- Joined
- Jan 27, 2020
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would sampling one of Acerthorn's streams and turning it into an experimental electronic music track be deemed "transformative" enough under fair use? Asking for a friend.
Headphone warning:
View attachment 3231966
I have no doubt there are several more percussion loops buried in that livestream audio. "Press in the A button" would make a good follow-up track.Could've used "Press in the A button" in there somewhere.
You're being wrong here, in the second part.In this excerpt from 2010 he admits he has a criminal history. This is 7 years before the face stabbing incident occurs.
You are in both Russ and Mel's threads. You must know by now that proposed orders are normal and done all the time. We've seen Russ do it, Freemantle do it, Hardin do it, Corpos do it in this lawsuit, and I even cited caselaw (in Mel's thread) that it is all normal.I'm sure the judge will appreciate you putting words in his mouth, Dave. No, he won't admonish you for that at all.
I would imagine so.Would sampling one of Acerthorn's streams and turning it into an experimental electronic music track be deemed "transformative" enough under fair use?
That's not debatable. Acerthorn is just wrong.That's debatable
@Mister Mint can you add that image to the OP?
I'd say yes. But something being fair use never stopped Dave from suing...Would sampling one of Acerthorn's streams and turning it into an experimental electronic music track be deemed "transformative" enough under fair use?
Whereand when is the stream? Do you have a link?Metokur put acerthorn in his april roundup thumbnail. We might finally get that stream bois. Prepare for a full blown meltdown from the fly eating dad stabber.
"We might finally get that stream bois"Whereand when is the stream? Do you have a link?
I Googled it and it just took me to a channel called Xyzem, but the thumbs didn't have Acer in them.
''Metokur put acerthorn in his april roundup thumbnail''"We might finally get that stream bois"
Learning to read would be a good first step.
I'm not expecting vexatious status for this. Heck his emergency preservation of evidence motion might even be founded in something.So remember how the judge told Acer to stop filling frivolous motions? Well, Acer had a genius idea! What if he filed more of them? And so he did.
Proposed orders are normal when you're making a motion or making a request of the court. It's not normal to file a proposed order in an opposition unless it's also a cross-motion. Otherwise you're just asking the court to deny the proposed order, there's no need to provide a counter proposed order.You are in both Russ and Mel's threads. You must know by now that proposed orders are normal and done all the time. We've seen Russ do it, Freemantle do it, Hardin do it, Corpos do it in this lawsuit, and I even cited caselaw (in Mel's thread) that it is all normal.
My point, largely, was to counter the bit about "judge [not] appreciat[ing] [Acerthorn] putting words in his mouth", which was just a misunderstanding of what a proposed order is.Proposed orders are normal when you're making a motion or making a request of the court. It's not normal to file a proposed order in an opposition unless it's also a cross-motion. Otherwise you're just asking the court to deny the proposed order, there's no need to provide a counter proposed order.
I don't think it's going to help Acerthorn with the judge though. Because he filed the unnecessary proposed order with the completely unnecessary "emergency" motion to preserve evidence after being warned multiple times to not make frivolous filings, I will be shocked if the Judge does not sanction him on Monday.My point, largely, was to counter the bit about "judge [not] appreciat[ing] [Acerthorn] putting words in his mouth", which was just a misunderstanding of what a proposed order is.
Yes, filing unnecessary motions certainly is won't help himI don't think it's going to help Acerthorn with the judge though. Because he filed the unnecessary proposed order with the completely unnecessary "emergency" motion to preserve evidence after being warned multiple times to not make frivolous filings, I will be shocked if the Judge does not sanction him on Monday.