Business YouTube is cracking down on adblock users: pay or disable - this is reminder to install brave

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
YouTube has introduced an anti-adblock feature, which alerts users with pop-ups and interrupts the viewing experience. The adblocking community is already working on ways to defeat the feature, but YouTube seems to be changing its detection scripts constantly.

Users trying to view a YouTube video with an adblocker enabled are now greeted with a pop-up warning.

“Adblockers are not allowed on YouTube,” the warning reads. “You can go ad-free with YouTube Premium, and creators can still get paid from your subscription.”

The buttons below give users two options: either allow ads or choose a paid subscription. However, for now, closing the alert allows viewing the video.

Complaints about YouTube’s actions have started appearing on social media, as many people use adblockers for limiting trackers and other privacy-intruding scripts. Security researchers have been urging users to restrict exposure to ad networks for a while now because they’re often used to deliver spyware such as Pegasus.

“Awfully brave of YouTube to think I'm gonna stop using AdBlock before I stop using YouTube,” one X user shared.


Others encouraged resistance against YouTube’s new measure by leaving adblocking solutions enabled: “If you show Google that you are willing to forgo your adblocker for YouTube, they will make this new adblock ban a permanent change.”

An ad-free YouTube Premium subscription costs users $13.99 per month.

Adblocking community working on a workaround​

The adblocker provider AdBlock Plus says that YouTube’s wall is “particularly distressing to many of our users.” Some of them are unhappy that many ads on YouTube include “obvious scams” that stay afloat even after reporting them to Google.

For now, AdBlock Plus recommends that users keep their filter lists up to date so that any changes made by the filter list authors are applied to their extensions. They can also add YouTube to their allowlists, which will continue blocking ads elsewhere but allow them when watching the popular website.

The uBlockOrigin adblocker already has a workaround offered on its subreddit page. For that, users have to update the extension and its filter with quick fixes to the latest version.

The post also warns that stacking multiple adblockers or using old block lists won’t help.

“Disclaimer: YouTube changes their detection scripts twice a day, which means that even if you got a filter update earlier today, another one might be required soon. There's no way around this if you want to remain logged in,” the post reads.

Some X users also shared filters for the adblocker to turn off the new YouTube feature.

Ads are a significant attack vector​

Blocking malicious ads with adblocking software is an essential component of good cybersecurity hygiene and is recommended by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

Malvertising is a significant vector for exploiting networks as it bypasses built-in browser settings to protect against pop-ups and website redirects. Malicious ads can generate a forced redirect or deliver a malicious payload.

“Adblocking software prevents different types of ads from displaying or removes them altogether, reducing the risk of receiving malicious advertisements or being redirected to malicious websites. A common adblocking technique uses web browser extensions that allow organizations to customize and control how online advertisements appear. CISA encourages organizations to evaluate solutions that would allow the ability to block a malicious advertisement,” the organization writes in its recommendations.

However, YouTube is not stepping back and insists that users will receive multiple notifications urging them to cease using the tools – or subscribe to YouTube Premium – before their viewing is disrupted, The Verge reported.

“We take disabling playback very seriously and will only disable playback if viewers ignore repeated requests to allow ads on YouTube,” Google spokesperson Oluwa Falodune’s mail to The Verge reads. “In cases when viewers feel they have been falsely flagged as using an adblocker, they can share this feedback by clicking on the link in the prompt.”

To find out more about DNS filtering solutions, you can check out this CyberNews experiment.



Over my dead body. Install brave or mozila i tested them both working , mozila had few days before they patched up and brave never had a bleep. Their blocking the adblock solution is now only workable on chrome . Also brave on mobile can play music in backround from youtube without paying shekels for premium. If youtube wants my money better let me view my downloaded videos without internet connection or demonitase and ban my favorite creators every time, or i dont know give me what i search for . Reminder to replace google with brave search engine or any non google based engine
 
This is what everyone was warned about. This is nothing.. What google has been doing in the browser space is where the real damage is being done. Bit by bit they are using the fact that most major browsers are based off their browser, to pick apart functionality (in the name of minimalism), security, privacy and control. Gimping the browser more and more every year, and disabling the abilities of add-ons (ad-blockers) more and more.
 
I'm sorry, but youtube has gone SO FUCKING HEAVY on the ads since the adpocalypse cut the number of monetizable creators by a significant margin. The more shit gets demonetized, the heavier they have to be with the ads on what's left to make up for it. Sorry, not sorry. You fucked yourselves over on this one. I'm not paying for your inability to run a business.

Side note, if the creator isn't demonitized by youtube, are they really worth watching anyways?
It's even worse, they've taken to demonetizing videos/creators, then still playing ads on the video, meaning YouTube keeps all the money. I hate video ads and I WILL block them, but if they had stuck to the first-party hosted banner ads that didn't get in the way, then maybe I might consider it. And you know, if they didn't keep screwing over all the good creators.
 

