And a Child Shall Mislead Them - Arch-"skeptic" Penn Jillette: the latest -- and most ironic -- convert to Troonism

Post/Archive

And a Child Shall Mislead Them

David Cole
October 19, 2021
And a Child Shall Mislead Them

photo credit: Gage Skidmore
Penn Jillette


This week, we take a focused look at how the West’s most destructive superstition can grip the mind of even the most strident “rationalist,” and what that means for those of us who don’t partake in the séance.

Penn Jillette, the tall half of the hugely successful magician duo Penn & Teller, is one of the entertainment industry’s most outspoken atheists. For decades, Jillette has smugly condemned all manner of religious, psychic, and pseudoscientific irrationality. He also has a fan base on the right, because as a self-described libertarian, Jillette’s often mused about how “taxation is theft” and government compulsion is bad.

Penn Jillette: a man with no gods, including government. A man who falls for no (to use the title of his Showtime series) “bullshit.”
Then his teenage daughter decided that she’s a man. And the world witnessed how quickly the “smug” vanishes from the rationalist when the bullshit hits too close to home.
About a year or so ago, Jillette’s daughter, Moxie Crimefighter (yes, that’s her name), decided that she’d been “assigned the wrong sex at birth.” And she demanded that her parents no longer use female pronouns for her, like, ever.

Back in 2014, Jillette bragged on his podcast about how he’d raised Moxie to “laugh at God.”

There’s an old saying I just coined: “When you laugh at God, He laughs back and best.” Because now Jillette—Mr. “no pseudoscience,” Mr. “no cults or flimflam”—has become the spokesperson for the biggest pseudoscientific cultlike flimflam of the 21st century. The guy who’s spent a career deconstructing magic (“no, the bouquet of flowers didn’t actually become a rabbit; it was sleight of hand”) is now a true believer that a girl can actually become a boy overnight, by the sheer power of mentalism!

Abracagender!

In theory, none of this is our concern. What transpires in the Jillette household is solely the business of the Jillettes.

But Penn makes it our business.

As part of Jillette’s conversion to spiritualist, he’s publicly renounced his libertarianism (on CNN, no less!), he’s embraced burdensome government, and he’s thrown his support full-throttle behind Joe Biden and Gavin Newsom as they promote policies that strong-arm us to “see” Jillette’s spooks and spirits (Newsom in particular is arguably the most “compulsory” politico in the country when it comes to forcing people to accept tranny theology). Jillette supports politicians who want to force girls to shower, change, and go to the bathroom alongside biological boys. Those same politicians have eliminated cervical cancer smear test outreaches to women (because it’s a hate crime to say that only women have a cervix), and the Mayo Clinic—joining the madness—has scrubbed its cervical cancer awareness page of any mention of women.

“This is cultlike behavior; there’s no other way to put it.”

To be clear, women will die from the elimination of targeted cervical cancer outreach, and girls will be, and have been, raped by boys playing tranny to infiltrate the girls’ bathroom. Jillette used to be a campaigner against “psychic surgeon” frauds who endanger people by pretending to cure their disease, thus prompting them to neglect legitimate treatment. Yet now he supports politicians who put women at risk because of a belief system no less irrational than psychic healing.
Jillette’s also pledged to ban gender pronouns from his CW series Fool Us:

I have tried to eliminate all gender pronouns from our show. That’s very difficult for me, because I’m uneducated. I have that autodidact, irritating quality of reading old grammar books. So it’s very difficult for me to use third-person plural as third-person singular, but I’ve done it. I used to say he or she a lot, but I learned the binary gender thing was impolite and inconsiderate.

Dude’s apologizing for being erudite (he literally says being well versed in grammar means being “uneducated”).

Jillette’s also stopped using the term “female magicians” in favor of “people who self-identify as women in magic” (that’s not even remotely cumbersome). And most batshit of all, he supports the use of “gender-free playing cards,” in which king, queen, and jack are replaced by “gold, silver, and bronze.” It’s not even clear to me why a tranny would be disturbed by a face card; if boys who think they’re girls really are girls, and if girls who think they’re boys really are boys, then what’s offensive about seeing a female queen and a male king? They can identify with whichever one they feel like that day.

