Business YouTube is cracking down on adblock users: pay or disable - this is reminder to install brave

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
YouTube has introduced an anti-adblock feature, which alerts users with pop-ups and interrupts the viewing experience. The adblocking community is already working on ways to defeat the feature, but YouTube seems to be changing its detection scripts constantly.

Users trying to view a YouTube video with an adblocker enabled are now greeted with a pop-up warning.

“Adblockers are not allowed on YouTube,” the warning reads. “You can go ad-free with YouTube Premium, and creators can still get paid from your subscription.”

The buttons below give users two options: either allow ads or choose a paid subscription. However, for now, closing the alert allows viewing the video.

Complaints about YouTube’s actions have started appearing on social media, as many people use adblockers for limiting trackers and other privacy-intruding scripts. Security researchers have been urging users to restrict exposure to ad networks for a while now because they’re often used to deliver spyware such as Pegasus.

“Awfully brave of YouTube to think I'm gonna stop using AdBlock before I stop using YouTube,” one X user shared.


Others encouraged resistance against YouTube’s new measure by leaving adblocking solutions enabled: “If you show Google that you are willing to forgo your adblocker for YouTube, they will make this new adblock ban a permanent change.”

An ad-free YouTube Premium subscription costs users $13.99 per month.

Adblocking community working on a workaround​

The adblocker provider AdBlock Plus says that YouTube’s wall is “particularly distressing to many of our users.” Some of them are unhappy that many ads on YouTube include “obvious scams” that stay afloat even after reporting them to Google.

For now, AdBlock Plus recommends that users keep their filter lists up to date so that any changes made by the filter list authors are applied to their extensions. They can also add YouTube to their allowlists, which will continue blocking ads elsewhere but allow them when watching the popular website.

The uBlockOrigin adblocker already has a workaround offered on its subreddit page. For that, users have to update the extension and its filter with quick fixes to the latest version.

The post also warns that stacking multiple adblockers or using old block lists won’t help.

“Disclaimer: YouTube changes their detection scripts twice a day, which means that even if you got a filter update earlier today, another one might be required soon. There's no way around this if you want to remain logged in,” the post reads.

Some X users also shared filters for the adblocker to turn off the new YouTube feature.

Ads are a significant attack vector​

Blocking malicious ads with adblocking software is an essential component of good cybersecurity hygiene and is recommended by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

Malvertising is a significant vector for exploiting networks as it bypasses built-in browser settings to protect against pop-ups and website redirects. Malicious ads can generate a forced redirect or deliver a malicious payload.

“Adblocking software prevents different types of ads from displaying or removes them altogether, reducing the risk of receiving malicious advertisements or being redirected to malicious websites. A common adblocking technique uses web browser extensions that allow organizations to customize and control how online advertisements appear. CISA encourages organizations to evaluate solutions that would allow the ability to block a malicious advertisement,” the organization writes in its recommendations.

However, YouTube is not stepping back and insists that users will receive multiple notifications urging them to cease using the tools – or subscribe to YouTube Premium – before their viewing is disrupted, The Verge reported.

“We take disabling playback very seriously and will only disable playback if viewers ignore repeated requests to allow ads on YouTube,” Google spokesperson Oluwa Falodune’s mail to The Verge reads. “In cases when viewers feel they have been falsely flagged as using an adblocker, they can share this feedback by clicking on the link in the prompt.”

To find out more about DNS filtering solutions, you can check out this CyberNews experiment.



Over my dead body. Install brave or mozila i tested them both working , mozila had few days before they patched up and brave never had a bleep. Their blocking the adblock solution is now only workable on chrome . Also brave on mobile can play music in backround from youtube without paying shekels for premium. If youtube wants my money better let me view my downloaded videos without internet connection or demonitase and ban my favorite creators every time, or i dont know give me what i search for . Reminder to replace google with brave search engine or any non google based engine
 
Has newpipe added a feature to log in to your account yet? That's the only thing preventing me from switching over from vanced.
You only need that if you feel the need to comment on stuff you watch. If you just want to log in for access to subscriptions, playlists etc then you can export those from your account and into your third-party app of choice. Sure it can be a bit of an annoyance to set up, but once you spend the 10-15 minutes to do it you won't look back.

It'll be a cold day in Hell before I ever go back to using the official YT app on my phone.
I think it's rolling out to random people little by little. It took forever for me to finally get the popup.
I wonder if the anti-adblocking shit is being rolled out by country? Not to jinx it, but so far I've been very lucky and I suspect it could be because I'm outside the US.
 
