Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I honestly wouldn’t be too worried about it. Maybe in the Midwest it’s different, but in the West, actual conservation is pretty popular among the rural conservative type, not the cargo cult green stuff found in urban areas. People who actually live surrounded by nature don’t want to see their home destroyed. The Captain Planet villain is a projection of people who are fine with strip mining for lithium and covering the hills with solar panels.This will be a slight bit off-topic but I just wanna muse a bit.
I am saddened that the Democrats have poisoned certain topics beyond recovery. My own pet one is climate and environmental issues.
It should not be a hard case to -conservatives- to -conserve- nature. There were so many avenues of argument that it beggers belief.
Conservation of nature: "We have such lovely natural beauty and splendour, perhaps we should help to maintain it more?"
Independence & Self/Community-Reliance: "Encourage recycling to reduce our reliance on foreign oils and products. Consider community composting and vegetable growing. Carpooling can help tie communities together."
Religion: "Did God not bequeath Earth to man and command him to rule it? And is not a part of rule the act of safeguarding?"
And I can keep going. These issues should in theory by bipartisan as fuck because unlike something like guns, or taxes, or almost anything else "Preserving Nature" has no real hard reason to be a political divide.
But they -made- it a political divide, went balls to the wall nuts on it, made apocolyptic predictions which never come true. and poisoned the very concept of the issue for generations.
What you say matches the Midwest as well but not how you think. Rural people in general are more conservationist, but the cities are where the pollution really occurs. Small, low-level acts could do a lot to drive down emissions and general pollutions if done on a wider scale.... but the impetus is dead.I honestly wouldn’t be too worried about it. Maybe in the Midwest it’s different, but in the West, actual conservation is pretty popular among the rural conservative type, not the cargo cult green stuff found in urban areas. People who actually live surrounded by nature don’t want to see their home destroyed. The Captain Planet villain is a projection of people who are fine with strip mining for lithium and covering the hills with solar panels.
"Now excuse us, we have to kick a ball for 90 minutes in a nation that still has slavery."
Presenting Environmental Conservatism and Self Sufficient Homesteading as compatible would have been an incredible political move. Instead they doubled down on the irony of Consumerist Environmentalism where you just need to buy the new cars and the new solar panels and pay taxes to the new wind farms and if you spend enough we can totally fix it. Imagine a world for a moment where they'd promoted the idea of owning a sewing machine and knowing how to patch your favorite but worn down lazy day t-shirt, instead of fast fashion companies presenting an "environmentally conscious" brand image while running coal powered sweatshops to make pizza patterned leggings.This will be a slight bit off-topic but I just wanna muse a bit.
I am saddened that the Democrats have poisoned certain topics beyond recovery. My own pet one is climate and environmental issues.
It should not be a hard case to -conservatives- to -conserve- nature. There were so many avenues of argument that it beggers belief.
Conservation of nature: "We have such lovely natural beauty and splendour, perhaps we should help to maintain it more?"
Independence & Self/Community-Reliance: "Encourage recycling to reduce our reliance on foreign oils and products. Consider community composting and vegetable growing. Carpooling can help tie communities together."
Religion: "Did God not bequeath Earth to man and command him to rule it? And is not a part of rule the act of safeguarding?"
And I can keep going. These issues should in theory by bipartisan as fuck because unlike something like guns, or taxes, or almost anything else "Preserving Nature" has no real hard reason to be a political divide.
But they -made- it a political divide, went balls to the wall nuts on it, made apocolyptic predictions which never come true. and poisoned the very concept of the issue for generations.
I think there's ways to find an audience if you can make a clear case why it's actually to Save The Snails and make it clear that it's not some bullshit NGO formed to push the idea that The Snails are found at a particular lot of land up for sale (and not at that other parcel of land who's owners happen to fund Save The Snails)What you say matches the Midwest as well but not how you think. Rural people in general are more conservationist, but the cities are where the pollution really occurs. Small, low-level acts could do a lot to drive down emissions and general pollutions if done on a wider scale.... but the impetus is dead.
More proof that soccer is a fag sport.
Our boy is getting better. Preparing. Training.
This will be a slight bit off-topic but I just wanna muse a bit.
I am saddened that the Democrats have poisoned certain topics beyond recovery. My own pet one is climate and environmental issues.
It should not be a hard case to -conservatives- to -conserve- nature. There were so many avenues of argument that it beggers belief.
Conservation of nature: "We have such lovely natural beauty and splendour, perhaps we should help to maintain it more?"
Independence & Self/Community-Reliance: "Encourage recycling to reduce our reliance on foreign oils and products. Consider community composting and vegetable growing. Carpooling can help tie communities together."
Religion: "Did God not bequeath Earth to man and command him to rule it? And is not a part of rule the act of safeguarding?"