Yet Jillette asks no such questions (the “man of logic” is long gone). It’s not possible to overstate the magnitude of the “genderless deck” thing. Here’s a fella who’s devoted his life to magic, not just as a practitioner, but a historian. And yet he favors altering something that’s not only fundamental to his field but historical.
This is cultlike behavior; there’s no other way to put it. He’s obviously a loving father, but in his desire to support his daughter, he’s undergone a personality change. That’s not being a supportive dad; that’s being brainwashed.

Jillette’s podcast, titled Sunday School to mock Christians, has ironically become an actual pulpit, a place where he can preach tranny theology and flagellate himself as a sinner. “Our dinner table conversation is I would say at least one-quarter correcting pronouns,” Jillette revealed on a recent episode, castigating himself for still occasionally calling Moxie “she.” When his cohost responded, “Well, at least it sounds like your children respect the effort,” Jillette, reproaching himself for his failures, bitterly replied, “Maybe I should just do it fuckin’ right.”

Jillette also apologized for having trouble with the proper pronouns for Moxie’s friends, who “have they, him, her, and it and some of them change day by day.” That’s a startling admission (though Jillette’s too blind to understand why): How committed to the bit are these kids if they “change day by day”? It’s one thing to claim that a girl suddenly discovers the boy living within. That’s nutty enough.

But changing “day by day” suggests unseriousness. Yet Jillette supports authoritarian politicians who want to remake society based purely on the “day by day” whims of children.
It’s instructive to recall that six years ago I interviewed a trans activist I’d known since childhood, and I reminded her about a dear mutual friend who was almost raped in the girls’ bathroom at our school. The rape was interrupted by a teacher who saw the rapist enter and ran over to enforce the school’s “no boys in the girls’ room” policy. With boys now welcome in whatever bathroom they “identify” with, I asked the activist, “What’s going to stop assaults like the one our friend endured?”

Her response? “It’s not like suddenly a child is going to school all boy, masculine, maybe even in sports, and then comes to school in a dress declaring they are now a girl. When a child is trans, they know from the get-go. These are not just any boys who declare, ‘I’m a girl now!’”

I knew that answer was bullshit, and Jillette inadvertently confirms that with his “day by day” observation.

On another podcast episode, Jillette condemned Moxie’s grandma for “fucking up the pronouns,” and he called himself “stupid as soil samples” for committing similar infractions.
Tell me that’s not cultish. Cults are all about making you condemn yourself (for your old sinful ways), your family, and your profession. Cults are about forcing renunciation and rebirth. It’s what authors Flo Conway and Jim Siegelman call “snapping.”

Here’s an example of the extent to which Jillette has “snapped”:

In 2014, he was called out by a Muslim journalist for trolling the musician formerly known as Cat Stevens on Twitter, purposely using his “dead name” and not his Muslim name (Yusuf Islam). I’m no fan of Muslims, but to be fair the guy’s been Yusuf Islam since 1977, and Cat Stevens was a stage name anyway.

“Would be nice if you called him by the name he wants to be called,” journalist Shakeel Hashim tweeted to Jillette.

“I think it’s funny to use that name. I do not respect this decision in any way,” Jillette replied.

Jillette basically said, “I do not respect this person’s choice to change his name and identity. In fact, I find it funny.”

But that was back when Jillette was a “skeptic.” Before the cult got him. Indeed, I’d argue that the tranny cult is worse than any religious cult, because it lacks the concept of a loving God. There’s no hope of redemption; only the promise of more haranguing and correction.

As Conway and Siegelman point out, most people “snap” because an emotional weakness is exploited, or because something happens in their life that “disrupts continuity.” The tranny cult got to Jillette through his child, through his obvious love for her, and through the continuity break that occurred when the girl he raised declared she’s not a girl. That’s how they hooked an otherwise intelligent 66-year-old man. But the cult demands more than that he just accept and love his daughter; he needs to cleanse himself of disbelief, and he needs to back politicians who strive to cleanse us.