Id rather pay twice as much for an ad blocker than pay for youtube premium.
Fuck off kikes and pajeets.
TAD
I'd rather give money directly to quality creators via Patreon, Ko-Fi etc than give money to JewTube. In one of his recent videos, Louis Rossmann made the point that he'd be better off if a viewer gave him a couple of bucks via PayPal as a one-off contribution than if the viewer watched the last 5 years worth of videos without an adblocker.

 
Ticker is RUM.

Not the most attractive proposition I've seen; it is down 67% from its 1-year high, and it is losing money.


You'd be a lot better off owning stock in Google...
It's also been being smeared by the MSM very recently. Anything to kill platforms they can't control the narrative on.
 
Many such cases! I read once that YouTube makes a negligible amount of profit from Premium, and I don't even know anyone who pays for it. Maybe they're trying to squeeze that avenue
This. Youtube is trying to turn itself into a service ala netflix or hulu. "People pay for ad free everywhere else, why not us too?". So they start killing adblockers hoping people are annoyed enough with ads, but like youtube enough to pay.
 
Also do adverts even work? I've always seen very mixed results for advertisement in terms of outcome studies; and it does seem very much that it's more a vehicle for propaganda now than a legitimate way of trying to convince you to buy things. Especially with how weird and ass most adverts are. Phone ads are especially bad for this.
"Use this new camera!" *four solid minutes of fat niggers dancing in New York to shitty pop music* "The new camera lets you edit images, like the old one did as well!" *Niggers all jump in the air* "Iphone XXIV, A phone for fat retarded niggers."

It seems to be less about convincing, and more about triggering a premade 'consoooom' signal in peoples brains now. Adverts seemed far more informative back in the day.
 
Also do adverts even work? I've always seen very mixed results for advertisement in terms of outcome studies; and it does seem very much that it's more a vehicle for propaganda now than a legitimate way of trying to convince you to buy things. Especially with how weird and ass most adverts are. Phone ads are especially bad for this.
"Use this new camera!" *four solid minutes of fat niggers dancing in New York to shitty pop music* "The new camera lets you edit images, like the old one did as well!" *Niggers all jump in the air* "Iphone XXIV, A phone for fat retarded niggers."

It seems to be less about convincing, and more about triggering a premade 'consoooom' signal in peoples brains now. Adverts seemed far more informative back in the day.

Most commercials target women and have for a long time since they predominately do the household shopping. It's why most of them just makes guys roll their eyes.
 
Also do adverts even work?
When it comes to ads, it’s not so much the conscious person they’re targeting, but the subconscious.

That’s why ads are also a vector for propaganda, as that does the same thing.

You can consciously make a decision on a product after seeing an ad, but whether you like it or not, the message “x is a good brand” has been received by your brain and your subconscious will incorporate that message into its decision making.

As for propaganda, if you want to make something normal, simply show it as normal, desirable, etc. and even those who have a problem with it will become used to seeing it and thus tolerating it.
 
I believe a well-copywrited print ad is still the most effective form of advertising, but it’s become near impossible to get people to read them. They are still good for targeting old, rich people (a good target demographic).

Radio ads come second and their effectiveness is well-researched. Local businesses love them.

Billboards work for movies and restaurants and any kind of image you want to ingrain into a commuter’s consciousness.

I think video ads have never had a great track record. It’s better when they are more opportunistic (think Big Bill Hell’s–esque MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND BUY NOW) or they’re funny enough for you to remember when you need to shop around (Geico). Skippable ads are worthless. I think video ads are also the most likely to backfire (hundreds of examples like GrubHub).

Web ads are notorious for being worthless. Social media campaigns aren’t much better and may also backfire spectacularly (Bud Light). The main draw is that they are cheap. You can buy much more advertising on the web than anywhere else.
 
Still isn't bothering me with Ublock and Braveshield.... I suspect this only getting the basic bitch adblockers.
I had it pop up using Ublock and Braveshield. Disabled Braveshield and kept Ublock and haven't seen it since (knock on wood).

The only reason for Google to be doing this is to fuck people. Adblockers were allowed because 1: they're legal and 2: people who use adblocks are unlikely to interact with ads in the first place. Cracking down on adblockers aren't going to get more people to interact with your shitty ads. It's just going to piss people off.
 
Firefox and uBlock so far and I'm doing well, but I'm already in strike 2.

I would give some shekels for youtube premium if they weren't such faggots. As it stands I sincerely hope the site dies or remains a money black hole forever
Same. I have no problem with paying for stuff online if that can help sites and authors to grow. I'm not a commie, I know the money my fav. creators get needs to come from somewhere and if that's me, so be it.

But Youtube are absolute commie faggots. For once, they don't want to give money to the people I follow. Why would I give them any money knowing they will instead pay people who support all the opposite I believe in? They can fuck themselves. Conservatives have in general more money than Leftoids, you think any of them are giving them even one penny?
 
Back