And I can keep going. These issues should in theory by bipartisan as fuck because unlike something like guns, or taxes, or almost anything else "Preserving Nature" has no real hard reason to be a political divide.
But they -made- it a political divide, went balls to the wall nuts on it, made apocolyptic predictions which never come true. and poisoned the very concept of the issue for generations.
let me know when he gets the ROCKET LAWN CHAIR
Under Trump and DeSantis, Florida has banned more offshore drilling and expanded measures for conservation. I wouldn't be too worried about it. People want to keep the land prestine, just not give up their lives and futures to chase a hypothetical doomsday scenario thats always revised to save face. Return to Teddy Roosevelt, the best Roosevelt.This will be a slight bit off-topic but I just wanna muse a bit.
I am saddened that the Democrats have poisoned certain topics beyond recovery. My own pet one is climate and environmental issues.
It should not be a hard case to -conservatives- to -conserve- nature. There were so many avenues of argument that it beggers belief.
Conservation of nature: "We have such lovely natural beauty and splendour, perhaps we should help to maintain it more?"
Independence & Self/Community-Reliance: "Encourage recycling to reduce our reliance on foreign oils and products. Consider community composting and vegetable growing. Carpooling can help tie communities together."
Religion: "Did God not bequeath Earth to man and command him to rule it? And is not a part of rule the act of safeguarding?"
And I can keep going. These issues should in theory by bipartisan as fuck because unlike something like guns, or taxes, or almost anything else "Preserving Nature" has no real hard reason to be a political divide.
But they -made- it a political divide, went balls to the wall nuts on it, made apocolyptic predictions which never come true. and poisoned the very concept of the issue for generations.
>a "fuck Biden" flagPeople in Seattle are getting ballsy. Biden's approval rating here is worse than most of the blue utopias, but this isn't something you normally see.
View attachment 3360246
Oh well there's your fucking problem right there. You have it set to M for moron. You should have it set to W for winning.
- Heavy reliance on Biden coming out and making very well approved, statesmanlike speeches
Fuck biden AND fuck you for voting him.People in Seattle are getting ballsy. Biden's approval rating here is worse than most of the blue utopias, but this isn't something you normally see.
View attachment 3360246
Oh well there's your fucking problem right there. You have it set to M for moron. You should have it set to W for winning.
No fucks should be given. I'd buy a car from them, no doubt.Fuck biden AND fuck you for voting him.
In other words, 'I don't care if this "outs" me as a trump supporter.'
Absolutely no fucks given.
Seattle seems shitty but I feel like if that was in Portland it would be riskier, from what I understand Seattle has more of a problem with everyone being strung out and homeless.People in Seattle are getting ballsy. Biden's approval rating here is worse than most of the blue utopias, but this isn't something you normally see.
View attachment 3360246
Not to doomer you @Gehanna, but I feel much the same, as I like that my city and has recycling and such. Doesn't make me "better", just that I'm playing a part in trying to prevent the Idiocracy garbage piles.This will be a slight bit off-topic but I just wanna muse a bit.
I am saddened that the Democrats have poisoned certain topics beyond recovery. My own pet one is climate and environmental issues.
It should not be a hard case to -conservatives- to -conserve- nature. There were so many avenues of argument that it beggers belief.
Conservation of nature: "We have such lovely natural beauty and splendour, perhaps we should help to maintain it more?"
Independence & Self/Community-Reliance: "Encourage recycling to reduce our reliance on foreign oils and products. Consider community composting and vegetable growing. Carpooling can help tie communities together."
Religion: "Did God not bequeath Earth to man and command him to rule it? And is not a part of rule the act of safeguarding?"
And I can keep going. These issues should in theory by bipartisan as fuck because unlike something like guns, or taxes, or almost anything else "Preserving Nature" has no real hard reason to be a political divide.
But they -made- it a political divide, went balls to the wall nuts on it, made apocolyptic predictions which never come true. and poisoned the very concept of the issue for generations.
iirc early on DeSantis was facing some pushback from more established GOP over his wetlands conservationUnder Trump and DeSantis, Florida has banned more offshore drilling and expanded measures for conservation.
oh yeah, anything you ever do that isn't _as_ bad for the environment as China, India, and some other shitholes like whatever derkaderkastan they make wrestling belts in, but they will shit out more pollution by the time I'm done writing this than you will ever do in your lifetimeNot to doomer you @Gehanna, but I feel much the same, as I like that my city and has recycling and such. Doesn't make me "better", just that I'm playing a part in trying to prevent the Idiocracy garbage piles.
But the doomer in me knows that for every effort I do, there's some street shitter in India, China, wherever that gives zero fucks about the environment.
Can pat myself on the ass all I want, but reality tells me I make zero difference.