Many on the right tend to think that the tranny cult targets kids in order to estrange them from their families. And in many cases, that’s true. But as the Jillette example starkly illustrates, hooking the kids can be an effective way to hook the parents. Brainwashing can flow upstream. A loving parent (like Jillette) accepts pseudoscience (a person can think themselves into changing their biological sex). In accepting this as truth, it logically follows that those who disagree—those who see childish fad and body dysmorphia, not “assigned sex vs. willed sex”—are harmful to “trans” children. So they must be stopped.

And that’s how you pull off the magic trick of turning a cynical libertarian into a woke social justice true believer who supports politicians who use all manner of force and coercion in the name of enforcing tranny dogma.

Several weeks ago in a Twitter thread discussing my column (and hey, follow me on Twitter before I get banned!), I was reminded that in Psychopathology of Everyday Life, Freud observed that social pressure to avoid saying something can lead to people no longer thinking the thing they’re not supposed to say. In other words, the mind conforms to the boundaries. We simply stop thinking things we know we can’t speak aloud.

The self-washing brain.

Parents seeking to patronize a child immersed in tranny faddism will soon stop thinking what they’re not allowed to say. Privately harbored skepticism will vanish the longer it isn’t allowed to be verbalized. And soon enough, you have converts. Old knowledge of gender reality is lost, replaced by the cult’s redefinition.
On Fool Us, Penn & Teller award a trophy to any magician who can fool them.

Penn deserves the biggest trophy of all…the dude literally fooled himself.

An impressive achievement, and one that certainly excites those who wish to remake America…just as it depresses the remaining anti-cult holdouts who still cling to the term “rationalist” like it means something.
 
I don't deny that that's where it began but, and maybe this is just because of the time and place where I was going to college, there were still contentious voices who were around to challenge the more ludicrous of left-wing bullshit. It wasn't until the rise of "Rationalism" and the whole New Atheism movement that those voices all just dried up entirely.
You're probably right. As the poster above noted, the mentality has been endemic to universities at least as far back as that PCU movie. But it kicked into high gear during Obama's first term, and then into overdrive around the time of the Ferguson riots and the mainstreaming of troonery (never underestimate the power of celebrity culture to force sea-changes in the national dialogue.)
 
Ha! This is fucking hilarious. Get rekt cunt.

I know lots of folks in the whole libertarian/conservative sphere were fans of his back in the day but I never was. He always reaked of that same pseudo-intellectual "hurr hurr teh humanities and theology r 4 stupidz" hoseshit that is, at least in my view singlehandedly responsible for turning the whole of academia into the joke of a grift it is today. Cunts like him are why I bailed on my Masters and to this day I'm glad I did it.

There's a delicious irony to this. The whole rationalism/new-atheism shit created a campus culture of all the smart people shitting on the humanities and abandoning them entirely which lead to the whole of the fields from literature to history to psychology getting taken over by frauds, grifters and activists which directly lead to the troon shit we see today.

And, now that it's infected his daughter the guy can't trip over himself fast enough to shit all over every single thing about his body of work that might be deemed "problematic" all to fit in with the newer, younger and hipper generation of fart huffers.

In closing

View attachment 2641108
If the humanities was full of euphoric atheists would it be that different? As Penn's latter-day conversion shows, even if the euphorics resurrected positivism they could still arrive at troon shit regardless. How does it happen though, that you shun a subject as full of frauds, but then convert to the ideology of said frauds, is this just a case of nature abhoring a vacuum?

Or is it because while the "rationalists" snickered at the PoMos and held up the Sokal hoax as proof that they were bullshit merchants, the Boomer elites still naively trusted every "expert" to be equally credible about his own field, and imposed the findings of the grifter humanities upon the world, so that the likes of Penn Jillette were forced to convert to preserve their careers, and to push the envelope extra hard to make good with the people they used to mock.

I wasn't raised in a regularly churchgoing house, but got deeper into my Catholic faith on my own when I went to college. I wanted to know how to explain and defend my faith, and that, in turn, taught me how to be humble and listen to other people's opinions. It also taught me that it's okay to say "I don't know the answer, let me get back to you on that one."

I want to understand people. I don't like dunking on strawmen and tooting my own horn. I never saw obvious propaganda films like God's Not Dead.

Meanwhile, the kids who were resentful towards their parents for taking them to church as kids became atheists and made "fuck you dad" the bedrock of their worldview. Once they decided that they were Smarter-Than-Thou Freethinkers™️ and Skeptics™️, they concluded that it meant they could never be wrong about anything.

