Canadian Truckers Convoy 2022 - The Leaf calls you a Nazi as he gasses you

People say Romania is the biggest shithole of Europe but I've always wanted to visit. The accent is top tier.
Bucharest is pretty dang cool but it's also a monument to Ceaușescu's megalomania.
The beatings will continue until we stop applying morals universally. Until we stop implicitly treating people as equal. Until we subjugate the liberalism within ourselves.

Plus I don't think it's fair comparing a plague upon mankind to a cold virus.

I actually don't buy that the current way society is run is the only way it can be run. I mean perhaps our current society, with its current social norms (which themselves are informed by our debased priest/media/culture policing class) can only have our current rulers, but if society is willing to change, if pattern recognition is allowed to again act as a social immune system against cultural parasites, then I believe the nature of our rulers can change too. It's tempting to think things are the way they are because it's the only way it could be, but a lot of conscious effort goes in to maintaining the current shape of things. Did you see how Elon Musk was bullied just earlier today in to taking down a tweet by the CEO of the ADL? Imagine if that sort of person had no power here. I think things could be different. Never perfect, but I would gladly live with materially less to have richer bonds between the good people of whichever body we form, including between rulers and ruled.
I don't buy that the current way society is run is the only way it can be run either, but falling into moral relativism is largely what got us into this mess to begin with. There's an immense God-shaped hole in the heart of the West - in each and every one of us as well - and we're still trying to pick up the pieces.
 
You want to really brainfuck people, point out that Swine Flu is still an epidemic. They just haven't heard about it because Western media can't get any bootlicking done by posting death counts from China and Southeast Asia.

In 2020, when Taiwan got their first wave of Covid-19, they also had a simultaneous outbreak of swine flu. They made it through by (1) being an island nation, and (2) immediately cracking down on people's movement. They closed off the borders and forced contact tracing and personal tracking apps on their citizens. I'm not a fan of the tactics, obviously, but at least it was a competent response tailored to their specific situation.

Right around the time the entire media apparatus was screeching that Trump told people to drink bleach, a bunch of Asian countries had finally wrestled Covid into a manageable state, some without the authoritarian measures. They had their own variants and everything over there, which never spread around enough for people to know the names. (There's a lot of Greek letters in between Alpha, Delta, and Omicron.) And they continue to deal with seasonal versions of the other flus.

Western approaches to epidemics aren't just stupid, they haven't evolved. There was no learning accomplished at the institutional level. Our readiness level has actually devolved, degraded by the politicization of it all.
We literally had no emergency supplies for epidemics because the previous POTUS was so goddamn lazy he didn't refill that shit, forcing everyone to use shitty masks TO THIS DAY, creating the 'ANYTHING TO KEEP GRAMMA FROM DYING' cope that increased the opposition to any actual quarantine procedure leading us to this dumbass bullshit today.
At a press conference today, leading researchers from the CDC have stated, "lmao they're practically dead already" in response to the rising death toll among the aged-care population. When asked by reporters what the average person can do to stay safe, one scientist advised, "just don't be old or fat, pussy."
I really want Acadeima to be like this tbh. The illusion of being intellectually superior is gone, so why not destroy the illusion of being eloquent as well. And then being actually smart?
Remake the entire scene into a dumbfuck mountain of understandable bullshit while Scientists just don't give a fuck.
 
I'm impressed with how quickly the Ottawa council and city leadership broke down once they were challenged.
It's been my experience with leftists that they all collapse pretty hard if they're challenged and can't use some form of power -- systemic power, institutional power, crying to HR, etc -- to suppress any opposition. It comes from the pseudo-religious thought processes that modern leftism relies upon. You know, "form conclusion, conclusion never changes, work backwards from it to find justifications."

If they aren't allowed to do this process, or the conclusion is sufficiently challenged, they literally have a mental breakdown.
 
Honestly, I question the fundamental assertion that progress is inherently good.

Like, sure, by every objective measurable metric, humanity as a species is much more successful today than we were a hundred thousand years ago. Everything is objectively better. But are we any happier for it?
"Happiness is not the natural state of mankind, and is never achieved from the outside in." - Terry Pratchett
 
Bucharest is pretty dang cool but it's also a monument to Ceaușescu's megalomania.

