Baked Alaska / Tim Treadstone / Tim Gionet / Anthime Joseph Gionet - White rapper, alt-right "activist", ex-Buzzfeed contributor; got arrested at the March for Trump, and a federal snitch

DrJonesHat said:
The pardon that baffled me the most was the former governor of Illinois (Blajovich or something like that) who is a Democrat. He was in prison for trying to sell the Senate seat left vacant after Obama won the Presidency.


Is there more on this incident? I just discovered this guy and this sounds hilarious.
Click to expand...
Trump tower went up in chicago during blag's governorship.

blag did what Hillary did with AG Lynch btw.

only difference is that blags on tape while Bill isnt. and Comey Admitted it in so many words.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: make_it_so
Angry Shoes said:
We all know Baked is a moron but how the fuck did he pay for a lawyer and they didn’t explain how a fucking plea deal works? That seems like a massive mistake on their part.
Click to expand...
Oh he fucking explained it. Baked is just an utter absolute moron plus attention whoring. He deliberately had this bullshit hearing to throw it and annoy everyone and milk it for superberries and shit.
Stanley Tit said:
I'm afraid some of you are in denial. The retard really did win. The plea deal is still on the table & he has two extra months now to raise money on the pretense that he'll take this to trial.

This isn't the year of the chud. It's the year of the retard.
Click to expand...
Baked is basically a goddamn retard who has hit on the creepy grift of ripping off even more retarded retards of their retard welfare.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: REGENDarySumanai and Chi-com Soldier
and 69 others said:
The one that got me was the jew who employed hundreds of illegals in a meat processing factory and was cruel and basically every negative Jewish stereotype, horrible person.

Obviously zion don "illegals are killing the workforce" trump couldn't sit by and see this poor man spend time in prison for essentially being the anthesis of what he "stood for".

That moment I lost all respect for trump, it is literally not explainable, he did it in the last day too, now I hear he let's out Democrats, plus letting that rapper out.


I know most presidents do this but anyone still supporting trump after that is a grade 1 retard.
Click to expand...
Shlomo Rubashkin? that was like a day 1 pardon early on in his term, it might've been the very first
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Chi-com Soldier
SpergioLeonne said:
It’s annoying that people are so eager for the drama, so eager for the fun version of shit to be true..

The judge gave Baked 60 days to figure his shit out and try the plea again. If Baked spergs again 60 days from now and tries to plead guilty while proclaiming his innocence for a second time, THEN he’s going to go to jail.

Until that happens, the judge was humane and this thread is full of mass delusion.

Don’t do this shit, guys. Chicken Little syndrome ruins everything. Keep to being accurate and then truly enjoy it when hilarious things happen.
Click to expand...
Not really. He painted himself into a corner by saying "GOD SPOKE THROUGH ME AND TOLD ME THAT I'M INNOCENT LETS GOOOOOO"

No matter what, he's going to come off as a disingenuous hypocrite and grifted and will be shit on for it if he takes the deal. And if he goes to trial, he'll be convicted and go to Levinworth. Which would also be funny.

The entertaining portion in Baked is how he puts himself into consistent no win scenarios. All on his own accord. It's glorious. Even if Baked "wins", he loses.

It's beautiful.

Oh, yeah. Almost forgot. Federal Judges don't actually have to adhere to the agreements of the plea deal when it comes to sentencing. They can find it to be too harsh, or not harsh enough. Which means even if Baked's plea says he doesn't have to do time, the Judge can say "fuck that, he can spend a few months in there, that's fine". The best part is that Judge is known for not maxing out the sentencing guidelines, but going beyond them. ESPECIALLY for Jan 6th people.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: detractorzer0
JustStopDude said:
I think the whole reason they want Baked and a lot of the other people to just plead out is because these prosecutors are trying to make their careers. Ain't no one landing higher office by spending two years putting a retard in jail for a minor charge.