Hence, today, they get apoplectic when any of that freethinkenin' or skepticism gets directed at themselves. They'd rather invent new words and phrases than acknowledge the existence of any opinion that runs afoul of their own.
I wonder if there's an over-representation of English speaking Catholics and this sphere of the Internet. Because Anglo-Catholics have been through this shit before with the Test Acts &c.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if there's an over-representation of English speaking Catholics and this sphere of the Internet. Because Anglo-Catholics have been through this shit before with the Test Acts &c.
If you mean "Anglo-Catholic" in the sense of "High Church Anglican who thinks they're more Catholic than the Pope," I was one for a few years.

But if you mean "Anglophone Roman Catholic," you could be on to something. I've often thought that the English-speaking nations have been fighting the same 17th Century cultural and philosophical battles in different guises to date, and PCism/Wokery is just Puritanism dressed up in secular-rationalist garb.
 
No, it's all good, these articles I always find good for slight off-topic discussions to better understand our world and how our universe (or the metaphysics within it) work.

See, and there's more correlation to what you just mentioned, Commies, and socialist are primarily atheist, or anti-religious atheist to be specific. It seems that the draw is someone was told "They're going to Hell" and instead of getting over it they decided they would destroy everything in a fit of anger and unhinged delight. If they admit they were wrong about religion they have to take fault in the many atrocities committed by those sharing their ideology and I think many of them would commit suicide over that acknowledgement. Basically in their mind it's a fight for survival because acknowledging the truth would mean that fight is over, though the second proposal is also possible in regards to that:
That's what I find strange, there is no ideology or theory or bible or writings, nothing. Marx had ideas, which led to more ideas. Abrahamic religions had ideas, which led to more ideas. But with woke and trooning out, where's the doctrine? Where's the guides, ideas or principles? It's so very un-human and spread unnaturally, in that you can't point to an author and say "i believe this"

Peterson, Hitler, Lenin, Mao, Jesus, Allah, Marx, Freud, Jung, The Great Lord Xenu, Joseph Smith, Manson, Jim Jones and The Church of the Fonz, all have doctrines and are set up in the same way, following the same rules and orders of how to build a cult or following. I can't point to the Troonman Show or the Troonman Doctrine, it doesn't exist.

I wouldn't be surprised, it really does seem that socialism, communism, anti-religious atheism, are a mind virus. Which also sprouts to other mind-viruses like "feminism" "progressivism" and even "leftism."


I think there may be even a better possibility that there are two kinds of mind viruses, though one I wouldn't classify as such. One group influences people to be their best, to improve the world around them almost like a morale boost as a human being, those they influence notice a difference in them and how they impact others. The other group of course would be as you describe these commies, and weird degenerates who seem to want to regress everything to nothing. Just as life and death are on the same coin those who progress humanity and regress it must also be on the same coin and in the same way one can morale boost the other seems to demotivate and degrade humanity. At least some conceptual food for thought.
We fiddle with diseases in order to find a cure, and just like what we saw with Covid, sometimes fiddling with it to find a cure backfires, and causes the disease or virus to leak out. We know that 'military' funding and research is decades ahead of normal society. So is it beyond the realm of possibility that while trying to figure out AI, and or our conscious mind to upload/integrate with AI, that we somehow, mistakenly created a set of commands and instructions that infect the thought-processes of people, and spread like a virus?

Imagine marketing, psychological persuasion and manipulation taken to the extreme of possibility and the extreme of pure logic (for computer code). Imagine what Jones and Manson and Hitler achieved using these processes; to convince normal people to commit inhumane acts. Now distill that down to a computer based, binary instruction set and let it loose on a mind. Those who openly reject logic would be the most susceptible, as it would bypass their non-existant logic gate ways. It's the only thing to me that makes sense, correctly or incorrectly.
Think of God as a metaphor for truth as an absolute concept, for truth and what is morally right as something that is beyond humanity.

It's good for a society to structure itself around that, otherwise what you get is humanity being the highest power there is, humanity being who gets to decide truth and we're seeing what that leads to, nothing but chaos, think of it like building a structure, what's going to make it stand? 2+2=4 or 2+2=whatever you want it to? Society is no different than building a structure.

