Dramacow Ryulong / Michael Cohen - Fanatic Wikisperg, Anti-Gamergater and All Around Asshole

[AnOminous]

Ryulong vs. bronies: the gift that keeps producing milk.

It would be funny if that was the final straw.

This bronies shit is basically displaced aggression, kicking the cat because your boss fired you stuff. Because he couldn't sperg up the Gamergate shit any more.

 

[Hellfire]

It would be funny if that was the final straw.

This bronies shit is basically displaced aggression, kicking the cat because your boss fired you stuff. Because he couldn't sperg up the Gamergate shit any more.

He just spilled his spaghetti towards Paravant, blaming his involvement in Gamergate for all that has happened.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryulong&diff=prev&oldid=1557437

No archives no further problems arising from archiving.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Shut up. You had three hours to figure out how you were doing things wrong and how you've alienated pretty much every single editor on this wiki, and yet you have not learned. Honestly the only reason you haven't been kicked out like Brx is because of David and the fact that you only survive because a few higher ups defend you should tell you something. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 06:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

It means that on this parochial little wiki dedicated to skepticism, atheism, and mocking Conservapedia, I've clearly rubbed several people the wrong way and you happen to be one of them. Because as far as I can tell there is no real way to properly amend things with you in the short term, I had preferred to avoid unnecessary confrontations like these by just not communicating with you or going to any pages that would have resulted in what had happened this evening. Although it's clear from the comments left on User talk:142․124․55․236 that this goes deeper than any mistrust originally developed by saying "KINKSHAME HORSEFUCKERS" or vastly rewriting the MLP page to be less kind to the Brony fandom. It boils down to how I've been writing about Gamergate and the inevitable drama that comes about when I react towards really bad concern trolls, and particularly ones that enter that particular part of the project. Or perhaps your own personal ideas of what constitutes Gamergate, not that the page here really said anything different from what it does now. But, again, clearly I've struck a nerve and there's no way for that to be fixed so I don't know what to tell you otherwise.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

making amends with me is best achieved by just about anything other than avoiding me and insulting me/deliberately pissing me off, as brx learned--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 06:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I would simply prefer to let some time pass because the wounds are still fresh. I don't feel I can address anything specific at this time.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

"vastly rewriting the MLP page to be less kind to the Brony fandom" -> that's a bit of an understatement, and it also wasn't the problem. Your edit warring and general dickish behaviour over it was. Carpetsmoker (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

 

[Cynical]

It would be funny if that was the final straw.

This bronies shit is basically displaced aggression, kicking the cat because your boss fired you stuff. Because he couldn't sperg up the Gamergate shit any more.

As the guy who created the thread on this guy, when I dug up all the crap on him, the GamerGate hate made perfect sense: he was friends with all the parties involved and a total social jackass wacko.

This brony shit I never saw coming, especially since I never saw anything like this compared to his other well known obsessions.

....hell, maybe there's just something about that show that just makes autists go rabid.

 

[Hellfire]

As the guy who created the thread on this guy, when I dug up all the crap on him, the GamerGate hate made perfect sense: he was friends with all the parties involved and a total social jackass wacko.

This brony shit I never saw coming, especially since I never saw anything like this compared to his other well known obsessions.

....hell, maybe there's just something about that show that just makes autists go rabid.

Surprisingly, looks like Ryulong only made one edit to the Wikipedia MLP page, removing some source that looks to now be dead that involved 4chan: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=541655231

Edit: He just linked his brony hate blog posts, seems to all be years old: http://ryulong.info/tagged/fucking-MLP/chrono

Cohen admits he "really fucking hates bronies" for their "disgusting entitlement."

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryulong&oldid=1557471

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...57471#.22I_really_fucking_hate_Bronies.....22

I am really struggling to comprehend why you make your life here so difficult Ryu. Your unwillingness to abide why what are a pretty relaxed set of RW guidlines and standards is apparent right from the early entries on your user talk page. I say unwillingness as it can't be inability as you are clearly not stupid. I don't get it. --TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 06:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Because habits are hard to break from Wikipedia and I really fucking hate Bronies. But I'm the one in the wrong and not two people who have unilaterally desysopped me and blocked me for hours at a time without a coop case.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

"I really fucking hate Bronies...."
What is this all about? Some people like watching a cartoon and acting like fans. What is there worth to hate in that? And if there is something to hate in that, why not just ignore them. I've managed to live my whole life without even encountering the concept until quite recently (never mind an actual Bronie) so it's not like they're inescapable. 07:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't know what to say about this anymore. The local page praised them when large portions of the Internet despise them and it's not because they're not gender conforming but because they bring with them a disgusting entitlement just like in every other fucking fandom I've ever come across.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

