Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

"I think women should be angrier in general. there's so much to be angry about"

View attachment 3264711

View attachment 3264736
"Anger is power. It is good. It is motivating."

Lady, you talk like MovieBob.
anger.png
Don't be like MovieBob.
 
Being a house husband rocked. The only bad part was the pinched faced old women and the stupid bitches at the grocery store that were all "What, you can't find a job like a real man?" Eat shit, bitch, you're just mad that your man can't burp a baby, cook tater-tot casserole, and sing the ABC Song with the kids like a real man.
What bullshit!
We did the math to work it all out financially, and what a glorious day it was when my husband retired early. He got to save his body from any more really tough physical labor while I still have another decade+ in me for my line of work. Spectacular home-keeper and father. Glad I held out for a winner!
 
I judge the fuck out of those people.

What kind of man can't care for his children? What kind of man can't do basic housework? Did you live like a fucking animal before you got married? What are you going to do if she gets injured, sick, or passes on? Get off your fucking lazy ass. Cut the fucking grass, clean the fucking gutters, take out the fucking garbage, do your fucking share of the deal you made, you mouth breathing retard. Weekends are for relaxing with the family, big projects to show your kids that things can be done that are complex, and drinking coffee with the wife till 2AM.


Being a house husband rocked. The only bad part was the pinched faced old women and the stupid bitches at the grocery store that were all "What, you can't find a job like a real man?" Eat shit, bitch, you're just mad that your man can't burp a baby, cook tater-tot casserole, and sing the ABC Song with the kids like a real man.

Keep that fucking house spotless, let the little ones help you so that you teach them how to clean and lead by example, play with the kids and make sure they get their naps and food, make dinners she likes, talk to her after the kids go to bed, then pound her flat on the bed with the dick she's been working all day to keep in luxury.

It ain't fucking rocket science.

Huh. So be a dead egger, single mother, or marry some worthless tool who just parrots feminist doctrine to get laid.

Yeah, no. I wouldn't advise that to any woman I didn't hate.

Yeah, I don't get the whole thing either.
What bullshit!
We did the math to work it all out financially, and what a glorious day it was when my husband retired early. He got to save his body from any more really tough physical labor while I still have another decade+ in me for my line of work. Spectacular home-keeper and father. Glad I held out for a winner!
Me again with another fun tidbit!
Some cultures have historically had the division not be "Man make money, woman stay home" but "Man do risky, woman do steady".
In these cultures, house husbands wouldn't be considered abnormal. It's their "job" to play with the kids while the women do the shit that needs to be done reliably or on a schedule. In exchange men go out hunting, raiding, conquering, etc.
 
Last edited:
You know what's fun? I always heard growing up that the pro-prohibition ladies were a bunch of mean ol' conservatives biddies who just hated a good time, but it turns out the real issue was the men drinking all the money away. They got pissed off at alcohol instead of the fact that men were not holding up their end of the marriage contract.
Ain't that something?
They would have been awesome on Twitter:
1652249440790.png
 
Say what you want, but it WAS a partnership. It was an equal relationship.

It was: I will do paid labor in order to support the family, you will do domestic labor to maintain the family.

Then retards came along and went HURRRR! UNPAID LABOR! HURRRRR!

It's not sexism to point out that the people who screech this shit are some of the most pampered fucking people in human history and that they want still MORE.

They act like all their husband does is go out to stripper bars, smoke cigars, and get massages all day, while they are literal slaves.

It's one of those things that grinds my fucking gears.

And if it's sexist to point out that they were getting paid and need to do the fucking dishes and shut the fuck up?

Then I guess I'm fucking sexist.