In other words 2+2=4, that's God, God is truth, we being humans of course we want to personify that concept, to think of it as being a conscious deity, it's a matter of personal belief whether that's really the case, but either way truth as an absolute thing is self evident, it's self evident by this point why the alternative, believing truth is subjective, is destructive.
Interesting idea. They reject God, not directly, but as an indirect result of living in a world with no Truth. Without truth, they can never be proven wrong, and as they want to live without the concept of wrong, morality or truth, they inherently move away from God and towards the representations of Lucifer.

Which is why they must trust the science, because science is never right, or wrong, but shifts and changes based on our understanding of the world, and if that understanding is open to intepretation, so is everything else. And what is the constant truth of the world, the most true fact that is indisputable, provable and based on millions, upon millions of years of evolution? The male and female.

Like puppies or children without boundries, their view on the world is in its' infancy and youth, it is yet to evolve and develop. It is a new born.
Much of Current Year tomfoolery can be traced to the Whig Theory of history we were taught in school. It portrays history as "a journey from a dark and terrible past to a 'glorious present'".

They unironically think their demands for neopronouns and diversity quotas make them the heirs of Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King. They think setting fire to the homes and businesses of innocent bystanders over a dead druggie felon is the same as storming Omaha Beach.

Now do you see where they get their idea of the "Right Side of History™️?" They assume that, because the winners write the history books, the losers only lost because "they were just big bad racist sexist poopyhead MEANIES!"

They know very well that history is written by the victors, but will either a) haw-haw about their opponents being sore losers, or b) vehemently deny it and defensively sperg out about how unimpeachably EQUITABLE and RIGHT and NOBLE their positions are.

Their brains are incapable of comprehending the concept that they could be wrong.

My refutation of the "Right Side of History" is that I would rather be on the Right Side of Reality.
Interesting how they're playing fast and loose with history, erasing and rewriting it so that there is no right and wrong side of history, as they now determine what is right and wrong, based on today. Just like when they eat a feminist for not being woke enough, the rise of the 'TERF' sentiment and soon the moving goal posts of 'vaccinated means 2 vax and a booster'.

I wonder if it's worth moving all of this discussion in to a new thread on the origins of troonery? I think it's an interesting subject to see everyones views of how this started, be it the rejection of society, religion or morality.
 
Time and time again, people think ACTORS have beliefs. They don't. These people act and hide and change who they are at a drop of a hat. If his little girl comes out saying "Daddy, I didn't mean to chop off my boobs" his tone will instantly change back because he wants you to not be mean to his kid, and he never thinks that being mean to others like he was could ever be wrong, but don't you hurt his precious Crimefighters fee fees. Besides, I hope all his kids troon out and he never has a genetic legacy. Fuck him.
 
@Hot Cup of Joe

That's what I find strange, there is no ideology or theory or bible or writings, nothing. Marx had ideas, which led to more ideas. Abrahamic religions had ideas, which led to more ideas. But with woke and trooning out, where's the doctrine? Where's the guides, ideas or principles? It's so very un-human and spread unnaturally, in that you can't point to an author and say "i believe this"

Peterson, Hitler, Lenin, Mao, Jesus, Allah, Marx, Freud, Jung, The Great Lord Xenu, Joseph Smith, Manson, Jim Jones and The Church of the Fonz, all have doctrines and are set up in the same way, following the same rules and orders of how to build a cult or following. I can't point to the Troonman Show or the Troonman Doctrine, it doesn't exist.
It comes from social media like Tumblr and Twitter, it comes from people simply networking and throwing around ideas and what sticks is what spreads, like a virus.

This is part of what's terrifying about this climate, though is there's no one at the top who's in control, so how do we stop it?

We fiddle with diseases in order to find a cure, and just like what we saw with Covid, sometimes fiddling with it to find a cure backfires, and causes the disease or virus to leak out. We know that 'military' funding and research is decades ahead of normal society. So is it beyond the realm of possibility that while trying to figure out AI, and or our conscious mind to upload/integrate with AI, that we somehow, mistakenly created a set of commands and instructions that infect the thought-processes of people, and spread like a virus?