But what did I do wrong here? Piss off two local Bronies. I haven't done ANYTHING with that page since Carpetsmoker desysopped me and banned me for an hour. And tonight I remove a single comment from here without archiving it immediately and I'm subject to a 3 hour ban. There's apparently no page on this website that I can edit without pissing someone off, turning it into a honeypot for some idiot Gamergater, or being mocked as you and everyone else is going after my sandbox page because I have no where else to fucking host it that has a format that I can work with. So please. Tell me what to do.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Cohen's friend Adam got up on his soapbox to try and convince others they should hate bronies too, argues that the RW article should reflect the limited experiences him and his friends have had.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...57509#.22I_really_fucking_hate_Bronies.....22

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:142․124․55․236#You.27re_featured_on_Twitter_btw

I'm glad you've had encounters that shape a more positive experience, but me and so many of my friends have had the opposite, and I feel like that should be reflected in the article. Kitsunelaine (talk) 08:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

David Gerard gave Cohen his sysop rights back, Cohen started warring with another sysop over page protection for his Talk page.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...e=User+talk:Ryulong&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=

 

[vertexwindi]

It's hilarious that he would call bronies privileged when he does nothing but edit wikipages and argue all day.

 

[Optimus Prime]

Whoever loses, we win - RW is about as perfect an isolated sandbox as can be to contain this shithead's behavior because literally nobody fucking cares about what he's trying to enforce anyway.

 

[AnOminous]

Whoever loses, we win - RW is about as perfect an isolated sandbox as can be to contain this shithead's behavior because literally nobody fucking cares about what he's trying to enforce anyway.

True. It'd be hilarious for him to get kicked off but RW is basically a joke and anyone having to deal with his insane shit there pretty much deserves to be doing just that.

 

[Optimus Prime]

True. It'd be hilarious for him to get kicked off but RW is basically a joke and anyone having to deal with his insane shit there pretty much deserves to be doing just that.

From the sounds of it, the majority of RW regulars already want him gone for good, but he's only still around let alone getting mod powers in the end after every time he loses them because the higher ups he's buddies with actively have to work to keep him on.

I can't help but feel a major revolt against the top brass of RW will come in time because they are clearly allowing a festering cancer to remain despite every attempt to remove it.

 

[chimpburgers]

Whoever loses, we win - RW is about as perfect an isolated sandbox as can be to contain this shithead's behavior because literally nobody fucking cares about what he's trying to enforce anyway.

It's keeping him and his stupidity contained there. They deserve him.

 

[Hellfire]

Cohen's friend Adam has decided to produce milk at Ryulong's talk, spilling his spaghetti about bronies and stomping his feet because others disagreed with his vitriol.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...58250#.22I_really_fucking_hate_Bronies.....22

You don't find anything wrong with the sexualisation of a show for 5 year olds and their parents? The fact that when they go online to look up the show and their characters, they find overwhelming amounts of porn? There should be an unspoken rule about the sexualisation of children's show characters (who are arguably children themselves): Don't do it. If it's debatable whether or not a character is of age, don't draw fucking porn of them, and don't call fursecution when called out on how creepy that is. There's also many things the community itself has been responsible for that just isn't okay, and should be covered on this here blog page instead of swept quietly under the rug. Kitsunelaine (talk) 07:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I find a lot wrong with the sexualization of everything by our society, but I have seen no evidence that the people who sexualize the show are any more of an issue than the people who sexualize Harry Potter or a million other things -- in a hyper-sexualized culture, everything gets sexualized in one way or another -- but that issue is distinct from the phenomenon of liking the show for any other reason. Also, kids are going to fing "overwhelming amounts of porn" on the internet no matter what they are looking for. The internet is made up largely of porn, and it is inescapble. That, again, is an issue separate from the question of liking the TV show for various non-sexualized reasons. Sorry, I see no real argument here. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 07:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

The problem is the volume and intensity for this specific show, and the fact that it's targeted age range is much lower than other things. I don't see copious amounts of porn of Strawberry Shortcake. Bronydom started from 4chan, and it hasnt' separated that far from it's roots. The userbase is quite often toxic, and a lot of the behavior it espouses is covered in depth in other articles on RationalWiki, without fear or shame. We would be remiss to say that it isn't present here. Kitsunelaine (talk) 08:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I wonder if it' more intense because people look for it there more intently -- the Streisand effect -- and how much of it gets created by the shaming of it, just by getting the idea out there. Anyway, until I see some objective, data-based analysis that concludes that there is some sort of meaningful nomber of people using the show as a way to facilitate illegal sexual activities, I can't take any claim like that seriously. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 08:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

here you go Kitsunelaine (talk) 08:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

When Adam tried to use his argumentum ad google, other RW users were not impressed.

