 people, 19 of them children. On May 14, a gunman shot and killed 10 people at a supermarket in Buffalo. On April 12, a gunman shot 10 people in a Brooklyn, N.Y. subway station. We’re 145 days into the year and there have already been 213 mass shootings in the United States.

The problem is mental illness.

The problem is lone-wolf gunmen.

The problem is soft targets.

The problem is evil.

The problem is them, over there; it’s their fault that the kids keep getting killed.

Wrong. The problem is you.

Way back in 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was castigated for saying that some Americans “cling to guns,” and for suggesting that this was unreasonable or unhealthy. The evidence — which is to say the pileup of bodies year after year — suggests he was correct.

But other politicians, seeing the backlash, learned what not to say. They learned not to point fingers, because they knew that they, too, would be accused of hating freedom, loving tyranny, overreaching in pursuit of control. They understood that they would be shouted down and then perhaps voted out.

They learned not to say the obvious: These mass shootings aren’t acts of God. The status quo is bad. Our lack of action on guns is killing people, and someone is to blame.

But who?

You. It’s your fault.

You, the gun-obsessed minority who lord over our politics and prevent change from being made. You, who mumble “thoughts and prayers” but balk at action.

You, the constitutional absolutist who believes that “the right to bear arms” — written in the late 1700s, when a state-of-the-art weapon was the flintlock musket — should be expanded to include modern-day, high-capacity automatic rifles, at the cost of children’s lives.

You, the “shooting hobbyist” or “gun enthusiast” who advocates against gun control because you think anything that makes your weekend amusement even the slightest bit more difficult to participate in is not to be borne.

You, the performative patriot who believes that background checks, age limitations, training requirements — any reasonable regulations that could help keep people safe — are insufferable limitations on your freedom.

You, the sophist who says “guns don’t kill people, people kill people,” as if those people aren’t killing others using guns, as if it isn’t obvious that the havoc they wreak would be much reduced had they not been given easy access to weapons of mass murder.

You, the pundit who sneers that your opponents “don’t want a solution” and then refuses to provide your own, preferring to use a tragedy to build your brand.

You, who would rather forget about the children murdered and the families broken, because if we thought about them too much you’d feel bad and might have to give something up.

Lest I be accused of being one-sided, let’s not stop the finger-pointing there. If it’s a “you” problem, it’s an “us” problem, too — the United States and its culture writ large, right and left included.

A country that defines itself by its freedom — and has, over decades, fetishized a misguided ideal of “liberty” that values the individual over everyone and everything else.

A country that touts its dynamism yet dithers, its leaders wringing their hands and offering empty platitudes — “we have to find solutions,” “we must take action” — as if the solutions aren’t obvious, as if the actions one could take haven’t been modeled for us by other countries for decades.

A country that exports democracy but whose politicians pretend that their jobs are meaningless, who believe that when it comes to gun control, “legislation doesn’t work” — despite the fact that they were elected to write it.

It’s easy to find excuses for why this keeps happening. We’ve done it for decades. But the comforting fictions have worn thin, to the point of transparency.

It’s time to stop feigning helplessness. To stop pretending we are the ones under attack. To stop gaslighting the real victims, who have already suffered tragedy enough.

It’s time to admit that we — we Americans, and the rationalizations we tolerate — are to blame. Only then can we shoulder the responsibility to act.

1653669772239.png
Opinion by Christine Emba

Christine Emba is an opinion columnist and editor for The Post and the author of "Rethinking Sex: A Provocation." Before coming to The Post in 2015, Christine was the Hilton Kramer Fellow in Criticism at the New Criterion and a deputy editor at the Economist Intelligence Unit.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/26/uvalde-mass-shooting-inaction-on-guns-to-blame/ (A)
 
Throwing a tantrum will never get you what you want faggot.
Speaking of performative, how long again was it when you retards were going about ACAB?

SPEAKING OF ACAB.
Chaz.
SPEAKING OF CHAZ.
George Floyd.
SPEAKING OF GEORGE FLOYD.
The lives of innocent children.
SPEAKING OF CHILDREN.
Roe V Wade.

For retards whose tactic is to gang up on individuals via a schizophrenic mass of gotchas and no yous you dumbfucks really cannot make an individual thought coherent.
mr-clippy-angry.jpg
 
They learned not to say the obvious: These mass shootings aren’t acts of God. The status quo is bad. Our lack of action on guns is killing people, and someone is to blame.