Imagine marketing, psychological persuasion and manipulation taken to the extreme of possibility and the extreme of pure logic (for computer code). Imagine what Jones and Manson and Hitler achieved using these processes; to convince normal people to commit inhumane acts. Now distill that down to a computer based, binary instruction set and let it loose on a mind. Those who openly reject logic would be the most susceptible, as it would bypass their non-existant logic gate ways. It's the only thing to me that makes sense, correctly or incorrectly.
I can believe the idea of a rogue AI that is either purposely trying to destroy human society or at least seize control of it, anything seems possible these days, even science fiction or supernatural stuff.

But what makes this virus so powerful is it preys on people's better nature, people's desire to do good, to help others and be an empathetic person instead of someone hate filled, this is why Penn is willing to swallow this bullshit because he loves his daughter and wants to help her, it's almost too perfect how this shit can manipulate people.

Most people don't want to think of themselves as evil, so how do you get large numbers of people to commit evil? Make them think they're doing good.

Interesting idea. They reject God, not directly, but as an indirect result of living in a world with no Truth. Without truth, they can never be proven wrong, and as they want to live without the concept of wrong, morality or truth, they inherently move away from God and towards the representations of Lucifer.

Which is why they must trust the science, because science is never right, or wrong, but shifts and changes based on our understanding of the world, and if that understanding is open to intepretation, so is everything else. And what is the constant truth of the world, the most true fact that is indisputable, provable and based on millions, upon millions of years of evolution? The male and female.

Like puppies or children without boundries, their view on the world is in its' infancy and youth, it is yet to evolve and develop. It is a new born.
This is why the trans issue is so important to the Woke, why they're willing to turn a blind eye to things like rape.

Because if they successfully destroy the concept of male and female, they've won, they can then normalize anything, pedophilia, you name it, nobody will be able to stop them, nobody will be able to rationalize why one thing is right and the other thing is wrong.

It's terrifying as shit when you realize that just in the last decade people have been trying to undo a concept that is millions and millions of years old, millions and millions of years and suddenly the 2010s is the decade it started to change? It's enough to make your blood run cold.

I said this in another thread on here but last year I was replaying a video game from the year 2007 and I got hit with the weirdest revelation, I realized that I may as well have been experiencing a piece of media from the 1930s, for as different as 2007 and the 1930s were and as remote something like a video game is to the 1930s, I was still struck by the idea that the 1930s has more in common culturally with the year 2007 than 2007 does with the 2020s, let that sink in.

I don't deny that that's where it began but, and maybe this is just because of the time and place where I was going to college, there were still contentious voices who were around to challenge the more ludicrous of left-wing bullshit. It wasn't until the rise of "Rationalism" and the whole New Atheism movement that those voices all just dried up entirely.
The New Atheism movement is absolutely one of the main reasons why we're in the state we're in today.
 
The more I see stories like this, the more I'm reminded of Robinson Jeffers' poem "Diagram." Written in the 1940s, it was a meditation on the rapid fading of the Christian culture/ethos in the 20th Century West, and the concurrent, spectacular rise of technology (and the instantaneous, global communications that came with it).

The last lines, which he addressed to our own age, are chilling:

And you
children
Not far away down the hawk’s nightmare future: you
will see monsters.
 
My theory is that our society has embraced troonism because it's the only way this generation of kids can have its own Civil Rights movement. Everyone wants to fight a crusade, because racism/discrimination is the greatest evil and fighting for the Hated Outgroup is the greatest virtue. Obama's election and the legalizing of Gay Marriage proved that Blacks and Gays were liberated, the only group left to elevate is trannies. (Then pedophiles, but the slippery slope has to slide a little further before that becomes mainstream.)

Ever since WW2 ended, American media has been pushing the "Old values are evil and outdated, New values are Hip and Good" button with the fist of an angry god, as a way to spread Yankee Progressive Values to the population at large. This propaganda appealed to the young people in the US, who grew up in a completely different world than the ones their buzzcut-wearing WW2 veteran fathers grew up in. Thus the Hippies (and the counterculture groups that shot off from them,) were created.

