Dramacow Ryulong / Michael Cohen - Fanatic Wikisperg, Anti-Gamergater and All Around Asshole

Last edited by a moderator:
He's probably already on some power rangers wikia tbh

He's back already.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Anita_Sarkeesian&diff=prev&oldid=1561165

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Doxing&diff=prev&oldid=1561169

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Doxing&diff=prev&oldid=1561187

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Gamergate&diff=prev&oldid=1561183

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Doxing&diff=prev&oldid=1561190

Michael Cohen said:
(Undo revision 1557907 by Aleksandra96 (talk) because it's all trash and tu quoque bullshit)

(stop adding that garbage sentence)

(removing the "YOU GUYS DO IT TOO" examples added by Aneris, which included a listing for someone who doesn't have a local page and is just being used as a tu quoque)

(more bullshit to attack Rebecca Watson for no reason)

Currently sperging out and edit warring over a 'See Also' section of the Doxing article mentioning people that don't have RW pages.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Arisboch&diff=prev&oldid=1561208

Michael Cohen said:
(oh god this is all about Eliza Sutton and the sources are just links to comments and Arisboch IF THERE ARE NO INTERNAL LINKS THEN THEY DON'T NEED TO BE UNDER SEE ALSO)

Doxing
Seriously? You're arguing over this shit? Because all of the examples Aneris added were regarding the Eliza Sutton bullshit where she spread lies about PZ Myers. And one instance of Margaret Pless saying she doxed someone. If these people don't have articles on the project, they don't have any fucking place in a "See also" section.Ryulong (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC
 
Last edited:
The ride just never ends.

The saddest part of all is that if Ryulong is THAT anal about having his edits reverted, he could fork RationalWiki or even Wikipedia (both sites provides content dumps), set up his own wiki, disable registration, then edit his heart out without fear any of his shit will go away.

That is, unless he gets off on being a whiny bitch to people.
 
The saddest part of all is that if Ryulong is THAT anal about having his edits reverted, he could fork RationalWiki or even Wikipedia (both sites provides content dumps), set up his own wiki, disable registration, then edit his heart out without fear any of his shit will go away.

That is, unless he gets off on being a whiny bitch to people.
The whole point to editing a wiki is so people read your content, which is never going to happen if he made his own
 
Man, he just kept going tonight. So, Cohen couldn't even make it a day away and returned and made about 100 edits after he was "trying to make a clean break because all of these websites are shit".

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:biggrin:oxing&oldid=1561393

The now-deleted paragraph reads like an eighth-grader wrote it, one giant sequence of "and this happened, and this happened." Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 02:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

It's better than the link dump to just go "YOUR SACRED COWS DOXXED PEOPLE TO AND AREN'T RECALCITRANT ABOUT IT".—Ryulong (talk) 02:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Well, if it's in all-caps, it must be true. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 02:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Someone made a DlagonDlagon account and caused another sperg out.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tielec01&oldid=1561506#DlagonDlagon

Why the fuck does this always happen? Why is it when I ban obvious trolls that are solely here to harass and mock me that I have you or someone else unblocking them and giving them the benefit of the doubt? It happens every god damn time. No sysop action I have ever taken on this website stands for more than half an hour.—Ryulong (talk) 04:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

I will note that sometimes people - and this isn't just in stuff relating to you - are given the benefit without even the doubt. I'll refrain from saying it's good practice, though. WalkerWalkerWalker 04:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

No. This is a constant behavior on here. I block someone who's only here to mock and denigrate me and harass me and they're immediately unblocked by someone else because banning them is feeding their trollish behavior when getting rid of them gets rid of further opportunities for them to troll. His screenname is intended to mock me. He's using the fucking 4chan/GG nickname for me and adding in the bullshit about the R/L translations that they constantly harass me over. It's an obvious bad faith account and there's no trust in my judgement to ban him for those obvious reasons.—Ryulong (talk) 04:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Meanwhile you lot are all feeding his trollish behavior more than me banning him would ever do. You're all assholes.—Ryulong (talk) 04:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

God, is there any group on the internet that you haven't alienated yourself from? Sorry I don't keep track of the nicknames that your various "enemies" have assigned to you; not that it matters as we don't ban people for silly names. Request a rename if it is so painful for you to allow them to edit the wiki under the current alias you small, small person. Tielec01 (talk) 05:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC

Cohen believes Paravant is out to get him because of him trying to change the MLP article.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...mergate_claims&oldid=1561542#Watson_v._Sutton

Cohen screenshotted the logs of other RW users talking about his diva quit and uploaded it as an example of RW's community being "toxic."