It would seem to me, as an outsider, that the problem is that you are trying to paint a subculture with a broad brush. Just as their are certain aspects of every subculture that people can pick and choose to like/dislike, it doesn't and shouldn't be a reflection of that subculture as a whole. For example, I define myself as a "punk." Hardline straight-edge folks also describe themselves as "punk." That doesn't mean that the actions of hardlines are s reflection on punk culture as a whole. Heck, the sub-section of punk I claim to be a part of thinks hardline is nothing but school bullies who think punk means fighting. Bottom line: there is an inherent danger and, indeed, a fallacy to painting an entire sub-culture with the broad brush of a small sub-sect. Gooniepunk (talk) 08:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I'd like to add my voice to Gooniepunk here. Most of my experience with bronies has been rather uniformly positive. Ryu (and the friends in question perhaps?) seems pretty familiar with 4chan and other troll hives while I (desperately) avoid such sites; could that perhaps explain this blatant discrepancy between our views of the fandom? 142.124.55.236 (talk) 13:41, 30 October 42015 AQD (UTC)

I find it significant that Kitsunelaine appeared to feel that simply googling My Little Pony would return plenty of Brony porn whereas, when I tried, I got nothing that I wouldn't want a five year old to see - well, I went down three pages worth, maybe if I went furter but.... Doesn't google tailor results to the known preferences of the googler? As such those who search out Brony porn will find it and continue to find it. Little girls will find more suitable stuff. Oh, and I would hope their parents have the safety filters on unlike me. As for accusations that paedophilia is rampant throughout Brony culture - the simple fact that Lauren Faust is happy to engage with them suggests otherwise. Doxys Midnight Runner (talk) 14:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

HuskyHarlot, a RW user who has rattled Cohen's cage in the past, observed Adam sperging out and joined in for some fun, and Cohen admitted he believes his precious Power Rangers fandom is "shit".

> ryulong offended by sexualized brony fan fic
> ryulong obsessed with power rangers
> mfw the most sexually disturbing fan fic of all time comes from power rangers
Agony in Pink Sarah (HH) 00:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

> mfw i go to your talk page and see gamergate apologia
also i'm not Ryulong, but nice try. Kitsunelaine (talk) 00:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

The Power Rangers fandom is shit too.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Wiki communities are "toxic shitholes," Power Rangers fandom is "shit," hmm... seems every community Cohen partakes in he despises.

 

[Cynical]

Cohen's friend Adam has decided to produce milk at Ryulong's talk, spilling his spaghetti about bronies and stomping his feet because others disagreed with his vitriol.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...58250#.22I_really_fucking_hate_Bronies.....22



When Adam tried to use his argumentum ad google, other RW users were not impressed.




HuskyHarlot, a RW user who has rattled Cohen's cage in the past, observed Adam sperging out and joined in for some fun, and Cohen admitted he believes his precious Power Rangers fandom is "shit".



Wiki communities are "toxic shitholes," Power Rangers fandom is "shit," hmm... seems every community Cohen partakes in he despises.

After shit like this, it Ryulong's own fault he's a cow, and he must be a glutton for punishment, because he keeps heading back to do more shit he's get mocked and called out for.

The guy is essentially a walking tragicomedy of his own creation.

 

[Optimus Prime]

After shit like this, it Ryulong's own fault he's a cow, and he must be a glutton for punishment, because he keeps heading back to do more shit he's get mocked and called out for.

The guy is essentially a walking tragicomedy of his own creation.

It makes me wonder why the fuck he hasn't gone and made his own fucking wiki, honestly. The Ryupedia.

 

[AnOminous]

Wiki communities are "toxic shitholes," Power Rangers fandom is "shit," hmm... seems every community Cohen partakes in he despises.

No, Ryulong. You are the shit.

 

[Accel_Rider]

No, Ryulong. You are the shit.

And then Michael was a lolcow.

