Yet you keep pointing it out
You don't know what you're talking about re: men because you've never had a relationship with a man that didn't use or abuse you. You have no standing to talk about a bodily autonomy you rented out to people.
This isn't "falling back" on anything-- it's the same as pointing out a former inmate at least has immense difficulty readjusting to civilian life. It's absolutely relevant.
I don't have to resist being called an incel by the likes of you, especially when your swearing is as put on as it is. I'd sooner value a paraplegic ripping into me for walking slow.
No sane person actually likes abortions
Emphasis mine.
It’s really gross how he hates women so much that he wants to keep blaming women for being absused and beaten.
Most women manage to not get beaten black and blue by pimps because they don't do drugs and thereafter become reliant on pimps and johns in the first place.
you literally cannot stop people from having sex.
>People will find ways to abort babies & get rid of them whether you like it or not.
And they still commit murders despite the act being made illegal. Point? Just like murder, being a whore is still wrong, even if "people will find ways" to do it.
There's value in recognizing and accounting for human shortcoming. The problem with communism, for example, is that it first and foremost is a fantasy that's deliberately ignorant of the vices of men and therefore doesn't account for them in its "prophecy" of the ascendant proletariat.
But-- putting aside that I don't trust Current Year + 8 teachers to
not groom children under the pretense of teaching them about "safe sex"-- the idea that we need to cushion people from the consequences of their actions instead of dealing with the genesis of age-inappropriate behavior (it's expected and understandable that teenagers would want to have sex, but the general, psychological, and financial consequences of any of its potential aftermaths cannot be readily borne as teenagers) is just a modernist band-aid as opposed to a realistic reckoning with reality.
We live in a highly sexualized society. It's becoming more common for women to begin openly prostituting themselves-- virtually or otherwise-- as soon as they turn 18, which actually means that they started at least a couple years prior. Among young men, of course, there was already the issue of them regarding sex as a rite of passage (i.e. such boys sought to use a woman's body in order to "become a man" or otherwise gain a sense of self-worth). Children are absolutely
inundated with sexual imagery, even without being exposed to pornographic sites whose biggest deterrent against improper access by children is a "Scouts' honor" question (and they know what they're doing).
All of this is getting multifariously worse, not better.
It's not that people are
just having sex "and we can't stop them". In the past, teen pregnancies used to be much lower than they are now-- part of that, I'm sure, was that there was an expectation that you
had to take responsibility and marry someone you impregnated. Sometimes that responsibility was taken while staring down a sawed-off shotgun.
You can argue that's not coming back, and it likely isn't (there's no cause for it, currently), but my point is that "decreasing the number of pregnancy cases wherein abortion would be readily contemplated" isn't something that's even substantially solved with "introduce kids to condoms and Plan B". The issue is deeper and much more grave. And I believe that with the treatment of
those issues, part of the cause for "popularity" (for lack of a better term) of abortion would be obviated.
...doesn't mean the institution can't also be attacked directly. But only attacking it directly is as bad as the aforementioned modernist band-aid.
