Opinion You. This is your fault.

1653669526639.png

On Tuesday, a gunman targeted a fourth-grade classroom at an elementary school in Uvalde, Tex., killing 21 people, 19 of them children. On May 14, a gunman shot and killed 10 people at a supermarket in Buffalo. On April 12, a gunman shot 10 people in a Brooklyn, N.Y. subway station. We’re 145 days into the year and there have already been 213 mass shootings in the United States.

The problem is mental illness.

The problem is lone-wolf gunmen.

The problem is soft targets.

The problem is evil.

The problem is them, over there; it’s their fault that the kids keep getting killed.

Wrong. The problem is you.

Way back in 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was castigated for saying that some Americans “cling to guns,” and for suggesting that this was unreasonable or unhealthy. The evidence — which is to say the pileup of bodies year after year — suggests he was correct.

But other politicians, seeing the backlash, learned what not to say. They learned not to point fingers, because they knew that they, too, would be accused of hating freedom, loving tyranny, overreaching in pursuit of control. They understood that they would be shouted down and then perhaps voted out.

They learned not to say the obvious: These mass shootings aren’t acts of God. The status quo is bad. Our lack of action on guns is killing people, and someone is to blame.

But who?

You. It’s your fault.

You, the gun-obsessed minority who lord over our politics and prevent change from being made. You, who mumble “thoughts and prayers” but balk at action.

You, the constitutional absolutist who believes that “the right to bear arms” — written in the late 1700s, when a state-of-the-art weapon was the flintlock musket — should be expanded to include modern-day, high-capacity automatic rifles, at the cost of children’s lives.

You, the “shooting hobbyist” or “gun enthusiast” who advocates against gun control because you think anything that makes your weekend amusement even the slightest bit more difficult to participate in is not to be borne.

You, the performative patriot who believes that background checks, age limitations, training requirements — any reasonable regulations that could help keep people safe — are insufferable limitations on your freedom.

You, the sophist who says “guns don’t kill people, people kill people,” as if those people aren’t killing others using guns, as if it isn’t obvious that the havoc they wreak would be much reduced had they not been given easy access to weapons of mass murder.

You, the pundit who sneers that your opponents “don’t want a solution” and then refuses to provide your own, preferring to use a tragedy to build your brand.

You, who would rather forget about the children murdered and the families broken, because if we thought about them too much you’d feel bad and might have to give something up.

Lest I be accused of being one-sided, let’s not stop the finger-pointing there. If it’s a “you” problem, it’s an “us” problem, too — the United States and its culture writ large, right and left included.

A country that defines itself by its freedom — and has, over decades, fetishized a misguided ideal of “liberty” that values the individual over everyone and everything else.

A country that touts its dynamism yet dithers, its leaders wringing their hands and offering empty platitudes — “we have to find solutions,” “we must take action” — as if the solutions aren’t obvious, as if the actions one could take haven’t been modeled for us by other countries for decades.

A country that exports democracy but whose politicians pretend that their jobs are meaningless, who believe that when it comes to gun control, “legislation doesn’t work” — despite the fact that they were elected to write it.

It’s easy to find excuses for why this keeps happening. We’ve done it for decades. But the comforting fictions have worn thin, to the point of transparency.

It’s time to stop feigning helplessness. To stop pretending we are the ones under attack. To stop gaslighting the real victims, who have already suffered tragedy enough.

It’s time to admit that we — we Americans, and the rationalizations we tolerate — are to blame. Only then can we shoulder the responsibility to act.

1653669772239.png
Opinion by Christine Emba

Christine Emba is an opinion columnist and editor for The Post and the author of "Rethinking Sex: A Provocation." Before coming to The Post in 2015, Christine was the Hilton Kramer Fellow in Criticism at the New Criterion and a deputy editor at the Economist Intelligence Unit.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/26/uvalde-mass-shooting-inaction-on-guns-to-blame/ (A)
 

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Suck my dick and kiss my whole asshole

To be serious, the issue is multifaceted. How men are being treated. Passing out antidepressants like candy. Covid lockdowns. Tucker talked about it the other night on his show.
 
Last edited:
You, the performative patriot who believes that background checks, age limitations, training requirements — any reasonable regulations that could help keep people safe — are insufferable limitations on your freedom.

Background checks already exist, as do age requirements in some states. Gun laws don't do anything to stop illegal gun use because bad people either get guns months in advance, or they buy them from underground markets. The only people they affect is law-abiding gun owners.

You, the sophist who says “guns don’t kill people, people kill people,” as if those people aren’t killing others using guns, as if it isn’t obvious that the havoc they wreak would be much reduced had they not been given easy access to weapons of mass murder.

If it wasn't a gun, then it would be cars, or knives, or bombs, or acid, or any other number of objects that could be used to maim others en masse. Remember Darrel Brooks? Of course you don't, because he was a black supremacist who targeted white people during a Christmas parade in November of 2021. He drove through a crowd with his SUV, striking around fifty people and killing a handful of them. Didn't even need a gun. Should we start banning "high capacity assault SUVs" now? Or is it a case of bad people improperly using tools for nefarious deeds?

A country that exports democracy but whose politicians pretend that their jobs are meaningless, who believe that when it comes to gun control, “legislation doesn’t work” — despite the fact that they were elected to write it.

Do a fucking ounce of research, and you'll understand just WHY gun control doesn't work.
 
You, the performative patriot who believes that background checks, age limitations, training requirements — any reasonable regulations that could help keep people safe — are insufferable limitations on your freedom.
My guns and I have a smaller kill count than the average diversity American in any major city. I abide by all the rules while they don't; and when violence happens, you come for the law abiders who get finger printed and have their credentials ran through the NICS system. Not the jogger who gets weapons via theft, burglary, or black market. Your laws are limitations on my freedom, and it becomes apparent when it's time to assign blame.

You, the sophist who says “guns don’t kill people, people kill people,” as if those people aren’t killing others using guns, as if it isn’t obvious that the havoc they wreak would be much reduced had they not been given easy access to weapons of mass murder.
I'll admit I'm not a big brain or legal professional; but one thing I do know is that "intent" is a huge factor when assigning guilt. It's why we have different levels of murder/manslaughter; and the one that carries the heaviest burden is the one with intent. So yes, people kill people, sometimes it's enacted via gun.

As for how bad the carnage is; I can go into any Wal-Mart and buy a $20 kitchen knife, take it home and sharpen it, then walk into any school and knife a bunch of women and children who are weaker than I am as a fully grown man. Will it require more effort than pulling a trigger, yeah sure, but if there's one thing to learn about these people is they choose their targets based on how much retaliation is expected. Even your basic mugger goes for people who look weak because they don't want a fight. It's also why you never hear of lone gunmen going to the local police precint; because they want soft targets.

And as a closing point; hammers have more kills than rifles, so don't even try that shit.
 
Hey, Christine Emba: go fuck yourself, negress.

You and your kind tell us global warming threatens us. You tell us global famine and more fuel shortages and food shortages are coming because of that and the Ukraine war.

Not to be a doomer…. but if that’s all true, if that all happens as you and your fellow WaPo “journalists” predict, we need guns to defend ourselves against those who’ll try to rob us for our food and our fuel. And if you want to defund the police well, it’ll be on us to protect our own.
 
Back