They are basically begging Baked to stop wasting everyone's time.
Click to expand...
The fucking sped doesn't realize how easy they were making it for him. It's absurdly generous to leave the offer open under the circumstances, frankly, and if they were hard charging on him, the instant he sperged out in court, the deal would be gone and any deal still available would be a worse one.

It's more evidence against him being an actual fed ironically because if he were, he'd have been under control enough that they would have told him to take the deal or else.
popnloch ness monster said:
Shlomo Rubashkin? that was like a day 1 pardon early on in his term, it might've been the very first
Click to expand...
Trump didn't actually pardon him. He commuted his sentence. He remains a convicted felon.
Sneedlerino said:
No matter what, he's going to come off as a disingenuous hypocrite and grifted and will be shit on for it if he takes the deal. And if he goes to trial, he'll be convicted and go to Levinworth. Which would also be funny.
Click to expand...
If you mean the military prison, civilians don't get sentenced there. As for the civilian prison of the same name, there would be no reason for him to be sentenced somewhere in Leavenworth, Kentucky. He would probably serve his federal time in a minimum security somewhere near his domicile whatever that currently is, or near his family if the judge and/or prison authorities felt inclined to be kind.
Sneedlerino said:
Which means even if Baked's plea says he doesn't have to do time, the Judge can say "fuck that, he can spend a few months in there, that's fine". The best part is that Judge is known for not maxing out the sentencing guidelines, but going beyond them. ESPECIALLY for Jan 6th people.
Click to expand...
It's hilarious that when Sullivan was insisting Baked would definitely be getting a fair trial in his court, Baked was completely oblivious to the real translation from judge-ese to normie, that is, "if you go to trial in my court odds are good you are getting some D.C. Blacksnake."
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: snoot booper, REGENDarySumanai, Chi-com Soldier and 2 others
Kaan141 said:
Trump, even if he gets reelected, will never pardon any Jan 6'ers, period.
Click to expand...
Trump would unironically pardon Andy Dick before any of the 1/6 defendants
Sammich said:
Slight side track here, the judge should be as neutral as possible
Click to expand...
It's all a part of Baked's keikaku. You see, the black man has an affinity for fat, loud, trashy white women - Tim knows this, and has been taking estrogen in an attempt to trip the judge's subconscious in his favor. It would take a truly heroic negroid lawman to resist those Double Ds by Mickey Ds.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Retribution, make_it_so, REGENDarySumanai and 3 others
F_Break said:
You have no idea what the prosecution will be allowed to bring up at trial
Click to expand...
I’m confident they won’t be able to call him a white supremacist the same way the prosecution was stopped from making those suggestions in Rittenhouse.

If it proceeds to trial I would be willing to make a gentlemen’s bet on this.

But I agree it’s very early (essentially no trial has started).
 
BAKED: "I'm proud I had the chance on the national stage to draw attention to what's being done to the January 6 Defendants. The Holy Spirit filled me and I said whatever God wanted me to say."

These are Baked's statements regarding his bungled plea deal. He states that he is "proud" in the same breath that he claims to have been filled by the Holy Spirit. Pride is never, and in no way, and can never be, a fruit of the Holy Spirit. Pride puffs itself up. The prideful man raises himself up against God. Where were you, Baked, when God made the cosmos?
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Meiwaku, ddlloo, malleusmaleficarum and 14 others
Symalsa said:
I’m confident they won’t be able to call him a white supremacist the same way the prosecution was stopped from making those suggestions in Rittenhouse.

If it proceeds to trial I would be willing to make a gentlemen’s bet on this.