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/File:RW_Community.png

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paravant&oldid=1561519#File:RW_Community.png

So you're really not helping refute my opinion that you're abusing the sysop tools to spite me at every turn.—Ryulong (talk) 05:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Did you really just call this community "toxic" based on those comments? Carpetsmoker (talk) 05:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes. Because it's all at my expense.—Ryulong (talk) 05:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

In Dutch we have a saying, that someone can "have long toes", meaning that a person has such long toes that it's difficult not to step on them (meaning to offend someone, like in English). Your toes aren't just long, I'm pretty sure you have more than 10 toes...
As I already said on the other talk page, lighten up; after all, it's just some random wanker on this stupid internets thing... We're allotted with such a short time on this planet, is this truly how you want to spend your time? Being angry about this? Or are there more important things in life? Here's some music to help you start relaxing Carpetsmoker (talk) 05:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Someone asked him why he was back not even a day after quitting, and it turned out Cohen saw someone expressing wrongthink and just had to come back and correct them.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryulong&oldid=1561538

So what happened yesterday
I thought you had enough? Why the sudden change of heart? Usually when people LANCB they last longer than 12 hours. Tielec01 (talk) 06:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Because someone betrayed my trust.—Ryulong (talk) 06:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Sounds ominous. Tielec01 (talk) 06:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Someone betrayed my trust yesterday and it upset me and I thought maybe I could stop participating here because that was somewhat related but I saw someone being a complete idiot and I couldn't stop myself from coming back and telling them off.—Ryulong (talk) 06:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Hah, someone on the internet was wrong. What next? Tielec01 (talk) 06:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Michael: If you want to quit these "toxic shitholes" that are wikis, take them off your bookmarks, get them out of your history, and forget about it.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: temeluchus
Man, he just kept going tonight. So, Cohen couldn't even make it a day away and returned and made about 100 edits after he was "trying to make a clean break because all of these websites are shit".

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:biggrin:oxing&oldid=1561393



Someone made a DlagonDlagon account and caused another sperg out.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tielec01&oldid=1561506#DlagonDlagon



Cohen believes Paravant is out to get him because of him trying to change the MLP article.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...mergate_claims&oldid=1561542#Watson_v._Sutton

Cohen screenshotted the logs of other RW users talking about his diva quit and uploaded it as an example of RW's community being "toxic."

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/File:RW_Community.png

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paravant&oldid=1561519#File:RW_Community.png



Someone asked him why he was back not even a day after quitting, and it turned out Cohen saw someone expressing wrongthink and just had to come back and correct them.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryulong&oldid=1561538



Michael: If you want to quit these "toxic shitholes" that are wikis, take them off your bookmarks, get them out of your history, and forget about it.
Kind of reminds one of KimmoA except maybe slightly less crazy and with opposed political opinions. Same paranoia and dejected whining about shit nobody cares about on the internet.
 
Because he has mentioned this community by name is and is aware we point and laugh at him.

Yep. We know he monitors the Gamergaters' boards on reddit/chans as well.

Dude has wasted almost a year of his life and who knows how many hours editing near daily about Gamergate bullshit on RationalWiki. If he's serious about trying to get away from his obsessive wiki editing, I'll spend the 40~ seconds to type some encouragement for him.

I mean for fuck's sake, he's still watching his 'buddyloids' translations on Wikipedia and messaging people to go revert if they ever get changed.

Ryulong's ad.jpg
 
have you ever read an article on RW?

this is a direct question

I have for laughs. I wouldn't go there for anything serious.

Kind of reminds one of KimmoA except maybe slightly less crazy and with opposed political opinions. Same paranoia and dejected whining about shit nobody cares about on the internet.

He's kind of the Lord Rainbowdash of the RW, in that even people who more or less agree with most of his positions can't stand him because he's just such a gigantic sperg.
 
Back