This problem is rooted in industrialization, specifically the advent of wage labor as the primary source of income over peasant (or in the case of America, yeoman, as in owning their own land and cultivating it) farming. If you calculate the total economic output of a peasant household, from ancient Greece through to the renaissance, from China to Europe, and even in nomadic, pastoralist settings in Africa and the steppes, you get economic output roughly equaling 50/50 between the sexes. This is because things like weaving, horticultural production and gathering, crafting, and other traditionally female activities (including beer brewing, before it became a commercial enterprise), all directly affected the household's bottom line. When the primary way money is earned becomes only the wages paid to the man, and the women is relegated to the domestic sphere alone, it radically changed the power dynamics in individual couples, regardless of the broader social dominance of men. In industrial cities, women's work, while necessary to the survival of the family, became valued at exactly 0 dollars because it no longer contributed to direct material wealth, because everything was switching over to the consumer economy where products have to be sources outside of the home. The idea of men's work and women's work is radically different to a couple who are dividing the labor on a homestead and farm, and to a couple who are living in an apartment in the city. The temperance movement just mentioned, where the issue is literally that men would receive their pay, walk straight to the pub to get trashed on cheap gin, and come home penniless to beat their kids, is a direct result of an economic structure the was only a few decades old at the time, not some sort of timeless reflection of human division of labor. I actually think human society is still grappling with this change and has not found a way to reach a new stable equilibrium, and you see this disorder spread as industrial production and urban living becomes dominant in societies all over the world. The discourse around "paying" for women's work is dumb, but so is the problem of men who lack the self-awareness to recognize that their lives and their families lives would literally be impossible without the work of their spouse. It's not all men obviously. But at the same time it's certainly not the ladies having insane midlife crises and chopping their dicks off to go live a trannie slut porn fantasy, leaving the kids with the wife, because being a woman is so "fun and freeing", so it's definitely some of them that are the problem.

(Though I personally believe that part of the problem is that we have gaggles of economists giving advice to people in power, spouting theories that don't value any work that can't be paid and quantified, so you hear the refrain over and over about how important things like daycare are to unlock "women's GDP potential", like raising healthy children who aren't pornsick anime NEETs has 0 value to society.)
 
Last edited:
Personally, I believe it should be a basic matter of personal autonomy that medical choices are between you and a doctor, period, and anyone else can really butt the fuck out. That's why I don't really like the anti-trans bills because they don't seem to acknowledge that, for instance, sometimes, it actually is appropriate to prescribe something like Lupron for an actual medical condition. Legislators who largely don't know shit about medicine are drafting sloppy language that doesn't do what they think it does.
1) I'm a big fan of personal autonomy, but every time I mention it on any form of hellsite, I immediately half half the userbase screaming about waffles, despite my clear mention of pancakes.
Let white libs stop breeding. Might save the future.
Fuck, you're an optimist; why do you think the progressives are so fucking mad about being called "groomers"? The bulk of them breed by cult induction, and the rest breed "normally", if you can call double-trans-to-hetero-and-spawning-a-genetic-mishap "normally", which they appear to believe they should be permitted to induct into their cult.

Tangentially, while I'm 100% onboard with calling religious indoctrination "grooming", I've been absolutely shell-shocked at the catastrophic colonic cataclysms being had by "progressives" over the large numbers of people coming out in favor of school choice, vouchers, and home-schooling. I knew that B.Ed degrees were just as lost a cause as the humanities, and I know that LibsOfTikTok is at least somewhat hyperbolic, but the fact that there's STILL teachers that refuse to DFE, and continue to post about how they intend to indoctrinate children into their bullshit amazes me.

PS: My time online is limited, I can't possibly read all 25 pages I missed, if that's a problem, that's cool but I can't help it.
 
"We don't need a domestic supply of infants" is, even jokingly, an incredibly gross and fucked up thing to say. I bet she's an anti-natalist too.
To be fair, the "domestic supply of infants" phrasing is from the draft opinion, not something she came up with. (Apparently Alito cited it from a study somewhere, so it's not his wording either, but it is included in the opinion.)
 
I guess this is the final push to get people to finally go for vouchers in the US. Good job you dumb education narcs loudly posting your aggressive garbage on your socials.