But who?

You. It’s your fault.
Yass Kween slay!! You sure showed them!! So stunning and brave of you to write this article in the Washington Post - the absolute favourite and trusted news source of the gun-obsessed, the constitutional absolutists, the shooting hobbyists and gun enthusiasts of America - and speak 👏 your 👏 truth 👏.

It's not like you are spewing word diarrhea out into the void where none of the people, upon whom you lay the blame, are ever going to read it (except to maybe pass it about on Internet forums dedicated to breeding a certain species of flightless bird). You are such a good person. Enjoy your well deserved ego boost.
 
You. You! Every last one of you, who has shispressed hate against me? You're the shitheads!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meat Target
Just remember these types of people are not interested in getting you to change your mind and agree with them. There is no fun or sense of moral superiority to be had in that.

They want to force you to do what they want. They want to make you watch as the values you hold dear are torn up and replaced with their "better" values. It's all about power, it's always about power with these types. They care only in as much as the tragedy gives them yet another opportunity to force change upon their enemies.

They are just more open about it these last 6 years as they feel they're on the cusp of finally winning once and for all. This is just the mask coming off of the Proggie agenda.
 
Just remember these types of people are not interested in getting you to change your mind and agree with them. There is no fun or sense of moral superiority to be had in that.

They want to force you to do what they want. They want to make you watch as the values you hold dear are torn up and replaced with their "better" values. It's all about power, it's always about power with these types. They care only in as much as the tragedy gives them yet another opportunity to force change upon their enemies.

They are just more open about it these last 6 years as they feel they're on the cusp of finally winning once and for all. This is just the mask coming off of the Proggie agenda.
They unironically are closer to fascism than the right is at this point. They're a bunch of authoritarian assholes who get a boner over the idea of forcing the dirty underclasses to smile while their entire way of life is destroyed. As much as I hate comparing IRL politics to YA novels, the class structure in the Hunger Games is probably the closest thing to what progressives ultimately want for society. Just imagine the Capital but with more overt sexual degeneracy, and instead of making the districts participate in a teenage slaughter arena they just bleed their resources dry and let them starve to death. Progress!
 
They unironically are closer to fascism than the right is at this point. They're a bunch of authoritarian assholes who get a boner over the idea of forcing the dirty underclasses to smile while their entire way of life is destroyed. As much as I hate comparing IRL politics to YA novels, the class structure in the Hunger Games is probably the closest thing to what progressives ultimately want for society. Just imagine the Capital but with more overt sexual degeneracy, and instead of making the districts participate in a teenage slaughter arena they just bleed their resources dry and let them starve to death. Progress!
This is actually what the comically obese Mario-worshiping fascist cow Bob "MovieBob" Chipman has said he wanted.
 
Last edited:
They unironically are closer to fascism than the right is at this point. They're a bunch of authoritarian assholes who get a boner over the idea of forcing the dirty underclasses to smile while their entire way of life is destroyed. As much as I hate comparing IRL politics to YA novels, the class structure in the Hunger Games is probably the closest thing to what progressives ultimately want for society. Just imagine the Capital but with more overt sexual degeneracy, and instead of making the districts participate in a teenage slaughter arena they just bleed their resources dry and let them starve to death. Progress!
The good news is that they are morons and pussies who fold like a cheap suitcase when you stand up to them, because they expect other people made of sterner stuff to do their violence for them. They are crybullies of the lowest species.
 
Muskets were not the state of the art when the Constitution was written. Rifles were pretty common in the colonies, the Kentucky longrifle had been around for a century by that point. Just because the redcoats were still stuck with muskets doesn't mean everyone was.
 
He also broke out an insane asylum patient, who's still at large, broke into Cyberdyne HQ, shot at police, blew up several cars and the building.
I'm just amazed he was able to disappear and hide out for the better part of a decade in between these two strings of incidents.
 
Fuckin' A it's my fault.

You could kill every little beaner and it wouldn't make me use an iota of a braincell to ponder if "Shall not be infringed" should be revoked.
For every gun you refuse to use, I'll use 3.
 
You, the constitutional absolutist who believes that “the right to bear arms” — written in the late 1700s, when a state-of-the-art weapon was the flintlock musket...
And state-of-the-art publication in the late 1700s was the printing press.

I'm fine with the Washington Post not enjoying the benefits of the First Amendment because 'LOL Founders didn't have it then.'
 
Back