I don't buy that the current way society is run is the only way it can be run either, but falling into moral relativism is largely what got us into this mess to begin with. There's an immense God-shaped hole in the heart of the West - in each and every one of us as well - and we're still trying to pick up the pieces.

I agree, though to some extent a Libertarian run society would soon morph into one that has the right values so it wouldn't be so bad if it was willing to accept some sort of ideological evolution. The heart of all political problems in the West is censorship of free debate on any topic, fostered by an elite that wishes to maintain power and control above all else. What starts as "All drugs are legal woo!" will be confronted with things like the Opioid crisis and people will begin opioid free communities and society will progress from there. The fact you can't run the local Librarian who is trying to convince your son to cut his dick off out of town is the kind of problem Libertarianism can solve because theoretically you can protest and build walls to keep the freaks out.

Not to go all Soyjak, but a lot of Principled Libertarians I met in my life remind me of the good aspects of Andrew Ryan from Bioshock. They may think you're kooky, hold dumb collectivist beliefs, or do things they find immoral (such as worshipping God) but they support your right to do it as long as you don't impose it on broader society. They will let you have your gated community, and will rule in your favor if an outsider comes in trying to cause trouble, provided you don't do the same to them.

Good ideas would be absorbed by osmosis, bad ones rejected. You just need to be able to build that cozy town before others notice and want to make their own. The current governments in the West makes keeping harmful elements difficult if not outright impossible to keep out of a town and will oppress you for trying to do it.
 
That basically what pisses me off about the whole damn pandemic. It was handled poorly to incite worry and conspiracy.
except people bitched and whined that China didn't do more to stop the spread despite invoking some of the most totalitarian policies in doing so.

Very much "not in my backyard" politics.


(Yes China may have literally developed it in cooperation with Faucci and then fucked up and then silenced peopled about it, but thats to be expected from China).
 
The problem with libertarianism as a political movement is that it’s full of retard libertines like Dax Herrera who really just want a society where they can be a total degenerate without consequences. So many of them conflate libertarianism with social permissiveness. Why did libertarians support gay marriage? The libertarian position is that marriage shouldn’t be regulated by the Government. It doesn’t follow from that that if the Government regulates marriage it should allow all forms of marriage. Yet so many libertarians supported gay marriage on libertarians principles. If you support it then whatever, but it’s nothing to do with libertarianism. Even fucking Hayek and Mises said that insofar as laws exist, a society isn’t better by removing any particular laws. Some Government intervention is beneficial, given other extant Government intervention.
I mean that's the logical consequence of libertarianism. Why shouldn't a group of dog fuckers be allowed to found their own community where you can marry a dog? Historically libertarianism was a synonym for that sort of degeneracy.
ATF has entered the chat

Can anyone give me the lowdown on how libertarianism is anything other than controlled opposition? Systems as dysfunctional as communism have out competed libertarianism in practice, how is that excusable?
Theoretically it's a socioeconomic system where you have more or less total freedom (except for a tiny government that makes sure you do) and all the good ideas win and then capitalism makes everyone besides the lazy and stupid people rich (who get rich anyway because private charities or something). In reality it's a heavily idealistic system that the elites like because it lets them push degeneracy, import hordes of immigrants, and give corporations handouts in name of "deregulation".

That said, libertarianism would work in practice, it would just look more or less like the world we have today if all the government agencies were privatized, so the same corporate hellhole we live in now where "freedom" is something only the powerful enjoy. I think globohomo probably wouldn't mind if a bunch of naive libertarians took over the government, because they'd inevitably end up turning power over to the corporations in their attempts to re-establish a free market (that wouldn't actually work because literally everyone is always looking for ways to cheat the system).
 