But I agree it’s very early (essentially no trial has started).
Click to expand...
It is determined on a case by case basis and largely depends on the temperament of the judge and the persuasiveness of the arguments made by both sides. The Rittenhouse trial didn't set any kind of legal precedent and if he got any other judge that shit could have easily been allowed. Rittenhouse was charged and tried by the state of Wisconsin whereas Baked Alaska is facing federal charges in federal court. Absolutely nothing from the Rittenhouse trial is applicable to Baked Alaska's situation.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Lorne Armstrong and Scribbler
Pope Negro Joe Ver. XIII said:
Now here's where you're wrong, it is not actually possible to commit treason against the U.S. government:

The United States was founded by a group of men (human males), and at the time, in an act of violent rebellion.

The Declaration of Independence was written by a group of men.

The Constitution was written by a group of men (this implies that it can also be abolished by a group of men).

There is no consistent, permanent principle, that exists between incarnations of the staff of the U.S. government, meaning anyone employed at state or federal level, in a judicial, executive, or legislative capacity.

If everyone from the U.S. government were immediately fired at this very moment, there would be no U.S. government.

The U.S. government and the U.S. are a democracy, and so there is "no government," no centralized principle or idea that unites this regime beyond the people who inhabit this country at the current moment.

Debates over immigration make this even fuzzier; as immigrants have much political clout, despite not being "citizens." This is par for the course in a democracy, which, when paired with postmodernism, essentially imply that everyone's truth is valid. If everyone's truth is valid, this is basically incompatible with the notion of governance, which implies that there is some objective truth that is super-valid over other, lesser truths.

If 51% of people engaged in rebellion against the U.S. government, it would not actually be rebellion, but a peaceful transition to a different form of government; this is because the U.S. government does not exist apart from the people who inhabit the U.S., and is in fact identical to its inhabitants. In other words, it would simply be people voting with their actions.

The government consists of a group of employees who can be fired from their job, and the "thing" that hires and fires them also consists of other employees, and this "thing" is inherently fractured, ununified, it consists of a series of arbitrary human principles, created by a group of men, which are voluntarily held as sacrosanct.

The core theme of the Constitution, DoI, and the Amendments is one of liberty and freedom, which ironically holds the seeds of its own self-destruction, as freedom as an absolute principle, is self-negating. Absolute freedom cannot exist (because freedom implies freedom from everything), freedom is relativity (but not as an absolute principle... which cannot exist), therefore when freedom poses as an absolute principle, it becomes another source of tyranny. (This is actually visible today in the modern world in many different forms.)

In summary:

The U.S. government was founded by a group of human males in an illegal act of rebellion, and they considered this act of rebellion to be a moral duty or imperative. These men inlaid this principle of responsibility of rebellion in the current form of government. Their notion of government was that human beings could choose how to live, collectively, however they see fit, as befits their happiness and desire. The notion that this kind of government could ever bar anyone from doing anything, is actually contradictory.

Actually if you think about it, we, as human beings, can live exactly as we want to, collectively, and there is no visible higher-power that prevents us from doing so. This means that any experience of suffering on this Earth is actually kind of voluntary, and not necessarily to be taken for granted.

There is no consistent principle through and between different incarnations of the government, as the government is a democracy, and simply consists of the people who hire and fire the different public servants, and suggest new laws or abolish old ones.

The notion that the Constitution can be absolute, while the people at the same time being free, is a contradiction. If we are truly free, we can choose not to follow the Constitution. If we are not truly free and the Constitution is absolute, it must be rewritten and made better... which is just a variation of the former statement.

Philosophically, the U.S. government doesn't even exist! There is no core, eternal, permanent, unified, and visible principle that exists across its incarnations, and its genesis cannot even be discerned! Emptiness, emptiness, oṃ, oṃ, oṃ. May all beings be at peace and ease.

Anyways, please let me know what you think. If it is impossible to discern an actual U.S. government, then I think this has practical implications which are not pretty. A true government would have to be absolute, or not at all (another form of absoluteness). A true government, IMO, is a non-human monarchy, i.e. a world that is governed by God (the Absolute Principle).
Click to expand...
I think you're retarded if you expected me to read All That Shit by You.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Sicko Hunter, RX-78, Buck Breaker of BUcha and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back