 

[Hellfire]

Cohen's once more expressed his butthurt for the chans as he tried to delete sections from RW's 4chan page, dubbing them 'pop culture boards' that weren't on mission for RationalWiki. Other RW users disagreed and had to revert him.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:4chan&oldid=1560210#Ryulong.27s_deletion

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=4chan&diff=prev&oldid=1560178

Once the sections were restored, a 'rape joke' triggered Ryulong in the /tg/ description.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=4chan&diff=prev&oldid=1560201

Cohen's butthurt jihad against My Little Pony also spilled onto the 4chan page and was removed, then Paravant removed /mlp/'s section entirely, possibly to stop Cohen from using it as a soapbox.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=4chan&diff=prev&oldid=1560117

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=4chan&diff=prev&oldid=1560120


Cohen is still obsessively editing the Gamergate articles, including delusional white knighting and hand waving to defend Anita.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anita_Sarkeesian&diff=prev&oldid=1560207


On Wikipedia, Ryulong buddies Adam (Kitsunelaine) and sysop Salvidrim! continued supporting Ryulong's shitty engrish 'buddyloid,' with Salvidrim! protecting the page due to 'vandalism' aka an IP trying to change it to the proper Buddyroid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kamen_Rider_×_Super_Sentai:_Super_Hero_Taisen&action=history

Does anyone else think Cohen is a lot like Joshua Goldberg? Both Gamergate-involved weaboos obsessed with wikis and their burning hatred for 4chan.

 

[chimpburgers]

Cohen's once more expressed his butthurt for the chans as he tried to delete sections from RW's 4chan page, dubbing them 'pop culture boards' that weren't on mission for RationalWiki. Other RW users disagreed and had to revert him.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:4chan&oldid=1560210#Ryulong.27s_deletion

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=4chan&diff=prev&oldid=1560178

Once the sections were restored, a 'rape joke' triggered Ryulong in the /tg/ description.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=4chan&diff=prev&oldid=1560201

Cohen's butthurt jihad against My Little Pony also spilled onto the 4chan page and was removed, then Paravant removed /mlp/'s section entirely, possibly to stop Cohen from using it as a soapbox.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=4chan&diff=prev&oldid=1560117

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=4chan&diff=prev&oldid=1560120


Cohen is still obsessively editing the Gamergate articles, including delusional white knighting and hand waving to defend Anita.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anita_Sarkeesian&diff=prev&oldid=1560207


On Wikipedia, Ryulong buddies Adam (Kitsunelaine) and sysop Salvidrim! continued supporting Ryulong's shitty engrish 'buddyloid,' with Salvidrim! protecting the page due to 'vandalism' aka an IP trying to change it to the proper Buddyroid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kamen_Rider_×_Super_Sentai:_Super_Hero_Taisen&action=history

Does anyone else think Cohen is a lot like Joshua Goldberg? Both Gamergate-involved weaboos obsessed with wikis and their burning hatred for 4chan.

He never stops with this nonsense and his jabs at people aren't even funny. I cannot express enough how much of a twit he is.

 

[DrJonesHat]

This just proves that the RW administration is shit, because someone that disruptive should have been banned long ago.

 

[chimpburgers]

This just proves that the RW administration is shit, because someone that disruptive should have been banned long ago.

If they hold the same viewpoints, then everything that person does is okay because they don't want to make their beliefs look like shit. I asked this question somewhere else the other day about why these communities don't just kick out these losers right away who are making them look bad. I think it comes down to an inflated sense of self-importance and hubris and a fear of admitting to being wrong. What they don't realize is that they are also turning off people who potentially want to learn more about what they believe in and shooting themselves in the foot and in this case, new members to the site and additional traffic.

 

[Cynical]

This just proves that the RW administration is shit, because someone that disruptive should have been banned long ago.

It's a SJW shit pit, they will defend their own unless they fuck up so bad they need to toss them or they go heretic.

 

[Optimus Prime]

He never stops with this nonsense and his jabs at people aren't even funny. I cannot express enough how much of a twit he is.

I think it's the only way he can think of to put into words whatever hateful things he wants people to notice. Dude's pretty much shunned from every place on the internet and he knows these days RW is the only place where he can put that shit up and not risk getting banned entirely as the admin. staff is buddy-buddy with him for some reason.

This just proves that the RW administration is shit, because someone that disruptive should have been banned long ago.

Hard to believe this dipshit used to be on top of the food chain on Wikipedia.

EDIT: Also somebody apparently nominated the fucker for the upcoming mod elections...and they're treating it for the moment as legit.