I really want Acadeima to be like this tbh. The illusion of being intellectually superior is gone, so why not destroy the illusion of being eloquent as well. And then being actually smart?
Remake the entire scene into a dumbfuck mountain of understandable bullshit while Scientists just don't give a fuck.
Bro, look up a paper in a field you're interested in and email the scientist who wrote it. Chances are they're just another dude like you, and believe me, they're all totally happy to talk about their work (sans political and academic faggotry) to someone interested. I'm friends with a dude who holds a PhD, he's got a LOT to say about the Chinese and none of it's nice. Also friends with another dude who studied med in current era, he'll tell you straight up how much he hates blacks and how much time they wasted in classes on stupid black awareness shit. I'm not a scientist but I've got a degree in it, every draft version of my student papers reads like that shitpost in a few ways, plenty of notes saying "fuckstick et al. attempted to demonstrate xyz, but they're wrong and gay because they didn't account for abc, possibly because they were busy thinking about cock". There's plenty of based scientists to go around, it's just the handful of fags that the media likes shitting it up for the rest of us.

Everyone one of us also agrees with you that scientific discourse need to be more intelligible by the common man too, the peer review feedback I wrote for other people almost always had one paragraph of the cunt's paper highlighted and commented to say "this is one sentence of information, stop trying to sound smart".
 
Honestly, I question the fundamental assertion that progress is inherently good.

Like, sure, by every objective measurable metric, humanity as a species is much more successful today than we were a hundred thousand years ago. Everything is objectively better. But are we any happier for it?

I’m not gonna go anprim and pretend as if humanity could somehow be arbitrarily kept in a pre-industrial state (because doing so would require an uber-authoritarian government keeping tabs on everyone making sure they don’t discover any forbidden knowledge), but I do think another ice age would do wonders for mankind’s collective psyche. Homo Sapiens evolved to survive those harsh environments, but without that external limiter on our power level we don’t know what to do with our abilities.

Well we could and we did for a long time, the major problem in the current year is the structure we live in. Nothing too complex, but just a society that has elites that want to do what they want whenever they want and people turned into consumer drones of product and propaganda with psychology and sociology judged from the lens that a person's ultimate happiness derives from comfort and luxury, a complete rejection of Maslows Hierarchy of Needs.

If people were just looked upon as biological cavemen, society could reorient itself in a way that brings meaning to people's lives. Allow for communities to form, allow for all basic needs to be met, show tangible value for labour, stop pushing social division and consumerism. If they did these things, people would feel far more comfortable.

Unless you're a sociopath, I don't believe it takes more than an owned property, a happy wife and kids, steady meaningful work, well paid work and being able to go every Friday to the Cheers style pub where you know everyone to be happy. It would also be beneficial for society as well since periods where there was more leisure time meant innovation. Instead nowadays most are in a constant state of anxiety, depression or are numb. That's just the men, women are in a completely different reality where they seem to do everything in their power to make their lives worse and are avoiding one another except to profit off it, mostly it seems to maximize the amount of attention they get until they die.
 
Turns out “let us abduct your kids so we can beat you and arrest you” may not be a very endearing negotiation tactic.

Who could have guessed?
They really do think the Truckers are as stupid as their biases say they are. It's glorious.

"Surely they'll just let us set up a violent massacre and not take any steps to stop it, I mean, clearly, we're the elites from the big city and these are just a bunch of... ugh... truck drivers."
 
I mean that's the logical consequence of libertarianism. Why shouldn't a group of dog fuckers be allowed to found their own community where you can marry a dog? Historically libertarianism was a synonym for that sort of degeneracy.
This is what I am talking about. It’s wrong. You can be a libertarian and think it’s wrong to fuck a dog. You don’t have to throw your hands up in the air and call yourself a radical subjectivist.
 
Even if the cops/military open automatic on women and children, I really doubt it anyone will escalate the conflict. It will die down immediately and that will be the end. At best, maybe we'll get some iconic image that will put you in jail for having on your hardrive.

Western people are simply not able to stand on their own anymore. The ideology of freedom is not something you are going to kill for when your freedom robs you on every luxury you got used to. It's easier to just move to a different country. Especially when the country you were raised in hasn't been loyal to you for the last few decades.
 
Last edited:
1645185835839.png
 
Back