Here's some true facts:
  • By and large, most families love their children and want them to do well, even stupid people who make bad decisions. We already have mandated reporting for children experiencing actual abuse. Except for in the most extreme cases, educators should not be keeping secrets from parents. The phenomena of parents throwing their gay kid on the street is overblown. Straights have to follow oppressive rules they don't like in their parent's house too.
  • No widespread curriculum is titled CRT, but that doesn't mean it's not being taught. CRT is foundational to how curriculum is being created. This year I completed a lesson study for STEM curriculum I co-created and when I submitted it to the coordinator I had to explain how the lesson topic supported racial and minority equity and inclusion. I told them them it didn't and I would not change the lesson to shoehorn it in either. Can you imagine what is going on right now in social studies and English then? At a school observation I saw teachers pulling up cheesy TED Talks as part of curriculum. It used to be to show a video it had to go through the district for approval - that rule is still on the books and no one enforces it anymore.
  • Teachers are receiving professional development founded in CRT. It's not labeled that, but holding a monthly practice of role-playing microagressions at a staff meeting falls under CRT. It's bad enough that teachers are passing off un-vetted TED Talks as curriculum, but they do it at staff meetings too. It gives the narc teachers a chance to show how moved they are by someone's story of being misjudged and it makes everyone else realize they won't be supported when they send some asshole kid to the office on a referral.
  • Charter schools are not often a great alternative. They are prone to sudden collapse, high teacher turnover, and don't necessarily have a better handle on educational practices than to public schools.
  • Private schools are not necessarily better. Religious or not, the woke like to pay for woke, so your kid may still be asked for his pronouns. Private schools will often inflate grades so you think you're getting what you paid for. So if you're going the private/charter route, be careful and ignore the stock photos of happy kids building rollercoasters or solar ovens.
  • Even with all the wokery, your kid will probably be fine at a public school - there are some terrible public schools bust most are fine enough for regular people. If your kid is a fucking genius, by all means, send them to some special program.
  • Don't send your weird kid to public school if you think for any reason they might be susceptible to troonery. It's just not a safe place for that right now.
 
Unfortunately a stunning proportion of men in my generation can't get their ass off the couch, expect their partners to keep house while bringing home an income, and can't commit to suppress their natural desires for sexual novelty in the slightest such that it doesn't distract time and resources from a successful and happy family unit.

What kind of man can't care for his children? What kind of man can't do basic housework? Did you live like a fucking animal before you got married? What are you going to do if she gets injured, sick, or passes on?
Welcome to 2.5 generations of fatherlessness society.
 
Seems then Kate really want to have her own thread on KF with the numbers of tweets where she suffers from TDS and EMDS (Elon Musk Derangement Syndrome)

I guess she hide under the carpet the detail then Bill Clinton had once said MAGA too.

Well Kate13 did have her own private board on here for a bit, but it got deleted. I myself was asked to see if it could be made into a public lolcow thread, but I work too much and have no idea how to create and mod threads here, so I declined.

But yeah, she's insane. A fat, divorced leftist Minnesotan woman? Yeesh,
 
"We don't need a domestic supply of infants" is, even jokingly, an incredibly gross and fucked up thing to say. I bet she's an anti-natalist too.

Also "empath" lol
That's one of the most retarded lines in this entire thread lol

I don't know if she knows this but a nation literally needs infants to carry on future generations. What are we just going to steal babies from third world countries? Outsource baby production factories in China and India? Or is her grand plan to just have everybody post dumb shit on twitter and watch cartoons until this generation dies off and humanity goes extinct

Kate is fucking hilarious lol
 
What are we just going to steal babies from third world countries? Outsource baby production factories in China and India?
Yes. Not stealing or hyperbolic things like factories, but she means that there's no reason for more Americans (by that, she and people who post things like her specifically mean the white ones) to be born. If she was here in Canada she'd be one of the ones bitching about "Old Stock Canadians." Like a typical western progressive, their complaints about overpopulation like immigration are only applied to a specific group; "Swedes need to have fewer children and import Somalis who have half a dozen kids on average, etc."
 
Back