Apologies if this was already posted.

I've had 2 accounts blocked, and I am using ublock. I stopped getting warnings on Brave, but I wanted to stick to Chrome.

Having ublock isn't enough; you need to use ublock to block the specific element sending the warning.

This solved my problem flawlessly so far.
When my account got blocked, I cleared out all YT/google cookies. logged back in and video playback was restored. Now I just make sure to purge/update ublock filter lists before opening a video, and so far that's worked out fine.
 
On mobile I use Mozilla with uBlock Origin. I don't know if it's a feature or a bug but once you pause the video, you can unpause it from the android pulldown menu and listen while browsing something else. I do kind of miss the thumbnail PIP while using the app but that's not even an option if you are listening to music for example.

On desktop it's just chrome with "AdBlock" brand adblocker, no problems for me (yet.)
 
I don't know if it's a feature or a bug but once you pause the video, you can unpause it from the android pulldown menu and listen while browsing something else
Knowing jewgle it's almost certainly a bug. I think turning off the screen still stops the playback though, which makes it terrible for playing music.
 
I’ve been using Brave and I actually started to get the adblocker pop-up for some videos. Though I could just click it away and the video would play as normal without any fake ads or anything happening. Also it’s not happening on mobile just when I’m watching at my desktop. Hopefully it was just a weird hiccup and Brave is fighting back the Google garbage but I wouldn’t be shocked if they are trying to fuck with Brave users.
 
Can websites promise that the ads they receive aren't going to rape my computer? No? Then the adblock stays on.
Why would they care about that when ads make them money? Your computer breaking and identify being stolen is your problem, not theirs and they have the legal army to ensure that never changes.
Ads are a legitimate security risk. Google wants you to intentionally allow them to potentially poz your neg hole. Are they going to pay to mitigate any damage done by an ad running a 0-day, no click exploit? No? What a fucking shock.
A cynic would argue they make more cash with vulnerable systems.
 
Eh, companies have been trying to beat Adblockers since the 90's, too little real effect. This little arms race is always going to favor the Adblocker side, too much of this is client side ultimately to really stop Adblockers for very long.

Plus while Google might be able to employ a thousand programmers to fight the Adblockers, none of them actually want to be stuck watching ads (Google employees have long admitted that they use Adblock, like everyone else), so they have basically no real motivation to succeed. Whereas the Adblocker side has a million people willing to work for free to find ways to break Google's plans. This is identical to the DRM/cracking community arms race.

Even if Google manages to finally find a way to keep Adblockers from working for more than a few days, someone will just make an add-on that loads the Ads in a separate window on mute while playing the real video or overlays the Ads with something else to ensure that Google doesn't make a cent off the Ad.

Worst case scenario, Google manages to get this to halfway work, it drives a large part of the Youtube user base to Rumble or Odyssey or whatever, and we finally get a decent Youtube competitor.
 

Apologies if this was already posted.

I've had 2 accounts blocked, and I am using ublock. I stopped getting warnings on Brave, but I wanted to stick to Chrome.

Having ublock isn't enough; you need to use ublock to block the specific element sending the warning.

This solved my problem flawlessly so far.
So I used the ublock origin script in this video and it worked for about 4 hours and now I can't scroll down and it's become almost unusable. :sigh:
 
It's even worse, they've taken to demonetizing videos/creators, then still playing ads on the video, meaning YouTube keeps all the money. I hate video ads and I WILL block them, but if they had stuck to the first-party hosted banner ads that didn't get in the way, then maybe I might consider it. And you know, if they didn't keep screwing over all the good creators.
Because demonitezation was never about the ad agencies. You can find plenty of ads who have no problem being shown before controversial content. It was, and always will be, about narrative control.
 
These guys.. I'm seeing a ton of shorts of barefoot porn teens dressed up as girl scouts suddenly, and I don't think I clicked anything on it to get this crap. Fuck Youtube, they won't allow basic crime tube words like 'assault'. Hambly can't say 'violence' without censoring himself. Now this. Reeks of this pajeet asshole taking over for damn sure as CEO.
 
I'm sorry, but youtube has gone SO FUCKING HEAVY on the ads since the adpocalypse cut the number of monetizable creators by a significant margin. The more shit gets demonetized, the heavier they have to be with the ads on what's left to make up for it. Sorry, not sorry. You fucked yourselves over on this one. I'm not paying for your inability to run a business.

Side note, if the creator isn't demonitized by youtube, are they really worth watching anyways?
I just started watching a video on mustard, cause im making some chicken, and there's 2 adds at the start.
And Im like "Fine okay what ever".
Then literally 2 minutes in, before the guy has even had time to open the can of the first of 3 mustards he will review I get an other add.


Who the fuck watches Youtube like this?
 
Back