Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
Capture.PNG

why not both.jpg

1651285328538.png

That's debatable.

image-000001.png
I'm sure the judge will appreciate you putting words in his mouth, Dave. No, he won't admonish you for that at all.
 
Last edited:
As a fun diversion from the court case, I decided to poke around in his old posts on the immigration forums regarding his ladyboy. I updated the OP with my, admittedly minimal, findings. I did find something a bit interesting worth mentioning though.

In this excerpt from 2010 he admits he has a criminal history. This is 7 years before the face stabbing incident occurs.
1651289116826.png

:thinking:
 
Would sampling one of Acerthorn's streams and turning it into an experimental electronic music track be deemed "transformative" enough under fair use? Asking for a friend.

Headphone warning:
 
In this excerpt from 2010 he admits he has a criminal history. This is 7 years before the face stabbing incident occurs.
You're being wrong here, in the second part.
snippet.jpg
Virginia Tech Incident threat happened prior to stabbing, as a result of which he was arrested and had a TRO applied to him for that threat. I assume this is what he's referring to. He filed the disability discrimination claim against that University in the summer of 2010, jfc. Which clearly indicates that the threat was made prior to the stabbening. Between these two events he has said, on record, that he has violent thoughts about his father, you know, the blood letter of apology and stuff...
Face stabbing occured in November 2011.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sure the judge will appreciate you putting words in his mouth, Dave. No, he won't admonish you for that at all.
You are in both Russ and Mel's threads. You must know by now that proposed orders are normal and done all the time. We've seen Russ do it, Freemantle do it, Hardin do it, Corpos do it in this lawsuit, and I even cited caselaw (in Mel's thread) that it is all normal.
Would sampling one of Acerthorn's streams and turning it into an experimental electronic music track be deemed "transformative" enough under fair use?
I would imagine so.
That's debatable
That's not debatable. Acerthorn is just wrong.
@Mister Mint can you add that image to the OP?

Re: The comment, you can believe you are acting in good faith, and still be in actuallity acting in bad faith. See, for example, Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, 780 F.2d 823 (9th Cir. 1986), Miller v. Los Angeles County Board of Education 827 F.2d 617 (9th Cir. 1987), Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc., 892 F.2d 802 (9th Cir. 1989),
 
Metokur put acerthorn in his april roundup thumbnail. We might finally get that stream bois. Prepare for a full blown meltdown from the fly eating dad stabber.
Whereand when is the stream? Do you have a link?

I Googled it and it just took me to a channel called Xyzem, but the thumbs didn't have Acer in them.
 
Whereand when is the stream? Do you have a link?

I Googled it and it just took me to a channel called Xyzem, but the thumbs didn't have Acer in them.
"We might finally get that stream bois"

Learning to read would be a good first step.
 
So remember how the judge told Acer to stop filling frivolous motions? Well, Acer had a genius idea! What if he filed more of them? And so he did.
I'm not expecting vexatious status for this. Heck his emergency preservation of evidence motion might even be founded in something.

I'm nonetheless expecting a very VERY stern talking to by the judge, and another threat of vexatious if he pulls that shit up again.
 
You are in both Russ and Mel's threads. You must know by now that proposed orders are normal and done all the time. We've seen Russ do it, Freemantle do it, Hardin do it, Corpos do it in this lawsuit, and I even cited caselaw (in Mel's thread) that it is all normal.
Proposed orders are normal when you're making a motion or making a request of the court. It's not normal to file a proposed order in an opposition unless it's also a cross-motion. Otherwise you're just asking the court to deny the proposed order, there's no need to provide a counter proposed order.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pee Cola
Proposed orders are normal when you're making a motion or making a request of the court. It's not normal to file a proposed order in an opposition unless it's also a cross-motion. Otherwise you're just asking the court to deny the proposed order, there's no need to provide a counter proposed order.
My point, largely, was to counter the bit about "judge [not] appreciat[ing] [Acerthorn] putting words in his mouth", which was just a misunderstanding of what a proposed order is.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Pee Cola
My point, largely, was to counter the bit about "judge [not] appreciat[ing] [Acerthorn] putting words in his mouth", which was just a misunderstanding of what a proposed order is.
I don't think it's going to help Acerthorn with the judge though. Because he filed the unnecessary proposed order with the completely unnecessary "emergency" motion to preserve evidence after being warned multiple times to not make frivolous filings, I will be shocked if the Judge does not sanction him on Monday.
 
I don't think it's going to help Acerthorn with the judge though. Because he filed the unnecessary proposed order with the completely unnecessary "emergency" motion to preserve evidence after being warned multiple times to not make frivolous filings, I will be shocked if the Judge does not sanction him on Monday.
Yes, filing unnecessary motions certainly is won't help him
 
Back