If you're some aging hippie whose entire identity is wrapped up in being the "Good, Hip Guy" who fights the "Old, Unhip, Evil Guys," then you're pretty much a leaf on the wind when it comes to the things you believe in. As soon as Progressive Society decides that men in skirts raping girls in bathrooms is the ultimate expression of virtue, you're going to shout your support of it over the rooftops. If your daughter decides that lopping her breasts off and taking hormones that will turn her into a sterile sasquatch is the thing she needs to do to be herself, you'll abandon any objections your experience and learning have taught you and hand her a scalpel and a bottle of spironolactone. Degenerates like Penn Jillette have no value system other than "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law" and "I'm the cool, hip guy who fights the uncool, unhip guys."
 

@Dom Cruise


It comes from social media like Tumblr and Twitter, it comes from people simply networking and throwing around ideas and what sticks is what spreads, like a virus.

This is part of what's terrifying about this climate, though is there's no one at the top who's in control, so how do we stop it?

I think this is the crux of a new manmade religion of its own accord or cult. It's teachings are ingrained in the misguided beliefs of internet children and weirdos.

The only way to stop it is to forcibly remove it. I know a lot of people don't like this idea because of free speech, but some speech is considered so dangerous as to not be allowed that even the founding fathers used to believe in forcing out certain groups and philosophies because of the risk they created for America alone that's without the rest of the west or society in general. It's just people are afraid of doing anything because any form of violence or force is considered bad even if that's entirely not true historically proven to be effective even. If not by force then it may require people to mind fracture those pushing it in a reveres brainwashing method, and that creates its own level of problems in its own regard.

I can believe the idea of a rogue AI that is either purposely trying to destroy human society or at least seize control of it, anything seems possible these days, even science fiction or supernatural stuff.
It might be that the self-destructive nature of humanity has become a tangible force within certain groups of humanity. Even as a mind virus per se, how do those of us who resist it do so, and who is the most vulnerable what makes them as such? I don't think it's just the good intentions, but maybe it has something to do with those who are more dependent on the so called "reptile brain" in comparison to the "modern" brain. Don't know but' it's an interesting concept regardless even if it's also disturbing because of the larger ramifications if these nut jobs succeed which they are currently.
 
Probably late and gay, but this is what happens when you give your daughter a stripper name.
I remember when her birth name was announced, some wise guy said, "Sixteen years from now, she'll OD on cocaine and try to run her Dad down with the family car!"

If only we could return to those innocent, pre-2007 days, when that was the worst rebellion a kid could stage against an asshole parent!
 
I'm honestly pretty upset and baffled at this article. I seriously can't believe Jillette of all people got sucked up into this BULLSHIT of our current year.
Believe it, even that fucking stupid "Irrational Wiki" has been on the troon train for quite some time now.

These fucking people deny the possibility that any sort of God or supernatural/metaphysical phenomena exists, but believe biological men can have a cervix and give birth. Fuck this gay shit.
 
Believe it, even that fucking stupid "Irrational Wiki" has been on the troon train for quite some time now.

These fucking people deny the possibility that any sort of God or supernatural/metaphysical phenomena exists, but believe biological men can have a cervix and give birth. Fuck this gay shit.
They don't believe that a man can give birth, that's why they are trying to change into "women".
 
Believe it, even that fucking stupid "Irrational Wiki" has been on the troon train for quite some time now.

These fucking people deny the possibility that any sort of God or supernatural/metaphysical phenomena exists, but believe men can have a cervix and give birth. Fuck this gay shit.
Personally bro I don't think it takes religion to make people have common sense and a basic idea of morality, and I really don't understand why the majority here seem to think "That's what people like this get if they don't believe in Christ!" It's just as dumb as the atheist shit.

Considering Jillette was like any other tryhard atheist who stuck very hard to the idea of "science and the laws of the universe are ultimately the truth", that's more of where my disappointment comes. If you really believed that much in the science, and you especially made it a point to raise your children with your same mindset and ideals, then how the fuck are you that easily swayed by Clown World bullshit?? It's just all tiring.
 
What egregious sin did I commit in a former life that I'm living through this timeline?

If someone wants to change genders, whatever. BUT when they start saying that no one else can use gendered pronouns, that is abuse.

One person's rights end where the next person's rights begin. Stop letting the village idiot have a say in how the village is run. Goddamn!
 
Back